Summary:
Because of the existence branches out of GNU statement expressions, it
is possible that emitting cleanups for a full expression may cause the
new insertion point to not be dominated by the result of the inner
expression. Consider this example:
struct Foo { Foo(); ~Foo(); int x; };
int g(Foo, int);
int f(bool cond) {
int n = g(Foo(), ({ if (cond) return 0; 42; }));
return n;
}
Before this change, result of the call to 'g' did not dominate its use
in the store to 'n'. The early return exit from the statement expression
branches to a shared cleanup block, which ends in a switch between the
fallthrough destination (the assignment to 'n') or the function exit
block.
This change solves the problem by spilling and reloading expression
evaluation results when any of the active cleanups have branches.
I audited the other call sites of enterFullExpression, and they don't
appear to keep and Values live across the site of the cleanup, except in
ARC code. I wasn't able to create a test case for ARC that exhibits this
problem, though.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30590
llvm-svn: 297084
This makes the C++ ABI depend entirely on the target: MS ABI for -win32 triples,
Itanium otherwise. It's no longer possible to do weird combinations.
To be able to run a test with a specific ABI without constraining it to a
specific triple, new substitutions are added to lit: %itanium_abi_triple and
%ms_abi_triple can be used to get the current target triple adjusted to the
desired ABI. For example, if the test suite is running with the i686-pc-win32
target, %itanium_abi_triple will expand to i686-pc-mingw32.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2545
llvm-svn: 199250
Reid Kleckner