Detect requires expressions in more unusable contexts. This is far from
perfect, but currently we have no good metric to decide between a
requires expression and a trailing requires clause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119138
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53576.
There was an inconsistency in formatting of delete expressions.
Before:
```
delete (void*)a;
delete[](void*) a;
```
After this patch:
```
delete (void*)a;
delete[] (void*)a;
```
Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks, owenpan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119117
The l_brace token in a macro definition should not be set to
TT_FunctionLBrace.
This patch could have fixed#42087.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118969
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53430.
Initially, I had a quick and dirty approach, but it led to a myriad of special cases handling comments (that may add unwrapped lines).
So I added TT_RecordLBrace type annotations and it seems like a much nicer solution.
I think that in the future it will allow us to clean up some convoluted code that detects records.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay, HazardyKnusperkeks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118337
After D86959 the code `#define lambda [](const decltype(x) &ptr) {}`
was formatted as `#define lambda [](const decltype(x) & ptr) {}` due to
now parsing the '&' token as a BinaryOperator. The problem was caused by
the condition `Line.InPPDirective && (!Left->Previous || !Left->Previous->is(tok::identifier))) {`
being matched and therefore not performing the checks for "previous token
is one of decltype/_Atomic/etc.". This patch moves those checks after the
existing if/else chain to ensure the left-parent token classification is
always run after checking whether the contents of the parens is an
expression or not.
This change also introduces a new TokenAnnotatorTest that checks the
token kind and Role of Tokens after analyzing them. This is used to check
for TT_PointerOrReference, in addition to indirectly testing this based
on the resulting formatting.
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88956
Björn Schäpers