Currently constructor initializer lists sometimes format incorrectly
when there is a preprocessor directive in the middle of the list.
This patch fixes the issue when parsing the initilizer list by
ignoring the preprocessor directive when checking if a block is
part of an initializer list.
rdar://82554274
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109951
Developers these days seem to argue over east vs west const like they used to argue over tabs vs whitespace or the various bracing style. These previous arguments were mainly eliminated with tools like `clang-format` that allowed those rules to become part of your style guide. Anyone who has been using clang-format in a large team over the last couple of years knows that we don't have those religious arguments any more, and code reviews are more productive.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fv--IKZFVO8https://mariusbancila.ro/blog/2018/11/23/join-the-east-const-revolution/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z6s6bacI424
The purpose of this revision is to try to do the same for the East/West const discussion. Move the debate into the style guide and leave it there!
In addition to the new `ConstStyle: Right` or `ConstStyle: Left` there is an additional command-line argument `--const-style=left/right` which would allow an individual developer to switch the source back and forth to their own style for editing, and back to the committed style before commit. (you could imagine an IDE might offer such a switch)
The revision works by implementing a separate pass of the Annotated lines much like the SortIncludes and then create replacements for constant type declarations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69764
Commits 58494c856a, f6bc614546, and 0fc27ef196 added special
handlings for K&R C function definitions and caused some
JavaScript/TypeScript regressions which were addressed in D107267,
D108538, and D108620. This patch would have prevented these known
regressions and will fix any unknown ones.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109582
Add backward compatibility tests for mapping the deprecated
ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine and
AllowAllConstructorInitializersOnNextLine to
PackConstructorInitializers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108882
Add a new option PackConstructorInitializers and deprecate the
related options ConstructorInitializerAllOnOneLineOrOnePerLine and
AllowAllConstructorInitializersOnNextLine. Below is the mapping:
PackConstructorInitializers ConstructorInitializer... AllowAll...
Never - -
BinPack false -
CurrentLine true false
NextLine true true
The option value Never fixes PR50549 by always placing each
constructor initializer on its own line.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108752
After
9da70ab3d4
we saw a few regressions around trailing attribute definitions and in
typedefs (examples in the added test cases). There's some tension
distinguishing K&R definitions from attributes at the parser level,
where we have to decide if we need to put the type of the K&R definition
on a new unwrapped line before we have access to the rest of the line,
so we're scanning backwards and looking for a pattern like f(a, b). But
this type of pattern could also be an attribute macro, or the whole
declaration could be a typedef itself. I updated the code to check for a
typedef at the beginning of the line and to not consider raw identifiers
as possible first K&R declaration (but treated as an attribute macro
instead). This is not 100% correct heuristic, but I think it should be
reasonably good in practice, where we'll:
* likely be in some very C-ish code when using K&R style (e.g., stuff
that uses `struct name a;` instead of `name a;`
* likely be in some very C++-ish code when using attributes
* unlikely mix up the two in the same declaration.
Ideally, we should only decide to add the unwrapped line before the K&R
declaration after we've scanned the rest of the line an noticed the
variable declarations and the semicolon, but the way the parser is
organized I don't see a good way to do this in the current parser, which
only has good context for the previously visited tokens. I also tried
not emitting an unwrapped line there and trying to resolve the situation
later in the token annotator and the continuation indenter, and that
approach seems promising, but I couldn't make it to work without
messing up a bunch of other cases in unit tests.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107950
A follow-up to
f6bc614546
where we handle the case where the semicolon is followed by a trailing
comment.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107907
https://reviews.llvm.org/D105964 updated the detection of function
definitions. It had the unfortunate effect to start marking object
definitions with attribute-like macros as function definitions.
This addresses this issue.
Reviewed By: owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107269
Previously, with AllowShortEnumsOnASingleLine disabled, enums that would have otherwise fit on a single line would always put the opening brace on its own line.
This patch ensures that these enums will only put the brace on its own line if the existing attachment rules indicate that it should.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99840
Break an unwrapped line before the first parameter declaration in a
K&R C function definition.
This fixes PR51074.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106112
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50702
I believe {D44609} may be too aggressive with brace wrapping rules which doesn't always apply to Lamdbas
The introduction of BeforeLambdaBody and AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine has impact on brace handling on other block types, which I suspect we didn't see before as people may not be using the BeforeLambdaBody style
From what I can tell this can be seen by the unit test I change as its not honouring the orginal LLVM brace wrapping style for the `Fct()` function
I added a unit test from PR50702 and have removed some of the code (which has zero impact on the unit test, which kind of suggests its unnecessary), some additional attempt has been made to try and ensure we'll only break on what is actually a LamdbaLBrace
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104222
This introduces ReferenceAlignment style option modeled around
PointerAlignment.
Style implementors can specify Left, Right, Middle or Pointer to
follow whatever the PointerAlignment option specifies.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104096
Currently the lambda body indents relative to where the lambda signature is located. This instead lets the user
choose to align the lambda body relative to the parent scope that contains the lambda declaration. Thus:
someFunction([] {
lambdaBody();
});
will always have the same indentation of the body even when the lambda signature goes on a new line:
someFunction(
[] {
lambdaBody();
});
whereas before lambdaBody would be indented 6 spaces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102706
21c18d5a04
improved the detection of multiplication in function call argument lists,
but unintentionally regressed the handling of function type casts (there
were no tests covering those).
This patch improves the detection of function type casts and adds a few tests.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104209
This allows to set a different indent width for preprocessor statements.
Example:
#ifdef __linux_
# define FOO
#endif
int main(void)
{
return 0;
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103286
This re-applies the old patch D27651, which was never landed, into the
latest "main" branch, without understanding the code. I just applied
the changes "mechanically" and made it compiling again.
This makes the right pointer alignment working as expected.
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR27353
For instance
const char* const* v1;
float const* v2;
SomeVeryLongType const& v3;
was formatted as
const char *const * v1;
float const * v2;
SomeVeryLongType const &v3;
This patch keep the *s or &s aligned to the right, next to their variable.
The above example is now formatted as
const char *const *v1;
float const *v2;
SomeVeryLongType const &v3;
It is a pity that this still does not work with clang-format in 2021,
even though there was a fix available in 2016. IMHO right pointer alignment
is the default case in C, because syntactically the pointer belongs to the
variable.
See
int* a, b, c; // wrong, just the 1st variable is a pointer
vs.
int *a, *b, *c; // right
Prominent example is the Linux kernel coding style.
Some styles argue the left pointer alignment is better and declaration
lists as shown above should be avoided. That's ok, as different projects
can use different styles, but this important style should work too.
I hope that somebody that has a better understanding about the code,
can take over this patch and land it into main.
For now I must maintain this fork to make it working for our projects.
Cheers,
Gerhard.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103245
This inheritance list style has been widely adopted by Symantec,
a division of Broadcom Inc. It breaks after the commas that
separate the base-specifiers:
class Derived : public Base1,
private Base2
{
};
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103204
We've accumulated a scary amount of local patches to this directory. I
tried to merge them all, but if your favorite change is missing please
reapply it manually (and send it upstream).
A need for such an option came up in a few libc++ reviews. That's because libc++ has both code in C++03 and newer standards.
Currently, it uses `Standard: C++03` setting for clang-format, but this breaks e.g. u8"string" literals.
Also, angle brackets are the only place where C++03-specific formatting needs to be applied.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101344
Clang-format was indenting the lines following the `?` in the added test
case by +5 instead of +4. This only happens in a very specific
situation, where the `?` is followed by a multiline block comment, as in
the example. This fix addresses this without regressing any of the
existing tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101033
Fixes https://llvm.org/PR41870.
Checks for newlines in option Style.EmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier are now based on the formatted new lines and not on the new lines in the file.
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99503
The current logic for access modifiers in classes ignores the option 'MaxEmptyLinesToKeep=1'. It is therefore impossible to have a coding style that requests one empty line after an access modifier. The patch allows the user to configure how many empty lines clang-format should add after an access modifier. This will remove lines if there are to many and will add them if there are missing.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98237
This patch fixes left pointer alignment after pointer qualifiers of
operators. Currently "operator void const*()" is formatted with a space between
const and pointer despite setting PointerAlignment to Left.
