This reverts r300535 and r300537.
The newly added tests in test/CodeGen/AArch64/GlobalISel/arm64-fallback.ll
produces slightly different code between LLVM versions being built with different compilers.
E.g., dependent on the compiler LLVM is built with, either one of the following
can be produced:
remark: <unknown>:0:0: unable to legalize instruction: %vreg0<def>(p0) = G_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT %vreg1, %vreg2; (in function: vector_of_pointers_extractelement)
remark: <unknown>:0:0: unable to legalize instruction: %vreg2<def>(p0) = G_EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELT %vreg1, %vreg0; (in function: vector_of_pointers_extractelement)
Non-determinism like this is clearly a bad thing, so reverting this until
I can find and fix the root cause of the non-determinism.
llvm-svn: 300538
For subtargets that use the custom lowering for divmod, e.g. gnueabi,
we used to check if the subtarget has hardware divide and then lower to
a div-mul-sub sequence if true, or to a libcall if false.
However, judging by the usage of hasDivide vs hasDivideInARMMode, it
seems that hasDivide only refers to Thumb. For instance, in the
ARMTargetLowering constructor, the code that specifies whether to use
libcalls for (S|U)DIV looks like this:
bool hasDivide = Subtarget->isThumb() ? Subtarget->hasDivide()
: Subtarget->hasDivideInARMMode();
In the case of divmod for arm-gnueabi, using only hasDivide() to
determine what to do means that instead of lowering to __aeabi_idivmod
to get the remainder, we lower to div-mul-sub and then further lower the
div to __aeabi_idiv. Even worse, if we have hardware divide in ARM but
not in Thumb, we generate a libcall instead of using it (this is not an
issue in practice since AFAICT none of the cores that we support have
hardware divide in ARM but not Thumb).
This patch fixes the code dealing with custom lowering to take into
account the mode (Thumb or ARM) when deciding whether or not hardware
division is available.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32005
llvm-svn: 300536
This fixes PR32471.
As comment 10 on that bug report highlights
(https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32471#c10), there are quite a
few different defendable design tradeoffs that could be made, including
not representing pointers at all in LLT.
I decided to go for representing vector-of-pointer as a concept in LLT,
while keeping the size of the LLT type 64 bits (this is an increase from
48 bits before). My rationale for keeping pointers explicit is that on
some targets probably it's very handy to have the distinction between
pointer and non-pointer (e.g. 68K has a different register bank for
pointers IIRC). If we keep a scalar pointer, it probably is easiest to
also have a vector-of-pointers to keep LLT relatively conceptually clean
and orthogonal, while we don't have a very strong reason to break that
orthogonality. Once we gain more experience on the use of LLT, we can
of course reconsider this direction.
Rejecting vector-of-pointer types in the IRTranslator is also an option
to avoid the crash reported in PR32471, but that is only a very
short-term solution; also needs quite a bit of code tweaks in places,
and is probably fragile. Therefore I didn't consider this the best
option.
llvm-svn: 300535
Summary:
Refactoring changed paramHasAttr(1 + i) to paramHasAttr(0), fix that to
paramHasAttr(i).
Add more tests to WebAssemblyOptimizeReturned that catch that
regression.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: jfb, sbc100, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32136
llvm-svn: 300502
Avoid looping through program to determine register counts.
This avoids needing to look at regmask operands.
Also fixes some counting errors with flat_scr when there
are no stack objects.
llvm-svn: 300482
It's basically a terrible idea anyway but objc_msgSend gets emitted like that.
We can decide on a better way to deal with it in the unlikely event that anyone
actually uses it.
llvm-svn: 300474
It's almost certainly not a good idea to actually use it in most cases (there's
a pretty large code size overhead on AArch64), but we can't do those
experiments until it's supported.
llvm-svn: 300462
Our 16 bit support is assembler-only + the terrible hack that is
.code16gcc. Simply using 32 bit registers does the right thing for the
latter.
Fixes PR32681.
llvm-svn: 300429
Summary:
In PR32594, inline assembly using the 'A' constraint on x86_64 causes
llvm to crash with a "Cannot select" stack trace. This is because
`X86TargetLowering::getRegForInlineAsmConstraint` hardcodes that 'A'
means the EAX and EDX registers.
