There are only two users of NativeRegisterContextRegisterInfo,
and both are in process plugins. Moving this code from Host
to Plugins/Process/Utility thus makes sense, and as it is the
only dependency from Host -> PluginProcessUtility, it also
breaks this cycle, reducing LLDB's overall cycle count from
45 to 44.
llvm-svn: 298466
Summary:
GetAuxvData was causing dependencies from host to target and linux
process modules. It also does not fit netbsd use case, as there we can
only read the auxiliary vector with ptrace, which is better done in the
process plugin, with the other ptrace calls.
I resolve these issues by moving the freebsd and linux versions into the
relevant process plugins. In case of linux, this required adding an
interface in NativeProcessProtocol. The empty definitions on other
platforms can simply be removed.
To get the code compiling I had to add ProcessGdbRemote -> ProcessLinux
dependency, which was not caught before because we depended on it
transitively.
Reviewers: zturner, emaste
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31031
llvm-svn: 298066
Summary:
These classes existed only because of the GetName() static function,
which can be moved to a more natural place anyway. I move the linux
version to NativeProcessLinux (and get rid of ProcFileReader), the
freebsd version to ProcessFreeBSD (and fix a bug where it was using the
current process ID, instead of the inferior pid), and remove the NetBSD
version (which was probably incorrect anyway, as it assumes the current
process instead of the inferior.
I also add an llgs test to that verifies thread names are read
correctly.
Reviewers: zturner, krytarowski, emaste
Subscribers: lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30981
llvm-svn: 298058
This was originall reverted due to some test failures in
ModuleCache and TestCompDirSymlink. These issues have all
been resolved and the code now passes all tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30698
llvm-svn: 297300
this reverts r297116 because it breaks the unittests and
TestCompDirSymlink. The ModuleCache unit test is trivially fixable, but
the CompDirSymlink failure is a symptom of a deeper problem: llvm's stat
functionality is not a drop-in replacement for lldb's. The former is
based on stat(2) (which does symlink resolution), while the latter is
based on lstat(2) (which does not).
This also reverts subsequent build fixes (r297128, r297120, 297117) and
r297119 (Remove FileSpec dependency on FileSystem) which builds on top
of this.
llvm-svn: 297139
This deletes LLDB's FileType enumeration and replaces all
users, and all calls to functions that check whether a file
exists etc with corresponding calls to LLVM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30624
llvm-svn: 297116
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
Summary:
These two register contexts were identical, so this shouldn't cause any
regressions, but I'd appreciate it if you can check that this at least compiles.
Reviewers: emaste, sas
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, lldb-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27126
llvm-svn: 296335
Summary: QPassSignals package allows lldb client to tell lldb-server to ignore certain types of signals and re-inject them back to inferior without stopping execution.
Reviewers: jmajors, labath
Subscribers: danalbert, srhines, emaste, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30286
Author: Eugene Zemtsov <ezemtsov@google.com>
llvm-svn: 296101
In the case we are stepping over the thread creation instruction, we
will end up calling Thread::SingleStep back-to-back twice (because of
the intermediate PTRACE_EVENT_CLONE stop). This will cause the cpu mask
to be set inappropriately (because the old SingleStepCheck object will
be destroyed after we create the new one), and the single-step will
fail.
Before the refactor the code was still incorrect in this case, but in a
different way (the thread was left with the incorrect mask after the
stepping was complete), so this was not easy to spot.
This fixes TestCreateDuringInstructionStep on the affected devices.
llvm-svn: 295440
While refactoring the code in r293046 I made a very basic error -
relying on destructor side-effects of a copyable object. Fix that and
make the object non-copyable.
This fixes the tests on the platforms that need this workaround, but
unfortunately we don't have a way to make a more platform-agnostic test
right now.
llvm-svn: 295345
Summary:
The std::call_once implementation in libstdc++ has problems on few systems: NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux PPC. LLVM ships with a homegrown implementation llvm::call_once to help on these platforms.
This change is required in the NetBSD LLDB port. std::call_once with libstdc++ results with crashing the debugger.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: labath, joerg, emaste, mehdi_amini, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29288
llvm-svn: 294202
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
Summary:
Use ProcessLauncherPosixFork in Linux and NetBSD.
Changes to ProcessLauncherLinux:
- Limit personality.h and ASLR code to Linux.
- Reuse portable ptrace(2) PT_TRACE_ME operation available on Linux and BSDs.
- Limit ETXTBSY error path from execve(2) to Linux.
- In LaunchProcess declaration change virtual to override.
This code should be readily available for FreeBSD.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, clayborg, labath, emaste
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: danalbert, srhines, mgorny, #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29347
llvm-svn: 293768
The main motivation for me doing this is being able to build an arm
android lldb-server against api level 9 headers, but it seems like a
good cleanup nonetheless.
The entirety of the cpu_set_t dance now resides in SingleStepCheck.cpp,
which is only built on arm64.
llvm-svn: 293046
Use the LLDB_LOG macro instead of the more verbose if(log) ... syntax.