AFAICS this has been broken since clang-format 10.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99458
Breaking a string literal or a function calls arguments with
AlignConsecutiveDeclarations or AlignConsecutiveAssignments did misalign
the continued line. E.g.:
void foo() {
int myVar = 5;
double x = 3.14;
auto str = "Hello"
"World";
}
or
void foo() {
int myVar = 5;
double x = 3.14;
auto str = "Hello"
"World";
}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98214
This commit removes the old way of handling Whitesmiths mode in favor of just setting the
levels during parsing and letting the formatter handle it from there. It requires a bit of
special-casing during the parsing, but ends up a bit cleaner than before. It also removes
some of switch/case unit tests that don't really make much sense when dealing with
Whitesmiths.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94500
... without an active column limit.
Before line comments were not touched at all with ColumnLimit == 0.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96896
This is a bug fix of https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49175
The expected code format:
unsigned int* a;
int* b;
unsigned int Const* c;
The actual code after formatting (without this patch):
unsigned int* a;
int* b;
unsigned int Const* c;
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97137
Adds support for coding styles that make a separate indentation level for access modifiers, such as Code::Blocks or QtCreator.
The new option, `IndentAccessModifiers`, if enabled, forces the content inside classes, structs and unions (“records”) to be indented twice while removing a level for access modifiers. The value of `AccessModifierOffset` is disregarded in this case, aiming towards an ease of use.
======
The PR (https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=19056) had an implementation attempt by @MyDeveloperDay already (https://reviews.llvm.org/D60225) but I've decided to start from scratch. They differ in functionality, chosen approaches, and even the option name. The code tries to re-use the existing functionality to achieve this behavior, limiting possibility of breaking something else.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94661
This allows the define BasedOnStyle: InheritParentConfig and then
clang-format looks into the parent directories for their
.clang-format and takes that as a basis.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93844
Adds an option to [clang-format] which sorts headers in an alphabetical manner using case only for tie-breakers. The options is off by default in favor of the current ASCIIbetical sorting style.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95017
Add new option called InsertEmptyLineBeforeAccessModifier. Empty line
before access modifier is inerted if this option is set to true (which
is the default value, because clang-format always inserts empty lines
before access modifiers), otherwise empty lines are removed.
Fixes issue #16518.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93846
* Adds an option to [clang-format] which sorts
headers in an alphabetical manner using case
only for tie-breakers. The options is off by
default in favor of the current ASCIIbetical
sorting style.
Reviewed By: curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95017
Currently, empty lines and comments break alignment of assignments on consecutive
lines. This makes the AlignConsecutiveAssignments option an enum that allows controlling
whether empty lines or empty lines and comments should be ignored when aligning
assignments.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, tinloaf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93986
Currently, empty lines and comments break alignment of assignments on consecutive
lines. This makes the AlignConsecutiveAssignments option an enum that allows controlling
whether empty lines or empty lines and comments should be ignored when aligning
assignments.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks, tinloaf
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93986
This allows to ignore for example Qts emit when
AlignConsecutiveDeclarations is set, otherwise it is parsed as a type
and it results in some misformating:
unsigned char MyChar = 'x';
emit signal(MyChar);
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93776
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48594
Empty or small templates were not being treated the same way as small classes especially when SplitEmptyRecord was set to true
This revision aims to help this by identifying a case when we should try not to merge the lines together
Reviewed By: curdeius, JohelEGP
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93839
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48569
This is a tentative fix which addresses a PR raise regarding Case indentation when working with Whitesmiths Indentation
I could not find online any reference sources as to what the case indentation for Whitesmith's should be (or be allowed to be)
But according to the documentation, we don't obey the rules for Whitesmith's
```
In particular, the documentation states that this option is to "indent case labels one level from the switch statement. When false, use the same indentation level as for the switch statement."
```
The behaviour we add here is actually as the TODO in the tests used to state in {D67627}, but when {D82016} was added and I brought these tests out from being TODO I realized I changed the indentation.
Reviewed By: curdeius, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93806
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48535
using `SpaceAfterCStyleCast: true`
```
size_t idx = (size_t) a;
size_t idx = (size_t) (a - 1);
```
is formatted as:
```
size_t idx = (size_t) a;
size_t idx = (size_t)(a - 1);
```
This revision aims to improve that by improving the function which tries to identify a CastRParen
Reviewed By: curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93626
Summary: The clang-format may go wrong when handle c++ coroutine keywords and pointer.
The default value for PointerAlignment is PAS_Right. So the following format is good:
```
co_return *a;
```
But within some code style, the value for PointerAlignment is PAS_Left, the behavior goes wrong:
```
co_return* a;
```
test-plan: check-clang
reviewers: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91245
A quick search of github.com, shows one common scenario for excessive use of //clang-format off/on is the indentation of #pragma's, especially around the areas of loop optimization or OpenMP
This revision aims to help that by introducing an `IndentPragmas` style, the aim of which is to keep the pragma at the current level of scope
```
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
// clang-format off
#pragma HLS UNROLL
// clang-format on
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
// clang-format off
#pragma HLS UNROLL
// clang-format on
....
```
can become
```
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
#pragma HLS UNROLL
for (int j = 0; j < 5; j++) {
#pragma HLS UNROLL
....
```
This revision also support working alongside the `IndentPPDirective` of `BeforeHash` and `AfterHash` (see unit tests for examples)
Reviewed By: curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92753
clang-format see the `disable:` in __pragma(warning(disable:)) as ObjectiveC method call
Remove any line starting with `#` or __pragma line from being part of the ObjectiveC guess
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42434
Reviewed By: curdeius, krasimir
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92922
This is a starting point to improve the handling of concepts in clang-format. There is currently no real formatting of concepts and this can lead to some odd formatting, e.g.
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar, miscco, curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79773
TokenAnnotator::splitPenalty() was always returning 0 for opening parens if
AlignAfterOpenBracket was set to BAS_DontAlign, so the preferred point for
line breaking was always after the open paren (and was ignoring
PenaltyBreakBeforeFirstCallParameter). This change restricts the zero
penalty to the AllowAllArgumentsOnNextLine case. This results in improved
formatting for FreeBSD where we set AllowAllArgumentsOnNextLine: false
and a high value for PenaltyBreakBeforeFirstCallParameter to avoid breaking
after the open paren.
Before:
```
functionCall(
paramA, paramB, paramC);
void functionDecl(
int A, int B, int C)
```
After:
```
functionCall(paramA, paramB,
paramC);
void functionDecl(int A, int B,
int C)
```
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90246
After D86959 the code `#define lambda [](const decltype(x) &ptr) {}`
was formatted as `#define lambda [](const decltype(x) & ptr) {}` due to
now parsing the '&' token as a BinaryOperator. The problem was caused by
the condition `Line.InPPDirective && (!Left->Previous || !Left->Previous->is(tok::identifier))) {`
being matched and therefore not performing the checks for "previous token
is one of decltype/_Atomic/etc.". This patch moves those checks after the
existing if/else chain to ensure the left-parent token classification is
always run after checking whether the contents of the parens is an
expression or not.
This change also introduces a new TokenAnnotatorTest that checks the
token kind and Role of Tokens after analyzing them. This is used to check
for TT_PointerOrReference, in addition to indirectly testing this based
on the resulting formatting.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88956
This allows building the clang-format unit tests in only 657 ninja steps
rather than 1257 which allows for much faster incremental builds after a
git pull.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89709
Some projects (e.g. FreeBSD) align pointers to the right but expect a
space between the '*' and any pointer qualifiers such as const. To handle
these cases this patch adds a new config option SpaceAroundPointerQualifiers
that can be used to configure whether spaces need to be added before/after
pointer qualifiers.
PointerAlignment = Right
SpaceAroundPointerQualifiers = Default/After:
void *const *x = NULL;
SpaceAroundPointerQualifiers = Before/Both
void * const *x = NULL;
PointerAlignment = Left
SpaceAroundPointerQualifiers = Default/Before:
void* const* x = NULL;
SpaceAroundPointerQualifiers = After/Both
void* const * x = NULL;
PointerAlignment = Middle
SpaceAroundPointerQualifiers = Default/Before/After/Both:
void * const * x = NULL;
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88227
Currently newer clang-format options cannot be included in .clang-format files, if not all users can be forced to use an updated version.
This patch tries to solve this by adding an option to clang-format, enabling to ignore unknown (newer) options.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86137
Some Java style guides and IDEs group Java static imports after
non-static imports. This patch allows clang-format to control
the location of static imports.
