The demanded mask and the constant should always be the same width for all callers today.
Also stop copying the demanded mask as its passed in. We should avoid allocating memory unless we are going to do something. The final AND to create the new constant will take care of it.
llvm-svn: 300927
getSignBit is a static function that creates an APInt with only the sign bit set. getSignMask seems like a better name to convey its functionality. In fact several places use it and then store in an APInt named SignMask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32108
llvm-svn: 300856
This question comes up in many places in SimplifyDemandedBits. This makes it easy to ask without allocating additional temporary APInts.
The BitVector class provides a similar functionality through its (IMHO badly named) test(const BitVector&) method. Though its output polarity is reversed.
I've provided one example use case in this patch. I plan to do more as a follow up.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32258
llvm-svn: 300851
Currently we don't explicitly process ConstantDataSequential, ConstantAggregateZero, or ConstantVector, or Undef before applying the Depth limit. Instead they occur after the depth check in the non-instruction path.
For the constant types that we do handle, the code is replicated from computeKnownBits.
This patch fixes the missing constant handling and the reduces the amount of code by just using computeKnownBits directly for any type of Constant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32123
llvm-svn: 300849
This change is correct because the verifier requires that at most one
argument be marked 'sret'.
NFC, removes a use of AttributeList slot APIs.
llvm-svn: 300784
This is preparation for a clang change to improve the [[nodiscard]] warning to not be ignored on methods that return a class marked [[nodiscard]] that are defined in the class itself. See D32207.
We should consider adding wrapper methods to APInt that return the overflow flag directly and discard the APInt result. This would eliminate the void casts and the need to create a bool before the call to pass to the out param.
llvm-svn: 300758
This patch uses lshrInPlace to replace code where the object that lshr is called on is being overwritten with the result.
This adds an lshrInPlace(const APInt &) version as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32155
llvm-svn: 300566
So, `cast<Instruction>` is not guaranteed to succeed. Change the
code so that we create a new constant and use it in the newly
created instruction, as it's done in other places in InstCombine.
OK'ed by Sanjay/Craig. Fixes PR32686.
llvm-svn: 300495
Causes some VGPR usage improvements in shaderdb, but
introduces some SGPR spilling regressions due to random
scheduling changes later.
llvm-svn: 300453
If we already called computeKnownBits for the RHS being a constant power of 2, we've already computed everything we can and should just stop. I think previously we would still recurse if we had determined the result was negative or had not determined the sign bit at all.
llvm-svn: 300432
This patch adds new optimization (Folding cmp(sub(a,b),0) into cmp(a,b))
to instCombineCall pass and was written specific for X86 CMP intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31398
llvm-svn: 300422
When checking if we should return a constant, we create some temporary APInts to see if we know all bits. But the exact computations we do are needed in several other locations in the same code.
This patch moves them to named temporaries so we can reuse them.
Ideally we'd write directly to KnownZero/One, but we currently seem to only write those variables after all the simplifications checks and I didn't want to change that with this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32094
llvm-svn: 300376
This avoids the confusing 'CS.paramHasAttr(ArgNo + 1, Foo)' pattern.
Previously we were testing return value attributes with index 0, so I
introduced hasReturnAttr() for that use case.
llvm-svn: 300367
...when C1 differs from C2 by one bit and C1 <u C2:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/Vuo
And move related folds to a helper function. This reduces code duplication and
will make it easier to remove the scalar-only restriction as a follow-up step.
llvm-svn: 300364
We currently only support folding a subtract into a select but not a PHI. This fixes that.
I had to fix an assumption in FoldOpIntoPhi that assumed the PHI node was always in operand 0. Now we pass it in like we do for FoldOpIntoSelect. But we still require some dancing to find the Constant when we create the BinOp or ConstantExpr. This is based code is similar to what we do for selects.
Since I touched all call sites, this also renames FoldOpIntoPhi to foldOpIntoPhi to match coding standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31686
llvm-svn: 300363
Currently this code always makes 2 or 3 calls to tryFactorization regardless of whether the LHS/RHS are BinaryOperators. We make 3 calls when both operands are BinaryOperators with the same opcode. Or surprisingly, when neither are BinaryOperators. This is because getBinOpsForFactorization returns Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd when the operand is not a BinaryOperator. If both LHS and RHS are not BinaryOperators then they both have an Opcode of Instruction::BinaryOpsEnd. When this happens we rely on tryFactorization to early out due to A/B/C/D being null. Similar behavior occurs for the other calls, we rely on getBinOpsForFactorization having made A/B or C/D null to get tryFactorization to early out.
