Move it out from under the constant check, reorder
predicates, add comments. This makes it easier to
extend to handle the non-constant case.
llvm-svn: 348284
There's a potential small enhancement to this code that could
solve the cases currently under proposal in D54827 via SimplifyCFG.
Whether instcombine should be doing this kind of semi-non-local
analysis in the first place is an open question, but separating
the logic out can only help if/when we decide to move it to a
different pass.
AFAICT, any proposal to do this in SimplifyCFG could also be seen
as an overreach + it would be incomplete to start the fold from a
branch rather than an icmp.
There's another question here about the code for processUGT_ADDCST_ADD().
That part may be completely dead after rL234638 ?
llvm-svn: 348273
By morphing the instruction rather than deleting and creating a new one,
we retain fast-math-flags and potentially other metadata (profile info?).
llvm-svn: 346331
The sibling fold for 'oge' --> 'ord' was already here,
but this half was missing.
The result of fabs() must be positive or nan, so asking
if the result is negative or nan is the same as asking
if the result is nan.
This is another step towards fixing:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
llvm-svn: 346321
As shown, this is used to eliminate redundant code in InstCombine,
and there are more cases where we should be using this pattern, but
we're currently unintentionally dropping flags.
llvm-svn: 346282
This is another part of solving PR39475:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
This might be enough to fix that particular issue, but as noted
with the FIXME, we're still dropping FMF on other folds around here.
llvm-svn: 346234
As stated in IEEE-754 and discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38086
...the sign of zero does not affect any FP compare predicate.
Known regressions were fixed with:
rL346097 (D54001)
rL346143
The transform will help reduce pattern-matching complexity to solve:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39475
...as well as improve CSE and codegen (a zero constant is almost always
easier to produce than 0x80..00).
llvm-svn: 346147
The 'OLT' case was updated at rL266175, so I assume it was just an
oversight that 'UGE' was not included because that patch handled
both predicates in InstSimplify.
llvm-svn: 345727
Summary:
This is a continuation of the fix for PR34627 "InstCombine assertion at vector gep/icmp folding". (I just realized bugpoint had fuzzed the original test for me, so I had fixed another trigger of the same assert in adjacent code in InstCombine.)
This patch avoids optimizing an icmp (to look only at the base pointers) when the resulting icmp would have a different type.
The patch adds a testcase and also cleans up and shrinks the pre-existing test for the adjacent assert trigger.
Reviewers: lebedev.ri, majnemer, spatel
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52494
llvm-svn: 343486
When C is not zero and infinites are not allowed (C / X) > 0 is a sign
test. Depending on the sign of C, the predicate must be swapped.
E.g.:
foo(double X) {
if ((-2.0 / X) <= 0) ...
}
=>
foo(double X) {
if (X >= 0) ...
}
Patch by: @marels (Martin Elshuber)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51942
llvm-svn: 343228
Summary:
Same as to D52146.
`((1 << y)+(-1))` is simply non-canoniacal version of `~(-1 << y)`: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/0vl
We can not canonicalize it due to the extra uses. But we can handle it here.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52147
llvm-svn: 342547
Summary:
Two folds are happening here:
1. https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oaFX
2. And then `foldICmpWithHighBitMask()` (D52001): https://rise4fun.com/Alive/wsP4
This change doesn't just add the handling for eq/ne predicates,
it actually builds upon the previous `foldICmpWithLowBitMaskedVal()` work,
so **all** the 16 fold variants* are immediately supported.
I'm indeed only testing these two predicates.
I do not feel like re-proving all 16 folds*, because they were already proven
for the general case of constant with all-ones in low bits. So as long as
the mask produces all-ones in low bits, i'm pretty sure the fold is valid.
But required, i can re-prove, let me know.
* eq/ne are commutative - 4 folds; ult/ule/ugt/uge - are not commutative (the commuted variant is InstSimplified), 4 folds; slt/sle/sgt/sge are not commutative - 4 folds. 12 folds in total.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38123https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38708
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52146
llvm-svn: 342546
Summary:
It is sometimes important to check that some newly-computed value
is non-negative and only n bits wide (where n is a variable.)
There are many ways to check that:
https://godbolt.org/z/o4RB8D
The last variant seems best?
(I'm sure there are some other variations i haven't thought of..)
More complicated, canonical pattern:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/uhA
We do need to have two `switch()`'es like this,
to not mismatch the swappable predicates.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38708
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52001
llvm-svn: 342173
Summary:
It is sometimes important to check that some newly-computed value
is non-negative and only `n` bits wide (where `n` is a variable.)
There are **many** ways to check that:
https://godbolt.org/z/o4RB8D
The last variant seems best?
(I'm sure there are some other variations i haven't thought of..)
Let's handle the second variant first, since it is much simpler.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/LYjYhttps://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38708
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper, RKSimon
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51985
llvm-svn: 342067
Name: op_ugt_sum
%a = add i8 %x, %y
%r = icmp ugt i8 %x, %a
=>
%notx = xor i8 %x, -1
%r = icmp ugt i8 %y, %notx
Name: sum_ult_op
%a = add i8 %x, %y
%r = icmp ult i8 %a, %x
=>
%notx = xor i8 %x, -1
%r = icmp ugt i8 %y, %notx
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/ZRxI
AFAICT, this doesn't interfere with any add-saturation patterns
because those have >1 use for the 'add'. But this should be
better for IR analysis and codegen in the basic cases.
This is another fold inspired by PR14613:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14613
llvm-svn: 342004
These are the folds in Alive;
Name: xor_ult
Pre: isPowerOf2(-C1)
%xor = xor i8 %x, C1
%r = icmp ult i8 %xor, C1
=>
%r = icmp ugt i8 %x, ~C1
Name: xor_ugt
Pre: isPowerOf2(C1+1)
%xor = xor i8 %x, C1
%r = icmp ugt i8 %xor, C1
=>
%r = icmp ugt i8 %x, C1
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Vty
The ugt case in its simplest form was already handled by DemandedBits,
but that's not ideal as shown in the multi-use test.
