Commit Graph

39 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Aaron Ballman 19e984ef8f Properly print unnamed TagDecl objects in diagnostics
The diagnostics engine is very smart about being passed a NamedDecl to
print as part of a diagnostic; it gets the "right" form of the name,
quotes it properly, etc. However, the result of using an unnamed tag
declaration was to print '' instead of anything useful.

This patch causes us to print the same information we'd have gotten if
we had printed the type of the declaration rather than the name of it,
as that's the most relevant information we can display.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D134813
2022-10-14 08:18:28 -04:00
Fangrui Song 83ea47acd7 [test] Make tests pass regardless of gnu++14/gnu++17 default
GCC from 11 onwards defaults to -std=gnu++17 for C++ source files. We want to do the same
(https://discourse.llvm.org/t/c-objc-switch-to-gnu-17-as-the-default-dialect/64360).
Split RUN lines, adjust `-verify`, or add `__cplusplus < 201703L` or `-Wno-dynamic-exception-spec`,
so that tests will pass regardless of gnu++14/gnu++17 default.

We have a desire to mark a test compatible with multiple language standards.
There are ongoing discussions how to add markers in the long term:

* https://discourse.llvm.org/t/iterating-lit-run-lines/62596
* https://discourse.llvm.org/t/lit-run-a-run-line-multiple-times-with-different-replacements/64932

As a workaround in the short term, add lit substitutions `%std_cxx98-`,
`%std_cxx11-14`, etc. They can be used for tests which work across multiple
language standards. If a range has `n` standards, run lit multiple times, with
`LIT_CLANG_STD_GROUP=0`, `LIT_CLANG_STD_GROUP=1`, etc to cover all `n` standards.

Reviewed By: #clang-language-wg, aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131464
2022-09-04 05:29:32 +00:00
Matheus Izvekov 15f3cd6bfc
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could expose a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-27 11:10:54 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere 888673b6e3
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit 7c51f02eff because it
stills breaks the LLDB tests. This was  re-landed without addressing the
issue or even agreement on how to address the issue. More details and
discussion in https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374.
2022-07-14 21:17:48 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov 7c51f02eff
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

---

Troubleshooting list to deal with any breakage seen with this patch:

1) The most likely effect one would see by this patch is a change in how
   a type is printed. The type printer will, by design and default,
   print types as written. There are customization options there, but
   not that many, and they mainly apply to how to print a type that we
   somehow failed to track how it was written. This patch fixes a
   problem where we failed to distinguish between a type
   that was written without any elaborated-type qualifiers,
   such as a 'struct'/'class' tags and name spacifiers such as 'std::',
   and one that has been stripped of any 'metadata' that identifies such,
   the so called canonical types.
   Example:
   ```
   namespace foo {
     struct A {};
     A a;
   };
   ```
   If one were to print the type of `foo::a`, prior to this patch, this
   would result in `foo::A`. This is how the type printer would have,
   by default, printed the canonical type of A as well.
   As soon as you add any name qualifiers to A, the type printer would
   suddenly start accurately printing the type as written. This patch
   will make it print it accurately even when written without
   qualifiers, so we will just print `A` for the initial example, as
   the user did not really write that `foo::` namespace qualifier.

2) This patch could expose a bug in some AST matcher. Matching types
   is harder to get right when there is sugar involved. For example,
   if you want to match a type against being a pointer to some type A,
   then you have to account for getting a type that is sugar for a
   pointer to A, or being a pointer to sugar to A, or both! Usually
   you would get the second part wrong, and this would work for a
   very simple test where you don't use any name qualifiers, but
   you would discover is broken when you do. The usual fix is to
   either use the matcher which strips sugar, which is annoying
   to use as for example if you match an N level pointer, you have
   to put N+1 such matchers in there, beginning to end and between
   all those levels. But in a lot of cases, if the property you want
   to match is present in the canonical type, it's easier and faster
   to just match on that... This goes with what is said in 1), if
   you want to match against the name of a type, and you want
   the name string to be something stable, perhaps matching on
   the name of the canonical type is the better choice.