However, on x86_64 it means the RAX and RDX registers, and on 16-bit x86
(ia16?) it means the old AX and DX registers.
Add new register classes in `X86RegisterInfo.td` to support these cases,
and amend the logic in `getRegForInlineAsmConstraint` to cope with
different subtargets. Also add a test case, derived from PR32594.
Reviewers: craig.topper, qcolombet, RKSimon, ab
Reviewed By: ab
Subscribers: ab, emaste, royger, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31902
llvm-svn: 300404
If a kernel's pointer argument is known to be readonly
set access qualifier accordingly. This allows RT not to
flush caches before dispatches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32091
llvm-svn: 300362
MOVNTDQA non-temporal aligned vector loads can be correctly represented using generic builtin loads, allowing us to remove the existing x86 intrinsics.
Clang companion patch: D31766.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31767
llvm-svn: 300325
This further improves Ahmed's change in rL299482. See the new comment for the
rationale.
The patch recovers most of the regression for bzip2 after D31965. We're down
to +2.68% from +6.97%.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32028
llvm-svn: 300276
If the offset cannot fit into the instruction, an addition to the
pointer is emitted before the actual access. However, BPF offsets are
16-bit but LLVM considers them to be, for the matter of this check,
to be 32-bit long.
This causes the following program:
int bpf_prog1(void *ign)
{
volatile unsigned long t = 0x8983984739ull;
return *(unsigned long *)((0xffffffff8fff0002ull) + t);
}
To generate the following (wrong) code:
0: 18 01 00 00 39 47 98 83 00 00 00 00 89 00 00 00
r1 = 590618314553ll
2: 7b 1a f8 ff 00 00 00 00 *(u64 *)(r10 - 8) = r1
3: 79 a1 f8 ff 00 00 00 00 r1 = *(u64 *)(r10 - 8)
4: 79 10 02 00 00 00 00 00 r0 = *(u64 *)(r1 + 2)
5: 95 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 exit
Fix it by changing the offset check to 16-bit.
Patch by Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32055
llvm-svn: 300269
In many cases ds operations can be combined even if offsets do not
fit into 8 bit encoding. What it takes is to adjust base address.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31993
llvm-svn: 300227
If workgroup size is known inform llvm about range returned by local
id and local size queries.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31804
llvm-svn: 300102
Check if the scale operand is identical (doesn't have to be 1) and
do not check the chaain operand.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31833
llvm-svn: 299986
If you run llc -stop-after=codegenprepare and feed the resulting MIR
to llc -start-after=codegenprepare, you'll have an empty machine
function since we haven't run any isel yet. Of course, this only works
if the MIRParser believes you that this is okay.
This is essentially a revert of r241862 with a fix for the problem it
was papering over.
llvm-svn: 299975
Use the same handling in the generic legalizer code as for the other
libcalls (G_FREM, G_FPOW).
Enable it on ARM for float and double so we can test it.
llvm-svn: 299931
Summary: Legalize only if the type is marked as Legal or Custom. If not, return Unsupported as LegalizerHelper is not able to handle non-power-of-2 types right now.
Reviewers: qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, dsanders, t.p.northover, kristof.beyls, javed.absar, ab
Reviewed By: kristof.beyls, ab
Subscribers: dberris, rovka, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31711
llvm-svn: 299929
A fix for the bug reported in PR30911.
The issue arises when multiple CALLSEQ_BEGIN nodes are unscheduled as
the last node to be unscheduled will gain access to the CallResource
register. But when a node is being picked, only CALLSEQ_END nodes are
checked against the CallResource and have their chains evaluated.
This then means that other CALLSEQ_BEGIN nodes can be scheduled
before the existing call sequence has been finalised. This patch adds
a check against the FrameSetup nodes in DelayForLiveRegs to prevent
this from happening.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31536
llvm-svn: 299926
Check the legality of ISD::[US]MULO to see whether
Intrinsic::[us]mul_with_overflow will legalize into a function call (and, thus,
will use the CTR register). Fixes PR32485.