Patch by: @bc-lee
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, JakeMerdichAMD
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87201
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47461
The following change {D80940} caused a regression in code which ifdef's around the try and catch block cause incorrect brace placement around the catch
```
try
{
}
catch (...) {
// This is not a small function
bar = 1;
}
}
```
The brace after the catch will be placed on a newline
Reviewed By: curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87291
In some situation shifts can be treated as a template, and is thus formatted as one. So, by doing a couple extra checks to assure that the condition doesn't contain a template, and is in fact a bit shift should solve this problem.
This is a fix for [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46969 | bug 46969 ]]
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: Saldivarcher
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86581
When using the always break after return type setting:
Before:
SomeType funcdecl(LIST(uint64_t));
After:
SomeType
funcdecl(LIST(uint64_t));"
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D87007
Before: _Atomic(uint64_t) * a;
After: _Atomic(uint64_t) *a;
This treats _Atomic the same as the the TypenameMacros and decltype. It
also allows some cleanup by removing checks whether the token before a
paren is kw_decltype and instead checking for TT_TypeDeclarationParen.
While touching this code also extend the decltype test cases to also check
for typeof() and _Atomic(T).
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86959
This adds a `AttributeMacros` configuration option that causes certain
identifiers to be parsed like a __attribute__((foo)) annotation.
This is motivated by our CHERI C/C++ fork which adds a __capability
qualifier for pointer/reference. Without this change clang-format parses
many type declarations as multiplications/bitwise-and instead.
I initially considered adding "__capability" as a new clang-format keyword,
but having a list of macros that should be treated as attributes is more
flexible since it can be used e.g. for static analyzer annotations or other language
extensions.
Example: std::vector<foo * __capability> -> std::vector<foo *__capability>
Depends on D86775 (to apply cleanly)
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, jrtc27
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86782
Currently a test failure always reports a line number inside verifyFormat()
which is not very helpful to see which test failed. With this change we now
emit the line number where the verify function was called. When using an
IDE such as CLion, the output now includes a clickable link that points to
the call site.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86926
When guessing whether a closing paren is then end of a cast expression also
skip over pointer qualifiers while looking for TT_PointerOrReference.
This prevents some address-of and dereference operators from being parsed
as a binary operator.
Before:
x = (foo *const) * v;
x = (foo *const volatile restrict __attribute__((foo)) _Nonnull _Null_unspecified _Nonnull) & v;
After:
x = (foo *const)*v;
x = (foo *const volatile restrict __attribute__((foo)) _Nonnull _Null_unspecified _Nonnull)&v;
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86716
Use spaces to align binary and ternary expressions when using AlignOperands and UT_AlignWithSpaces.
This fixes an oversight in the new UT_AlignWithSpaces option (see D75034), which did not correctly identify the alignment of binary/ternary expressions.
Reviewed By: curdeius
Patch by: fickert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85600
Summary:
The MultiLine option in BreakBeforeBraces was only handling standard
control statement, leading to invalid indentation with for each macros:
Previous behavior:
/* invalid: brace should be on the same line */
Q_FOREACH(int a; list)
{
foo();
}
/* valid */
Q_FOREACH(int longVariable;
list)
{
foo();
}
To fix this, simply add the TT_ForEachMacro kind in the list of
recognized control statements for the multiline option.
This is a fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44632
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed by: mitchell-stellar
Contributed by: vthib
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85304
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46383
When the c preprocessor stringizes tokens, the generated string literals
are affected by the whitespace. This means clang-format can affect
codegen silently, adding spaces and newlines to strings. Practically
speaking, the vast majority of cases will be harmless, only affecting
single identifiers or debug macros.
In the interest of doing no harm in other cases though, this introduces
a blacklist option 'WhitespaceSensitiveMacros', which contains a list of
names of function-like macros whose contents should not be touched by
clang-format, period. Clang-format can't automatically detect these
without a real compile context, so users will have to specify it
explicitly (it still beats clang-format off'ing at every invocation).
Defaults include "STRINGIZE", "PP_STRINGIZE", and "BOOST_PP_STRINGIZE".
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82620
Summary:
After D50078, we're experiencing unexpected un-indent using a style combining `AlignOperands: DontAlign` with `BreakBeforeTernaryOperators: false`, such as Google's JavaScript style:
```
% bin/clang-format -style=google ~/test.js
aaaaaaaaaaa = bbbbbbbb ? cccccccccccccccccc() :
dddddddddd ? eeeeeeeeeeeeee :
fffff;
```
The issue lies with the interaction of `AlignOperands: DontAlign` and the edited code section in ContinuationIndenter.cpp, which de-dents the intent by `Style.ContinuationIndentWidth`. From [[ ac3e5c4d93/clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h (L170) | the documentation ]] of AlignOperands: DontAlign:
> The wrapped lines are indented `ContinuationIndentWidth` spaces from the start of the line.
So the de-dent effectively erases the necessary `ContinuationIndentWidth` in that case.
This patch restores the `AlignOperands: DontAlign` behavior, producing:
```
% bin/clang-format -style=google ~/test.js
aaaaaaaaaaa = bbbbbbbb ? cccccccccccccccccc() :
dddddddddd ? eeeeeeeeeeeeee :
fffff;
```
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82199
Summary:
This patch fixes bug #44192
When clang-format is run with option AllowShortBlocksOnASingleLine, it is expected to either succeed in putting the short block with its control statement on a single line or fail and leave the block as is. When brace wrapping after control statement is activated, if the block + the control statement length is superior to column limit but the block alone is not, clang-format puts the block in two lines: one for the control statement and one for the block. This patch removes this unexpected behaviour. Current unittests are updated to check for this behaviour.
Patch By: Bouska
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71512
Summary:
{D80144} introduce an ObjC regression
Only parse the `[]` if what follows is really an attribute
Reviewers: krasimir, JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: rdwampler, aaron.ballman, curdeius, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80547
Summary:
This revision is to complement {D75791} so we can be sure that we don't change any default behavior.
For now just add rules to cover AfterExternBlock, but in the future we should add cases to cover the other BraceWrapping rules for each style. This will help guard us when we change code inside of the various getXXXStyle() functions to ensure we are not breaking everyone.
Reviewed By: MarcusJohnson91
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https:
Summary:
Its currently not possible to recreate the GNU style using the `BreakBeforeBraces: Custom` style due to a lack of missing `BeforeWhile` in the `BraceWrappingFlags`
The following request was raised to add `BeforeWhile` in a `do..while` context like `BeforeElse` and `BeforeCatch` to give greater control over the positioning of the `while`
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42164
Reviewers: krasimir, mitchell-stellar, sammccall
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79325
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33890
This revision allow the microsoft `for each(.... in ...` nonstandard C++ extension which can be used in C++/CLI to be handled as a ForEach macro.
This prevents the breaking between the for and each onto a new line
Reviewed By: JakeMerdichAMD
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80228
Summary:
The following revision follows D80115 since @MyDeveloperDay and I apparently both had the same idea at the same time, for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45816 and my efforts on tooling support for AMDVLK, respectively.
This option aligns adjacent bitfield separators across lines, in a manner similar to AlignConsecutiveAssignments and friends.
Example:
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1;
uint32_t exponent : 8;
uint32_t mantissa : 23;
};
```
would become
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1;
uint32_t exponent : 8;
uint32_t mantissa : 23;
};
```
This also handles c++2a style bitfield-initializers with AlignConsecutiveAssignments.
```
struct RawFloat {
uint32_t sign : 1 = 0;
uint32_t exponent : 8 = 127;
uint32_t mantissa : 23 = 0;
}; // defaults to 1.0f
```
Things this change does not do:
- Align multiple comma-chained bitfield variables. None of the other
AlignConsecutive* options seem to implement that either.
- Detect bitfields that have a width specified with something other
than a numeric literal (ie, `int a : SOME_MACRO;`). That'd be fairly
difficult to parse and is rare.
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits, MyDeveloperDay
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80176
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43845
When a '//comment' trails a consecutive alignment, it adds a whitespace
replacement within the comment token. This wasn't handled correctly in
the alignment code, which treats it as a whole token and thus double
counts it.
This can wrongly trigger the "line too long, it'll wrap" alignment-break
condition with specific lengths, causing the alignment to break for
seemingly no reason.