3) This patch could exposed a bug in how you get the source range of some
   TypeLoc. For some reason, a lot of code is using getLocalSourceRange(),
   which only looks at the given TypeLoc node. This patch introduces a new,
   and more common TypeLoc node which contains no source locations on itself.
   This is not an inovation here, and some other, more rare TypeLoc nodes could
   also have this property, but if you use getLocalSourceRange on them, it's not
   going to return any valid locations, because it doesn't have any. The right fix
   here is to always use getSourceRange() or getBeginLoc/getEndLoc which will dive
   into the inner TypeLoc to get the source range if it doesn't find it on the
   top level one. You can use getLocalSourceRange if you are really into
   micro-optimizations and you have some outside knowledge that the TypeLocs you are
   dealing with will always include some source location.

4) Exposed a bug somewhere in the use of the normal clang type class API, where you
   have some type, you want to see if that type is some particular kind, you try a
   `dyn_cast` such as `dyn_cast<TypedefType>` and that fails because now you have an
   ElaboratedType which has a TypeDefType inside of it, which is what you wanted to match.
   Again, like 2), this would usually have been tested poorly with some simple tests with
   no qualifications, and would have been broken had there been any other kind of type sugar,
   be it an ElaboratedType or a TemplateSpecializationType or a SubstTemplateParmType.
   The usual fix here is to use `getAs` instead of `dyn_cast`, which will look deeper
   into the type. Or use `getAsAdjusted` when dealing with TypeLocs.
   For some reason the API is inconsistent there and on TypeLocs getAs behaves like a dyn_cast.

5) It could be a bug in this patch perhaps.

Let me know if you need any help!

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-15 04:16:55 +02:00
Jonas Devlieghere 3968936b92
Revert "[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare"
This reverts commit bdc6974f92 because it
breaks all the LLDB tests that import the std module.

  import-std-module/array.TestArrayFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-basic.TestDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/deque-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentDequeFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list.TestForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/forward_list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentForwardListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list.TestListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/list-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentListFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/queue.TestQueueFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/stack.TestStackFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector.TestVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-bool.TestVectorBoolFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-dbg-info-content.TestDbgInfoContentVectorFromStdModule.py
  import-std-module/vector-of-vectors.TestVectorOfVectorsFromStdModule.py

https://green.lab.llvm.org/green/view/LLDB/job/lldb-cmake/45301/
2022-07-13 09:20:30 -07:00
Matheus Izvekov bdc6974f92
[clang] Implement ElaboratedType sugaring for types written bare
Without this patch, clang will not wrap in an ElaboratedType node types written
without a keyword and nested name qualifier, which goes against the intent that
we should produce an AST which retains enough details to recover how things are
written.

The lack of this sugar is incompatible with the intent of the type printer
default policy, which is to print types as written, but to fall back and print
them fully qualified when they are desugared.

An ElaboratedTypeLoc without keyword / NNS uses no storage by itself, but still
requires pointer alignment due to pre-existing bug in the TypeLoc buffer
handling.

Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112374
2022-07-13 02:10:09 +02:00
isuckatcs caf2767c47 [Clang][AST] Fixed BindingDecl AST-dump for tuple like structures
The AST of a BindingDecl in case of tuple like structures wasn't
properly printed. For these bidnings there is information stored
in BindingDecl::getHoldingVar(), and this information was't
printed in the AST-dump.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126131
2022-06-14 21:13:04 +02:00
Nathan James cfb8169059
[clang] Add a raw_ostream operator<< overload for QualType
Under the hood this prints the same as `QualType::getAsString()` but cuts out the middle-man when that string is sent to another raw_ostream.

