These tests are failing in XCode 8.0, 8.1, and 8.2, but not in Xcode
8.3. Annoyingly the version numbering for clang does not follow Xcode
and is bumped to 8.1 only in Xcode 8.3. So Xfailing apple-clang-8.0
should catch all cases here.
llvm-svn: 296704
This patch fixes llvm.org/PR32097 by using the __is_abstract
builtin type-trait instead of the previous library-only implementation.
All supported compilers provide this trait. I've tested as far
back as Clang 3.2, GCC 4.6 and MSVC trunk.
llvm-svn: 296561
Summary:
`ConstexprTestTypes::NoCtors` is an aggregate type (and consequently a literal type) in C++17,
but not in C++14 since it has a base class. This patch updates the comment to accurately describe the reason for the XFAIL.
Reviewers: EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30481
llvm-svn: 296558
A static assertion was misfiring since it checked
is_callable<Visitor, decltype(__variant_alt<T>.value)>. However
the decltype expression doesn't capture the value category as
required. This patch applies extra braces to decltype to fix
that.
llvm-svn: 294612
In addition to the PR for LWG 2773 this patch also ensures
that each of std::ignores constructors or assignment operators
are constexpr.
llvm-svn: 294165
When compiled with Clang for Windows, this was emitting "enumerator value
evaluates to 4294967295, which cannot be narrowed to type 'int' [-Wc++11-narrowing]".
The test should more strenuously avoid poking this ABI deficiency (and it
already has coverage for explicitly specified underlying types).
Fixes D29140.
llvm-svn: 294159
test/std/strings/string.classes/typedefs.pass.cpp
Actually test what basic_string's typedefs stand for.
test/std/utilities/meta/meta.trans/meta.trans.other/result_of11.pass.cpp
NotDerived and ND were completely unused.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.pair/default.pass.cpp
P2 was mistakenly not being used. Yes, that's
right: -Wunused-local-typedef CAUGHT A MISTAKE! AMAZING!
Fixes D29137.
llvm-svn: 294156
Pending LIT changes are about to remove the REQUIRES-ANY keyword
in place of supporting boolean && and || within "REQUIRES". This
patch prepares libc++ for that change so that when applied
the bots don't lose their mind.
llvm-svn: 292901
Summary:
Exactly what the title says.
This patch also adds a `std::hash<nullptr_t>` specialization in C++17, but it was not added by this paper and I can't find the actual paper that adds it.
See http://wg21.link/P0513R0 for more info.
If there are no comments in the next couple of days I'll commit this
Reviewers: mclow.lists, K-ballo, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28938
llvm-svn: 292684
MSVC has compiler warnings C4127 "conditional expression is constant" (enabled
by /W4) and C6326 "Potential comparison of a constant with another constant"
(enabled by /analyze). They're potentially useful, although they're slightly
annoying to library devs who know what they're doing. In the latest version of
the compiler, C4127 is suppressed when the compiler sees simple tests like
"if (name_of_thing)", so extracting comparison expressions into named
constants is a workaround. At the same time, using std::integral_constant
avoids C6326, which doesn't look at template arguments.
test/std/containers/sequences/vector.bool/emplace.pass.cpp
Replace 1 == 1 with true, which is the same as far as the library is concerned.
Fixes D28837.
llvm-svn: 292432
This is the subject of an active NB comment. Regardless of what the Working
Paper currently says, asking this question is morally wrong, because the
answer can change when the type is completed. C1XX now detects such
precondition violations and complains about them; perhaps Clang should too.
Fixes D28591.
llvm-svn: 292281
The test was previously set to XFAIL if __cpp_structured_bindings
wasn't defined. However there are Clang 4.0 versions which do not
define this macro but do provide structured bindings, which causes
the test to pass unexpectedly.
This patch changes the XFAIL to an UNSUPPORTED.
llvm-svn: 291060
In ABI v1 libc++ implements std::pointer_safety as a class type instead
of an enumeration. However this class type does not provide
a default constructor as it should. This patch adds that default constructor.
llvm-svn: 291059
In the C++ standard `std::pointer_safety` is defined
as a C++11 strongly typed enum. However libc++ currently defines
it as a class type which simulates a C++11 enumeration. This
can be detected in valid C++ code.
This patch introduces an the _LIBCPP_ABI_POINTER_SAFETY_ENUM_TYPE ABI option.
When defined `std::pointer_safety` is implemented as an enum type.
Unfortunatly this also means it can no longer be provided as an extension
in C++03.
Additionally this patch moves the definition for `get_pointer_safety()`
out of the dylib, and into the headers. New usages of `get_pointer_safety()`
will now use the inline version instead of the dylib version. However in
order to keep the dylib ABI compatible the old definition is explicitly
compiled into it.
llvm-svn: 291046
Summary:
This patch attempts to re-implement a fix for LWG 2770, but not the actual specified PR.
The PR for 2770 specifies tuple_size<T const> as only conditionally providing a `::value` member. However C++17 structured bindings require `tuple_size<T const>` to be complete only if `tuple_size<T>` is also complete. Therefore this patch implements only provides the specialization `tuple_size<T CV>` iff `tuple_size<T>` is a complete type.
This fixes http://llvm.org/PR31513.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, rsmith, mpark
Subscribers: mpark, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28222
llvm-svn: 291019
These tests were using malloc()'s return value without checking for null,
which MSVC's /analyze rightly warns about. Asserting that the pointer is
non-null both expresses the test's intention and silences the warning.
Fixes D27785.
llvm-svn: 290921
This patch implements the correct PR for LWG 2770. It also makes the primary
tuple_size template incomplete again which fixes part of llvm.org/PR31513.
llvm-svn: 290846
Eric Fiselier