I'm not sure if these are all of the symmetrical folds, but I adjusted
the existing code for one of the folds to try to show the similarities.
There's no obvious connection, but this is another preliminary step
for PR14613...
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14613
llvm-svn: 341997
There were two combines not covered by the check before now, neither of which
actually differed from normal in the benefit analysis.
The most recent seems to be because it was just added at the top of the
function (naturally). The older is from way back in 2008 (r46687) when we just
didn't put those checks in so routinely, and has been diligently maintained
since.
llvm-svn: 341831
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38149 | PR38149 ]]
As discussed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1158957 and later,
the IR for 'check for [no] signed truncation' pattern can be improved:
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/gBf
^ that pattern will be produced by Implicit Integer Truncation sanitizer,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
in signed case, therefore it is probably a good idea to improve it.
Proofs for this transform: https://rise4fun.com/Alive/mgu
This transform is surprisingly frustrating.
This does not deal with non-splat shift amounts, or with undef shift amounts.
I've outlined what i think the solution should be:
```
// Potential handling of non-splats: for each element:
// * if both are undef, replace with constant 0.
// Because (1<<0) is OK and is 1, and ((1<<0)>>1) is also OK and is 0.
// * if both are not undef, and are different, bailout.
// * else, only one is undef, then pick the non-undef one.
```
The DAGCombine will reverse this transform, see
https://reviews.llvm.org/D49266
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, rkruppe, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49320
llvm-svn: 337190
All predicates are handled.
There does not seem to be any other possible folds here.
There are some more folds possible with inverted mask though.
llvm-svn: 337112
Summary:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38123
This pattern will be produced by Implicit Integer Truncation sanitizer,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D48958https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21530
in unsigned case, therefore it is probably a good idea to improve it.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/Rny
^ there are more opportunities for folds, i will follow up with them afterwards.
Caveat: this somehow exposes a missing opportunities
in `test/Transforms/InstCombine/icmp-logical.ll`
It seems, the problem is in `foldLogOpOfMaskedICmps()` in `InstCombineAndOrXor.cpp`.
But i'm not quite sure what is wrong, because it calls `getMaskedTypeForICmpPair()`,
which calls `decomposeBitTestICmp()` which should already work for these cases...
As @spatel notes in https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179#1158760,
that code is a rather complex mess, so we'll let it slide.
Reviewers: spatel, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: yamauchi, majnemer, t.p.northover, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49179
llvm-svn: 336834
This patch changes order of transform in InstCombineCompares to avoid
performing transforms based on ranges which produce complex bit arithmetics
before more simple things (like folding with constants) are done. See PR37636
for the motivating example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48584
Reviewed By: spatel, lebedev.ri
llvm-svn: 336172
Summary:
When iterating users of a multiply in processUMulZExtIdiom, the
call to setOperand in the truncation case may replace the use
being visited; make sure the iterator has been advanced before
doing that replacement.
Reviewers: majnemer, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48192
llvm-svn: 334844
Inspired by r331508, I did a grep and found these.
Mostly just change from dyn_cast to cast. Some cases also showed a dyn_cast result being converted to bool, so those I changed to isa.
llvm-svn: 331577
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
Summary:
Folding patterns like:
%vec = shufflevector <4 x i8> %insvec, <4 x i8> undef, <4 x i32> zeroinitializer
%cast = bitcast <4 x i8> %vec to i32
%cond = icmp eq i32 %cast, 0
into:
%ext = extractelement <4 x i8> %insvec, i32 0
%cond = icmp eq i32 %ext, 0
Combined with existing rules, this allows us to fold patterns like:
%insvec = insertelement <4 x i8> undef, i8 %val, i32 0
%vec = shufflevector <4 x i8> %insvec, <4 x i8> undef, <4 x i32> zeroinitializer
%cast = bitcast <4 x i8> %vec to i32
%cond = icmp eq i32 %cast, 0
into:
%cond = icmp eq i8 %val, 0
When we construct a splat vector via a shuffle, and bitcast the vector into an integer type for comparison against an integer constant. Then we can simplify the the comparison to compare the splatted value against the integer constant.
Reviewers: spatel, anna, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: efriedma, rengolin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44997
llvm-svn: 329087
Summary:
Presently, InstCombiner::foldICmpWithCastAndCast() implicitly assumes that it is
only invoked with icmp instructions of integer type. If that assumption is broken,
and it is called with an icmp of vector type, then it fails (asserts/crashes).
This patch addresses the deficiency. It allows it to simplify
icmp (ptrtoint x), (ptrtoint/c) of vector type into a compare of the inputs,
much as is done when the type is integer.
Reviewers: apilipenko, fedor.sergeev, mkazantsev, anna
Reviewed By: anna
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44063
llvm-svn: 326730
Making a width of GEP Index, which is used for address calculation, to be one of the pointer properties in the Data Layout.
p[address space]:size:memory_size:alignment:pref_alignment:index_size_in_bits.
The index size parameter is optional, if not specified, it is equal to the pointer size.
Till now, the InstCombiner normalized GEPs and extended the Index operand to the pointer width.
It works fine if you can convert pointer to integer for address calculation and all registered targets do this.
But some ISAs have very restricted instruction set for the pointer calculation. During discussions were desided to retrieve information for GEP index from the Data Layout.
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2018-January/120416.html
I added an interface to the Data Layout and I changed the InstCombiner and some other passes to take the Index width into account.
This change does not affect any in-tree target. I added tests to cover data layouts with explicitly specified index size.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42123
llvm-svn: 325102
Because of potential UB (known bits conflicts with an llvm.assume),
we have to check rather than assert here because InstSimplify doesn't
kill the compare:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35846
llvm-svn: 322104
Summary:
This patch adds an early out to visitICmpInst if we are looking at a compare as part of an integer absolute value idiom. Similar is already done for min/max.
In the particular case I observed in a benchmark we had an absolute value of a load from an indexed global. We simplified the compare using foldCmpLoadFromIndexedGlobal into a magic bit vector, a shift, and an and. But the load result was still used for the select and the negate part of the absolute valute idiom. So we overcomplicated the code and lost the ability to recognize it as an absolute value.
