Summary:
This removes the 'remapTypeIndices' method on every TypeRecord class. My
original idea was that this would be the beginning of some kind of
generic entry point that would enumerate all of the TypeIndices inside
of a TypeRecord, so that we could write generic graph algorithms for
them without duplicating the knowledge of which fields are type index
fields everywhere. This never happened, and nothing else uses this
method. I need to change the API to deal with merging into IPI streams,
so let's move it into the file that uses it first.
Reviewers: zturner, ruiu
Reviewed By: zturner, ruiu
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31267
llvm-svn: 298564
Previously we could round-trip type records from PDB -> Yaml ->
PDB, but for symbols we could only go from PDB -> Yaml. This
completes the round-tripping for symbols as well.
llvm-svn: 297625
Previously the type dumper itself was passed around to a lot of different
places and manipulated in ways that were more appropriate on the type
database. For example, the entire TypeDumper was passed into the symbol
dumper, when all the symbol dumper wanted to do was lookup the name of a
TypeIndex so it could print it. That's what the TypeDatabase is for --
mapping type indices to names.
Another example is how if the user runs llvm-pdbdump with the option to
dump symbols but not types, we still have to visit all types so that we
can print minimal information about the type of a symbol, but just without
dumping full symbol records. The way we did this before is by hacking it
up so that we run everything through the type dumper with a null printer,
so that the output goes to /dev/null. But really, we don't need to dump
anything, all we want to do is build the type database. Since
TypeDatabaseVisitor now exists independently of TypeDumper, we can do
this. We just build a custom visitor callback pipeline that includes a
database visitor but not a dumper.
All the hackery around printers etc goes away. After this patch, we could
probably even delete the entire CVTypeDumper class since really all it is
at this point is a thin wrapper that hides the details of how to build a
useful visitation pipeline. It's not a priority though, so CVTypeDumper
remains for now.
After this patch we will be able to easily plug in a different style of
type dumper by only implementing the proper visitation methods to dump
one-line output and then sticking it on the pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28524
llvm-svn: 291724
We were starting to get some name clashes between llvm-pdbdump
and the common CodeView framework, so I took this opportunity
to rename a bunch of files to more accurately describe their
usage. This also helps in llvm-pdbdump to distinguish
between different files and whether they are used for pretty
dump mode or raw dump mode.
llvm-svn: 291627
This creates a centralized class in which to store type records.
It stores types as an array of entries, which matches the
notion of a type stream being a topologically sorted DAG.
Logic to build up such a database was already being used in
CVTypeDumper, so CVTypeDumper is now updated to to read from
a TypeDatabase which is filled out by an earlier visitor in
the pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28486
llvm-svn: 291626
This is the 3rd of 3 patches to get reading and writing of
CodeView symbol and type records to use a single codepath.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26427
llvm-svn: 289978
Previously support had been added for using CodeViewRecordIO
to read (deserialize) CodeView type records. This patch adds
support for writing those same records. With this patch,
reading and writing of CodeView type records finally uses a single
codepath.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26253
llvm-svn: 286304
Using a pattern similar to that of YamlIO, this allows
us to have a single codepath for translating codeview
records to and from serialized byte streams. The
current patch only hooks this up to the reading of
CodeView type records. A subsequent patch will hook
it up for writing of CodeView type records, and then a
third patch will hook up the reading and writing of
CodeView symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26040
llvm-svn: 285836
Type visitor code had already been refactored previously to
decouple the visitor and the visitor callback interface. This
was necessary for having the flexibility to visit in different
ways (for example, dumping to yaml, reading from yaml, dumping
to ScopedPrinter, etc).
This patch merely implements the same visitation pattern for
symbol records that has already been implemented for type records.
llvm-svn: 283609
Until now, our use case for the visitor has been to take a stream of bytes
representing a type stream, deserialize the records in sequence, and do
something with them, where "something" is determined by how the user
implements a particular set of callbacks on an abstract class.
For actually writing PDBs, however, we want to do the reverse. We have
some kind of description of the list of records in their in-memory format,
and we want to process each one. Perhaps by serializing them to a byte
stream, or perhaps by converting them from one description format (Yaml)
to another (in-memory representation).
This was difficult in the current model because deserialization and
invoking the callbacks were tightly coupled.
With this patch we change this so that TypeDeserializer is itself an
implementation of the particular set of callbacks. This decouples
deserialization from the iteration over a list of records and invocation
of the callbacks. TypeDeserializer is initialized with another
implementation of the callback interface, so that upon deserialization it
can pass the deserialized record through to the next set of callbacks. In
a sense this is like an implementation of the Decorator design pattern,
where the Deserializer is a decorator.
This will be useful for writing Pdbs from yaml, where we have a
description of the type records in Yaml format. In this case, the visitor
implementation would have each visitation callback method implemented in
such a way as to extract the proper set of fields from the Yaml, and it
could maintain state that builds up a list of these records. Finally at
the end we can pass this information through to another set of callbacks
which serializes them into a byte stream.
