CodeExtractor looks up the dominator node corresponding to return blocks
when splitting them. If one of these blocks is unreachable, there's no
node in the Dom and CodeExtractor crashes because it doesn't check
for domtree node validity.
In theory, we could add just a check for skipping null DTNodes in
`splitReturnBlock` but the fix I propose here is slightly different. To the
best of my knowledge, unreachable blocks are irrelevant for the algorithm,
therefore we can just skip them when building the candidate set in the
constructor.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32335
llvm-svn: 300946
Before, we assumed that any ConstantInt offset was precisely the access width,
so we could use the "[rN]!" form. ISelLowering only ever created that kind, but
further simplification during combining could lead to unexpected constants and
incorrect codegen.
Should fix PR32658.
llvm-svn: 300878
This change is correct because the verifier requires that at most one
argument be marked 'sret'.
NFC, removes a use of AttributeList slot APIs.
llvm-svn: 300784
The most common case for a branch condition is
a single use compare. Directly invert the branch
predicate rather than adding a lot of xor i1 true
which the DAG will have to fold later.
This produces nicer to read structurizer output.
This produces some random changes in codegen
due to the DAG swapping branch conditions itself,
and then does a poor job of dealing with those
inverts.
llvm-svn: 300732
Summary:
See http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#non-integral-pointer-type
The NewGVN test does not fail without these changes (perhaps it does
try to coerce pointers <-> integers to begin with?), but I added the
test case anyway.
Reviewers: dberlin
Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, Prazek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32208
llvm-svn: 300730
This patch simplifies the examples from D31509 and D31927 (PR30630) and catches
the basic identity shuffle tests that Zvi recently added.
I'm not sure if we have something like this in DAGCombiner, but we should?
It's worth noting that "MaxRecurse / RecursionLimit" is only 3 on entry at the moment.
We might want to bump that up if there are longer shuffle chains like this in the wild.
For now, we're ignoring shuffles that have undef mask elements because it's not
clear how those should be handled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31960
llvm-svn: 300714
InstSimplify returned the wrong type when simplifying a vector GEP
and we ended up crashing when trying to replace all uses with the
new value. Fixes PR32697.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32180
llvm-svn: 300693
Summary: In case all predecessor go to a single successor of current BB. We want to fold (not thread).
Reviewers: efriedma, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: dberlin, majnemer, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30869
llvm-svn: 300657
In tryToVectorizeList, under a very limited circumstance (when entered
from tryToVectorizePair), the values may be reordered (swapped) and the
SLP tree is built with the new order. This extends that to the case when
starting from phis in vectorizeChainsInBlock when there are exactly two
phis. The textual order of phi nodes shouldn't really matter. Without
this change, the loop body in the accompnaying test case is fully vectorized
when we swap the orde of the phis but not with this order. While this
doesn't solve the phi-ordering problem in a general way (for more than 2
phis), this is simple fix that piggybacks on an existing mechanism and
is useful in cases like multiplying two complex numbers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32065
llvm-svn: 300574
Summary:
* Add checks for store. That is needed because GlobalsAA is called
twice in the current pipeline with different sets of Function passes
following it. However, the loads are eliminated using instcombine
which happens everywhere. On the other hand, DeadStoreElimination is
performed only once so by checking for store we'll be able to catch
more cases when GlobalsAA is invalidated unintentionally.
* Add empty function above/below the test so that we don't depend on
the relative order of instcombine/dead-store-elimination and the
pass that invalidates the analysis (inside the same
FunctionPassManager).
Reviewers: kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: kristof.beyls
Subscribers: llvm-commits, n.bozhenov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32015
Patch by Andrei Elovikov <andrei.elovikov@intel.com>
llvm-svn: 300553
The DWARF specification knows 3 kinds of non-empty simple location
descriptions:
1. Register location descriptions
- describe a variable in a register
- consist of only a DW_OP_reg
2. Memory location descriptions
- describe the address of a variable
3. Implicit location descriptions
- describe the value of a variable
- end with DW_OP_stack_value & friends
The existing DwarfExpression code is pretty much ignorant of these
restrictions. This used to not matter because we only emitted very
short expressions that we happened to get right by accident. This
patch makes DwarfExpression aware of the rules defined by the DWARF
standard and now chooses the right kind of location description for
each expression being emitted.
This would have been an NFC commit (for the existing testsuite) if not
for the way that clang describes captured block variables. Based on
how the previous code in LLVM emitted locations, DW_OP_deref
operations that should have come at the end of the expression are put
at its beginning. Fixing this means changing the semantics of
DIExpression, so this patch bumps the version number of DIExpression
and implements a bitcode upgrade.
There are two major changes in this patch:
I had to fix the semantics of dbg.declare for describing function
arguments. After this patch a dbg.declare always takes the *address*
of a variable as the first argument, even if the argument is not an
alloca.
When lowering a DBG_VALUE, the decision of whether to emit a register
location description or a memory location description depends on the
MachineLocation — register machine locations may get promoted to
memory locations based on their DIExpression. (Future) optimization
passes that want to salvage implicit debug location for variables may
do so by appending a DW_OP_stack_value. For example:
DBG_VALUE, [RBP-8] --> DW_OP_fbreg -8
DBG_VALUE, RAX --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
DBG_VALUE, RAX, DIExpression(DW_OP_deref) --> DW_OP_reg0 +0
All testcases that were modified were regenerated from clang. I also
added source-based testcases for each of these to the debuginfo-tests
repository over the last week to make sure that no synchronized bugs
slip in. The debuginfo-tests compile from source and run the debugger.