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: kostyakozko, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79465
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45614
`[[nodiscard]]` after a macro doesn't behave the same as an __attribute__ resulting in incorrect indentation
This revision corrects that behavior
See original Mozilla bug:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1629756
Before:
```
class FooWidget : public nsBaseWidget {
public:
FooWidget();
NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS_INHERITED
[[nodiscard]] nsresult
FunctionOne();
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionTwo();
};
```
After:
```
class FooWidget : public nsBaseWidget {
public:
FooWidget();
NS_DECL_ISUPPORTS_INHERITED
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionOne();
[[nodiscard]] nsresult FunctionTwo();
};
```
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79990
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44476
```template <typename T> [[nodiscard]] int a() { return 1; }```
gets incorrectly formatted to be
```template <typename T>[[nodiscard]] int a() { return 1; }```
This revision ensure there is a space between the template and the attribute
Reviewed By: JakeMerdichAMD
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79905
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45942
With Chromium style (although that is not important) its just it defines PointerAligmment: Left
The following arguments `S&&` are formatted differently depending on if the class has an attribute between it and the class identifier
```
class S {
S(S&&) = default;
};
class [[nodiscard]] S {
S(S &&) = default;
};
```
The prescense of [[nodiscard]] between the `class/struct` and the `{` causes the `{` to be incorrectly seen as a `TT_FunctionLBrace` which in turn transforms all the && to be `TT_BinaryOperators` rather than `TT_PointerOrReference`, as binary operators other spacing rules come into play causing a miss format
This revision resolves this by allowing the parseRecord to consider the [[nodisscard]]
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80008
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44345
When namespaces get long the namespace end comment wraps onto the next line
```
namespace would:🇮🇹:save::you:🅰️:lot::of::time::if_::i::just::gave:🆙:and_::
went::mad::now {
void foo();
void bar();
} // namespace
// would:🇮🇹:save::you:🅰️:lot::of::time::if_::i::just::gave:🆙:and_::went::mad::now
```
If clang-format it applied successively it will duplicate the end comment
```
namespace would:🇮🇹:save::you:🅰️:lot::of::time::if_::i::just::gave:🆙:and_::
went::mad::now {
void foo();
void bar();
} // namespace
// would:🇮🇹:save::you:🅰️:lot::of::time::if_::i::just::gave:🆙:and_::went::mad::now
// would:🇮🇹:save::you:🅰️:lot::of::time::if_::i::just::gave:🆙:and_::went::mad::now
```
This revision checks to ensure the end comment is not on the next line before adding yet another comment
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79935
Summary:
Even when BreakBeforeBinaryOperators is set, AlignOperands kept
aligning the beginning of the line, even when it could align the
actual operands (e.g. after an assignment).
With this patch, the operands are actually aligned, and the operator
gets aligned with the equal sign:
int aaaaa = bbbbbb
+ cccccc;
This not happen in tests, to avoid 'breaking' the indentation:
if (aaaaa
&& bbbbb)
return;
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, acoomans, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32478
Summary:
When multiple ternary operators are chained, e.g. like an if/else-if/
else-if/.../else sequence, clang-format will keep aligning the colon
with the question mark, which increases the indent for each
conditionals:
int a = condition1 ? result1
: condition2 ? result2
: condition3 ? result3
: result4;
This patch detects the situation (e.g. conditionals used in false branch
of another conditional), to avoid indenting in that case:
int a = condition1 ? result1
: condition2 ? result2
: condition3 ? result3
: result4;
When BreakBeforeTernaryOperators is false, this will format like this:
int a = condition1 ? result1 :
condition2 ? result2 :
conditino3 ? result3 :
result4;
This formatting style is referenced here:
https://www.fluentcpp.com/2018/02/27/replace-else-if-ternary-operator/
and here:
https://marcmutz.wordpress.com/2010/10/14/top-5-reasons-you-should-love-your-ternary-operator/
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: hokein, dyung, MyDeveloperDay, acoomans, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50078
Summary:
Currently the 'AlignConsecutive*' options incorrectly align across
elif and else statements, even if they are very far away and across
unrelated preprocessor macros.
This failed since on preprocessor run 2+, there is not enough context
about the #ifdefs to actually differentiate one block from another,
causing them to align across different blocks or even large sections of
the file.
Eg, with AlignConsecutiveAssignments:
```
\#if FOO // Run 1
\#else // Run 1
int a = 1; // Run 2, wrong
\#endif // Run 1
\#if FOO // Run 1
\#else // Run 1
int bar = 1; // Run 2
\#endif // Run 1
```
is read as
```
int a = 1; // Run 2, wrong
int bar = 1; // Run 2
```
The approach taken to fix this was to add a new flag to Token that
forces breaking alignment across groups of lines (MustBreakAlignBefore)
in a similar manner to the existing flag that forces a line break
(MustBreakBefore). This flag is set for the first Token after a
preprocessor statement or diff conflict marker.
Fixes #25167,#31281
Patch By: JakeMerdichAMD
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79388
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45639
clang-format incorrectly splits the `[[` in a long argument list
```
void SomeLongClassName::ALongMethodNameInThatClass([[maybe_unused]] const shared_ptr<ALongTypeName>& argumentNameForThat
LongType) {
}
```
becomes
```
void SomeLongClassName::ALongMethodNameInThatClass([
[maybe_unused]] const shared_ptr<ALongTypeName> &argumentNameForThatLongType) {
}
```
leaving one `[` on the previous line
For a function with just 1 very long argument, clang-format chooses to split between the `[[`,
This revision prevents the slip between the two `[` and the second `[`
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79401
Summary: systemd recently added a clang-format file. One issue I
encountered in using clang-format on systemd is that systemd does
not add a space before the parens of their foreach macros but
clang-format always adds a space. This does not seem to be
configurable in clang-format. This revision adds the
ControlStatementsExceptForEachMacros option to SpaceBeforeParens
which puts a space before all control statement parens except
ForEach macros. This drastically reduces the amount of changes
when running clang-format on systemd's source code.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, krasimir, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78869
Summary: The condition added with the new setting checked whether the character was an l-brace, not specifically a lambda l-brace, when deciding whether it was possible to break before it or not. This caused the l-brace of some initialiser lists to break onto the next line with the first argument of the initialiser list when the setting was enabled.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, Wawha
Patch By: duncan-llvm
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79022
Summary:
BTW my actual code that hit this issue is like
```
[a, b = std::move(b)](auto &&... c) mutable -> std::invoke_result_t<decltype(b), decltype(c)...> { /* omitted */ }
```
where this explicit return type is required for SFINAE.
Reviewed By: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: johnchen902
Subscribers: krasimir, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78694
Summary:
This is a tentative fix for https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45357
Spaces seem to be introduced between * and * due to changes brought in for {D69573}
Reviewers: sylvestre.ledru, mitchell-stellar, sammccall, Abpostelnicu, krasimir, jbcoe
Reviewed By: Abpostelnicu
Subscribers: tstellar, hans, Abpostelnicu, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78879
Summary:
Even when BreakBeforeBinaryOperators is set, AlignOperands kept
aligning the beginning of the line, even when it could align the
actual operands (e.g. after an assignment).
With this patch, there is an option to actually align the operands, so
that the operator gets right-aligned with the equal sign or return
operator:
int aaaaa = bbbbbb
+ cccccc;
return aaaaaaa
&& bbbbbbb;
This not happen in parentheses, to avoid 'breaking' the indentation:
if (aaaaa
&& bbbbb)
return;
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper
Subscribers: cfe-commits, klimek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32478
When multiple ternary operators are chained, e.g. like an if/else-if/
else-if/.../else sequence, clang-format will keep aligning the colon
with the question mark, which increases the indent for each
conditionals:
int a = condition1 ? result1
: condition2 ? result2
: condition3 ? result3
: result4;
This patch detects the situation (e.g. conditionals used in false branch
of another conditional), to avoid indenting in that case:
int a = condition1 ? result1
: condition2 ? result2
: condition3 ? result3
: result4;
When BreakBeforeTernaryOperators is false, this will format like this:
int a = condition1 ? result1 :
condition2 ? result2 :
conditino3 ? result3 :
result4;
Summary:
Use spaces instead of tabs for alignment with UT_ForContinuationAndIndentation to make the code aligned for any tab/indent width.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38381
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: fickert
Tags: #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75034
Summary:
clang-format currently puts the first enumerator on the same line as the
enum keyword and opening brace if it fits (for example, for anonymous
enums if IndentWidth is 8):
$ echo "enum { RED, GREEN, BLUE };" | clang-format -style="{BasedOnStyle: llvm, ColumnLimit: 15, IndentWidth: 8}"
enum { RED,
GREEN,
BLUE };
This doesn't seem to be intentional, as I can't find any style guide that
suggests wrapping enums this way. Always force the enumerator to be on a new
line, which gets us the desired result:
$ echo "enum { RED, GREEN, BLUE };" | ./bin/clang-format -style="{BasedOnStyle: llvm, ColumnLimit: 15, IndentWidth: 8}"
enum {
RED,
GREEN,
BLUE
};
Test Plan:
New test added. Confirmed test failed without change and passed with change by
running:
$ ninja FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: osandov
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77682
This fixes a regression from D69573 which broke the following example:
$ echo 'operator C<T>*();' | bin/clang-format --style=Chromium
operator C<T> *();
(There should be no space before the asterisk.)