Also cleaned up all the call sites where this occurs.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123926
2022-04-20 22:09:05 +01:00
Logan Smith 08eb614e30 [NFC][testing] Return underlying strings directly instead of OS.str()
This avoids an unnecessary copy required by 'return OS.str()', allowing
instead for NRVO or implicit move. The .str() call (which flushes the
stream) is no longer required since 65b13610a5,
which made raw_string_ostream unbuffered by default.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115374
2021-12-09 16:05:46 -08:00
Stephen Kelly 9e5fc578f9 [ASTMatchers] Ignore parts of BindingDecls which are not spelled in source
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95740
2021-02-02 14:23:13 +00:00
Stephen Kelly b765eaf9a6 [ASTMatchers] Add support for CXXRewrittenBinaryOperator
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94130
2021-01-16 13:44:22 +00:00
Stephen Kelly bcaa198949 Remove unportable test
The default content of translation unit varies too much between
platforms.
2020-11-18 12:42:07 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 246b428fb3 [AST] Ignore implicit nodes in IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode
Update the ASTNodeTraverser to dump only nodes spelled in source.  There
are only a few which need to be handled, but Decl nodes for which
isImplicit() is true are handled together.

Update the RAV instances used in ASTMatchFinder to ignore the nodes too.
As with handling of template instantiations, it is necessary to allow
the RAV to process the implicit nodes because they need to be visitable
before the first traverse() matcher is encountered.  An exception to
this is in the MatchChildASTVisitor, because we sometimes wish to make a
node matchable but make its children not-matchable.  This is the case
for defaulted CXXMethodDecls for example.

Extend TransformerTests to illustrate the kinds of problems that can
arise when performing source code rewriting due to matching implicit
nodes.

This change accounts for handling nodes not spelled in source when using
direct matching of nodes, and when using the has() and hasDescendant()
matchers.  Other matchers such as
cxxRecordDecl(hasMethod(cxxMethodDecl())) still succeed for
compiler-generated methods for example after this change.  Updating the
implementations of hasMethod() and other matchers is for a follow-up
patch.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90982
2020-11-17 16:30:07 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 4eb880439a Fix dumping of explicit template specializations
This was missing from commit 7efe07a1 (Traverse-ignore explicit template
instantiations, 2020-11-06).
2020-11-07 22:34:16 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 7efe07a12b Traverse-ignore explicit template instantiations
Continue to dump and match on explicit template specializations, but
omit explicit instantiation declarations and definitions.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90763
2020-11-06 15:25:59 +00:00
Matt Morehouse a6d15d4070 Undo Revert "Ignore template instantiations if not in AsIs mode"
MaskRay already fixed the ASan bug.
2020-11-03 13:59:01 -08:00
Matt Morehouse 72531ae6e6 Revert "Ignore template instantiations if not in AsIs mode"
This reverts commit 53df3beb62 due to
check-asan failure on the buildbot.
2020-11-03 13:57:31 -08:00
Stephen Kelly 53df3beb62 Ignore template instantiations if not in AsIs mode
Summary:
IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode should ignore these because they are
not written in the source.  This matters for example when trying to
replace types or values which are templated.  The new test in
TransformerTest.cpp in this commit demonstrates the problem.

In existing matcher code, users can write
`unless(isInTemplateInstantiation())` or `unless(isInstantiated())` (the
user must know which to use).  The point of the
TK_IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode is to allow the novice to avoid such
details.  This patch changes the IgnoreUnlessSpelledInSource mode to
skip over implicit template instantiations.

This patch does not change the TK_AsIs mode.

Note: An obvious attempt at an alternative implementation would simply
change the shouldVisitTemplateInstantiations() in ASTMatchFinder.cpp to
return something conditional on the operational TraversalKind.  That
does not work because shouldVisitTemplateInstantiations() is called
before a possible top-level traverse() matcher changes the operational
TraversalKind.

Reviewers: sammccall, aaron.ballman, gribozavr2, ymandel, klimek

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80961
2020-11-02 20:21:48 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 52ff86d255 [AST] Fix traversal over CXXConstructExpr in Syntactic mode
Summary:
Skip over elidable nodes, and ensure that intermediate
CXXFunctionalCastExpr nodes are also skipped if they are semantic.