I've chosen a simpler case for the test here.
Reviewers: spatel, davide, majnemer
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39766
llvm-svn: 317994
Summary:
The following transformation for cmp instruction:
icmp smin(x, PositiveValue), 0 -> icmp x, 0
should only be done after checking for min/max to prevent infinite
looping caused by a reverse canonicalization. That is why this
transformation was moved to place after the mentioned check.
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38934
Patch by: Artur Gainullin <artur.gainullin@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 315895
We can support ashr similar to lshr, if we know that none of the shifted in bits are used. In that case SimplifyDemandedBits would normally convert it to lshr. But that conversion doesn't happen if the shift has additional users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38521
llvm-svn: 314945
Apparently this works by virtue of the fact that the pointers are pointers to the APInts stored inside of the ConstantInt objects. But I really don't think we should be relying on that.
llvm-svn: 314761
Summary: This currently uses ConstantExpr to do its math, but as noted in a TODO it can all be done directly on APInt.
Reviewers: spatel, majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38440
llvm-svn: 314640
This reverts r314017 and similar code added in later commits. It seems to not work for pointer compares and is causing a bot failure for the last several days.
llvm-svn: 314360
If this transformation succeeds, we're going to remove our dependency on the shift by rewriting the and. So it doesn't matter how many uses the shift has.
This distributes the one use check to other transforms in foldICmpAndConstConst that do need it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38206
llvm-svn: 314233
All this optimization cares about is knowing how many low bits of LHS is known to be zero and whether that means that the result is 0 or greater than the RHS constant. It doesn't matter where the zeros in the low bits came from. So we don't need to specifically look for an AND. Instead we can use known bits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38195
llvm-svn: 314153
The result of the isSignBitCheck isn't used anywhere else and this allows us to share the m_APInt call in the likely case that it isn't a sign bit check.
llvm-svn: 314018
We already did (X & C2) > C1 --> (X & C2) != 0, if any bit set in (X & C2) will produce a result greater than C1. But there is an equivalent inverse condition with <= C1 (which will be canonicalized to < C1+1)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38065
llvm-svn: 313819
This is a preliminary step towards solving the remaining part of PR27145 - IR for isfinite():
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27145
In order to solve that one more generally, we need to add matching for and/or of fcmp ord/uno
with a constant operand.
But while looking at those patterns, I realized we were missing a canonicalization for nonzero
constants. Rather than limiting to just folds for constants, we're adding a general value
tracking method for this based on an existing DAG helper.
By transforming everything to 0.0, we can simplify the existing code in foldLogicOfFCmps()
and pick up missing vector folds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37427
llvm-svn: 312591
Previously the InstCombiner class contained a pointer to an IR builder that had been passed to the constructor. Sometimes this would be passed to helper functions as either a pointer or the pointer would be dereferenced to be passed by reference.
This patch makes it a reference everywhere including the InstCombiner class itself so there is more inconsistency. This a large, but mechanical patch. I've done very minimal formatting changes on it despite what clang-format wanted to do.
llvm-svn: 307451
We assumed the constant was a scalar when creating the replacement operand.
Also, improve tests for this fold and move the tests for this fold to their own file.
I'll move the related and missing tests to this file as a follow-up.
llvm-svn: 306985
I noticed this missed bswap optimization in the CGP memcmp() expansion,
and then I saw that we don't have the fold in InstCombine.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34763
llvm-svn: 306980
Summary:
Many languages have a three way comparison idiom where comparing two values
produces not a boolean, but a tri-state value. Typical values (e.g. as used in
the lcmp/fcmp bytecodes from Java) are -1 for less than, 0 for equality, and +1
for greater than.
We actually do a great job already of converting three way comparisons into
binary comparisons when the result produced has one a single use. Unfortunately,
such values can have more than one use, and in that case, our existing
optimizations break down.
The patch adds a peephole which converts a three-way compare + test idiom into a
binary comparison on the original inputs. It focused on replacing the test on
the result of the three way compare and does nothing about removing the three
way compare itself. That's left to other optimizations (which do actually kick
in commonly.)
We currently recognize one idiom on signed integer compare. In the future, we
plan to recognize and simplify other comparison idioms on
other signed/unsigned datatypes such as floats, vectors etc.
This is a resurrection of Philip Reames' original patch:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D19452
Reviewers: majnemer, apilipenko, reames, sanjoy, mkazantsev
Reviewed by: mkazantsev
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34278
llvm-svn: 306100
I believe this code used to use APInt references which would have worked. But then they were changed to pointers to allow m_APInt to be used.
llvm-svn: 304875
Every other place in InstCombine that uses these methods in ValueTracking already pass this information. This makes the remaining sites consistent.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33567
llvm-svn: 304018
We have wrappers for several other ValueTracking methods that take care of passing all of the analysis and assumption cache parameters. This extends it to isKnownToBeAPowerOfTwo.
llvm-svn: 303924
There's probably a lot more like this (see also comments in D33338 about responsibility),
but I suspect we don't usually get a visible manifestation.
Given the recent interest in improving InstCombine efficiency, another potential micro-opt
that could be repeated several times in this function: morph the existing icmp pred/operands
instead of creating a new instruction.
llvm-svn: 303860
The swapped operands in the first test is a manifestation of an
inefficiency for vectors that doesn't exist for scalars because
the IRBuilder checks for an all-ones mask for scalars, but not
vectors.
llvm-svn: 303818
This continues the changes started when computeSignBit was replaced with this new version of computeKnowBits.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33431
llvm-svn: 303773
Summary:
Fix naming conventions and const correctness.
This completes the changes made in rL303029.
Patch by Yoav Ben-Shalom.
Reviewers: craig.topper
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33377
llvm-svn: 303529
The missing optimization for xor-of-icmps still needs to be added, but by
being more efficient (not generating unnecessary logic ops with constants)
we avoid the bug.
