Summary:
The memory history plugin for Asan creates a HistoryThread with the
recorded PC values provided by the Asan runtime. In other cases,
thoses PCs are gathered by LLDB directly.
The PCs returned by the Asan runtime are the PCs of the calls in the
backtrace, not the return addresses you would normally get when
unwinding the stack (look for a call to GetPreviousIntructionPc in
AsanGetStack).
When the above addresses are passed to the unwinder, it will subtract
1 from each address of the non zero frames because it treats them as
return addresses. This can lead to the final report referencing the
wrong line.
This patch fixes this issue by threading a flag through HistoryThread
and HistoryUnwinder that tells them to treat every frame like the
first one. The Asan MemoryHistory plugin can then use this flag.
This fixes running TestMemoryHistory on arm64 devices, although it's
hard to guarantee that the test will continue to exhibit the boundary
condition that triggers this bug.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, kubamracek
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, danielkiss, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76341
LLDB has a few different styles of header guards and they're not very
consistent because things get moved around or copy/pasted. This patch
unifies the header guards across LLDB and converts everything to match
LLVM's style.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74743
Summary:
These fields are unused and have been since their inception, from what
I can tell.
Reviewers: compnerd, JDevlieghere, davide, labath
Subscribers: kubamracek, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63357
llvm-svn: 363881
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
These are general purpose "utility" classes, whose functionality is not
debugger-specific in any way. As such, I believe they belong in the
Utility module.
This doesn't break any particular dependency (yet), but it reduces the
number of Core dependencies across the board.
Reviewers: zturner, jingham, teemperor, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55361
llvm-svn: 349157
This patch removes the comments grouping header includes. They were
added after running IWYU over the LLDB codebase. However they add little
value, are often outdates and burdensome to maintain.
llvm-svn: 346626
This brings the LLDB configuration closer to LLVM's and removes visual
clutter in the source code by removing the @brief commands from
comments.
This patch also reflows the paragraphs in all doxygen comments.
See also https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46321
llvm-svn: 331373
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.
llvm-svn: 269877
libldi library to collect extended backtrace information; switch
to the libBacktraceRecording library and its APIs. Complete the
work of adding QueueItems to Queues and allow for the QueueItems
to be interrogated about their extended backtraces in turn.
There's still cleanup and documentation to do on this code but the
code is functional and I it's a good time to get the work-in-progress
checked in.
<rdar://problem/15314027>
llvm-svn: 200822
(and same thing to Thread base class) which can be used when looking
at an ExtendedBacktrace thread; it will try to find the IndexID() of
the original thread that was executing this backtrace when it was
recorded. If lldb can't find a record of that thread, it will return
the same value as IndexID() for the ExtendedBacktrace thread.
llvm-svn: 194912
do anything right now. Add a few new methods to the Thread base
class which HistoryThread needs. I think I updated all the
CMakeLists files correctly for the new plugin.
llvm-svn: 194756
Still working out some of the details of these classes but
I wanted to get the overall structure checked in.
<rdar://problem/15314068>
llvm-svn: 194245
Fred Riss