The DumpDataExtractor function had two branches for printing floating
point values. One branch (APFloat) was used if we had a Target object
around and could query it for the appropriate semantics. If we didn't
have a Target, we used host operations to read and format the value.
This patch changes second path to use APFloat as well. To make it work,
I pick reasonable defaults for different byte size. Notably, I did not
include x87 long double in that list (as it is ambibuous and
architecture-specific). This exposed a bug where we were printing
register values using the target-less branch, even though the registers
definitely belong to a target, and we had it available. Fixing this
prompted the update of several tests for register values due to slightly
different floating point outputs.
The most dubious aspect of this patch is the change in
TypeSystemClang::GetFloatTypeSemantics to recognize `10` as a valid size
for x87 long double. This was necessary because because sizeof(long
double) on x86_64 is 16 even though it only holds 10 bytes of useful
data. This generalizes the hackaround present in the target-free branch
of the dumping function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129750
It seems std::ostringstream ignores NaN signs on Darwin while it prints them on
Linux. This causes that LLDB behaves differently on those platforms which is
both confusing for users and it also means we have to deal with that in our
tests.
This patch manually implements the NaN/Inf printing (which are apparently
implementation defined) to make LLDB print the same thing on all platforms. The
only output difference in practice seems to be that we now print negative NaNs
as `-nan`, but this potentially also changes the output on other systems I
haven't tested this on.
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102845
The added DumpDataExtractorTest uncovered that this is lshifting a negative
integer which upsets ubsan and breaks the sanitizer bot. This patch just
changes the variable we shift to be unsigned and adds a bunch of tests to make
sure this function does what it promises.
* Using a base address or skipping it with LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS
* Using a data offset, which does not effect the printed addresses
* Not providing an output stream
* Formatting a double sized HexFloat
* Formatting over multiple lines
Since address printing now has its own test,
I've removed the base address from all the format
type tests.
The multi line tests still use a base address to check that
it's incremented correctly for each new line.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101627
Covering basic cases where you have 1 item on 1 line.
Apart from eFormatCharArray, where using multiple lines
highlights the difference between it and eFormatVectorOfChar.
Reviewed By: #lldb, teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101453
Pavel Labath