See discussion in post-commit comments:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D32143
llvm-svn: 303312
As noted in the post-commit comments in D32143, we should be
catching the constant operand cases sooner to be more efficient
and less likely to expose a missing fold.
llvm-svn: 303309
This adds routines for reseting KnownBits to unknown, making the value all zeros or all ones. It also adds methods for querying if the value is zero, all ones or unknown.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32637
llvm-svn: 302262
This patch introduces a new KnownBits struct that wraps the two APInt used by computeKnownBits. This allows us to treat them as more of a unit.
Initially I've just altered the signatures of computeKnownBits and InstCombine's simplifyDemandedBits to pass a KnownBits reference instead of two separate APInt references. I'll do similar to the SelectionDAG version of computeKnownBits/simplifyDemandedBits as a separate patch.
I've added a constructor that allows initializing both APInts to the same bit width with a starting value of 0. This reduces the repeated pattern of initializing both APInts. Once place default constructed the APInts so I added a default constructor for those cases.
Going forward I would like to add more methods that will work on the pairs. For example trunc, zext, and sext occur on both APInts together in several places. We should probably add a clear method that can be used to clear both pieces. Maybe a method to check for conflicting information. A method to return (Zero|One) so we don't write it out everywhere. Maybe a method for (Zero|One).isAllOnesValue() to determine if all bits are known. I'm sure there are many other methods we can come up with.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32376
llvm-svn: 301432
getSignBit is a static function that creates an APInt with only the sign bit set. getSignMask seems like a better name to convey its functionality. In fact several places use it and then store in an APInt named SignMask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32108
llvm-svn: 300856
We currently only support folding a subtract into a select but not a PHI. This fixes that.
I had to fix an assumption in FoldOpIntoPhi that assumed the PHI node was always in operand 0. Now we pass it in like we do for FoldOpIntoSelect. But we still require some dancing to find the Constant when we create the BinOp or ConstantExpr. This is based code is similar to what we do for selects.
Since I touched all call sites, this also renames FoldOpIntoPhi to foldOpIntoPhi to match coding standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31686
llvm-svn: 300363
Switch from Euclid's algorithm to Stein's algorithm for computing GCD. This
avoids the (expensive) APInt division operation in favour of bit operations.
Remove all memory allocation from within the GCD loop by tweaking our `lshr`
implementation so it can operate in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31968
llvm-svn: 300252
The first thing it did was get the User for the Use to get the instruction back. This requires looking through the Uses for the User using the waymarking walk. That's pretty fast, but its probably still better to just pass the Instruction we already had.
llvm-svn: 298772
Summary:
When InstCombine is optimizing certain select-cmp-br patterns
it replaces the result of the select in uses outside of the
basic block containing the select. This is only legal if the
path from the select to the outside use is disjoint from all
other paths out from the originating basic block.
The problem found was that InstCombiner::replacedSelectWithOperand
did not consider the case when both edges out from the br pointed
to the same label. In that case the paths aren't disjoint and the
transformation is illegal. This patch avoids the faulty rewrites
by verifying that there is a single flow to the successor where
we want to replace uses.
Reviewers: llvm-commits, spatel, majnemer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30455
llvm-svn: 296752
transformToIndexedCompare
If they don't have the same type, the size of the constant
index would need to be adjusted (and this wouldn't be always
possible).
Alternatively we could try the analysis with the initial
RHS value, which would guarantee that the two sides have
the same type. However it is unlikely that in practice this
would pass our transformation requirements.
Fixes PR31808 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31808).
llvm-svn: 293629
This is a minimal patch to avoid the infinite loop in:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=31751
But the general problem is bigger: we're not canonicalizing all of the min/max forms reported
by value tracking's matchSelectPattern(), and we don't define min/max consistently. Some code
uses matchSelectPattern(), other code uses matchers like m_Umax, and others have their own
inline definitions which may be subtly different from any of the above.
The reason that the test cases in this patch need a cast op to trigger is because we don't
(yet) canonicalize all min/max forms based on matchSelectPattern() in
canonicalizeMinMaxWithConstant(), but we do make min/max+cast transforms based on
matchSelectPattern() in visitSelectInst().
The location of the icmp transforms that trigger the inf-loop seems arbitrary at best, so
I'm moving those behind the min/max fence in visitICmpInst() as the quick fix.
llvm-svn: 293345
Allows LLVM to optimize sequences like the following:
%add = add nuw i32 %x, 1
%cmp = icmp ugt i32 %add, %y
Into:
%cmp = icmp uge i32 %x, %y
Previously, only signed comparisons were being handled.
Decrements could also be handled, but 'sub nuw %x, 1' is currently canonicalized to
'add %x, -1' in InstCombineAddSub, losing the nuw flag. Removing that canonicalization
seems like it might have far-reaching ramifications so I kept this simple for now.
Patch by Matti Niemenmaa!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24700
llvm-svn: 291975
Min/max canonicalization (r287585) exposes the fact that we're missing combines for min/max patterns.
This patch won't solve the example that was attached to that thread, so something else still needs fixing.
The line between InstCombine and InstSimplify gets blurry here because sometimes the icmp instruction that
we want to fold to already exists, but sometimes it's the swapped form of what we want.
Corresponding changes for smax/umin/umax to follow.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27531
llvm-svn: 289855
After r289755, the AssumptionCache is no longer needed. Variables affected by
assumptions are now found by using the new operand-bundle-based scheme. This
new scheme is more computationally efficient, and also we need much less
code...
llvm-svn: 289756
At least the plugin used by the LibreOffice build
(<https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Clang_plugins>) indirectly
uses those members (through inline functions in LLVM/Clang include files in turn
using them), but they are not exported by utils/extract_symbols.py on Windows,
and accessing data across DLL/EXE boundaries on Windows is generally
problematic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26671
llvm-svn: 289647
Instead, expose whether the current type is an array or a struct, if an array
what the upper bound is, and if a struct the struct type itself. This is
in preparation for a later change which will make PointerType derive from
Type rather than SequentialType.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26594
llvm-svn: 288458
These 2 helper functions were already using APInt internally, so just
change the API and caller to allow folds for splats. The scalar
regression tests look quite thorough, so I just added a couple of
tests to prove that vectors are handled too.
