This patch mechanically replaces None with std::nullopt where the
compiler would warn if None were deprecated. The intent is to reduce
the amount of manual work required in migrating from Optional to
std::optional.
This is part of an effort to migrate from llvm::Optional to
std::optional:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/deprecating-llvm-optional-x-hasvalue-getvalue-getvalueor/63716
AARGetter is an abstraction over a source of the `AAResults` introduced
to support the legacy pass manager as well as the modern one. Since the
Argument Promotion pass doesn't support the legacy pass manager anymore,
the abstraction is not required and `AAResults` may be used directly.
The instance of the `FunctionAnalysisManager` is passed through the
functions to get all the required analyses just wherever they are
required and do not use the awkward getter callbacks.
The `ReplaceCallSite` parameter was required for the legacy pass manager
only and isn't used anymore, so the parameter has been eliminated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128727
The `isDenselyPacked` static member of the `ArgumentPromotionPass` class
is not used in the class itself anymore. The single known user of the
function is in the `AttributorAttributes.cpp` file, so the function has
been moved into the file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128725
It makes sense to handle byval promotion in the same way as non-byval
but also allowing `store` instructions. However, these should
use the same checks as the `load` instructions do, i.e. be part of the
`ArgsToPromote` collection. For these instructions, the check for
interfering modifications can be disabled, though. The promotion
algorithm itself has been modified a lot: all the accesses (i.e. loads
and stores) are rewritten to the emitted `alloca` instructions. To
optimize these new `alloca`s out, the `PromoteMemToReg` function from
`Transforms/Utils/PromoteMemoryToRegister.cpp` file is invoked after
promotion.
In order to let the `PromoteMemToReg` promote as many `alloca`s as it
is possible, there should be no `GEP`s from the `alloca`s. To
eliminate the `GEP`s, its own `alloca` is generated for every argument
part because a single `alloca` for the whole argument (that
significantly simplifies the code of the pass though) unfortunately
cannot be used.
The idea comes from the following discussion:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D124514#3479676
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125485
Support for the legacy pass manager in ArgPromotion causes
complications in D125485. As the legacy pass manager for middle-end
optimizations is unsupported, drop ArgPromotion from the legacy
pipeline, rather than introducing additional complexity to deal
with it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128536
It makes sense to make a non-byval promotion attempt first and then
fall back to the byval one. The non-byval ('usual') promotion is
generally better, for example it does promotion even when a structure
has more elements than 'MaxElements' but not all of them are actually
used in the function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124514
X86 codegen uses function attribute `min-legal-vector-width` to select the proper ABI. The intention of the attribute is to reflect user's requirement when they passing or returning vector arguments. So Clang front-end will iterate the vector arguments and set `min-legal-vector-width` to the width of the maximum for both caller and callee.
It is assumed any middle end optimizations won't care of the attribute expect inlining and argument promotion.
- For inlining, we will propagate the attribute of inlined functions because the inlining functions become the newer caller.
- For argument promotion, we check the `min-legal-vector-width` of the caller and callee and refuse to promote when they don't match.
The problem comes from the optimizations' combination, as shown by https://godbolt.org/z/zo3hba8xW. The caller `foo` has two callees `bar` and `baz`. When doing argument promotion, both `foo` and `bar` has the same `min-legal-vector-width`. So the argument was promoted to vector. Then the inlining inlines `baz` to `foo` and updates `min-legal-vector-width`, which results in ABI mismatch between `foo` and `bar`.
This patch fixes the problem by expanding the concept of `min-legal-vector-width` to indicator of functions arguments. That says, any passes touch functions arguments have to set `min-legal-vector-width` to the value reflects the width of vector arguments. It makes sense to me because any arguments modifications are ABI related and should response for the ABI compatibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123284
The structure ArgPart and alias OffsetAndArgPart have been moved
into the anonymous namespace. NFC.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124617
The condition should be 'ArgParts.size() > MaxElements', so that if we
have exactly 3 elements in the 'ArgParts' vector, the promotion should
be allowed because the 'MaxElement' threshold is not exceeded yet.
The default value for 'MaxElement' has been decreased to 2 in order
to avoid an actual change in argument promoting behavior. However,
this changes byval argument transformation behavior by allowing
adding not more than 2 arguments to the function instead of 3 allowed
before.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124178
Some loop counters ('i', 'e') and variables ('type') were named not
in accordance with the code style and clang-tidy issues warnings
about the using of such variables. This patch renames the variables
and fixes some typos in the comments within the source file.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123662
In addition to the self-recursion check, also check whether there
is more than one node in the SCC, which implies that there is a
larger cycle. I believe checking SCC structure (rather than
something like norecurse) is the right thing to do here, because
this is specifically about preventing infinite loops over the SCC.
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/42028.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119418
This rewrites ArgPromotion to be based on offsets rather than GEP
structure. We inspect all loads at constant offsets and remember
which types are loaded at which offsets. Then we promote based on
those types.
This generalizes ArgPromotion to work with bitcasted loads, and
is compatible with opaque pointers.
This patch also fixes incorrect handling of alignment during
argument promotion. Previously, the implementation only checked
that the pointer is dereferenceable, but was happy to speculate
overaligned loads. (I would have fixed this separately in advance,
but I found this hard to do with the previous implementation
approach).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118685
Before walking all the callers, check whether we have a
dereferenceable attribute directly on the argument.
Also make it clearer that the code currently does not treat
alignment correctly.
Instead use either Type::getPointerElementType() or
Type::getNonOpaquePointerElementType().
This is part of D117885, in preparation for deprecating the API.
