- reverts r321622, r321625, and r321626.
- the use of bit-fields is still resulting in warnings - even though we can use static-asserts to harden the code and ensure the bit-fields are wide enough. The bots still complain of warnings being seen.
- to silence the warnings requires specifying the bit-fields with the underlying enum type (as opposed to the enum type itself), which then requires lots of unnecessary static casts of each enumerator within DeclSpec to the underlying-type, which even though could be seen as implementation details, it does hamper readability - and given the additional litterings, makes me question the value of the change.
So in short - I give up (for now at least).
Sorry about the noise.
llvm-svn: 321628
- Since these enums are used as bit-fields - for the bit-fields to be interpreted as unsigned, the underlying type must be specified as unsigned.
Previous failed attempt - wherein I did not specify an underlying type - was the sum of:
https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321614https://reviews.llvm.org/rC321615
llvm-svn: 321622
- the enum changes to TypeSpecifierType are breaking some tests - and will require a more careful integration.
Sorry about rushing these changes - thought I could sneak them in prior to heading out for new years ;)
llvm-svn: 321616
This implements [dcl.modules.export] from the C++ Modules TS, which lets a module re-export another module with the "export import" syntax.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40270
llvm-svn: 318744
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
This change avoid a crash that occurred when skipping to EOF while parsing an
ObjC interface/implementation.
rdar://31963299
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34185
llvm-svn: 305719
as identifiers in Objective-C++
This commit improves the 'expected identifier' errors that are presented when a
C++ keyword is used as an identifier in Objective-C++ by mentioning that this is
a C++ keyword in the diagnostic message. It also improves the error recovery:
the parser will now treat the C++ keywords as identifiers to prevent unrelated
parsing errors.
rdar://20626062
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26503
llvm-svn: 299950
This enhances the AST to keep track of locations of the names in those ObjC property attributes, and reports them for indexing.
Patch by Nathan Hawes!
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30907
llvm-svn: 297972
This patch ensures that the typo fixit for the @try/@finally/@autoreleasepool {}
directive is shown only when we're parsing an actual statement where such
directives can actually be present.
rdar://19669565
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26916
llvm-svn: 288334
The ObjC class protocol list assumes there is an associated location for each protocol but no location is provided
when the protocol list comes from a typedef, and we end up with a buffer overflow when trying to get locations for the protocol names.
Fixes crash of rdar://28980278.
llvm-svn: 286331
Fix a crash-on-invalid.
When parsing type arguments and protocols,
parseObjCTypeArgsOrProtocolQualifiers() calls ParseTypeName(), which tries to
find matching tokens for '[', '(', etc whenever they appear among potential
type names. If unmatched, ParseTypeName() yields a tok::eof token stream. This
leads to crashes since the parsing at this point is not expected to go beyond
the param list closing '>'.
Fix that by properly handling tok::eof in
parseObjCTypeArgsOrProtocolQualifiers() callers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23852
rdar://problem/25063557
llvm-svn: 281383
into ParseDeclOrFunctionDefInternal() (which is called by
MaybeParseMicrosoftAttributes()), so that the attributes can be stored in
the DeclSpec. No behavior change yet, part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280574
Sema actions on ObjCDictionaryLiteral and ObjCArryLiteral are currently
done as a side-effect of Sema upon parent expressions, which incurs of
delayed typo corrections for such literals to be performed by TypoTransforms
upon the ObjCDictionaryLiteral and ObjCArryLiteral themselves instead of
its elements individually.
This is specially bad because it was not designed to act on several
elements; searching through all possible combinations of corrections for
several elements is very expensive. Additionally, when one of the
elements has no correction candidate, we still explore all options and
at the end emit no typo corrections whatsoever.
Do the proper sema actions by acting on each element alone during appropriate
literal parsing time to get proper diagonistics and decent compile time
behavior.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22183
rdar://problem/21046678
llvm-svn: 276020
This patch adds a new AST node: ObjCAvailabilityCheckExpr, and teaches the
Parser and Sema to generate it. This node represents an availability check of
the form:
@available(macos 10.10, *);
Which will eventually compile to a runtime check of the host's OS version. This
is the first patch of the feature I proposed here:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2016-July/049851.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22171
llvm-svn: 275654
- In functions with try { } catch { }, only the try block would be
skipped, not the catch blocks
- The template functions would still be parsed.
- The initializers within a constructor would still be parsed.
- The inline functions within class would still be stored, only to be
discared later.
- Invalid code with try would assert (as in "int foo() try assert_here")
This attempt to do even less while skipping function bodies.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20821
llvm-svn: 272963
Instead of setting DeclSpec's range end to point to the next token
after the DeclSpec, we use getLocForEndOfToken to insert fix-it after a type
name.