Patch by Tim Neumann!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31790
llvm-svn: 299910
The math works out where it can actually be counter-productive. The probability
calculations correctly handle the case where the alternative is 0 probability,
rely on those calculations.
Includes a test case that demonstrates the problem.
llvm-svn: 299892
Qin may be large, and Succ may be more frequent than BB. Take these both into
account when deciding if tail-duplication is profitable.
llvm-svn: 299891
Merging identical blocks when it doesn't reduce fallthrough. It is common for
the blocks created from critical edge splitting to be identical. We would like
to merge these blocks whenever doing so would not reduce fallthrough.
llvm-svn: 299890
BIC is generally faster, and it can put the output in a different
register from the input.
We already do this in Thumb2 mode; not sure why the equivalent fix
never got applied to ARM mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31797
llvm-svn: 299803
The original instruction might get legalized and erased and expanded
into intermediate instructions and the intermediate instructions might
fail legalization. This end up in reporting GISelFailure on the erased
instruction.
Instead report GISelFailure on the intermediate instruction which failed
legalization.
Reviewed by: ab
llvm-svn: 299802
When using -ffixed-x18, the x18 (or w18) register can safely be used
with the "global register variable" GCC extension, but the backend
fails to recognize it.
Patch by Roland McGrath.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31793
llvm-svn: 299799
This reverts commit r299766. This change appears to have broken the MIPS
buildbots. Reverting while I investigate.
Revert "[mips] Remove usage of debug only variable (NFC)"
This reverts commit r299769. Follow up commit.
llvm-svn: 299788
Increase threshold to unroll a loop which contains an "if" statement
whose condition defined by a PHI belonging to the loop. This may help
to eliminate if region and potentially even PHI itself, saving on
both divergence and registers used for the PHI.
Add a small bonus for each of such "if" statements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31693
llvm-svn: 299779
We have two cases here, the first one being the following instruction
selection from the builtin function:
bm(n)zi builtin -> vselect node -> bins[lr]i machine instruction
In case of bm(n)zi having an immediate which has either its high or low bits
set, a bins[lr] instruction can be selected through the selectVSplatMask[LR]
function. The function counts the number of bits set, and that value is
being passed to the bins[lr]i instruction as its immediate, which in turn
copies immediate modulo the size of the element in bits plus 1 as per specs,
where we get the off-by-one-error.
The other case is:
bins[lr]i -> vselect node -> bsel.v
In this case, a bsel.v instruction gets selected with a mask having one bit
less set than required.
Patch by Stefan Maksimovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30579
llvm-svn: 299768
By target hookifying getRegisterType, getNumRegisters, getVectorBreakdown,
backends can request that LLVM to scalarize vector types for calls
and returns.
The MIPS vector ABI requires that vector arguments and returns are passed in
integer registers. With SelectionDAG's new hooks, the MIPS backend can now
handle LLVM-IR with vector types in calls and returns. E.g.
'call @foo(<4 x i32> %4)'.
Previously these cases would be scalarized for the MIPS O32/N32/N64 ABI for
calls and returns if vector types were not legal. If vector types were legal,
a single 128bit vector argument would be assigned to a single 32 bit / 64 bit
integer register.
By teaching the MIPS backend to inspect the original types, it can now
implement the MIPS vector ABI which requires a particular method of
scalarizing vectors.
Previously, the MIPS backend relied on clang to scalarize types such as "call
@foo(<4 x float> %a) into "call @foo(i32 inreg %1, i32 inreg %2, i32 inreg %3,
i32 inreg %4)".
This patch enables the MIPS backend to take either form for vector types.
Reviewers: zoran.jovanovic, jaydeep, vkalintiris, slthakur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27845
llvm-svn: 299766
A test case was found with llvm-stress that caused DAGCombiner to crash
when compiling for an older subtarget without vector support.
SystemZTargetLowering::combineTruncateExtract() should do nothing for older
subtargets.
