The proper approach is to rebuild libutil and libkvm with a desired sanitizer.
An alternative approach to reimplement these functions (and other ones like
curses(3), editline(3) etc) does not scale and enforces linkage every single
binary with these libraries.
llvm-svn: 325593
Summary:
This patch (on top of https://reviews.llvm.org/D35755) provides the clang side necessary
to enable the Solaris port of the sanitizers implemented by https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898,
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40899, and https://reviews.llvm.org/D40900).
A few features of note:
* While compiler-rt cmake/base-config-ix.cmake (COMPILER_RT_OS_DIR) places
the runtime libs in a tolower(CMAKE_SYSTEM_NAME) directory, clang defaults to
the OS part of the target triplet (solaris2.11 in the case at hand). The patch makes
them agree on compiler-rt's idea.
* While Solaris ld accepts a considerable number of GNU ld options for compatibility,
it only does so for the double-dash forms. clang unfortunately is inconsistent here
and sometimes uses the double-dash form, sometimes the single-dash one that
confuses the hell out of Solaris ld. I've changed the affected places to use the double-dash
form that should always work.
* As described in https://reviews.llvm.org/D40899, Solaris ld doesn't create the
__start___sancov_guards/__stop___sancov_guards labels gld/gold/lld do, so I'm
including additional runtime libs into the link that provide them.
* One test uses -fstack-protector, but unlike other systems libssp hasn't been folded
into Solaris libc, but needs to be linked with separately.
* For now, only 32-bit x86 asan is enabled on Solaris. 64-bit x86 should follow, but
sparc (which requires additional compiler-rt changes not yet submitted) fails miserably
due to a llvmsparc backend limitation:
fatal error: error in backend: Function "_ZN7testing8internal16BoolFromGTestEnvEPKcb": over-aligned dynamic alloca not supported.
However, inside the gcc tree, Solaris/sparc asan works almost as well as x86.
Reviewers: rsmith, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: jyknight, fedor.sergeev, cfe-commits
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40903
llvm-svn: 324296
Summary:
kvm - kernel memory interface
The kvm(3) functions like kvm_open(), kvm_getargv() or kvm_getenvv()
are used in programs that can request information about a kernel and
its processes. The LLVM sanitizers will make use of them on NetBSD.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, vitalybuka, dvyukov
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42017
llvm-svn: 323022
llvm-objcopy is getting to where it can be used in non-trivial ways
(such as for dwarf fission in clang). It now supports dwarf fission but
this feature hasn't been thoroughly tested yet. This change allows
people to optionally build clang to use llvm-objcopy rather than GNU
objcopy. By default GNU objcopy is still used so nothing should change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39029
llvm-svn: 317960
Summary:
This change adds Scudo as a possible Sanitizer option via -fsanitize=.
This allows for easier static & shared linking of the Scudo library, it allows
us to enforce PIE (otherwise the security of the allocator is moot), and check
for incompatible Sanitizers combo.
In its current form, Scudo is not compatible with any other Sanitizer, but the
plan is to make it work in conjunction with UBsan (-fsanitize=scudo,undefined),
which will require additional work outside of the scope of this change.
Reviewers: eugenis, kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: eugenis, alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits, srhines
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39334
llvm-svn: 317337
Summary:
* Rename -shared-libasan to -shared-libsan, keeping the old name as alias.
* Add -static-libsan for targets that default to shared.
* Remove an Android special case. It is now possible (but untested) to use static compiler-rt libraries there.
* Support libclang_rt.ubsan_standalone as a shared library.
Unlike GCC, this change applies -shared-libsan / -static-libsan to all sanitizers.
I don't see a point in multiple flags like -shared-libubsan, considering that most sanitizers
are not compatible with each other, and each link has basically a single shared/static choice.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, kcc, rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38525
llvm-svn: 315015
Passes 'new-pass-manager' option to the linker plugin when the new pass
manager is enabled.