The areFunctionArgsABICompatible() hook currently accepts a list of
pointer arguments, though what we're actually interested in is the
ABI compatibility after these pointer arguments have been converted
into value arguments.
This means that a) the current API is incompatible with opaque
pointers (because it requires inspection of pointee types) and
b) it can only be used in the specific context of ArgPromotion.
I would like to reuse the API when inspecting calls during inlining.
This patch converts it into an areTypesABICompatible() hook, which
accepts a list of types. This makes the method more generally usable,
and compatible with opaque pointers from an API perspective (the
actual usage in ArgPromotion/Attributor is still incompatible,
I'll follow up on that in separate patches).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116031
Previously, any change in any function in an SCC would cause all
analyses for all functions in the SCC to be invalidated. With this
change, we now manually invalidate analyses for functions we modify,
then let the pass manager know that all function analyses should be
preserved since we've already handled function analysis invalidation.
So far this only touches the inliner, argpromotion, function-attrs, and
updateCGAndAnalysisManager(), since they are the most used.
This is part of an effort to investigate running the function
simplification pipeline less on functions we visit multiple times in the
inliner pipeline.
However, this causes major memory regressions especially on larger IR.
To counteract this, turn on the option to eagerly invalidate function
analyses. This invalidates analyses on functions immediately after
they're processed in a module or scc to function adaptor for specific
parts of the pipeline.
Within an SCC, if a pass only modifies one function, other functions in
the SCC do not have their analyses invalidated, so in later function
passes in the SCC pass manager the analyses may still be cached. It is
only after the function passes that the eager invalidation takes effect.
For the default pipelines this makes sense because the inliner pipeline
runs the function simplification pipeline after all other SCC passes
(except CoroSplit which doesn't request any analyses).
Overall this has mostly positive effects on compile time and positive effects on memory usage.
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=instructionshttps://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=7f627596977624730f9298a1b69883af1555765e&to=39e824e0d3ca8a517502f13032dfa67304841c90&stat=max-rss
D113196 shows that we slightly regressed compile times in exchange for
some memory improvements when turning on eager invalidation. D100917
shows that we slightly improved compile times in exchange for major
memory regressions in some cases when invalidating less in SCC passes.
Turning these on at the same time keeps the memory improvements while
keeping compile times neutral/slightly positive.
Reviewed By: asbirlea, nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113304
We already make sure to properly clear analyses for deleted functions.
This makes investigating some future potential compile time improvements easier.
Reviewed By: asbirlea
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113032
getMetadata() currently uses a weird API where it populates a
structure passed to it, and optionally merges into it. Instead,
we can return the AAMDNodes and provide a separate merge() API.
This makes usages more compact.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109852
Make sure the alignment of the generated operations matches the
alignment of the byval argument. Previously, we were just ignoring
alignment and getting lucky.
While I'm here, also delete the unnecessary "tail" handling.
Passing a pointer to a byval argument to a "tail" call is UB, so
rewriting to an alloca doesn't require any special handling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89819
Not doing it here can lead to subtle bugs - the analysis results are
associated by the Function object's address. Nothing stops the memory
allocator from allocating new functions at the same address.
Currently make_early_inc_range cannot be used with iterators with
operator* implementations that do not return a reference.
Most notably in the LLVM codebase, this means the User iterator ranges
cannot be used with make_early_inc_range, which slightly simplifies
iterating over ranges while elements are removed.
Instead of directly using BaseT::reference as return type of operator*,
this patch uses decltype to get the actual return type of the operator*
implementation in WrappedIteratorT.
This patch also updates a few places to use make use of
make_early_inc_range.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93992
Currently ArgPromotion removes dead GEPs as part of the legality check
in isSafeToPromoteArgument. If no promotion happens, this means the pass
claims no modifications happened, even though GEPs were removed.
This patch fixes the issue by delaying removal of dead GEPs until
doPromotion: isSafeToPromoteArgument can simply skips dead GEPs and
the code in doPromotion dealing with GEPs is updated to account for
dead GEPs. Once we committed to promotion, it should be safe to
remove dead GEPs.
Alternatively isSafeToPromoteArgument could return an additional boolean
to indicate whether it made changes, but this is quite cumbersome and
there should be no real benefit of weeding out some dead GEPs here if we
do not perform promotion.
I added a test for the case where dead GEPs need to be removed when
promotion happens in 578c5a0c6e.
Fixes PR47477.
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93991
The argument promotion pass currently fails to copy function annotations
over to the modified function after promoting arguments.
This patch copies the original function annotation to the new function.
Reviewed By: fhann
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86630
Currently, ArgPromotion may leave metadata uses of promoted values,
which will end up in the wrong function, creating invalid IR.
PR33641 fixed this for dead arguments, but it can be also be triggered
arguments with users that are promoted (see the updated test case).
We also have to drop uses to them after promoting them. We need to do
this after dealing with the non-metadata uses, so I also moved the empty
use case to the loop that deals with updating the arguments of the new
function.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85127
Remove the function Instruction::setProfWeight() and make
use of Instruction::copyMetadata(.., {LLVMContext::MD_prof}).
This is correct for all use cases of setProfWeight() as it
is applied to CallBase instructions only.
This change results in prof metadata copied intact even if
the source has "VP". The old pair of calls
extractProfTotalWeight() + setProfWeight() resulted in
setting branch_weights if the source had "VP" data.
Reviewers: yamauchi, davidxl
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80987
Along the lines of D77454 and D79968. Unlike loads and stores, the
default alignment is getPrefTypeAlign, to match the existing handling in
various places, including SelectionDAG and InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80044
Kazu Hirata