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32382
<rdar://problem/31205000>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31439
llvm-svn: 300522
Summary: If there is suffix added in the function name (e.g. module hash added by thinLTO), we will not be able to find a match in profile as the suffix does not exist in profile. This patch build a map from function name to Function *. The map includes the entry for the stripped function name so that inlineHotFunctions can find the corresponding function to promote/inline.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo, tejohnson
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31952
llvm-svn: 300507
So, `cast<Instruction>` is not guaranteed to succeed. Change the
code so that we create a new constant and use it in the newly
created instruction, as it's done in other places in InstCombine.
OK'ed by Sanjay/Craig. Fixes PR32686.
llvm-svn: 300495
The splitIndirectCriticalEdges function generates and invalid CFG when the
'Target' basic block is a loop to itself. When this occurs, the code that
updates the predecessor terminator needs to update the terminator in the split
basic block.
This occurs when there is an edge from block D back to D. Since D is split in
to D0 and D1, the code needs to update the terminator in D1. But D1 is not in
the OtherPreds vector, so it was not getting updated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32126
llvm-svn: 300480
Causes some VGPR usage improvements in shaderdb, but
introduces some SGPR spilling regressions due to random
scheduling changes later.
llvm-svn: 300453
This patch is a generalization of the improvement introduced in rL296898.
Previously, we were able to peel one iteration of a loop to get rid of a Phi that becomes
an invariant on the 2nd iteration. In more general case, if a Phi becomes invariant after
N iterations, we can peel N times and turn it into invariant.
In order to do this, we for every Phi in loop's header we define the Invariant Depth value
which is calculated as follows:
Given %x = phi <Inputs from above the loop>, ..., [%y, %back.edge].
If %y is a loop invariant, then Depth(%x) = 1.
If %y is a Phi from the loop header, Depth(%x) = Depth(%y) + 1.
Otherwise, Depth(%x) is infinite.
Notice that if we peel a loop, all Phis with Depth = 1 become invariants,
and all other Phis with finite depth decrease the depth by 1.
Thus, peeling N first iterations allows us to turn all Phis with Depth <= N
into invariants.
Reviewers: reames, apilipenko, mkuper, skatkov, anna, sanjoy
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31613
llvm-svn: 300446
When peeling loops basing on phis becoming invariants, we make a wrong loop size check.
UP.Threshold should be compared against the total numbers of instructions after the transformation,
which is equal to 2 * LoopSize in case of peeling one iteration.
We should also check that the maximum allowed number of peeled iterations is not zero.
Reviewers: sanjoy, anna, reames, mkuper
Reviewed By: mkuper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31753
llvm-svn: 300441
This patch adds new optimization (Folding cmp(sub(a,b),0) into cmp(a,b))
to instCombineCall pass and was written specific for X86 CMP intrinsics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31398
llvm-svn: 300422
...when C1 differs from C2 by one bit and C1 <u C2:
http://rise4fun.com/Alive/Vuo
And move related folds to a helper function. This reduces code duplication and
will make it easier to remove the scalar-only restriction as a follow-up step.
llvm-svn: 300364
We currently only support folding a subtract into a select but not a PHI. This fixes that.
I had to fix an assumption in FoldOpIntoPhi that assumed the PHI node was always in operand 0. Now we pass it in like we do for FoldOpIntoSelect. But we still require some dancing to find the Constant when we create the BinOp or ConstantExpr. This is based code is similar to what we do for selects.
Since I touched all call sites, this also renames FoldOpIntoPhi to foldOpIntoPhi to match coding standards.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31686
llvm-svn: 300363
Switch from Euclid's algorithm to Stein's algorithm for computing GCD. This
avoids the (expensive) APInt division operation in favour of bit operations.
Remove all memory allocation from within the GCD loop by tweaking our `lshr`
implementation so it can operate in-place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31968
llvm-svn: 300252
Summary:
Bug noticed by inspection.
Extend the test to handle invokes as well as calls, and rewrite it to
not depend on the inliner and other passes.
Also simplify the call site replacement code with CallSite, similar to
what I did to dead arg elimination and arg promotion (rL300235 and
rL300229).
Reviewers: danielcdh, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32041
llvm-svn: 300251
Summary: For iterative SamplePGO, an indirect call can be speculatively promoted to multiple direct calls and get inlined. All these promoted direct calls will share the same callsite location (offset+discriminator). With the current implementation, we cannot distinguish between different promotion candidates and its inlined instance. This patch adds callee_name to the key of the callsite sample map. And added helper functions to get all inlined callee samples for a given callsite location. This helps the profile annotator promote correct targets and inline it before annotation, and ensures all indirect call targets to be annotated correctly.
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo
Reviewed By: davidxl
Subscribers: andreadb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31950
llvm-svn: 300240
Summary:
In first order recurrences where phi's are used outside the loop,
we should generate an additional vector.extract of the second last element from
the vectorized phi update.
This is because we require the phi itself (which is the value at the second last
iteration of the vector loop) and not the phi's update within the loop.
Also fix the code gen when we just unroll, but don't vectorize.
Fixes PR32396.
Reviewers: mssimpso, mkuper, anemet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31979
llvm-svn: 300238
This is effectively a retry of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rL299851
but now we have tests and an assert to make sure the bug
that was exposed with that attempt will not happen again.
I'll fix the code duplication and missing sibling fold next,
but I want to make this change as small as possible to reduce
risk since I messed it up last time.
This should fix:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32524
llvm-svn: 300236
Noticed by inspection while doing attribute work. DAE, InstCombineCalls,
and ArgPromotion have a fair amount of duplicated code for hacking on
call sites, and you can find bugs by comparing them.
Add a test case for this.
llvm-svn: 300229
Davide Italiano