Debugging some DWARF5 binaries was causing errors to appear when DWARFExpression::Evaluate was called:
error: GetDIE for DIE 0x31 is outside of its CU 0x123450
The issue is in the DWARF expression evaluator. Fixed with this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133623
The class only supports a single DWARF unit (needed for my new test), and it
reimplements chunks of object and symbol file classes. We can just make it use
the real thing, save some LOC and get the full feature set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90393
This patch refactors `emitDebugInfo()` to make the length field be
inferred from its content. Besides, the `Visitor` class is removed in
this patch. The original `Visitor` class helps us determine an
appropriate length and emit the .debug_info section. These two
processes can be merged into one process. Besides, the length field
should be inferred when it's missing rather than when it's zero.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84008
Summary:
This patch removes the bitrotted SymbolFileDWARF(Dwo)Dwp classes, and
replaces them with dwp support implemented directly inside
SymbolFileDWARFDwo, in a manner mirroring the implementation in llvm.
This patch does:
- add support for the .debug_cu_index section to our DWARFContext
- adds a llvm::DWARFUnitIndex argument to the DWARFUnit constructors.
This argument is used to look up the offsets of the debug_info and
debug_abbrev contributions in the sections of the dwp file.
- makes sure the creation of the DebugInfo object as well as the initial
discovery of DWARFUnits is thread-safe, as we can now call this
concurrently when doing parallel indexing.
This patch does not:
- use the DWARFUnitIndex to search for other kinds of contributions
(debug_loc, debug_ranges, etc.). This means that units which reference
these sections will not work correctly. These will be handled by
follow-up patches, but even the present level of support is sufficient
to enable basic functionality.
- Make the llvm::DWARFContext thread-safe. Right now, it just avoids this
problem by ensuring everything is initialized ahead of time. However,
this is something we will run into more often as we try to use more of
llvm, and so I plan to start looking into our options here.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, clayborg
Subscribers: mgorny, mgrang, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73783
Greg Clayton