It seems the problem is in TokenAnnotator::spaceRequiredBetween(),
which only looked at the token to the left of the * to see if it was a
type or not. That code only handled simple types or identifiers, not
templates or qualified types. This patch addresses that.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76850
Summary:
This diff extends the -style=file option to allow a config file to be specified explicitly. This is useful (for instance) when adding IDE commands to reformat code to a personal style.
Reviewers: djasper, ioeric, krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed by: MyDeveloperDay
Contributed by: tnorth
Subscribers: cfe-commits, lebedev.ri, MyDeveloperDay, klimek, sammccall, mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72326
This option add a line break then a lambda is inside a function call.
Reviewers : djasper, klimek, krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44609
Summary:
This change adds an option to insert trailing commas into container
literals. For example, in JavaScript:
const x = [
a,
b,
^~~~~ inserted if missing.
]
This is implemented as a seperate post-processing pass after formatting
(because formatting might change whether the container literal does or
does not wrap). This keeps the code relatively simple and orthogonal,
though it has the notable drawback that the newly inserted comma is not
taken into account for formatting decisions (e.g. it might exceed the 80
char limit). To avoid exceeding the ColumnLimit, a comma is only
inserted if it fits into the limit.
Trailing comma insertion conceptually conflicts with argument
bin-packing: inserting a comma disables bin-packing, so we cannot do
both. clang-format rejects FormatStyle configurations that do both with
this change.
Reviewers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Summary:
An heuristic targetting `x && x->foo` was targed overly broadly and caused the
last T&& to be treated as a binary operator.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73334
Summary: This diff expands the SpacesAroundConditions option added in D68346 to include adding spaces to catch statements.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch by: timwoj
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72793
Summary:
The documentation for IndentCaseLabels claimed that the "Switch
statement body is always indented one level more than case labels". This
is technically false for the code block immediately following the label.
Its closing bracket aligns with the start of the label.
If the case label are not indented, it leads to a style where the
closing bracket of the block aligns with the closing bracket of the
switch statement, which can be hard to parse.
This change introduces a new option, IndentCaseBlocks, which when true
treats the block as a scope block (which it technically is).
(Note: regenerated ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst using tools/dump_style.py)
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Patch By: capn
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72276
Summary:
Revision a75f8d98d7 fixed spacing for operators,
but caused the const and non-const versions to diverge:
```
// With Style.PointerAlignment = FormatStyle::PAS_Left:
struct A {
operator char*() { return ""; }
operator const char *() const { return ""; }
};
```
The code was checking if the type specifier was directly preceded by `operator`.
However there could be comments and `const/volatile` in between.
Reviewers: mprobst
Reviewed By: mprobst
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72911
Summary:
Found a bug introduced with BraceWrappingFlags AfterControlStatement MultiLine. This feature conflicts with the existing BeforeCatch and BeforeElse flags.
For example, our team uses BeforeElse.
if (foo ||
bar) {
doSomething();
}
else {
doSomethingElse();
}
If we enable MultiLine (which we'd really love to do) we expect it to work like this:
if (foo ||
bar)
{
doSomething();
}
else {
doSomethingElse();
}
What we actually get is:
if (foo ||
bar)
{
doSomething();
}
else
{
doSomethingElse();
}
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, Bouska, mitchell-stellar
Patch by: pastey
Subscribers: Bouska, cfe-commits
Tags: clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71939
Summary:
As a followup to D69144, this diff fixes the coroutine keyword spacing
for co_yield / co_returning negative numbers.
Reviewers: modocache, sammccall, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69180
Patch by Jonathan Thomas (jonathoma)!
Summary: Adds a new option SpaceBeforeBrackets to add spaces before brackets (i.e. int a[23]; -> int a [23];) This is present as an option in the Visual Studio C++ code formatting settings, but there was no matching setting in clang-format.
Reviewers: djasper, MyDeveloperDay, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits, klimek
Patch by: Anteru
Tags: #clang, #clang-format, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D6920
Line ending detection is now set with the `DeriveLineEnding` option.
CRLF can now be used as the default line ending by setting `UseCRLF`.
When line ending detection is disabled, all line endings are converted
according to the `UseCRLF` option.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19031
Summary:
By additional regex match, grouping of main include can be enabled in files that are not normally considered as a C/C++ source code.
For example, this might be useful in templated code, where template implementations are being held in *Impl.hpp files.
On the occassion, 'assume-filename' option description was reworded as it was misleading. It has nothing to do with `style=file` option and it does not influence sourced style filename.
Reviewers: rsmith, ioeric, krasimir, sylvestre.ledru, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch by: furdyna
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67750
Summary:
This fixes an edge case in the `SpacesInSquareBrackets` option where an initial `&ref` lambda parameter is not padded with an initial space.
`int foo = [&bar ]() {}` is fixed to give `int foo = [ &bar ]() {}`
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, klimek, sammccall
Reviewed by: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69649
Summary:
The code `throw -1;` is currently formatted by clang-format as
`throw - 1;`. This diff adds a fix for this edge case and a test to check
for this in the future.
For context, I am looking into a related bug in the clang-formatting of
coroutine keywords: `co_yield -1;` is also reformatted in this manner
as `co_yield - 1;`. A later diff will add these changes and tests for the
`co_yield` and `co_return` keywords.
Patch by Jonathan Thomas (jonathoma)!
Reviewers: modocache, sammccall, Quuxplusone
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69144
llvm-svn: 375258
Summary:
r373922 added checks for a few tokens that, following an `)` make it
unlikely that the `)` is the closing paren of a cast expression. The
specific check for `tok::l_square` there introduced a regression for
casts of Obj-C calls, like:
```
(cast)[func arg]
```
From the tests added in r373922, I believe the `tok::l_square` case is added to
capture the case where a non-cast `)` is directly followed by an
attribute specifier, like:
```
int f(int x) [[noreturn]];
```
I've specialized the code to look for such attribute specifier instead
of `tok::l_square` in general. Also, I added a regression test and moved
the test cases added in r373922 to an already existing place documenting
other instances of historically misidentified casts.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69164
llvm-svn: 375247
Summary:
r373165 fixed an issue where a templated noexcept member function with a
reference qualifier would be indented more than expected:
```
// Formatting produced with LLVM style with AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes
// before r373165:
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
// after:
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The way this is done is that in the AnnotatingParser in
`lib/FormatTokenAnnotator.cpp` the determination of the usage of a `&` or `&&`
(the line in determineTokenType
```
Current.Type = determineStarAmpUsage(...
```
is not performed in some cases anymore, combining with a few additional related
checks afterwards. The net effect of these checks results in the `&` or `&&`
token to start being classified as `TT_Unknown` in cases where before `r373165`
it would be classified as `TT_UnaryOperator` or `TT_PointerOrReference` by
`determineStarAmpUsage`.
This inadvertently caused 2 classes of regressions I'm aware of:
- The address-of `&` after a function assignment would be classified as
`TT_Unknown`, causing spaces to surround it, disregarding style options:
```
// before r373165:
void (*fun_ptr)(void) = &fun;
// after:
void (*fun_ptr)(void) = & fun;
```
- In cases where there is a function declaration list -- looking macro between
a template line and the start of the function declaration, an `&` as part of
the return type would be classified as `TT_Unknown`, causing spaces to
surround it:
```
// before r373165:
template <class T>
DEPRECATED("lala")
Type& foo();
// after:
template <class T>
DEPRECATED("lala")
Type & foo();
```
In these cases the problems are rooted in the skipping of the classification of
a `&` (and similarly `&&`) by determineStarAmpUsage which effects the formatting
decisions later in the pipeline.