This check was placed in canTreatAsByteVector(), which also helps in a few
other places.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 299763
It turns out -float-abi=hard doesn't set the hard float calling
convention for libcalls. We need to use a hard float triple instead
(e.g. gnueabihf).
llvm-svn: 299761
Summary:
Difference beetween PreRegAlloc() and MachineSSAOptimization() are that the former is run despite of -O0 optimization level. In my undestanding SiShrinkInstructions and SDWAPeephole shouldn't run when optimizations are disabled.
With this change order of passes will not change.
Reviewers: arsenm, vpykhtin, rampitec
Subscribers: qcolombet, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31705
llvm-svn: 299757
Legalize to a libcall.
On this occasion, also start allowing soft float subtargets. For the
moment G_FREM is the only legal floating point operation for them.
llvm-svn: 299753
The new codepath has been in the tree for years, and there isn't any
reason to use two codepaths here.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30596
llvm-svn: 299723
This is possible in ways that are not compiler bugs,
so stop asserting on them.
This emits an extra error when emitting objects when it
can't encode the new pseudo, but I'm not sure that matters.
llvm-svn: 299712
In LowerMUL, the chain information is not preserved for the new
created Load SDNode.
For example, if a Store alias with one of the operand of Mul.
The Load for that operand need to be scheduled before the Store.
The dependence is recorded in the chain of Store, in TokenFactor.
However, when lowering MUL, the SDNodes for the new Loads for
VMULL are not updated in the TokenFactor for the Store. Thus the
chain is not preserved for the lowered VMULL.
llvm-svn: 299701
Summary:
Host CPU detection now supports Kryo, so we need to recognize it in ARM
target.
Reviewers: mcrosier, t.p.northover, rengolin, echristo, srhines
Reviewed By: t.p.northover, echristo
Subscribers: aemerson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31775
llvm-svn: 299674
If a workgroup size is known to be not greater than wavefront size
the s_barrier instruction is not needed since all threads are guarantied
to come to the same point at the same time.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31731
llvm-svn: 299659
During the optimisation of jump tables in the constant island pass,
an extra ADD could be left over, now dead but not removed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31389
llvm-svn: 299634
This is a follow-on to r299096 which added support for fmadd.
Subtract does not have the case where with two multiply operands we commute in
order to fuse with the multiply with the fewer uses.
llvm-svn: 299572
Commit r298799 changed code that made the XFAIL on MachineBranchProb.ll
irrelevant, but some configurations still failed. I can't reproduce it
locally, so I'm hoping that enabling this will tell me if some
configurations will really fail or if they were just too slow.
llvm-svn: 299558
This is a generic combine enabled via target hook to reduce icmp logic as discussed in:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32401
It's likely that other targets will want to enable this hook for scalar transforms,
and there are probably other patterns that can use bitwise logic to reduce comparisons.
Note that we are missing an IR canonicalization for these patterns, and we will probably
prefer the pair-of-compares form in IR (shorter, more likely to fold).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31483
llvm-svn: 299542
When DAGCombiner visits a SIGN_EXTEND_INREG of a BUILD_VECTOR with
constant operands, a new BUILD_VECTOR node will be created transformed
constants.
Llvm-stress found a case where the new BUILD_VECTOR had constant operands
of an illegal type, because the (legal) element type is in fact not a legal
scalar type.
This patch changes this so that the new BUILD_VECTOR has the same operand
type as the old one.
Review: Eli Friedman, Nirav Dave
https://bugs.llvm.org//show_bug.cgi?id=32422
llvm-svn: 299540
Before r294774, there was a problem when lowering broadcasts to use
128-bit subvectors.
When we looked through a bitcast to find the broadcast input, we'd keep
using the original type, so you'd end up with things like:
(v8f32 (broadcast
(v4f32 (extract_subvector
(v8i32 V),
...))
))
r294774 fixed it to always emit subvectors with the scalar type of the
original source.
It also introduced some asserts, to check that we use scalars with
the same size, and vectors with the same number of elements.
The scalar size equality is checked earlier when looking through bitcasts,
and is a useful assert.
However, the number of elements don't have to be identical: we're always
going to extract a 128-bit subvector, and we can have different size
inputs if we looked through a concat_vector to find a 256-bit source.