These folds should be grouped with the other cmp+shift folds though.
That can be an NFC follow-up.
llvm-svn: 281663
This pattern is matched in foldICmpBinOpEqualityWithConstant() and already works
with vectors too. I changed some comments over there to point out the current
location. The tests for this transform are currently in 'sub.ll'.
Note that the remaining folds in this block all require a sub too, so they should
get grouped with the other icmp(sub) patterns.
llvm-svn: 281627
This is a big glob of transforms that probably should work for vectors,
but currently they are disallowed because of ConstantInt guards.
llvm-svn: 281614
Everything under foldICmpInstWithConstant() should now be working for
splat vectors via m_APInt matchers. Ie, I've removed all of the FIXMEs
that I added while cleaning that section up. Note that not all of the
associated FIXMEs in the regression tests are gone though, because some
of the tests require earlier folds that are still scalar-only.
llvm-svn: 281139
I introduced this potential bug by missing this diff in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL280873
...however, I'm not sure how to reach this code path with a regression test.
We may be able to remove this code and assume that the transform to a constant
is always handled by InstSimplify?
llvm-svn: 280964
This is a revert of r280676 which was a revert of r280637;
ie, this is r280637 again. It was speculatively reverted to
help debug buildbot failures.
llvm-svn: 280861
The transform in question:
icmp (and (trunc W), C2), C1 -> icmp (and W, C2'), C1'
...is still not enabled for vectors, thus no functional change intended.
It's not clear to me if this is a good transform for vectors or even
scalars in general. Changing that behavior may be a follow-on patch.
llvm-svn: 280627
While removing a scalar shackle from an icmp fold, I noticed that I couldn't find any tests to trigger
this code path.
The 'and' shrinking transform should be handled by InstCombiner::foldCastedBitwiseLogic()
or eliminated with InstSimplify. The icmp narrowing is part of InstCombiner::foldICmpWithCastAndCast().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24031
llvm-svn: 280370
This is prep work before changing the callers to also use APInt which will
allow folds for splat vectors. Currently, the callers have ConstantInt
guards in place, so no functional change intended with this commit.
llvm-svn: 280282
Like other recent changes near here, the goal is to allow vector types for
all of these folds. Splitting things up makes it easier to incrementally
enhance the code and easier to read.
llvm-svn: 279851
Removing the redundant 'CmpRHSV' local variable exposes a bug in the caller
foldICmpShrConstant() - it was sending in the div constant instead of the
cmp constant. But I have not been able to expose this in a regression test
yet - the affected folds all appear to be handled before we ever reach this
code. I'll keep trying to find a case as I make changes to allow vector folds
in both functions.
llvm-svn: 279828
There was no logic in foldICmpDivConstant, so no need for a separate function.
The code is directly copy/pasted, so further cleanups to follow.
llvm-svn: 279685
I deleted a fold from InstCombine at:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL279568
because it (like any InstCombine to a constant?) should always happen in InstSimplify,
however, it's not obvious what the assumptions are in the remaining code.
Add a comment and assert to make it clearer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23819
llvm-svn: 279626
There will only be 3 lines of code in foldICmpShrConst() when the cleanup is done,
so it doesn't make much sense to have a separate function for a single fold.
llvm-svn: 279575
AFAICT, these already worked in all cases for scalar types, and I enhanced
the code to work for vector types in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL279543
llvm-svn: 279568
The callers still have ConstantInt guards, so there is no functional change
intended from this change. But relaxing the callers will allow more folds
for vector types.
llvm-svn: 279396
This is a partial enablement (move the ConstantInt guard down) because there are many
different folds here and one of the later ones will require reworking 'isSignBitCheck'.
llvm-svn: 279339
Specifically, this is done near the end of "SimplifyICmpInst" using
computeKnownBits() as the broader solution. There are even vector
tests (yay!) for this in test/Transforms/InstSimplify/compare.ll.
I considered putting an assert here instead of just deleting, but
then we could assert every possible fold in InstSimplify in
InstCombine, so...less is more?
llvm-svn: 279300
The intended transform is:
// Simplify icmp eq (or (ptrtoint P), (ptrtoint Q)), 0
// -> and (icmp eq P, null), (icmp eq Q, null).
P and Q are both pointer types, but may have different types. We need
two calls to getNullValue() to make the icmps.
llvm-svn: 279271
Of course, we really need to refactor and fix all of the cmp predicates,
but this one is interesting because without it, we later perform an
information-losing transform of icmp (shl 1, Y), C, and we can't recover
the better fold.
llvm-svn: 279263
Clean up the existing code by:
1. Renaming variables
2. Adding local variables
3. Making it vector-safe
This is still guarded by a ConstantInt check, so no functional change is intended.
But this should be ready to go: if we move the ConstantInt check down, all of
these folds should do the right thing for vector types.
llvm-svn: 279150
Use m_APInt for the xor constant, but this is all still guarded by the initial
ConstantInt check, so no vector types should make it in here.
llvm-svn: 278957
1. Change variable names
2. Use local variables to reduce code
3. Use ? instead of if/else
4. Use the APInt variable instead of 'RHS' so the removal of the FIXME code will be direct
llvm-svn: 278944
This is a mechanical change of comments in switches like fallthrough,
fall-through, or fall-thru to use the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro instead.
llvm-svn: 278902
1. Fix variable names
2. Add local variables to reduce code
3. Fix code comments
4. Add early exit to reduce indentation
5. Remove 'else' after if -> return
6. Hoist common predicate
llvm-svn: 278864
Besides breaking up a 700 line function to improve readability,
this sinks the 'FIXME: ConstantInt' check into each helper. So
now we can independently break that restriction within any of the
helper functions.
