Details:
Switch all #includes to use <> because that is consistent with what happens in the cmake checks.
Otherwise, we could be in the situation where cmake checks see that headers exist at <perfmon/...>
but in llvm-exegesis code, we use "perfmon/...", which may not exist.
Related PR/revisions: D84076, PR51017+D105615
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105861
Starting with Skylake, the LBR contains the precise number of cycles between the two
consecutive branches.
Making use of this will hopefully make the measurements more precise than the
existing methods of using RDTSC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77422
New change: check for existence of field `cycles` in perf_branch_entry before enabling this mode.
This should prevent compilation errors when building for older kernel whose headers don't support it.
From @erichkeane:
```
This patch doesn't seem to build for me:
/iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-exegesis/lib/X86/X86Counter.cpp: In function ‘llvm::Error llvm::exegesis::parseDataBuffer(const char*, size_t, const void*, const void*, llvm::SmallVector<long int, 4>*)’:
/iusers/ekeane1/workspaces/llvm-project/llvm/tools/llvm-exegesis/lib/X86/X86Counter.cpp:99:37: error: ‘struct perf_branch_entry’ has no member named ‘cycles’
CycleArray->push_back(Entry.cycles);
I'm on RHEL7, so I have kernel 3.10, so it doesn't have 'cycles'.
According ot this: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.3/source/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h#L963 kernel 4.3 is the first time that 'cycles' appeared in this structure.
```
Starting with Skylake, the LBR contains the precise number of cycles between the two
consecutive branches.
Making use of this will hopefully make the measurements more precise than the
existing methods of using RDTSC.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77422
LBR contains (up to) 16 entries for last x branches and the X86LBRCounter (from D77422) should be able to return all those.
Currently, it just returns the latest entry, which could lead to mis-leading measurements.
This patch aslo changes the LatencyBenchmarkRunner to accommodate multi-value readings.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D81050
A perf helper is always only ever cretaed to be checked for validity
then passed as Counter ctor argument, never to be touched again.
Its lifetime should outlive that of the counter, and there is never any
reason to have two different counters of top of the perf helper.
Make sure these assumptions always hold by making the Counter consume the
PerfHelper.
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
This allows simplifying references of llvm::foo with foo when the needs
come in the future.
Reviewers: courbet, gchatelet
Reviewed By: gchatelet
Subscribers: javed.absar, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53455
llvm-svn: 344922
Summary:
I'm slowly looking into a new X86 scheduler model,
for AMD Bulldozer CPU, model 2 (bdver2, Piledriver).
And naturally, i have hit that assert :)
I happened to know what it meant, and how to fix it,
but that is not too common knowledge.
Reviewers: courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47572
llvm-svn: 333632
Summary:
[llvm-exegesis][RFC] Automatic Measurement of Instruction Latency/Uops
This is the code corresponding to the RFC "llvm-exegesis Automatic Measurement of Instruction Latency/Uops".
The RFC is available on the LLVM mailing lists as well as the following document
for easier reading:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QidaJMJUyQdRrFKD66vE1_N55whe0coQ3h1GpFzz27M/edit?usp=sharing
Subscribers: mgorny, gchatelet, orwant, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44519
llvm-svn: 329156
Vy Nguyen