It seems that r300930 was creating an infinite loop in dag-combine when
compling the following file:
MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-typeset/z21.c
llvm-svn: 300940
immediate operands.
This commit adds an AArch64 dag-combine that optimizes code generation
for logical instructions taking immediate operands. The optimization
uses demanded bits to change a logical instruction's immediate operand
so that the immediate can be folded into the immediate field of the
instruction.
This recommits r300913, which broke bots because I didn't fix a call to
ShrinkDemandedConstant in SIISelLowering.cpp after changing the APIs of
TargetLoweringOpt and TargetLowering.
rdar://problem/18231627
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D5591
llvm-svn: 300930
immediate operands.
This commit adds an AArch64 dag-combine that optimizes code generation
for logical instructions taking immediate operands. The optimization
uses demanded bits to change a logical instruction's immediate operand
so that the immediate can be folded into the immediate field of the
instruction.
rdar://problem/18231627
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D5591
llvm-svn: 300913
Associate the version-when-defined with definitions of standard DWARF
constants. Identify the "vendor" for DWARF extensions.
Use this information to verify FORMs in .debug_abbrev are defined as
of the DWARF version specified in the associated unit.
Removed two tests that had specified DWARF v1 (which essentially does
not exist).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D30785
llvm-svn: 300875
This enables use after free and uninit memory checking for memory
returned by a recycler. SelectionDAG currently relies on the opcode of a
free'd node being ISD::DELETED_NODE, so poke a hole in the asan poison
for SDNode opcodes. This means that we won't find some issues, but only
in SDag.
llvm-svn: 300868
This will become asan errors once the patch lands that poisons the
memory after free. The x86 change is a hack, but I don't see how to
solve this properly at the moment.
llvm-svn: 300867
Recently alloca address space has been added to data layout. Due to this
change, pointer returned by alloca may have different size as pointer in
address space 0.
However, currently the value type of frame index is assumed to be of the
same size as pointer in address space 0.
This patch fixes that.
Most targets assume alloca returning pointer in address space 0, which
is the default alloca address space. Therefore it is NFC for them.
AMDGCN target with amdgiz environment requires this change since it
assumes alloca returning pointer to addr space 5 and its size is 32,
which is different from the size of pointer in addr space 0 which is 64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32021
llvm-svn: 300864
getSignBit is a static function that creates an APInt with only the sign bit set. getSignMask seems like a better name to convey its functionality. In fact several places use it and then store in an APInt named SignMask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32108
llvm-svn: 300856
Adds MVT::ElementCount to represent the length of a
vector which may be scalable, then adds helper functions
that work with it.
Patch by Graham Hunter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32019
llvm-svn: 300842
This patch adds a few helper functions to obtain new vector
value types based on existing ones without needing to care
about whether they are scalable or not.
I've confined their use to a few common locations right now,
and targets that don't have scalable vectors should never
need to care about these.
Patch by Graham Hunter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32017
llvm-svn: 300838
- introduced in r300522 and found via the Swift LLDB testsuite.
The fix is to set the location kind to memory whenever an FrameIndex
location is emitted.
rdar://problem/31707602
llvm-svn: 300793
- introduced in r300522 and found via the Swift LLDB testsuite.
The fix is to set the location kind to memory whenever an FrameIndex
location is emitted.
rdar://problem/31707602
llvm-svn: 300790
I've changed one of the tests to not fold away, but we didn't and still don't do the transform
that the comment claims we do (and I don't know why we'd want to do that).
Follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300725https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300763
llvm-svn: 300772
This allows forming more 'not' ops, so we get improvements for ISAs that have and-not.
Follow-up to:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL300725
llvm-svn: 300763
This is preparation for a clang change to improve the [[nodiscard]] warning to not be ignored on methods that return a class marked [[nodiscard]] that are defined in the class itself. See D32207.
We should consider adding wrapper methods to APInt that return the overflow flag directly and discard the APInt result. This would eliminate the void casts and the need to create a bool before the call to pass to the out param.
llvm-svn: 300758
The patch itself is simple: stop discriminating against vectors in visitAnd() and again in
SimplifyDemandedBits().
Some notes for reference:
1. We're not consistent about calls to SimplifyDemandedBits in the various visitXXX functions.
Sometimes, we check if the RHS is a constant first. Other times (like here), we just dive in.
2. I'd like to break the vector shackles in steps for the sake of risk minimization, but we could
make similar simultaneous changes in other places if we think that would be better.
3. I don't know what the intent of the changed tests in this patch was supposed to be, but since
they wiggled in a positive way, I'm just going with that. :)
4. In the rotate tests, note that we can see through non-splat constants. This is a result of D24253.
5. My motivation for being here now is to make D31944 look better, so this is step 1 of N towards
improving the vector codegen in that patch without writing any actual new code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32230
llvm-svn: 300725
This fixes PR32471.
As comment 10 on that bug report highlights
(https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32471#c10), there are quite a
few different defendable design tradeoffs that could be made, including
not representing pointers at all in LLT.
I decided to go for representing vector-of-pointer as a concept in LLT,
while keeping the size of the LLT type 64 bits (this is an increase from
48 bits before). My rationale for keeping pointers explicit is that on
some targets probably it's very handy to have the distinction between
pointer and non-pointer (e.g. 68K has a different register bank for
pointers IIRC). If we keep a scalar pointer, it probably is easiest to
also have a vector-of-pointers to keep LLT relatively conceptually clean
and orthogonal, while we don't have a very strong reason to break that
orthogonality. Once we gain more experience on the use of LLT, we can
of course reconsider this direction.