I've looked into the goal of r373165 and noticed that replacing `noexcept` with
`const` in the given example produces no extra indentation with the old code:
```
// before r373165:
struct f {
template <class T>
int foo() & const {}
};
struct f {
template <class T>
int foo() & noexcept {}
};
```
I investigated how clang-format annotated these two examples differently to
determine the places where the processing of both diverges in the pipeline.
There were two places where the processing diverges, causing the extra indent in
the `noexcept` case:
1. The `const` is annotated as a `TT_TrailingAnnotation`, whereas `noexcept`
is annotated as `TT_Unknown`. I've updated the `determineTokenType` function
to account for this by adding a missing `tok:kw_noexcept` to the clause that
marks a token as `TT_TrailingAnnotation`.
2. The `&` in the second example is wrongly identified as `TT_BinaryOperator`
in `determineStarAmpUsage`. This is the reason for the extra indentation --
clang-format gets confused and thinks this is an expression.
I've updated `determineStarAmpUsage` to check for `tok:kw_noexcept`.
With these two updates in place, the additional parsing introduced by r373165
becomes unnecessary and all added tests pass (with updates, as now clang-format
respects the style configuration for spaces around the `&` in the test
examples).
I've removed these additions and added regression tests for the cases above.
Reviewers: AndWass, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68695
llvm-svn: 374172
Summary:
clang-format is incorrectly thinking the parameter parens are part of a cast operation, this is resulting in there sometimes being not space between the paren and the noexcept (and other keywords like volatile etc..)
```
void operator++(int) noexcept;
void operator++(int &) noexcept;
void operator delete(void *, std::size_t, const std::nothrow_t &)noexcept;
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68481
llvm-svn: 373922
Summary:
This patch makes the `SpacesInSquareBrackets` setting also apply to C++ lambdas with parameters.
Looking through the revision history, it appears support for only array brackets was added, and lambda brackets were ignored. Therefore, I am inclined to think it was simply an omission, rather than a deliberate choice.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17887 and https://reviews.llvm.org/D4944.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, reuk, owenpan
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Patch by: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68473
llvm-svn: 373821
Summary:
According to the clang-format documentation, "Fundamentally, C++11 braced lists are formatted exactly like function calls would be formatted in their place. If the braced list follows a name (e.g. a type or variable name), clang-format formats as if the `{}` were the parentheses of a function call with that name."
This patch furthers the treatment of C++11 braced list braces as parentheses by respecting the `SpacesInParentheses` setting.
Reviewers: MyDeveloperDay, reuk, owenpan
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68415
llvm-svn: 373751
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43531
Fix for clang-format incorrectly handles "alternative operators" as described by https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/operator_alternative
compl = ~
not = !
these are unary operators, and clang-format will remove the space between them and a numeric constant
this incorrectly formats the following code
```
int a compl 5;
int a not 5;
```
into:
```
int a compl5;
int a not5;
```
The code adds FIXME unit tests for "alternative token" representations for {} [] and # as defined by the same link, which would require a more detailed change to the FormatTokenLexer
Reviewers: klimek, reuk, owenpan, mitchell-stellar, STL_MSFT
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68332
llvm-svn: 373750
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42417
This revision removes the extra space between the opertor-> and the parens ()
```
class Bug {
auto operator-> () -> int*;
auto operator++(int) -> int;
};
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, byoungyoung, mitchell-stellar
Reviewed By: mitchell-stellar
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68242
llvm-svn: 373746
Summary:
Change the BraceWrappingFlags' AfterControlStatement from a bool to an enum with three values:
* "Never": This is the default, and does not do any brace wrapping after control statements.
* "MultiLine": This only wraps braces after multi-line control statements (this really only happens when a ColumnLimit is specified).
* "Always": This always wraps braces after control statements.
The first and last options are backwards-compatible with "false" and "true", respectively.
The new "MultiLine" option is useful for when a wrapped control statement's indentation matches the subsequent block's indentation. It makes it easier to see at a glance where the control statement ends and where the block's code begins. For example:
```
if (
foo
&& bar )
{
baz();
}
```
vs.
```
if (
foo
&& bar ) {
baz();
}
```
Short control statements (1 line) do not wrap the brace to the next line, e.g.
```
if (foo) {
bar();
} else {
baz();
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, owenpan, reuk, MyDeveloperDay, klimek
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Patch By: mitchell-stellar
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68296
llvm-svn: 373647
Summary:
The historical context:
- clang-format was written when C++11 was current,
and the main language-version concern was >> vs > > template-closers.
An option was added to allow selection of the 03/11 behavior, or auto-detection.
- there was no option to choose simply "latest standard" so anyone who didn't
ever want 03 behavior or auto-detection specified Cpp11.
- In r185149 this option started to affect lexer mode.
- no options were added to cover c++14, as parsing/formatting
didn't change that much. The usage of Cpp11 to mean "latest" became
codified e.g. in r206263
- c++17 added some new constructs. These were mostly backwards-compatible and so
not used in old programs, so having no way to turn them off was OK.
- c++20 added some new constructs and keywords (e.g. co_*) that changed the
meaning of existing programs, and people started to complain that
the c++20 parsing couldn't be turned off.
New plan:
- Default ('Auto') behavior remains unchanged: parse as latest, format
template-closers based on input.
- Add new 'Latest' option that more clearly expresses the intent "use
modern features" that many projects have chosen for their .clang-format files.
- Allow pinning to *any* language version, using the same name as clang -std:
c++03, c++11, c++14 etc. These set precise lexer options, and any
clang-format code depending on these can use a >= check.
- For backwards compatibility, `Cpp11` is an alias for `Latest`, not `c++11`.
This matches the historical documented semantics of this option.
This spelling (and `Cpp03`) are deprecated.
Reviewers: klimek, modocache
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67541
llvm-svn: 373439
Summary:
The following code
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
will be formatted to the following with LLVM style, and
`AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes`
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The indentation of the `void bar()` line is wrong.
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, krasimir, timwoj, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, ilya-biryukov, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Patch By: AndWass
Tags: #clang-format, #clang, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68072
llvm-svn: 373165
The following code
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
will be formatted to the following with LLVM style, and
`AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations: Yes`
```
struct f {
template <class T>
void bar() && noexcept {}
};
```
The indentation of the `void bar()` line is wrong.
Patch by Andreas Wass (AndWass)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68072
llvm-svn: 373056
Summary:
It is annoying that the clang-format tests aren't themselves clang-formatted, if you use a format on save option in VS or vim this file gets massively changed then you have to `git difftool` all the other changes back out, which is risky.
I know people don't like mass clang-format changes but sometimes it becomes unmanageable to not. There are no other changes here other than just the reformat.
clang-format tests all pass.
```
[==========] 691 tests from 21 test cases ran. (55990 ms total)
[ PASSED ] 691 tests.
```
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, timwoj
Reviewed By: owenpan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67888
llvm-svn: 372689
Summary:
This patch adds support for the Whitesmiths indentation style to clang-format. It’s an update to a patch submitted in 2015 (D6833), but reworks it to use the newer API.
There are still some issues with this patch, primarily around `switch` and `case` support. The added unit test won’t currently pass because of the remaining issues.
Reviewers: mboehme, MyDeveloperDay, djasper
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: krasimir, MyDeveloperDay, echristo, cfe-commits
Patch By: @timwoj (Tim Wojtulewicz)
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67627
llvm-svn: 372497
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41899
```auto lambda = [&a = a]() { a = 2; };```
is formatted as
```auto lambda = [& a = a]() { a = 2; };```
With an extra space if PointerAlignment is set to Left
> The space "& a" looks strange when there is no type in the lambda's intializer expression. This can be worked around with by setting "PointerAlignment: Right", but ideally "PointerAlignment: Left" would not add a space in this case.
Reviewers: klimek, owenpan, krasimir, timwoj
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67718
llvm-svn: 372249
This patch makes cases work where the lambda's template list doesn't
contain any of + - ! ~ / % << | || && ^ == != >= <= ? : true false
(see added FIXME).
Ports r359967 to clang-format.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67246
llvm-svn: 371854
Summary:
This option determines whether goto labels are indented according to scope. Setting this option to false causes goto labels to be flushed to the left.