Reviewed By: majnemer, ruiu, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23177
llvm-svn: 277871
This provides a better layering of responsibilities among different
aspects of PDB writing code. Some of the MSF related code was
contained in CodeView, and some was in PDB prior to this. Further,
we were often saying PDB when we meant MSF, and the two are
actually independent of each other since in theory you can have
other types of data besides PDB data in an MSF. So, this patch
separates the MSF specific code into its own library, with no
dependencies on anything else, and DebugInfoCodeView and
DebugInfoPDB take dependencies on DebugInfoMsf.
llvm-svn: 276458
This allows better catching of compiler errors since we can use
the override keyword to verify that methods are actually
overridden.
Also in this patch I've changed from storing a boolean Error
code everywhere to returning an llvm::Error, to propagate richer
error information up the call stack.
Reviewed By: ruiu, rnk
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21410
llvm-svn: 272926
This adds method and tests for writing to a PDB stream. With
this, even a PDB stream which is discontiguous can be treated
as a sequential stream of bytes for the purposes of writing.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21157
llvm-svn: 272369
To facilitate this, a couple of changes had to be made:
1. `ModuleSubstream` got moved from `DebugInfo/PDB` to
`DebugInfo/CodeView`, and various codeview related types are defined
there. It turns out `DebugInfo/CodeView/Line.h` already defines many of
these structures, but this is really old code that is not endian aware,
doesn't interact well with `StreamInterface` and not very helpful for
getting stuff out of a PDB. Eventually we should migrate the old readobj
`COFFDumper` code to these new structures, or at least merge their
functionality somehow.
2. A `ModuleSubstream` visitor is introduced. Depending on where your
module substream array comes from, different subsets of record types can
be expected. We are already hand parsing these substream arrays in many
places especially in `COFFDumper.cpp`. In the future we can migrate these
paths to the visitor as well, which should reduce a lot of code in
`COFFDumper.cpp`.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20936
Reviewed By: ruiu, majnemer
llvm-svn: 271621
We have need to reuse this functionality, including making
additional generic stream types that are smarter about how and
when they copy memory versus referencing the original memory.
So all of these structures belong in the common library
rather than being pdb specific.
llvm-svn: 270751
Summary:
This code is intended to be used as part of LLD's PDB writing. Until
that exists, this is exposed via llvm-readobj for testing purposes.
Type stream merging uses the following algorithm:
- Begin with a new empty stream, and a new empty hash table that maps
from type record contents to new type index.
- For each new type stream, maintain a map from source type index to
destination type index.
- For each record, copy it and rewrite its type indices to be valid in
the destination type stream.
- If the new type record is not already present in the destination
stream hash table, append it to the destination type stream, assign it
the next type index, and update the two hash tables.
- If the type record already exists in the destination stream, discard
it and update the type index map to forward the source type index to
the existing destination type index.
Reviewers: zturner, ruiu
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20122
llvm-svn: 269521
This introduces a variadic template and some helper macros to
safely and correctly deserialize many types of common record
fields while maintaining error checking.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20183
Reviewed By: rnk, amccarth
llvm-svn: 269315
Summary: This diff is the initial implementation of the LLVM CodeView library. There is much more work to be done, namely a CodeView dumper and tests. This patch should help others make progress on the LLVM->CodeView debug info emission while I continue with the implementation of the dumper and tests.
This library implements support for emitting debug info in the CodeView format. This phase of the implementation only includes support for CodeView type records. Clients that need to emit type records will use a class derived from TypeTableBuilder. TypeTableBuilder provides member functions for writing each kind of type record; each of these functions eventually calls the writeRecord virtual function to emit the actual bits of the record. Derived classes override writeRecord to implement the folding of duplicate records and the actual emission to the appropriate destination. LLVMCodeView provides MemoryTypeTableBuilder, which creates the table in memory. In the future, other classes derived from TypeTableBuilder will write to other destinations, such as the type stream in a PDB.
The rest of the types in LLVMCodeView define the actual CodeView type records and all of the supporting enums and other types used in the type records. The TypeIndex class is of particular interest, because it is used by clients as a handle to a type in the type table.
The library provides a relatively low-level interface based on the actual on-disk format of CodeView. For example, type records refer to other type records by TypeIndex, rather than by an actual pointer to the referent record. This allows clients to emit type records one at a time, rather than having to keep the entire transitive closure of type records in memory until everything has been emitted. At some point, having a higher-level interface layered on top of this one may be useful for debuggers and other tools that want a more holistic view of the debug info. The lower-level interface should be sufficient for compilers and linkers to do the debug info manipulation that they need to do efficiently.
Reviewers: rnk, majnemer
Subscribers: silvas, rnk, jevinskie, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14961
llvm-svn: 256385
Reid Kleckner