value-profile-load.test needs adjustment with a mutator change in
bb54bcf849, which reverted as of now, but will be
recommitted after landing this patch.
This patch makes value-profile-load.test more friendly to (and aware of) the
current value profiling strategy, which is based on the hamming as well as the
absolute distance. To this end, this patch adjusts the set of input values that
trigger an expected crash. More specifically, this patch now uses a single value
0x01effffe as a crashing input, because this value is close to values like
{0x1ffffff, 0xffffff, ...}, which are very likely to be added to the corpus per
the current hamming- and absolute-distance-based value profiling strategy. Note
that previously the crashing input values were {1234567 * {1, 2, ...}, s.t. <
INT_MAX}.
Every byte in the chosen value 0x01effeef is intentionally different; this was
to make it harder to find the value without the intermediate inputs added to the
corpus by the value profiling strategy.
Also note that LoadTest.cpp now uses a narrower condition (Size != 8) for
initial pruning of inputs, effectively preventing libFuzzer from generating
inputs longer than necessary and spending time on mutating such long inputs in
the corpus - a functionality not meant to be tested by this specific test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86247
The behavior of the CrossOver mutator has changed with
bb54bcf849. This seems to affect the
value-profile-load test on Darwin. This patch provides a wider margin for
determining success of the value-profile-load test, by testing the targeted
functionality (i.e., GEP index value profile) more directly and faster. To this
end, LoadTest.cpp now uses a narrower condition (Size != 8) for initial pruning
of inputs, effectively preventing libFuzzer from generating inputs longer than
necessary and spending time on mutating such long inputs in the corpus - a
functionality not meant to be tested by this specific test.
Previously, on x86/Linux, it required 6,597,751 execs with -use_value_profile=1
and 19,605,575 execs with -use_value_profile=0 to hit the crash. With this
patch, the test passes with 174,493 execs, providing a wider margin from the
given trials of 10,000,000. Note that, without the value profile (i.e.,
-use_value_profile=0), the test wouldn't pass as it still requires 19,605,575
execs to hit the crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86247
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Resulting library binaries will be named libclang_rt.fuzzer*, and will
be placed in Clang toolchain, allowing redistribution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36908
llvm-svn: 311407
Dokyung Song