This is mostly copied from [[ http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-September/045014.html | this patch ]] submitted by Christian Neukirchen that didn't make its way into trunk.
```
true: false:
int f() { vs. int f() {
if (foo()) { if (foo()) {
label1: label1:
bar(); bar();
} }
label2: label2:
return 1; return 1;
} }
```
Reviewers: klimek, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Patch by: tetsuo-cpp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67037
llvm-svn: 371719
Summary:
This (invalid) fragment is crashing clang-format:
```
#if 1
int x;
#elif
int y;
#endif
```
The reason being that the parser expects a token after `#elif`, and the
subsequent parsing of the next line does not check if `CurrentToken` is null.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65940
llvm-svn: 368280
This is like r305666 (which added support for `if constexpr`) except
that it allows a macro name after the if.
This is slightly tricky for two reasons:
1. r305666 didn't add test coverage for all cases where it added a
kw_constexpr, so I had to figure out what all the added cases were
for. I now added tests for all `if constexpr` bits that didn't have
tests. (This took a while, see e.g. https://reviews.llvm.org/D65223)
2. Parsing `if <ident> (` as an if means that `#if defined(` and
`#if __has_include(` parse as ifs too. Add some special-case code
to prevent this from happening where it's incorrect.
Fixes PR39248.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65227
llvm-svn: 367167
Summary:
Previously, clang-format detected something like the following as a C++11 attribute specifier.
@[[NSArray class]]
instead of an array with an Objective-C method call inside. In general, when the attribute specifier checking runs, if it sees 2 identifiers in a row, it decides that the square brackets represent an Objective-C method call. However, here, `class` is tokenized as a keyword instead of an identifier, so this check fails.
To fix this, the attribute specifier first checks whether the first square bracket has an "@" before it. If it does, then that square bracket is not the start of a attribute specifier because it is an Objective-C array literal. (The assumption is that @[[.*]] is not valid C/C++.)
Contributed by rkgibson2.
Reviewers: benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64632
llvm-svn: 366267
This option behaves similarly to AlignConsecutiveDeclarations and
AlignConsecutiveAssignments, aligning the assignment of C/C++
preprocessor macros on consecutive lines.
I've worked in many projects (embedded, mostly) where header files full
of large, well-aligned "#define" blocks are a common pattern. We
normally avoid using clang-format on these files, since it ruins any
existing alignment in said blocks. This style option will align "simple"
PP macros (no parameters) and PP macros with parameter lists on
consecutive lines.
Related Bugzilla entry (thanks mcuddie):
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20637
Patch by Nick Renieris (VelocityRa)!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28462
llvm-svn: 364938
Summary:
Other macros are used to declare namespaces, and should thus be handled
similarly. This is the case for crpcut's TESTSUITE macro, or for
unittest-cpp's SUITE macro:
TESTSUITE(Foo) {
TEST(MyFirstTest) {
assert(0);
}
} // TESTSUITE(Foo)
This patch deals with this cases by introducing a new option to specify
lists of namespace macros. Internally, it re-uses the system already in
place for foreach and statement macros, to ensure there is no impact on
performance.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: acoomans, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813
llvm-svn: 362740
Summary:
Adds a `TypenameMacros` configuration option that causes certain identifiers to be handled in a way similar to `typeof()`.
This is enough to:
- Prevent misinterpreting declarations of pointers to such types as expressions (`STACK_OF(int) * foo` -> `STACK_OF(int) *foo`),
- Avoid surprising line breaks in variable/struct field declarations (`STACK_OF(int)\nfoo;` -> `STACK_OF(int) foo;`, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30353).
Reviewers: Typz, krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: Typz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57184
llvm-svn: 361986
Summary:
Addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41170
The AlwaysBreakAfterReturn type setting can go wrong if the line ends with a comment
```
void foo() /* comment */
```
or
```
void foo() // comment
```
It will incorrectly see such functions as Declarations and not Definitions
The following code addresses this by looking for function which end with `; <comment>` rather than just `;` or `<comment>`
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, reuk, russellmcc, owenpan, sammccall
Reviewed By: owenpan
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits, sammccall
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60363
llvm-svn: 358375
Summary:
Addresses PR40696 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40696
The BreakAfterReturnType didn't work if it had a single arguments which was a template with an integer template parameter
```
int foo(A<8> a) { return a; }
```
When run with the Mozilla style. would not break after the `int`
```
int TestFn(A<8> a)
{
return a;
}
```
This revision resolves this issue by allowing numeric constants to be considered function parameters if if seen inside `<>`
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, JonasToth, krasimir, reuk, alexfh
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59309
llvm-svn: 357837
This patch aims to add support for the following rules from the JUCE coding standards:
- Always put a space before an open parenthesis that contains text - e.g. foo (123);
- Never put a space before an empty pair of open/close parenthesis - e.g. foo();
Patch by Reuben Thomas
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55170
llvm-svn: 357344
Summary:
This option `AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine` similar to the other `AllowShort*` options, but applied to C++ lambdas.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57687
llvm-svn: 357027
Summary:
Sometime after 6.0.0 and the current trunk 9.0.0 the following code would be considered as objective C and not C++
Reported by: https://twitter.com/mattgodbolt/status/1096188576503644160
$ clang-format.exe test.h
Configuration file(s) do(es) not support Objective-C: C:\clang\build\.clang-format
--- test.h --
```
std::vector<std::pair<std::string,std::string>> C;
void foo()
{
for (auto && [A,B] : C)
{
std::string D = A + B;
}
}
```
The following code fixes this issue of incorrect detection
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, JonasToth, reuk
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59546
llvm-svn: 356575
rC355158 added an optional language parameter to getLLVMStyle(), but this parameter was not used in getPredefinedStyle(). Because unit tests directly specify the style, this codepath wasn't tested. Add an additional unit test for getStyle().
llvm-svn: 356099
Summary:
Addressing: PR25010 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25010
Code like:
```
if(true) var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
is reformatted to be
```
if (true)
var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
Even when `AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine` is true
The following revision comes from a +1'd suggestion in the PR to support AllowShortIfElseStatementsOnASingleLine
This suppresses the clause prevents the merging of the if when there is a compound else
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, reuk
Reviewed By: reuk
Subscribers: reuk, Higuoxing, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59087
llvm-svn: 356031
Summary:
Addressing: PR25010 - https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25010
Code like:
```
if(true) var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
is reformatted to be
```
if (true)
var++;
else {
var--;
}
```
Even when `AllowShortIfStatementsOnASingleLine` is true
The following revision comes from a +1'd suggestion in the PR to support AllowShortIfElseStatementsOnASingleLine
This suppresses the clause prevents the merging of the if when there is a compound else
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, reuk
Reviewed By: reuk
Subscribers: reuk, Higuoxing, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59087
llvm-svn: 356029
Summary:
A Lamdba with a return type template with a boolean literal (true,false) behaves differently to an integer literal
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40910
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, JonasToth, alexfh, krasimir, jkorous
Reviewed By: jkorous
Subscribers: jkorous, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
llvm-svn: 355450
A template specialization of a template foo<int N> can contain integer constants and a whole bunch of operators - e. g. foo< 1 ? !0 : (3+1)%4 >
Inspired by https://reviews.llvm.org/D58922
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58934
llvm-svn: 355434
Summary:
getLLVMStyle() sets the default style, but doesn't take the language as a parameter, so can't set default parameters when they differ from C++. This change adds LanguageKind as an input to getLLVMStyle so that we can start doing that.
See D55964 as a motivation for this, where we want Tablegen to be formatted differently than C++.
Reviewers: djasper, krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: jdoerfert, MyDeveloperDay, kristina, cfe-commits, arphaman
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56943
llvm-svn: 355123
Trailing comments are not always aligned properly when UseTab is set to Always.
Consider:
int a; // x
int bbbbbbbb; // x
With .clang-format:
---
Language: Cpp
BasedOnStyle: LLVM
UseTab: Always
...
The trailing comments of this code block should be aligned, but aren't
To align the first trailing comment it needs to insert 8 spaces. This should be
one tab plus six spaces. It skips the logic of the first partial tab in
FirstTabWidth (=2) + Style.TabWidth (=8) <= Spaces (=8) and only inserts one
tab. Proposed fix and test is attached.
