This should fix the windows bots. It looks like the failing tests are of the
form
prog1 > file
prog2 file
and prog2 fails trying to read the file. The best fix would probably be to close
stdout/stderr in prog1, but it was not the intention of 186511 to change this,
so just restore the old behavior for now.
llvm-svn: 186530
This has some advantages:
* Lets us use native, utf16 windows functions.
* Easy to produce good errors on windows about trying to use a
directory when we want a file.
* Simplifies the unix version a bit.
llvm-svn: 186511
The status function is already using a syscall that returns the file size.
Remember it and implement file_size as a simple wrapper.
No functionally change, but clients that already use status now can avoid
calling file_size.
llvm-svn: 186016
* Don't try to create parent directories in unique_file. It had two problem:
* It violates the contract that it is atomic. If the directory creation
success and the file creation fails, we would return an error but the
file system was modified.
* When creating a temporary file clang would have to first check if the
parent directory existed or not to avoid creating one when it was not
supposed to.
* More efficient implementations of createUniqueDirectory and the unique_file
that produces only the file name. Now all 3 just call into a static
function passing what they want (name, file or directory).
Clang also has to be updated, so tests might fail if a bot picks up this commit
and not the corresponding clang one.
llvm-svn: 185126
It looks like clang-tools-extra/unittests/cpp11-migrate/TransformTest.cpp
depends on the behaviour of the old one on Windows. Maybe a difference
between GetCurrentDirectoryA and GetCurrentDirectoryW?
llvm-svn: 184009
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Rafael Espindola