The bug was introduced with:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL294863
...and manifests as a selection failure in x86, but that's actually
another bug. This fix prevents wrong codegen with -0.0, but in the
more common case when we have NSZ and NNAN (-ffast-math), we should
still be able to fold this setcc/compare.
llvm-svn: 294924
I don't know if anything other than x86 vectors is affected by this change, but this may allow
us to remove target-specific intrinsics for blendv* (vector selects). The simplification arises
from the fact that blendv* instructions only use the sign-bit when deciding which vector element
to choose for the destination vector. The mechanism to fold VSELECT into SHRUNKBLEND nodes already
exists in x86 lowering; this demanded bits change just enables the transform to fire more often.
The original motivation starts with a bug for DSE of masked stores that seems completely unrelated,
but I've explained the likely steps in this series here:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=11210
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29687
llvm-svn: 294863
If a vector index is out of bounds, the result is supposed to be
undefined but is not undefined behavior. Change the legalization
for indexing the vector on the stack so that an out of bounds
index does not create an out of bounds memory access.
llvm-svn: 291604
Summary:
Most targets set the action for these nodes to Expand even though there
isn't actually any code for them in ExpandNode. Instead, targets simply
relied on the fact that no code generates these nodes as long as the
nodes aren't legal or custom.
However, generating these nodes can be useful e.g. for divide-by-constant
in wider integer types.
Expand of [US]MUL_LOHI will use MULH[US] when legal or custom, and
a sequence of half-width multiplications otherwise. Promote uses a wider
multiply.
This patch intends to not change the generated code, but indirect effects
are possible since expansions/promotions that were previously done in
DAGCombine may now be done in LegalizeDAG.
See D24822 for a change that actually uses the new expansion.
Reviewers: spatel, bkramer, venkatra, efriedma, hfinkel, ast, nadav, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, jyknight, nemanjai, wdng, nhaehnle, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24956
llvm-svn: 289050
We treat bitwise 'not' as a special operation and try not to reduce its all-ones mask.
Presumably, this is because a 'not' may be cheaper than a generic 'xor' or it may get
folded into another logic op if the target has those. However, if we can remove a logic
instruction by changing the xor's constant mask value, that should always be a win.
Note that the IR version of SimplifyDemandedBits() does not treat 'not' as a special-case
currently (although that's marked with a FIXME). So if you run this IR through -instcombine,
you should get the same end result. I'm hoping to add a different backend transform that
will expose this problem though, so I need to solve this first.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27356
llvm-svn: 288676
Summary: Further preparation for the expansion of MUL_LOHI added in D24956.
Reviewers: efriedma, RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27064
llvm-svn: 288248
Implemented widening (v2f32) and splitting (v16f64).
On splitting, I use "popcnt" to calculate memory increment.
More type legalization work will come in the next patches.
llvm-svn: 287761
Fixed an issue with vector usage of TargetLowering::isConstTrueVal / TargetLowering::isConstFalseVal boolean result matching.
The comment said we shouldn't handle constant splat vectors with undef elements. But the the actual code was returning false if the build vector contained no undef elements....
This patch now ignores the number of undefs (getConstantSplatNode will return null if the build vector is all undefs).
The change has also unearthed a couple of missed opportunities in AVX512 comparison code that will need to be addressed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26031
llvm-svn: 286238
This bug was exposed by using nsw/nuw for more aggressive folds in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL284844
The changes mimic the IR demanded bits logic in InstCombiner::SimplifyDemandedUseBits(),
but we can't just flip flag bits in the DAG; we have to create a new node that has the
bits cleared.
This should fix:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=30841
llvm-svn: 285656
Summary:
The main purpose of this new helper is to enable simplifying operations that
have multiple uses. SimplifyDemandedBits does not handle multiple uses
currently, and this new function makes it possible to optimize:
and v1, v0, 0xffffff
mul24 v2, v1, v1 ; Multiply ignoring high 8-bits.
To:
mul24 v2, v0, v0
Where before this would not be optimized, because v1 has multiple uses.
Reviewers: bogner, arsenm
Subscribers: nhaehnle, wdng, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24964
llvm-svn: 284266
Add the ability to computeKnownBits and SimplifyDemandedBits to extract the known zero/one bits from BUILD_VECTOR, returning the known bits that are shared by every vector element.
