These directives define per-test lit substitutions. The concept was
discussed at
<https://discourse.llvm.org/t/iterating-lit-run-lines/62596/10>.
For example, the following directives can be inserted into a test file
to define `%{cflags}` and `%{fcflags}` substitutions with empty
initial values, which serve as the parameters of another newly defined
`%{check}` substitution:
```
// DEFINE: %{cflags} =
// DEFINE: %{fcflags} =
// DEFINE: %{check} = %clang_cc1 %{cflags} -emit-llvm -o - %s | \
// DEFINE: FileCheck %{fcflags} %s
```
The following directives then redefine the parameters before each use
of `%{check}`:
```
// REDEFINE: %{cflags} = -foo
// REDEFINE: %{fcflags} = -check-prefix=FOO
// RUN: %{check}
// REDEFINE: %{cflags} = -bar
// REDEFINE: %{fcflags} = -check-prefix=BAR
// RUN: %{check}
```
Of course, `%{check}` would typically be more elaborate, increasing
the benefit of the reuse.
One issue is that the strings `DEFINE:` and `REDEFINE:` already appear
in 5 tests. This patch adjusts those tests not to use those strings.
Our prediction is that, in the vast majority of cases, if a test
author mistakenly uses one of those strings for another purpose, the
text appearing after the string will not happen to have the syntax
required for these directives. Thus, the test author will discover
the mistake immediately when lit reports the syntax error.
This patch also expands the documentation on existing lit substitution
behavior.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, MaskRay, awarzynski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132513
This helps lit unit test performance by a lot, especially on windows. The performance gain comes from launching one gtest executable for many subtests instead of one (this is the current situation).
The shards are executed by the test runner and the results are stored in the
json format supported by the GoogleTest. Later in the test reporting stage,
all test results in the json file are retrieved to continue the test results
summary etc.
On my Win10 desktop, before this patch: `check-clang-unit`: 177s, `check-llvm-unit`: 38s; after this patch: `check-clang-unit`: 37s, `check-llvm-unit`: 11s.
On my Linux machine, before this patch: `check-clang-unit`: 46s, `check-llvm-unit`: 8s; after this patch: `check-clang-unit`: 7s, `check-llvm-unit`: 4s.
Reviewed By: yln, rnk, abrachet
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122251
Currently, a LIT test named directly (on the command line) will
be run even if the name of the test file does not meet the rules
to be considered a test in the LIT test configuration files for
its test suite. For example, if the test does not have a
recognised file extension.
This makes it relatively easy to write a LIT test that won't
actually be run. I did in: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82567
This patch adds an error to avoid users doing that. There is a
small performance overhead for this check. A command line option
has been added so that users can opt into the old behaviour.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83069
In TestRunner.py, D78589 extracts a `_parseKeywords` function from
`parseIntegratedTestScript`, which then expects `_parseKeywords` to
always return a list of keyword/value pairs. However, the extracted
code sometimes returns an unresolved `lit.Test.Result` on a keyword
parsing error, which then produces a stack dump instead of the
expected diagnostic.
This patch fixes that, makes the style of those diagnostics more
consistent, and extends the lit test suite to cover them.
Reviewed By: ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81665
This allows defining substitutions in terms of other substitutions. For
example, a %build substitution could be defined in terms of a %cxx
substitution as '%cxx %s -o %t.exe' and the script would be properly
expanded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76178
This commit adds a new keyword in lit called ALLOW_RETRIES. This keyword
takes a single integer as an argument, and it allows the test to fail that
number of times before it first succeeds.
This work attempts to make the existing test_retry_attempts more flexible
by allowing by-test customization, as well as eliminate libc++'s FLAKY_TEST
custom logic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76288
Summary:
Automatically upgrade debugging experience (single process, no thread
pool) when:
1) we only run a single test
2) user specifies `-j1`
Details:
Fix `--max-failures` in single process mode. Option did not have an
effect in single process mode.
Add display feedback for single process mode. Adapted test.
Improve argument checking (require positive integers).
`--single-process` is now essentially an alias for `-j1`. Should we
remove it?
Reviewers: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58249
llvm-svn: 354068
This fixes projects/compiler-rt/test/fuzzer/sigusr.test, which was
broken by r333614. The trouble was that "&&" changes the command for
which "$!" gives the pid.
llvm-svn: 333620
(Relands r333584, reverted in 333592.)
When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed. For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.
When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.
To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.
To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of windows cmd.exe
as the external shell, this patch extends -vv to set "echo on" instead
of "echo off" in bat files. (Support for windows cmd.exe as a lit
external shell will likely be dropped later, but I found out too
late.)
Reviewed By: delcypher, asmith, stella.stamenova, jmorse, lebedev.ri, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598
llvm-svn: 333614
(Relands r330755 (reverted in r330848) with fix for PR37239.)
When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed. For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.
When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.
To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.
To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of windows cmd.exe
as the external shell, this patch extends -vv to set "echo on" instead
of "echo off" in bat files. (Support for windows cmd.exe as a lit
external shell will likely be dropped later, but I found out too
late.)