As much as possible, the code was only {cut/paste/clang-format}'ed
to minimize risk (no functional changes intended), so several more
readability improvements are still possible.
llvm-svn: 278828
There's some formatting and pointer deref ugliness here that I intend to fix in
subsequent patches. The overall goal is to refactor the obnoxiously long switch
and incrementally remove the restriction to scalar types (allow folds for vector
splats). This patch introduces the use of m_APInt which means the RHSV reference
is now a pointer (and may have matched a vector splat), but the check of 'RHS'
remains, so vector folds are disallowed and no functional change is intended.
llvm-svn: 278816
This is part of an effort to constify ValueTracking.cpp. This change is
to methods which need const Value* instead of Value* to go with the upcoming
changes to ValueTracking.
llvm-svn: 278528
I'm removing a misplaced pair of more specific folds from InstCombine in this patch as well,
so we know where those folds are happening in InstSimplify.
llvm-svn: 277738
This removes the restriction for the icmp constant, but as noted by the FIXME comments,
we still need to change individual checks for binop operand constants.
llvm-svn: 277629
Making smaller pieces out of some of these ~1000 line functions should make
it easier to incrementally upgrade them to handle vector types.
llvm-svn: 276304
As suggested by clang-tidy's performance-unnecessary-copy-initialization.
This can easily hit lifetime issues, so I audited every change and ran the
tests under asan, which came back clean.
llvm-svn: 272126
In r271810 ( http://reviews.llvm.org/rL271810 ), I loosened the check
above this to work for any Constant rather than ConstantInt. AFAICT,
that part makes sense if we can determine that the shrunken/extended
constant remained equal. But it doesn't make sense for this later
transform where we assume that the constant DID change.
This could assert for a ConstantExpr:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=28011
And it could be wrong for a vector as shown in the added regression test.
llvm-svn: 271908
Change the name of the ICmpInst to 'ICmp' and the Constant (was a ConstantInt) to 'C',
so that it's hopefully clearer that 'CI' refers to CastInst in this context.
While we're scrubbing, fix the documentation comment and use 'auto' with 'dyn_cast'.
llvm-svn: 271817
This bug was introduced in r269728 and is the likely cause of many stage 2 ubsan bot failures.
I'll add a test in a follow-up commit assuming this fixes things properly.
llvm-svn: 269797
Fix a bug introduced with rL269426 :
[InstCombine] canonicalize* LE/GE vector integer comparisons to LT/GT (PR26701, PR26819)
We were assuming that a ConstantDataVector / ConstantVector / ConstantAggregateZero operand of
an ICMP was composed of ConstantInt elements, but it might have ConstantExpr or UndefValue
elements. Handle those appropriately.
Also, refactor this function to join the scalar and vector paths and eliminate the switches.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20289
llvm-svn: 269728
*We don't currently handle the edge case constants (min/max values), so it's not a complete
canonicalization.
To fully solve the motivating bugs, we need to enhance this to recognize a zero vector
too because that's a ConstantAggregateZero which is a ConstantData, not a ConstantVector
or a ConstantDataVector.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17859
llvm-svn: 269426
This reapplies commit r268521, that was reverted in r268530 due to a test failure in select-implied.ll
Modified the test case to reflect the new change.
llvm-svn: 268557
The functionality contained within getIntrinsicIDForCall is two-fold: it
checks if a CallInst's callee is a vectorizable intrinsic. If it isn't
an intrinsic, it attempts to map the call's target to a suitable
intrinsic.
Move the mapping functionality into getIntrinsicForCallSite and rename
getIntrinsicIDForCall to getVectorIntrinsicIDForCall while
reimplementing it in terms of getIntrinsicForCallSite.
llvm-svn: 266801
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
InstCombine wants to optimize compares of calls to fabs with zero.
However, we didn't have the necessary legality checking to verify that
the function call had the same behavior as fabs.
llvm-svn: 266452
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27105
We can check if all bits outside of a constant mask are set with a
single constant.
As noted in the bug report, although this form should be considered the
canonical IR, backends may want to transform this into an 'andn' / 'andc'
comparison against zero because that could be a single machine instruction.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18842
llvm-svn: 266362
Remove an ad-hoc transform in InstCombine and replace it with more
general machinery (ValueTracking, InstructionSimplify and VectorUtils).
This fixes PR27332.
llvm-svn: 266175
When checking whether an smin is positive, we can move the comparison to one of the inputs if the other is known positive. If the known positive one is the min, then the other can't be negative. If the other is the min, then we compute the min.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17873
llvm-svn: 263059
For some cases, InstCombine replaces the sequence of xor/sub instruction
followed by cmp instruction into a single cmp instruction.
However, this replacement may result suboptimal result especially when
the xor/sub has more than one use, as discussed in
bug 26465 (https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26465).
This patch make the replacement happen only when xor/sub has only one
use.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16915
Patch by Taewook Oh!
llvm-svn: 260695
This miscompile came about because we tried to use a transform which was
only appropriate for xor operators when addition was present.
This fixes PR26407.
llvm-svn: 259375
This contains a fix for the issue that caused the revert:
we no longer assume that we can insert instructions after the
instruction that produces the base pointer. We previously
assumed that this would be ok, because the instruction produces
a value and therefore is not a terminator. This is false for invoke
instructions. We will now insert these new instruction directly
at the location of the users.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Look through PHIs, GEPs, IntToPtrs and PtrToInts to expose more constants when comparing GEPs
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the base
pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have complex
pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs, conversions to
or from integers, etc) the value of the original base pointer will be
hidden to the optimizer and this transformation will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the relevant
uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The GEP comparison
will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257897
In setInsertionPoint if the value is not a PHI, Instruction or
Argument it should be a Constant, not a ConstantExpr.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Look through PHIs, GEPs, IntToPtrs and PtrToInts to expose more constants when comparing GEPs
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the base
pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have complex
pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs, conversions to
or from integers, etc) the value of the original base pointer will be
hidden to the optimizer and this transformation will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the relevant
uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The GEP comparison
will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257164
Summary:
When comparing two GEP instructions which have the same base pointer
and one of them has a constant index, it is possible to only compare
indices, transforming it to a compare with a constant. This removes
one use for the GEP instruction with the constant index, can reduce
register pressure and can sometimes lead to removing the comparisson
entirely.
InstCombine was already doing this when comparing two GEPs if the
base pointers were the same. However, in the case where we have
complex pointer arithmetic (GEPs applied to GEPs, PHIs of GEPs,
conversions to or from integers, etc) the value of the original
base pointer will be hidden to the optimizer and this transformation
will be disabled.