This is an initial step towards determining the sign bits of a vector (PR29079).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24253
llvm-svn: 280927
Following the discussion on D22038, this refactors a PowerPC specific setcc -> srl(ctlz) transformation so it can be used by other targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23445
llvm-svn: 278799
We used to combine "sext(setcc x, y, cc) -> (select (setcc x, y, cc), -1, 0)"
Instead, we should combine to (select (setcc x, y, cc), T, 0) where the value
of T is 1 or -1, depending on the type of the setcc, and getBooleanContents()
for the type if it is not i1.
This fixes PR28504.
llvm-svn: 277371
The following condition expression ( a >> n) & 1 is converted to "bt a, n" instruction. It works on all intel targets.
But on AVX-512 it was broken because the expression is modified to (truncate (a >>n) to i1).
I added the new sequence (truncate (a >>n) to i1) to the BT pattern.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22354
llvm-svn: 275950
Summary:
Instead, we take a single flags arg (a bitset).
Also add a default 0 alignment, and change the order of arguments so the
alignment comes before the flags.
This greatly simplifies many callsites, and fixes a bug in
AMDGPUISelLowering, wherein the order of the args to getLoad was
inverted. It also greatly simplifies the process of adding another flag
to getLoad.
Reviewers: chandlerc, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: jholewinski, arsenm, jyknight, dsanders, nemanjai, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22249
llvm-svn: 275592
I think this converts all the simple cases that really just care about
the generated code being position independent or not. The remaining
uses are a bit more complicated and are checking things like "is this
a library or executable" or "can this symbol be preempted".
llvm-svn: 274055
The setCallee function will set the number of fixed arguments based
on the size of the argument list. The FixedArgs parameter was often
explicitly set to 0, leading to a lack of consistent value for non-
vararg functions.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20376
llvm-svn: 273403
This used to be free, copying and moving DebugLocs became expensive
after the metadata rewrite. Passing by reference eliminates a ton of
track/untrack operations. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 272512
There are at least 2 places (DAGCombiner, X86ISelLowering) where this could be used instead
of ad-hoc and watered down code that is trying to match a power-of-2 pattern.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20439
llvm-svn: 270073
After looking at D19087 again, it occurred to me that we can do better. If we consolidate
the valueHasExactlyOneBitSet() transforms, we won't incur extra overhead from calling it a
2nd time, and we can shrink SimplifySetCC() a bit. No functional change intended.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20050
llvm-svn: 268932
When custom lowered, this is not called if the store is custom
lowered. Move it to be a utility function so targets can
easily expand unaligned accesses when custom lowering.
llvm-svn: 267029
Removed some unused headers, replaced some headers with forward class declarations.
Found using simple scripts like this one:
clear && ack --cpp -l '#include "llvm/ADT/IndexedMap.h"' | xargs grep -L 'IndexedMap[<]' | xargs grep -n --color=auto 'IndexedMap'
Patch by Eugene Kosov <claprix@yandex.ru>
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19219
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266595
Summary:
The motivation for this new function is to move an invalid assumption
about the relationship between the names of register definitions in
tablegen files and their assembly names into TargetRegisterInfo, so that
we can begin working on fixing this assumption.
The current problem is that if you have a register definition in
TableGen like:
def MYReg0 : Register<"r0", 0>;
The function TargetLowering::getRegForInlineAsmConstraint() derives the
assembly name from the tablegen name: "MyReg0" rather than the given
assembly name "r0". This is working, because on most targets the
tablegen name and the assembly names are case insensitive matches for
each other (e.g. def EAX : X86Reg<"eax", ...>
getRegAsmName() will allow targets to override this default assumption and
return the correct assembly name.
Reviewers: echristo, hfinkel
Subscribers: SamWot, echristo, hfinkel, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15614
llvm-svn: 265955
A ``swifterror`` attribute can be applied to a function parameter or an
AllocaInst.
This commit does not include any target-specific change. The target-specific
optimization will come as a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18092
llvm-svn: 265189
For the same reason as the corresponding load change.
Note that ExpandStore is completely broken for non-byte sized element
vector stores, but preserve the current broken behavior which has tests
for it. The behavior should be the same, but now introduces a new typed
store that is incorrectly split later rather than doing it directly.
llvm-svn: 264928
On AMDGPU we want to be able to promote i64/f64 loads to v2i32.
If the access is unaligned, this would conclude that since i64 is legal,
it would convert it back to i64 and there is an endless legalization
loop.
Extract the logic for scalarizing the load into a new TargetLowering
function, where this can also replace the custom function AMDGPU
has for this.
llvm-svn: 264927
Simon Pilgrim