Reviewed By: delcypher, asmith, stella.stamenova, jmorse, lebedev.ri, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598
llvm-svn: 333584
When debugging test failures with -vv (or -v in the case of the
internal shell), this makes it easier to locate the RUN line that
failed. For example, clang's test/Driver/linux-ld.c has 892 total RUN
lines, and clang's test/Driver/arm-cortex-cpus.c has 424 RUN lines
after concatenation for line continuations.
When reading the generated shell script, this also makes it easier to
locate the RUN line that produced each command.
To support reporting RUN line numbers in the case of the internal
shell, this patch extends the internal shell to support the null
command, ":", except pipelines are not supported.
Reviewed By: asmith, delcypher
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44598
llvm-svn: 330755
A few tests were manually constructing a LitConfig object, since
I added a new argument to it this was triggering some failures
I didn't detect. `ninja check-lit` passes now.
llvm-svn: 313461
Summary:
rL257221 attempted to run lit's own test suite continuously, but that
commit was reverted because lit's test suite does not pass on Windows.
Because lit's tests do not run continuously, they often regress.
In order to un-revert rL257221, mark lit tests that fail as XFAIL for
Windows platforms.
Test Plan:
On a Windows development environment, follow the instructions in
utils/lit/README.txt to run lit's test suite:
```
utils/lit/lit.py \
--path /path/to/your/llvm/build/bin \
utils/lit/tests
```
Verify that the test suite is run and a successful exit code is
returned.
Reviewers: mgorny, rnk, delcypher, beanz
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35879
llvm-svn: 309123
Summary:
`assert.assertItemEqual` went away in Python 3. Seeing how lists
are ordered, comparing a list against each other should work just
as well.
Patch by @jbergstroem (Johan Bergström).
Reviewers: modocache, gparker42
Reviewed By: modocache
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31229
llvm-svn: 298479
and UNSUPPORTED"
After r292904 llvm-lit fails to emit the test results in the XML format for
Apple's internal buildbots.
rdar://30164800
llvm-svn: 292942
A `lit` condition line is now a comma-separated list of boolean expressions.
Comma-separated expressions act as if each expression were on its own
condition line:
For REQUIRES, if every expression is true then the test will run.
For UNSUPPORTED, if every expression is false then the test will run.
For XFAIL, if every expression is false then the test is expected to succeed.
As a special case "XFAIL: *" expects the test to fail.
Examples:
# Test is expected fail on 64-bit Apple simulators and pass everywhere else
XFAIL: x86_64 && apple && !macosx
# Test is unsupported on Windows and on non-Ubuntu Linux
# and supported everywhere else
UNSUPPORTED: linux && !ubuntu, system-windows
Syntax:
* '&&', '||', '!', '(', ')'. 'true' is true. 'false' is false.
* Each test feature is a true identifier.
* Substrings of the target triple are true identifiers for UNSUPPORTED
and XFAIL, but not for REQUIRES. (This matches the current behavior.)
* All other identifiers are false.
* Identifiers are [-+=._a-zA-Z0-9]+
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18185
llvm-svn: 292904
A `lit` condition line is now a comma-separated list of boolean expressions.
Comma-separated expressions act as if each expression were on its own
condition line:
For REQUIRES, if every expression is true then the test will run.
For UNSUPPORTED, if every expression is false then the test will run.
For XFAIL, if every expression is false then the test is expected to succeed.
As a special case "XFAIL: *" expects the test to fail.
Examples:
# Test is expected fail on 64-bit Apple simulators and pass everywhere else
XFAIL: x86_64 && apple && !macosx
# Test is unsupported on Windows and on non-Ubuntu Linux
# and supported everywhere else
UNSUPPORTED: linux && !ubuntu, system-windows
Syntax:
* '&&', '||', '!', '(', ')'. 'true' is true. 'false' is false.
* Each test feature is a true identifier.
* Substrings of the target triple are true identifiers for UNSUPPORTED
and XFAIL, but not for REQUIRES. (This matches the current behavior.)
* All other identifiers are false.
* Identifiers are [-+=._a-zA-Z0-9]+
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D18185
llvm-svn: 292896
Summary:
Libc++ frequently has the need to parse more than just the builtin *test keywords* (`RUN`, `REQUIRES`, `XFAIL`, ect). For example libc++ currently needs a new keyword `MODULES-DEFINES: macro list...`. Instead of re-implementing the script parsing in libc++ this patch allows `parseIntegratedTestScript` to take custom parsers.
This patch introduces a new class `IntegratedTestKeywordParser` which implements the logic to parse/process a test keyword. Parsing of various keyword "kinds" are supported out of the box, including 'TAG', 'COMMAND', and 'LIST', which parse keywords such as `END.`, `RUN:` and `XFAIL:` respectively.
As an example after this change libc++ can implement the `MODULES-DEFINES` simply using:
```
mparser = IntegratedTestKeywordParser('MODULES-DEFINES:', ParserKind.LIST)
parseIntegratedTestScript(test, additional_parsers=[mparser])
macro_list = mparser.getValue()
```
Reviewers: ddunbar, modocache, rnk, danalbert, jroelofs
Subscribers: mgrang, llvm-commits, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27005
llvm-svn: 288694