Patch by Graham Yiu.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38517
llvm-svn: 314964
Summary:
An implementation of ubsan runtime library suitable for use in production.
Minimal attack surface.
* No stack traces.
* Definitely no C++ demangling.
* No UBSAN_OPTIONS=log_file=/path (very suid-unfriendly). And no UBSAN_OPTIONS in general.
* as simple as possible
Minimal CPU and RAM overhead.
* Source locations unnecessary in the presence of (split) debug info.
* Values and types (as in A+B overflows T) can be reconstructed from register/stack dumps, once you know what type of error you are looking at.
* above two items save 3% binary size.
When UBSan is used with -ftrap-function=abort, sometimes it is hard to reason about failures. This library replaces abort with a slightly more informative message without much extra overhead. Since ubsan interface in not stable, this code must reside in compiler-rt.
Reviewers: pcc, kcc
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, aprantl, krytarowski, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36810
llvm-svn: 312029
Summary:
Relanding https://reviews.llvm.org/D35739 which was reverted because
it broke the tests on non-Linux. The tests have been fixed to be
platform agnostic, and additional tests have been added to make sure
that the plugin has the correct extension on each platform
(%pluginext doesn't work in CHECK lines).
Reviewers: srhines, pirama
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: emaste, mehdi_amini, eraman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36769
llvm-svn: 310960
Summary:
It's only named LLVMgold.so on Linux. Fix the name for Windows and
Darwin.
Also fix the path for Windows so binutils doesn't have to.
Reviewers: srhines, pirama
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35739
llvm-svn: 310895
The commit r310291 introduced the failure. r310332 was a test fix commit and
r310300 was a followup commit. I reverted these two to avoid merge conflicts
when reverting.
The 'openmp-offload.c' test is failing on Darwin because the following
run lines:
// RUN: touch %t1.o
// RUN: touch %t2.o
// RUN: %clang -### -no-canonical-prefixes -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=nvptx64-nvidia-cuda -save-temps -no-canonical-prefixes %t1.o %t2.o 2>&1 \
// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHK-TWOCUBIN %s
trigger the following assertion:
Driver.cpp:3418:
assert(CachedResults.find(ActionTC) != CachedResults.end() &&
"Result does not exist??");
llvm-svn: 310345
Projects that want to statically link their own C++ standard library currently
need to pass -nostdlib or -nodefaultlibs, which also disables linking of the
builtins library, -lm, and so on. Alternatively, they could use `clang` instead
of `clang++`, but that already disables implicit addition of -lm on some
toolchains.
Add a dedicated flag -nostdlib++ that disables just linking of libc++ /
libstdc++. This is analogous to -nostdinc++.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35780
llvm-svn: 308997
Summary:
Enable LLVM asan sanitizer for NetBSD/amd64.
Don't generate -ldl for dlopen(3)-like functions on NetBSD.
These features are available in libc on NetBSD.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, eugenis, kcc, dim
Reviewed By: dim
Subscribers: #clang, #sanitizers
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34960
llvm-svn: 307104
Previously, adding libfuzzer to a project was a multi-step procedure,
involving libfuzzer compilation, linking the library, and specifying
coverage flags.
With this change,libfuzzer can be enabled by adding a single
-fsanitize=fuzzer flag instead.
llvm-svn: 301212
Summary: We need to be able to disable samplepgo for specific files by supporting -fno-auto-profile and -fno-profile-sample-use
Reviewers: davidxl, dnovillo, echristo
Reviewed By: echristo
Subscribers: echristo, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31213
llvm-svn: 298446
Summary:
This patch adds -f[no-]rtlib-add-rpath, which if enabled, embeds the
arch-specific subdirectory in resource directory using -rpath (instead
of doing so only during native compilation).
This patch also re-enables test arch-specific-libdir.c which was
silently unsupported because of the REQUIRES tag 'linux'.
Reviewers: bkramer, rnk, mgorny
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30700
llvm-svn: 297751
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Kamil Rytarowski