I have also consolidated the log channels (everything now goes to the posix
channel, instead of a mixture of posix and lldb), and cleaned up some of the
more convoluted log statements.
llvm-svn: 292489
Previously it parsed /proc/<pid>/maps for every module separately
resulting in a very slow response time. This CL add some caching and
optimizes the implementation to improve the code from O(n*m) to O(n+m)
where n is the number of modules requested and m is the number of
files mapped into memory.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28233
llvm-svn: 290895
This code is currently unused.
Removing it should make porting of the linux plugin to NetBSD easier, and we can
always add it later if needed.
llvm-svn: 289801
Summary:
This is a test-the-water change about possibilities of reducing duplication in
the register context definitions.
I've named the new class RegisterInfoPOSIX, as RegisterContextPOSIX was already
taken :(. The two files were identical except for a fix by Tamas in D12636,
which was applied to the Linux version only, which fixed a discrepancy between
the definitions of fpsr and fpcr on one hand, and all other floating point
register definitions on the other.
Linux test suite still passes after this change. For freebsd, make the floating
point register behavior consistent, but I don't know whether it will be
consistently fixed, or consistently broken. By eyeballing the code, I have a
feeling that a similar fix to D12636 will be required in
RegisterContextPOSIXProcessMonitor_arm64::ReadRegister, but I can't be sure as I
have no way to test it (the assert in that function should fire upon accessing
the registers if it is wrong though).
Reviewers: emaste, clayborg
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, beanz, mgorny, modocache, dmikulin, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25947
llvm-svn: 287916
My script updated lldb::Errors, and I failed to fix it entirely
before pushing. This restore everything in lldb as it was before
r286561.
llvm-svn: 286565
This is forcing to use Error::success(), which is in a wide majority
of cases a lot more readable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26481
llvm-svn: 286561
Summary:
Check whether the setting the breakpoint failed during instruction emulation. If
it did, the next pc is likely in unmapped memory, and the inferior will crash
anyway after the next instruction. Do not return an error in this case, but just
continue stepping.
Reenabled the crash during step test for android/linux.
Reviewers: labath
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25926
Author: Jason Majors <jmajors@google.com>
llvm-svn: 285187
It's quite sad that we have to edit so many files just to add a register. I am
going to investigate how to merge these definitions somehow, but for now this
should at least get arm64 linux working again.
llvm-svn: 284970
This patch fixes ARM/AArch64 watchpoint bug which was taking inferior out of control while stepping over watchpoints.
Also adds a test case that tests above problem.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25057
llvm-svn: 284706
Summary:
This patch adds support for handling the SIGSEGV signal with 'si_code ==
SEGV_BNDERR', which is thrown when a bound violation is caught by the
Intel(R) MPX technology.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25329
llvm-svn: 283474
This patch refactors the way the XState type is checked and, in order to
simplify the code, it removes the usage of the 'cpuid' instruction: just checking
if the ptrace calls done throuhg ReadFPR is enough to verify both if there is
HW support and if there is kernel support. Also the XCR0 bits are enough to check if
there is both HW and kernel support for AVX and MPX.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24764
llvm-svn: 282072
Summary:
This patch uses the instruction CPUID to verify that FXSAVE, XSAVE, AVX
and MPX are supported by the target hardware. In case the HW supports XSAVE,
and at least one of the extended register sets, it further checks if the
target software has the kernel support for such features, by verifying that
their XSAVE part is correctly managed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24559
llvm-svn: 281507
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This reverts commit rL280668 because the register tests fail on i386
Linux.
I investigated a little bit what causes the failure - there are missing
registers when running 'register read -a'.
This is the output I got at the bottom:
"""
...
Memory Protection Extensions:
bnd0 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000}
bnd1 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000}
bnd2 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000}
bnd3 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000}
unknown:
2 registers were unavailable.
"""
Also looking at the packets exchanged between the client and server:
"""
...
history[308] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4a#d7
history[309] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet:
$name:bnd0;bitsize:128;offset:1032;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory
Protection Extensions;ehframe:101;dwarf:101;#48
history[310] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4b#d8
history[311] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet:
$name:bnd1;bitsize:128;offset:1048;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory
Protection Extensions;ehframe:102;dwarf:102;#52
history[312] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4c#d9
history[313] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet:
$name:bnd2;bitsize:128;offset:1064;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory
Protection Extensions;ehframe:103;dwarf:103;#53
history[314] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4d#da
history[315] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet:
$name:bnd3;bitsize:128;offset:1080;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory
Protection Extensions;ehframe:104;dwarf:104;#54
history[316] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4e#db
history[317] tid=0x7338 < 76> read packet:
$name:bndcfgu;bitsize:64;offset:1096;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;#99
history[318] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4f#dc
history[319] tid=0x7338 < 78> read packet:
$name:bndstatus;bitsize:64;offset:1104;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;#8e
...
"""
The bndcfgu and bndstatus registers don't have the 'Memory Protections
Extension' set. I looked at the code and it seems that that is set
correctly.
So I'm not sure what's the problem or where does it come from.
Also there is a second failure related to something like this in the
tests:
"""
registerSet.GetName().lower()
"""
For some reason the registerSet.GetName() returns None.
llvm-svn: 280703
Nitesh Jain