Relax the overzealous assert.
Replace it with a check of the original source vector being 256 or 512
bits. If it's 128 bits, we can't extract_subvector from it.
Fixes PR32371.
llvm-svn: 299490
This improves upon r246462: that prevented FMOVs from being emitted
for the cross-class INSERT_SUBREGs by disabling the formation of
INSERT_SUBREGs of LOAD. But the ld1.s that we started selecting
caused us to introduce partial dependencies on the vector register.
Avoid that by using SCALAR_TO_VECTOR: it's a first-class citizen that
is folded away by many patterns, including the scalar LDRS that we
want in this case.
Credit goes to Adam for finding the issue!
llvm-svn: 299482
This mode is just like -mcmodel=small except that it moves the
thread pointer from TPIDR_EL0 to TPIDR_EL1.
Patch by Roland McGrath.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31624
llvm-svn: 299462
This patch is a part one of two reviews, one for the clang and the other for LLVM.
The patch deletes the back-end intrinsics and adds support for them in the auto upgrade.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31393
llvm-svn: 299432
Summary:
Lift the restrictions that prevented the tree walking introduced in the
previous change and add support for patterns like:
(G_ADD (G_MUL (G_SEXT $src1), (G_SEXT $src2)), $src3) -> SMADDWrrr $dst, $src1, $src2, $src3
Also adds support for G_SEXT and G_ZEXT to support these cases.
One particular aspect of this that I should draw attention to is that I've
tried to be overly conservative in determining the safety of matches that
involve non-adjacent instructions and multiple basic blocks. This is intended
to be used as a cheap initial check and we may add a more expensive check in
the future. The current rules are:
* Reject if any instruction may load/store (we'd need to check for intervening
memory operations.
* Reject if any instruction has implicit operands.
* Reject if any instruction has unmodelled side-effects.
See isObviouslySafeToFold().
Reviewers: t.p.northover, javed.absar, qcolombet, aditya_nandakumar, ab, rovka
Reviewed By: ab
Subscribers: igorb, dberris, llvm-commits, kristof.beyls
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30539
llvm-svn: 299430
This patch teaches the hazard scheduler how to handle empty blocks
when search for the next real instruction when dealing with forbidden
slots.
Reviewers: slthakur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31293
llvm-svn: 299427
PSADBW pattern currently supports the 32 bit IR pattern and only GLT (greather than) comparison.
The patch extends the pattern to catch also 64 bit IR pattern and includes all other comparison types (not only GLT).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31577
llvm-svn: 299425
It can be costly to transfer from the gprs to the xmm registers and can prevent loads merging.
This patch splits vXi16/vXi32/vXi64 BUILD_VECTORS that use the same operand in multiple elements into a BUILD_VECTOR with only a single insertion of each of those elements and then performs an unary shuffle to duplicate the values.
There are a couple of minor regressions this patch unearths due to some missing MOVDDUP/BROADCAST folds that I will address in a future patch.
Note: Now that vector shuffle lowering and combining is pretty good we should be reusing that instead of duplicating so much in LowerBUILD_VECTOR - this is the first of several patches to address this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31373
llvm-svn: 299387
The x86_64 ABI requires that the stack is 16 byte aligned on function calls. Thus, the 8-byte error code, which is pushed by the CPU for certain exceptions, leads to a misaligned stack. This results in bugs such as Bug 26413, where misaligned movaps instructions are generated.
This commit fixes the misalignment by adjusting the stack pointer in these cases. The adjustment is done at the beginning of the prologue generation by subtracting another 8 bytes from the stack pointer. These additional bytes are popped again in the function epilogue.
Fixes Bug 26413
Patch by Philipp Oppermann.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30049
llvm-svn: 299383
Summary:
Move the aarch64-type-promotion pass within the existing type promotion framework in CGP.
This change also support forking sexts when a new sext is required for promotion.
Note that change is based on D27853 and I am submitting this out early to provide a better idea on D27853.
Reviewers: jmolloy, mcrosier, javed.absar, qcolombet
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28680
llvm-svn: 299379
Diana Picus