Rejecting vector-of-pointer types in the IRTranslator is also an option
to avoid the crash reported in PR32471, but that is only a very
short-term solution; also needs quite a bit of code tweaks in places,
and is probably fragile. Therefore I didn't consider this the best
option.
llvm-svn: 300664
This showed up in r300535/r300537, which were reverted in r300538 due to
some of the introduced tests in there failing on some bots, due to the
non-determinism fixed in this commit.
Re-committing r300535/r300537 will add 2 tests for the change in this
commit.
llvm-svn: 300663
Android x86_64 target uses f128 type and stores f128 values in %xmm* registers.
SoftenFloatRes_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT should not convert result value
from f128 to i128.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D32102
llvm-svn: 300583
This patch uses lshrInPlace to replace code where the object that lshr is called on is being overwritten with the result.
This adds an lshrInPlace(const APInt &) version as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32155
llvm-svn: 300566
Remove non-consecutive stores from store merge candidate search as
they cannot be merged and will prevent us from finding subsequent
mergeable store cases.
Reviewers: jyknight, bogner, javed.absar, spatel
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32086
llvm-svn: 300561
This reverts r300535 and r300537.
The newly added tests in test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/arm64-fallback.ll
produces slightly different code between LLVM versions being built with different compilers.
E.g., dependent on the compiler LLVM is built with, either one of the following
can be produced:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: unable to legalize instruction: %vreg0<def>(p0) = G_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT %vreg1, %vreg2; (in function: vector_of_pointers_extractelement)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: unable to legalize instruction: %vreg2<def>(p0) = G_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT %vreg1, %vreg0; (in function: vector_of_pointers_extractelement)
Non-determinism like this is clearly a bad thing, so reverting this until
I can find and fix the root cause of the non-determinism.
llvm-svn: 300538
This fixes PR32471.
As comment 10 on that bug report highlights
(https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32471#c10), there are quite a
few different defendable design tradeoffs that could be made, including
not representing pointers at all in LLT.
I decided to go for representing vector-of-pointer as a concept in LLT,
while keeping the size of the LLT type 64 bits (this is an increase from
48 bits before). My rationale for keeping pointers explicit is that on
some targets probably it's very handy to have the distinction between
pointer and non-pointer (e.g. 68K has a different register bank for
pointers IIRC). If we keep a scalar pointer, it probably is easiest to
also have a vector-of-pointers to keep LLT relatively conceptually clean
and orthogonal, while we don't have a very strong reason to break that
orthogonality. Once we gain more experience on the use of LLT, we can
of course reconsider this direction.
Rejecting vector-of-pointer types in the IRTranslator is also an option
to avoid the crash reported in PR32471, but that is only a very
short-term solution; also needs quite a bit of code tweaks in places,
and is probably fragile. Therefore I didn't consider this the best
option.
llvm-svn: 300535
The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location
descriptions:
1. Register location descriptions
- describe a variable in a register
- consist of only a DW_OP_reg
2. Memory location descriptions
- describe the address of a variable
3. Implicit location descriptions
- describe the value of a variable
- end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends
The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these
restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very
short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This
patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF
standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for
each expression being emitted.
This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not
for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on
how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref
operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put
at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of
DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression
and implements a bitcode upgrade.
There are two major changes in this patch:
I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function
arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address*
of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an
alloca.
When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register
location description or a memory location description depends on the
MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to
memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization
passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may
do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example:
DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8
DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also
added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests
repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs
slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
<rdar://problem/31205000>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439
llvm-svn: 300522
The splitIndirectCriticalEdges function generates and invalid CFG when the
'Target' basic block is a loop to itself. When this occurs, the code that
updates the predecessor terminator needs to update the terminator in the split
basic block.
This occurs when there is an edge from block D back to D. Since D is split in
to D0 and D1, the code needs to update the terminator in D1. But D1 is not in
the OtherPreds vector, so it was not getting updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32126
llvm-svn: 300480
This is a version of D32090 that unifies all of the
`getInstrProf*SectionName` helper functions. (Note: the build failures
which D32090 would have addressed were fixed with r300352.)
We should unify these helper functions because they are hard to use in
their current form. E.g we recently introduced more helpers to fix
section naming for COFF files. This scheme doesn't totally succeed at
hiding low-level details about section naming, so we should switch to an
API that is easier to maintain.
This is not an NFC commit because it fixes llvm-cov's testing support
for COFF files (this falls out of the API change naturally). This is an
area where we lack tests -- I will see about adding one as a follow up.
Testing: check-clang, check-profile, check-llvm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32097
llvm-svn: 300381
This avoids the confusing 'CS.paramHasAttr(ArgNo + 1, Foo)' pattern.
Previously we were testing return value attributes with index 0, so I
introduced hasReturnAttr() for that use case.
llvm-svn: 300367
Instructions CALLSEQ_START..CALLSEQ_END and their target dependent
counterparts keep data like frame size, stack adjustment etc. These
data are accessed by getOperand using hard coded indices. It is
error prone way. This change implements the access by special methods,
which improve readability and allow changing data representation without
massive changes of index values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31953
llvm-svn: 300196
Akira Hatanaka