This change detects when the two sides of the comparison can be
expressed as GEPs with the same base pointer, even if they don't
appear as such in the IR. The transformation will convert all the
pointer arithmetic to arithmetic done on indices and all the
relevant uses of GEPs to GEPs with a common base pointer. The
GEP comparison will be converted to a comparison done on indices.
Reviewers: majnemer, jmolloy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jevinskie, jmolloy, aadg, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15146
llvm-svn: 257064
Allow LLVM to optimize the sequence like the following:
%inc = add nsw i32 %i, 1
%cmp = icmp slt %n, %inc
into:
%cmp = icmp sle i32 %n, %i
The case is not handled previously due to the complexity of compuation of %n.
Hence, LLVM cannot swap operands of icmp accordingly.
llvm-svn: 250746
This will allow us to optimize code such as:
int f(int *p) {
int x;
return p == &x;
}
as well as:
int *allocate(void);
int f() {
int x;
int *p = allocate();
return p == &x;
}
The folding can only be done under certain circumstances. Even though p and &x
cannot alias, the comparison must still return true if the pointer
representations are equal. If a user successfully generates a p that's a
correct guess for &x, comparison should return true even though p is an invalid
pointer.
This patch argues that if the address of the alloca isn't observable outside the
function, the function can act as-if the address is impossible to guess from the
outside. The tricky part is keeping the act consistent: if we fold p == &x to
false in one place, we must make sure to fold any other comparisons based on
those pointers similarly. To ensure that, we only fold when &x is involved
exactly once in comparison instructions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13358
llvm-svn: 249490
Summary:
`signum(x)` is sometimes implemented as `(x >> 63) | (-x >>> 63)` (for
an `i64` `x`). This change adds a matcher for that pattern, and an
instcombine rule to optimize `signum(x) s< 1`.
Later, we can also consider optimizing:
icmp slt signum(x), 0 --> icmp slt x, 0
icmp sle signum(x), 1 --> true
etc.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12703
llvm-svn: 247846
The patch extends the optimization to cases where the constant's
magnitude is so small or large that the rounding of the conversion
is irrelevant. The "so small" case includes negative zero.
Differential review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11210
llvm-svn: 247708
PR24605 is caused due to an incorrect insert point in instcombine's IR
builder. When simplifying
%t = add X Y
...
%m = icmp ... %t
the replacement for %t should be placed before %t, not before %m, as
there could be a use of %t between %t and %m.
llvm-svn: 246315
The original checkin was buggy, this change has a fix.
Original commit message:
[InstCombine] Transform A & (L - 1) u< L --> L != 0
Summary:
This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:
1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.
This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210
llvm-svn: 245753
Summary:
This transform is never a pessimization at the IR level (since it
replaces an `icmp` with another), and has potentiall payoffs:
1. It may make the `icmp` fold away or become loop invariant.
2. It may make the `A & (L - 1)` computation dead.
This shows up in Java, in range checks generated by array accesses of
the form `a[i & (a.length - 1)]`.
Reviewers: reames, majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12210
llvm-svn: 245635
Bitwise arithmetic can obscure a simple sign-test. If replacing the
mask with a truncate is preferable if the type is legal because it
permits us to rephrase the comparison more explicitly.
llvm-svn: 245171
`InstCombiner::OptimizeOverflowCheck` was asserting an
invariant (operands to binary operations are ordered by decreasing
complexity) that wasn't really an invariant. Fix this by instead having
`InstCombiner::OptimizeOverflowCheck` establish the invariant if it does
not hold.
llvm-svn: 244676
Summary:
Fixes PR23809. Without passing the context to SimplifyICmpInst, we would
use the assume to prove that the condition feeding the assume is
trivially true (see isValidAssumeForContext in ValueTracking.cpp),
causing the removal of the assume which may be useful for later
optimizations.
Test Plan: pr23800.ll
Reviewers: hfinkel, majnemer
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: henryhu, llvm-commits, wengxt, broune, meheff, eliben
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10695
llvm-svn: 240683
This change is NFC because both the ``break;`` and the fall through end
up returning immediately. However, this helps clarify intent and also
ensures correctness in case more ``case`` blocks are added later.
llvm-svn: 239172
This change does a few things:
- Move some InstCombine transforms to InstSimplify
- Run SimplifyCall from within InstCombine::visitCallInst
- Teach InstSimplify to fold [us]mul_with_overflow(X, undef) to 0.
llvm-svn: 237995
Make sure if we're truncating a constant that would then be sign extended
that the sign extension of the truncated constant is the same as the
original constant.
> Canonicalize min/max expressions correctly.
>
> This patch introduces a canonical form for min/max idioms where one operand
> is extended or truncated. This often happens when the other operand is a
> constant. For example:
>
> %1 = icmp slt i32 %a, i32 0
> %2 = sext i32 %a to i64
> %3 = select i1 %1, i64 %2, i64 0
>
> Would now be canonicalized into:
>
> %1 = icmp slt i32 %a, i32 0
> %2 = select i1 %1, i32 %a, i32 0
> %3 = sext i32 %2 to i64
>
> This builds upon a patch posted by David Majenemer
> (https://www.marc.info/?l=llvm-commits&m=143008038714141&w=2). That pass
> passively stopped instcombine from ruining canonical patterns. This
> patch additionally actively makes instcombine canonicalize too.
>
> Canonicalization of expressions involving a change in type from int->fp
> or fp->int are not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 237821
SimplifyDemandedBits was "simplifying" a constant by removing just sign bits.
This caused a canonicalization race between different parts of instcombine.
Fix and regression test added - third time lucky?
llvm-svn: 237539
The AArch64 LNT bot is unhappy - I've found that the problem is in
SimpliftDemandedBits, but that's going to require another code review
so reverting in the meantime.
llvm-svn: 237528
The test timeouts were due to instcombine fighting itself. Regression test added.
Original log message:
Canonicalize min/max expressions correctly.