Patch by Hylke Kleve.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57655
llvm-svn: 354183
Summary:
From https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40516
```
$ cat a.cpp
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::myFunction() {
// do stuff
}
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::operator++() {
// do stuff
}
$ ~/ll/build/opt/bin/clang-format -style=LLVM a.cpp
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &
NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::myFunction() {
// do stuff
}
const NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName &NamespaceName::VeryLongClassName::
operator++() {
// do stuff
}
```
What was happening is that the split penalty before `operator` was being set to
a smaller value by a prior if block. Moved checks around to fix this and added a
regression test.
Reviewers: djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57604
llvm-svn: 353033
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
r346756 refined clang-format to not treat the `[` in `asm (...: [] ..)` as an
ObjCExpr. However that's not enough, as we might have a comma-separated list of
such clobbers as in the newly added test.
This updates the detection to instead look at the Line's first token being `asm`
and not mark `[`-s as ObjCExprs in this case.
Reviewers: djasper, benhamilton
Reviewed By: djasper, benhamilton
Subscribers: benhamilton, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54795
llvm-svn: 347465
Summary:
The opening square of an inline asm clobber was being annotated as an ObjCExpr.
This caused, amongst other things, the ObjCGuesser to guess header files
containing that pattern as ObjC files.
Reviewers: benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54111
llvm-svn: 346756
Summary:
The issue is that for array subscript like:
```
arr[[Foo() bar]];
```
ClangFormat will recognize it as C++11 attribute syntax and put a space between 'arr' and first '[', like:
```
arr [[Foo() bar]];
```
Now it is fixed. Tested with:
```
ninja FormatTests
```
Reviewers: benhamilton
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54288
llvm-svn: 346566
Summary:
This is done in order to improve cases where the lambda's body is moved too far to the right. Consider the following snippet with column limit set to 79:
```
void f() {
leader::MakeThisCallHere(&leader_service_,
cq_.get(),
[this, liveness](const leader::ReadRecordReq& req,
std::function<void()> done) {
logger_->HandleReadRecord(
req, resp, std::move(done));
});
leader::MakeAnother(&leader_service_,
cq_.get(),
[this, liveness](const leader::ReadRecordReq& req,
std::function<void()> done) {
logger_->HandleReadRecord(
req, resp, std::move(done), a);
});
}
```
The tool favors extra indentation for the lambda body and so the code incurs extra wrapping and adjacent calls are indented to a different level. I find this behavior annoying and I'd like the tool to favor new lines and, thus, use the extra width.
The fix, reduced, brings the following formatting.
Before:
function(1,
[] {
DoStuff();
//
},
1);
After:
function(
1,
[] {
DoStuff();
//
},
1);
Refer to the new tests in FormatTest.cpp
Contributed by oleg.smolsky!
Reviewers: djasper, klimek, krasimir
Subscribers: cfe-commits, owenpan
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52676
llvm-svn: 345753
This patch moves the virtual file system form clang to llvm so it can be
used by more projects.
Concretely the patch:
- Moves VirtualFileSystem.{h|cpp} from clang/Basic to llvm/Support.
- Moves the corresponding unit test from clang to llvm.
- Moves the vfs namespace from clang::vfs to llvm::vfs.
- Formats the lines affected by this change, mostly this is the result of
the added llvm namespace.
RFC on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-October/126657.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52783
llvm-svn: 344140
Summary:
Some macros are used in the body of function, and actually contain the trailing semicolon: they should thus be automatically followed by a new line, and not get merged with the next line. This is for example the case with Qt's Q_UNUSED macro:
void foo(int a, int b) {
Q_UNUSED(a)
return b;
}
This patch deals with these cases by introducing a new option to specify list of statement macros. This re-uses the system already in place for foreach macros, to ensure there is no impact on performance.
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: krasimir
Subscribers: acoomans, mgrang, alexfh, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33440
llvm-svn: 343602
This fixes formatting namespaces with preceding 'inline' and 'export' (Modules TS) specifiers.
This change fixes namespaces not being identified as such with preceding 'inline' or 'export' specifiers.
Motivation: I was experimenting with the Modules TS (-fmodules-ts) and found it would be useful if clang-format would correctly format 'export namespace'. While making the changes, I noticed that similar issues still exist with 'inline namespace', and addressed them as well.
Patch by Marco Elver!
Reviewers: klimek, djasper, owenpan, sammccall
Reviewed By: owenpan, sammccall
Subscribers: owenpan, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51036
llvm-svn: 341450
Summary:
The Bug was reported and fixed by Owen Pan. See the original bug report here: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38557
Patch by Owen Pan!
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: JonasToth, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50697
llvm-svn: 340624
Summary:
Bug was caused due to comments at the start of scope. For a code like:
```
int func() { //
int b;
int c;
}
```
the comment at the first line gets IndentAndNestingLevel (1,1) whereas
the following declarations get only (0,1) which prevents them from insertion
of a new scope. So, I changed the AlignTokenSequence to look at previous
*non-comment* token when deciding whether to introduce a new scope into
stack or not.
Patch by Kadir Cetinkaya!
Reviewers: rsmith, djasper
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: lebedev.ri, cfe-commits, klimek
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43303
llvm-svn: 338578
WebKit C++ style for object initialization is as follows:
Foo foo { bar };
Yet using clang-format -style=webkit changes this to:
Foo foo{ bar };
As there is no existing combination of rules that will ensure a space
before a braced list in this fashion, this patch adds a new
SpaceBeforeCpp11BracedList rule.
Patch by Ross Kirsling!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46024
llvm-svn: 334692
Summary:
This option replaces the BreakBeforeInheritanceComma option with an
enum, thus introducing a mode where the colon stays on the same line as
constructor declaration:
// When it fits on line:
class A : public B, public C {
...
};
// When it does not fit:
class A :
public B,
public C {
...
};
This matches the behavior of the `BreakConstructorInitializers` option,
introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D32479.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: mzeren-vmw, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43015
llvm-svn: 334408
Summary:
This patch fixes two bugs in clang-format where the template wrapper doesn't skip over
comments causing a long template declaration to not be split into multiple lines.
These were latent and exposed by r332436.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47257
llvm-svn: 333085
Summary:
Introduce `PenaltyBreakTemplateDeclaration` to control the penalty,
and change `AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations` to an enum with 3 modes:
* `No` for regular, penalty based, wrapping of template declaration
* `MultiLine` for always wrapping before multi-line declarations (e.g.
same as legacy behavior when `AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations=false`)
* `Yes` for always wrapping (e.g. same as legacy behavior when
`AlwaysBreakTemplateDeclarations=true`)
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42684
llvm-svn: 332436
Summary:
This patch changes the behavior of PenaltyBreakBeforeFirstCallParameter
so that is does not apply after a brace, when Cpp11BracedListStyle is
false.
This way, variable initialization is wrapped more like an initializer
than like a function call, which is more consistent with user
expectations for this braced list style.
With PenaltyBreakBeforeFirstCallParameter=200, this gives the following
code: (with Cpp11BracedListStyle=false)
Before :
const std::unordered_map<std::string, int> Something::MyHashTable =
{ { "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa", 0 },
{ "bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", 1 },
{ "ccccccccccccccccccccc", 2 } };
After :
const std::unordered_set<std::string> Something::MyUnorderedSet = {
{ "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa", 0 },
{ "bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb", 1 },
{ "ccccccccccccccccccccc", 2 }
};
Reviewers: krasimir, djasper, klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43290
llvm-svn: 332434
The DEBUG() macro is very generic so it might clash with other projects.
The renaming was done as follows:
- git grep -l 'DEBUG' | xargs sed -i 's/\bDEBUG\s\?(/LLVM_DEBUG(/g'
- git diff -U0 master | ../clang/tools/clang-format/clang-format-diff.py -i -p1 -style LLVM
Explicitly avoided changing the strings in the clang-format tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44975
llvm-svn: 332350
Summary: This will be shared by include insertion/deletion library.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: mgorny, klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46758
llvm-svn: 332284
Summary:
This diff improves the Objective-C guessing heuristic by
replacing the hard-coded list of a subset of Objective-C @keywords
with a general check which supports all @keywords.
I also added a few more Foundation keywords which were missing from
the heuristic.
Test Plan: Unit tests updated. Ran tests with:
% make -j16 FormatTests && ./tools/clang/unittests/Format/FormatTests
Reviewers: djasper, jolesiak
Reviewed By: djasper
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45521
llvm-svn: 329918
Josh Learn