Summary:
Currently, we only have nice exploration for LEA instruction,
while for the rest, we rely on `randomizeUnsetVariables()`
to sometimes generate something interesting.
While that works, it isn't very reliable in coverage :)
Here, i'm making an assumption that while we may want to explore
multi-instruction configs, we are most interested in the
characteristics of the main instruction we were asked about.
Which we can do, by taking the existing `randomizeMCOperand()`,
and turning it on it's head - instead of relying on it to randomly fill
one of the interesting values, let's pregenerate all the possible interesting
values for the variable, and then generate as much `InstructionTemplate`
combinations of these possible values for variables as needed/possible.
Of course, that requires invasive changes to no longer pass just the
naked `Instruction`, but sometimes partially filled `InstructionTemplate`.
As it can be seen from the test, this allows us to explore
`X86::OperandType::OPERAND_COND_CODE` for instructions
that take such an operand.
I'm hoping this will greatly simplify exploration.
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Subscribers: orodley, mgorny, sdardis, tschuett, jrtc27, atanasyan, mstojanovic, andreadb, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74156
Summary:
Right now there are no snippet generators that emit the `Config` Field,
but I plan to add it to investigate LEA operands for PR32326.
What was broken was:
- `Config` Was not propagated up until the BenchmarkResult::Key.
- Clustering should really consider different configs as measuring
different things, so we should stabilize on (Opcode, Config) instead of
just Opcode.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits, lebedev.ri
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68629
llvm-svn: 374031
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This allows simplifying references of llvm::foo with foo when the needs
come in the future.
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53455
llvm-svn: 344922
Summary: LatencyGenerator now computes all possible mode of serial execution for an Instruction upfront and generates CodeTemplate for the ones that give the best results (e.g. no need to generate a two instructions snippet when repeating a single one would do). The next step is to generate even more configurations for cases (e.g. for XOR we should generate "XOR EAX, EAX, EAX" and "XOR EAX, EAX, EBX")
Reviewers: courbet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53320
llvm-svn: 344689
Summary: This is prelimineary to moving random functions to SnippetGenerator.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52718
llvm-svn: 343456
Summary: This is is preparation of exploring value ranges.
Reviewers: courbet
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52542
llvm-svn: 343098
Roman Lebedev