Diagnostic for `-Wauto-import` shouldn't be a warning because it doesn't
represent a potential problem in code that should be fixed. And the
emitted fix-it is likely to trigger `-Watimport-in-framework-header`
which makes it challenging to have a warning-free codebase. But it is
still useful to see how include directives are translated into modular
imports and which module a header belongs to, that's why keep it as a remark.
Keep `-Wauto-import` for now to allow a gradual migration for codebases
using `-Wno-auto-import`, e.g., `-Weverything -Wno-auto-import`.
rdar://79594287
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130138
This addresses [cpp.include]/7
(when encountering #include header-name)
If the header identified by the header-name denotes an importable header, it
is implementation-defined whether the #include preprocessing directive is
instead replaced by an import directive.
In this implementation, include translation is performed _only_ for headers
in the Global Module fragment, so:
```
module;
#include "will-be-translated.h" // IFF the header unit is available.
export module M;
#include "will-not-be-translated.h" // even if the header unit is available
```
The reasoning is that, in general, includes in the module purview would not
be validly translatable (they would have to immediately follow the module
decl and without any other intervening decls). Otherwise that would violate
the rules on contiguous import directives.
This would be quite complex to track in the preprocessor, and for relatively
little gain (the user can 'import "will-not-be-translated.h";' instead.)
TODO: This is one area where it becomes increasingly difficult to disambiguate
clang modules in C++ from C++ standard modules. That needs to be addressed in
both the driver and the FE.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128981
Volodymyr Sapsai