Reviewers: klimek, ymandel

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82278
2020-10-30 12:14:41 +00:00
Richard Smith a6308c0ad9 When performing a substitution into a dependent alias template, mark the
outer levels as retained rather than omitting their arguments.

This better reflects what's going on (we're performing a substitution
while still inside a template), and in theory is more correct, but I've
not found a testcase where it matters in practice (largely because we
don't allow alias templates to be declared inside a function).

Fixed AST dumping of SubstNonTypeTemplateParm[Pack]Expr to demonstrate
that we're properly substituting through dependent alias templates. (We
can't deduce properly through these yet, but we can at least produce the
right input to template argument deduction.)

No functionality change intended.
2020-06-23 14:43:04 -07:00
Richard Smith 5eca1d5e0d AST dump: recurse into type template arguments when dumping.
Also, do not dump the desugared type for a TemplateSpecializationType
twice.
2020-06-23 00:07:00 -07:00
Stephen Kelly e60de8c825 Add missing test 2020-05-24 22:50:50 +01:00
Stephen Kelly 04ed532ef0 Fix skip-invisible with overloaded method calls 2020-05-24 12:36:16 +01:00
Stephen Kelly 26ac5a34ba Fix ignoring traversal of intermediate parens 2020-05-23 01:04:44 +01:00
Stephen Kelly aa5d2d2248 Traverse-ignore invisible CXXConstructExprs with default args 2020-05-23 01:04:44 +01:00
Reid Kleckner cd62511496 Remove clang::ast_type_traits namespace in favor of clang
DynTypedNode and ASTNodeKind are implemented as part of the clang AST
library, which uses the main clang namespace. There doesn't seem to be a
need for this extra level of namespacing.

I left behind aliases in the ast_type_traits namespace for out of tree
clients of these APIs. To provide aliases for the enumerators, I used
this pattern:
  namespace ast_type_traits {
  constexpr TraversalKind TK_AsIs = ::clang::TK_AsIs;
  }
I think the typedefs will be useful for migration, but we might be able
to drop these enumerator aliases.

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74499
2020-02-13 10:46:47 -08:00
Stephen Kelly 9a3ff47823 Fix the invisible-traversal to ignore more nodes 2020-01-20 11:59:13 +00:00
Oliver Stannard 6c203149b6 [clang] Remove raw string literals in macros
Older (but still supported) versions of GCC don't handle C++11 raw
string literals in macro parameters correctly.
2020-01-13 12:38:58 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 5a79cfa32d Customize simplified dumping and matching of LambdaExpr
Reviewers: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71680
2019-12-21 11:02:11 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 0378f3a903 Revert "Customize simplified dumping and matching of LambdaExpr"
This reverts commit 494b1318ca.
2019-12-20 21:33:31 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 494b1318ca Customize simplified dumping and matching of LambdaExpr
Reviewers: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71680
2019-12-20 21:13:23 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 98e8f774eb Add method to ignore invisible AST nodes
Reviewers: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: mgorny, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70613
2019-12-18 22:33:23 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 84fd2bedf4 Trim trailing whitespace 2019-12-18 22:33:23 +00:00
Stephen Kelly a9f597b62e Output names in the AST in tests 2019-12-18 22:33:23 +00:00
Anton Bikineev 45f721ff05 [clang] Fix mismatched args constructing AddressSpaceAttr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65589

llvm-svn: 368152
2019-08-07 11:12:43 +00:00
Stephen Kelly ad3314b146 Add a Visit overload for DynTypedNode to ASTNodeTraverser
Reviewers: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61834

llvm-svn: 361117
2019-05-19 13:03:48 +00:00
Nico Weber e78ac9cc72 Revert r361033 "Add a Visit overload for DynTypedNode to ASTNodeTraverser"
It fails to build on some bots.

Also revert follow-up r361055.

llvm-svn: 361059
2019-05-17 18:31:24 +00:00
Stephen Kelly 0855896c68 Add a Visit overload for DynTypedNode to ASTNodeTraverser
Reviewers: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Tags: #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61834

llvm-svn: 361033
2019-05-17 13:55:28 +00:00