This patch introduces a canonical form for min/max idioms where one operand
is extended or truncated. This often happens when the other operand is a
constant. For example:
%1 = icmp slt i32 %a, i32 0
%2 = sext i32 %a to i64
%3 = select i1 %1, i64 %2, i64 0
Would now be canonicalized into:
%1 = icmp slt i32 %a, i32 0
%2 = select i1 %1, i32 %a, i32 0
%3 = sext i32 %2 to i64
This builds upon a patch posted by David Majenemer
(https://www.marc.info/?l=llvm-commits&m=143008038714141&w=2). That pass
passively stopped instcombine from ruining canonical patterns. This
patch additionally actively makes instcombine canonicalize too.
Canonicalization of expressions involving a change in type from int->fp
or fp->int are not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 237520
This reverts r237453 - it was causing timeouts on some bots. Reverting
while I investigate (it's probably InstCombine fighting itself...)
llvm-svn: 237458
This patch introduces a canonical form for min/max idioms where one operand
is extended or truncated. This often happens when the other operand is a
constant. For example:
%1 = icmp slt i32 %a, i32 0
%2 = sext i32 %a to i64
%3 = select i1 %1, i64 %2, i64 0
Would now be canonicalized into:
%1 = icmp slt i32 %a, i32 0
%2 = select i1 %1, i32 %a, i32 0
%3 = sext i32 %2 to i64
This builds upon a patch posted by David Majenemer
(https://www.marc.info/?l=llvm-commits&m=143008038714141&w=2). That pass
passively stopped instcombine from ruining canonical patterns. This
patch additionally actively makes instcombine canonicalize too.
Canonicalization of expressions involving a change in type from int->fp
or fp->int are not yet implemented.
llvm-svn: 237453
Summary:
This change moves creating calls to `llvm.uadd.with.overflow` from
InstCombine to CodeGenPrep. Combining overflow check patterns into
calls to the said intrinsic in InstCombine inhibits optimization because
it introduces an intrinsic call that not all other transforms and
analyses understand.
Depends on D8888.
Reviewers: majnemer, atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8889
llvm-svn: 234638
Summary:
This patch adds an enum `OverflowCheckFlavor` and a function
`OptimizeOverflowCheck`. This will allow InstCombine to optimize
overflow checks without directly introducing an intermediate call to the
`llvm.$op.with.overflow` instrinsics.
This specific change is a refactoring and does not intend to change
behavior.
Reviewers: majnemer, atrick
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8888
llvm-svn: 234388
Summary:
Now that the DataLayout is a mandatory part of the module, let's start
cleaning the codebase. This patch is a first attempt at doing that.
This patch is not exactly NFC as for instance some places were passing
a nullptr instead of the DataLayout, possibly just because there was a
default value on the DataLayout argument to many functions in the API.
Even though it is not purely NFC, there is no change in the
validation.
I turned as many pointer to DataLayout to references, this helped
figuring out all the places where a nullptr could come up.
I had initially a local version of this patch broken into over 30
independant, commits but some later commit were cleaning the API and
touching part of the code modified in the previous commits, so it
seemed cleaner without the intermediate state.
Test Plan:
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: llvm-commits
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 231740
- First, there's a crash when we try to combine that pointers into `icmp`
directly by creating a `bitcast`, which is invalid if that two pointers are
from different address spaces.
- It's not always appropriate to cast one pointer to another if they are from
different address spaces as that is not no-op cast. Instead, we only combine
`icmp` from `ptrtoint` if that two pointers are of the same address space.
llvm-svn: 229063
creating a non-internal header file for the InstCombine pass.
I thought about calling this InstCombiner.h or in some way more clearly
associating it with the InstCombiner clas that it is primarily defining,
but there are several other utility interfaces defined within this for
InstCombine. If, in the course of refactoring, those end up moving
elsewhere or going away, it might make more sense to make this the
combiner's header alone.
Naturally, this is a bikeshed to a certain degree, so feel free to lobby
for a different shade of paint if this name just doesn't suit you.
llvm-svn: 226783
While the term "Target" is in the name, it doesn't really have to do
with the LLVM Target library -- this isn't an abstraction which LLVM
targets generally need to implement or extend. It has much more to do
with modeling the various runtime libraries on different OSes and with
different runtime environments. The "target" in this sense is the more
general sense of a target of cross compilation.
This is in preparation for porting this analysis to the new pass
manager.
No functionality changed, and updates inbound for Clang and Polly.
llvm-svn: 226078
This is already handled in general when it is known the
conversion can't lose bits with smaller integer types
casted into wider floating point types.
This pattern happens somewhat often in GPU programs that cast
workitem intrinsics to float, which are often compared with 0.
Specifically handle the special case of compares with zero which
should also be known to not lose information. I had a more general
version of this which allows equality compares if the casted float is
exactly representable in the integer, but I'm not 100% confident that
is always correct.
Also fold cases that aren't integers to true / false.
llvm-svn: 225265
a cache of assumptions for a single function, and an immutable pass that
manages those caches.
The motivation for this change is two fold. Immutable analyses are
really hacks around the current pass manager design and don't exist in
the new design. This is usually OK, but it requires that the core logic
of an immutable pass be reasonably partitioned off from the pass logic.
This change does precisely that. As a consequence it also paves the way
for the *many* utility functions that deal in the assumptions to live in
both pass manager worlds by creating an separate non-pass object with
its own independent API that they all rely on. Now, the only bits of the
system that deal with the actual pass mechanics are those that actually
need to deal with the pass mechanics.
Once this separation is made, several simplifications become pretty
obvious in the assumption cache itself. Rather than using a set and
callback value handles, it can just be a vector of weak value handles.
The callers can easily skip the handles that are null, and eventually we
can wrap all of this up behind a filter iterator.
For now, this adds boiler plate to the various passes, but this kind of
boiler plate will end up making it possible to port these passes to the
new pass manager, and so it will end up factored away pretty reasonably.
llvm-svn: 225131
We are allowed to move the 'B' to the right hand side if we an prove
there is no signed overflow and if the comparison itself is signed.
llvm-svn: 225034
Sanjay Patel