We also rely on these null checks to check the result of getIdentityValue and early out for it.
This patches refactors this to pull these checks up to SimplifyUsingDistributiveLaws so we don't rely on BinaryOpsEnd as a sentinel or this A/B/C/D null behavior. I think this makes this code easier to reason about. Should also give a tiny performance improvement for cases where the LHS or RHS isn't a BinaryOperator.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31913
llvm-svn: 300353
Add hasParamAttribute() and use it instead of hasAttribute(ArgNo+1,
Kind) everywhere.
The fact that the AttributeList index for an argument is ArgNo+1 should
be a hidden implementation detail.
NFC
llvm-svn: 300272
Switch from Euclid's algorithm to Stein's algorithm for computing GCD. This
avoids the (expensive) APInt division operation in favour of bit operations.
Remove all memory allocation from within the GCD loop by tweaking our `lshr`
implementation so it can operate in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31968
llvm-svn: 300252
Summary:
Bug noticed by inspection.
Extend the test to handle invokes as well as calls, and rewrite it to
not depend on the inliner and other passes.
Also simplify the call site replacement code with CallSite, similar to
what I did to dead arg elimination and arg promotion (rL300235 and
rL300229).
Reviewers: danielcdh, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32041
llvm-svn: 300251
This is effectively a retry of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL299851
but now we have tests and an assert to make sure the bug
that was exposed with that attempt will not happen again.
I'll fix the code duplication and missing sibling fold next,
but I want to make this change as small as possible to reduce
risk since I messed it up last time.
This should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32524
llvm-svn: 300236
It's less efficient to produce 'ule' than 'ult' since we know we're going to
canonicalize to 'ult', but we shouldn't have duplicated code for these folds.
As a trade-off, this was a pretty terrible way to make a '2'. :)
if (LHSC == SubOne(RHSC))
AddC = ConstantExpr::getSub(AddOne(RHSC), LHSC);
The next steps are to share the code to fix PR32524 and add the missing 'and'
fold that was left out when PR14708 was fixed:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14708
llvm-svn: 300222
This seems like a much more natural API, based on Derek Schuff's
comments on r300015. It further hides the implementation detail of
AttributeList that function attributes come last and appear at index
~0U, which is easy for the user to screw up. git diff says it saves code
as well: 97 insertions(+), 137 deletions(-)
This also makes it easier to change the implementation, which I want to
do next.
llvm-svn: 300153
This replicates the known bits and constant creation code from the single use case for these instructions and adds it here. The computeKnownBits and constant creation code for other instructions is now in the default case of the opcode switch.
llvm-svn: 300094
We already handled a superset check that included the known ones too and folded to a constant that may include ones. But it can also handle the case of no ones.
llvm-svn: 300093
As discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32486
...the canonicalization of vector select to shufflevector does not hold up
when undef elements are present in the condition vector.
Try to make the undef handling clear in the code and the LangRef.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31980
llvm-svn: 300092
Currently if we reach an instruction with multiples uses we know we can't do any optimizations to that instruction itself since we only have the demanded bits for one of the users. But if we know all of the bits are zero/one for that one user we can still go ahead and create a constant to give to that user.
This might then reduce the instruction to having a single use and allow additional optimizations on the other path.
This picks up an additional case that r300075 didn't catch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31552
llvm-svn: 300084
If we are adding/subtractings 0s below the highest demanded bit we can just use the other operand and remove the operation.
My primary motivation is observing that we can call ShrinkDemandedConstant for the add/sub and create a 0 constant, rather than removing the add completely. In the case I saw, we modified the constant on an add instruction to a 0, but the add is not put into the worklist. So we didn't revisit it until the next InstCombine iteration. This caused an IR modification to remove add and a subsequent iteration to be ran.
With this change we get bypass the add in the first iteration and prevent the second iteration from changing anything.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31120
llvm-svn: 300075
One potential way to make InstCombine (very slightly?) faster is to recycle instructions
when possible instead of creating new ones. It's not explicitly stated AFAIK, but we don't
consider this an "InstSimplify". We could, however, make a new layer to house transforms
like this if that makes InstCombine more manageable (just throwing out an idea; not sure
how much opportunity is actually here).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31863
llvm-svn: 300067
Craig Topper