Summary:
The memory history plugin for Asan creates a HistoryThread with the
recorded PC values provided by the Asan runtime. In other cases,
thoses PCs are gathered by LLDB directly.
The PCs returned by the Asan runtime are the PCs of the calls in the
backtrace, not the return addresses you would normally get when
unwinding the stack (look for a call to GetPreviousIntructionPc in
AsanGetStack).
When the above addresses are passed to the unwinder, it will subtract
1 from each address of the non zero frames because it treats them as
return addresses. This can lead to the final report referencing the
wrong line.
This patch fixes this issue by threading a flag through HistoryThread
and HistoryUnwinder that tells them to treat every frame like the
first one. The Asan MemoryHistory plugin can then use this flag.
This fixes running TestMemoryHistory on arm64 devices, although it's
hard to guarantee that the test will continue to exhibit the boundary
condition that triggers this bug.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, kubamracek
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, danielkiss, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76341
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
Update StackFrame::GetSymbolContext to mirror the logic in
RegisterContextLLDB::InitializeNonZerothFrame that knows not to do the
pc decrement when the given frame is a signal trap handler frame or the
parent of one, because the pc may not follow a call in these frames.
Accomplish this by adding a behaves_like_zeroth_frame field to
lldb_private::StackFrame, set to true for the zeroth frame, for
signal handler frames, and for parents of signal handler frames.
Also add logic to propagate the signal handler flag from UnwindPlan to
the FrameType on the RegisterContextLLDB it generates, and factor out a
helper to resolve symbol and address range for an Address now that we
need to invoke it in four places.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, clayborg, jfb
Reviewed By: jasonmolenda
Subscribers: labath, dexonsmith, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64993
llvm-svn: 367691
Summary:
These fields are unused and have been since their inception, from what
I can tell.
Reviewers: compnerd, JDevlieghere, davide, labath
Subscribers: kubamracek, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63357
llvm-svn: 363881
Unlike std::make_unique, which is only available since C++14,
std::make_shared is available since C++11. Not only is std::make_shared
a lot more readable compared to ::reset(new), it also performs a single
heap allocation for the object and control block.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57990
llvm-svn: 353764
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.
llvm-svn: 269877
mistake in the lock acquistion in HistoryUnwind and HistoryThread.
We've got a deadlock with one use case of HistoryUnwind; I
need to figure out what lock ordering is causing this and fix
it for real.
<rdar://problem/17411904>
llvm-svn: 211541
to modify the same UnwindTable object simultaneously. Fix
HistoryThread and HistoryUnwind's mutex lock acqusition to
retain the lock for the duration of the operation instead of
releasing the temporary immediately.
<rdar://problem/17055023>
llvm-svn: 211241
hold a strong pointer to that extended backtrace thread in the Process
just like we do for asking a thread's extended backtrace.
Also, give extended backtrace threads an invalid ThreadIndexID number.
We'll still give them valid thread_id's. Clients who want to know the
original thread's IndexID can call GetExtendedBacktraceOriginatingIndexID().
<rdar://problem/16126034>
llvm-svn: 203088
Still working out some of the details of these classes but
I wanted to get the overall structure checked in.
<rdar://problem/15314068>
llvm-svn: 194245
Jonas Devlieghere