Before this fix, fix-it will change
^(NSView view) to ^(*NSView view)
This commit correctly updates the source to ^(NSView* view).
rdar://21042144
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20844
llvm-svn: 271448
constructor's definition is in an implementation block.
Without this commit, ptr doesn't get initialized to null in the
following code:
struct S {
S();
void *ptr = nullptr;
};
@implementation I
S::S() {}
@end
rdar://problem/25693624
llvm-svn: 266645
Under certain conditions clang currently fails to properly diagnostic ObjectC
parameter list when type args and protocols are mixed in the same list. This
happens when the first item in the parameter list is a (1) protocol, (2)
unknown type or (3) a list of protocols/unknown types up to the first type
argument. Fix the problem to report the proper error, example:
NSArray<M, NSValue *, NSURL, NSArray <id <M>>> *foo = @[@"a"];
NSNumber *bar = foo[0];
NSLog(@"%@", bar);
$ clang ...
x.m:7:13: error: angle brackets contain both a type ('NSValue') and a protocol ('M')
NSArray<M, NSValue *, NSURL, NSArray <id <M>>> *foo = @[@"a"];
~ ^
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18997
rdar://problem/22204367
llvm-svn: 266245
While this won't help fix things like the bug that r260219 addressed, it
seems like good tidy up to have anyway.
(it might be nice if "makeArrayRef" always produced a MutableArrayRef &
let it decay to an ArrayRef when needed - then I'd use that for the
MutableArrayRefs in this patch)
If we had std::dynarray I'd use that instead of unique_ptr+size_t,
ideally (but then it'd have to be threaded down through the Preprocessor
all the way - no idea how painful that would be)
llvm-svn: 260246
Add "enum ObjCPropertyQueryKind" to a few APIs that used to only take the name
of the property: ObjCPropertyDecl::findPropertyDecl,
ObjCContainerDecl::FindPropertyDeclaration,
ObjCInterfaceDecl::FindPropertyVisibleInPrimaryClass,
ObjCImplDecl::FindPropertyImplDecl, and Sema::ActOnPropertyImplDecl.
ObjCPropertyQueryKind currently has 3 values:
OBJC_PR_query_unknown, OBJC_PR_query_instance, OBJC_PR_query_class
This extra parameter specifies that we are looking for an instance property with
the given name, or a class property with the given name, or any property with
the given name (if both exist, the instance property will be returned).
rdar://23891898
llvm-svn: 259070
This is the third patch in a series of patches to support class properties
in addition to instance properties in objective-c.
rdar://23891898
llvm-svn: 258834
called on an empty list.
This commit makes Parser::parseObjCTypeParamListOrProtocolRefs return
nullptr if it sees an invalid type parameter (e.g., __kindof) in the
type parameter list.
rdar://problem/23068920
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15463
llvm-svn: 255754
r251874 stopped back-patching the AST when an Objective-C 'readonly'
property is redeclared in a class extension as 'readwrite'. However,
it did not properly handle merging of Objective-C property attributes
(e.g., getter name, ownership, atomicity) to the redeclaration,
leading to bad metadata. Merge (and check!) those property attributes
so we get the right metadata and reasonable ASTs. Fixes
rdar://problem/23823989.
llvm-svn: 255309
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Typeof.html
Differences from the GCC extension:
* __auto_type is also permitted in C++ (but only in places where
it could appear in C), allowing its use in headers that might
be shared across C and C++, or used from C++98
* __auto_type can be combined with a declarator, as with C++ auto
(for instance, "__auto_type *p")
* multiple variables can be declared in a single __auto_type
declaration, with the C++ semantics (the deduced type must be
the same in each case)
This patch also adds a missing restriction on applying typeof to
a bit-field, which GCC has historically rejected in C (due to
lack of clarity as to whether the operand should be promoted).
The same restriction also applies to __auto_type in C (in both
GCC and Clang).
This also fixes PR25449.
Patch by Nicholas Allegra!
llvm-svn: 252690
Introduce co- and contra-variance for Objective-C type parameters,
which allows us to express that (for example) an NSArray is covariant
in its type parameter. This means that NSArray<NSMutableString *> * is
a subtype of NSArray<NSString *> *, which is expected of the immutable
Foundation collections.
Type parameters can be annotated with __covariant or __contravariant
to make them co- or contra-variant, respectively. This feature can be
detected by __has_feature(objc_generics_variance). Implements
rdar://problem/20217490.
llvm-svn: 241549
Warn in cases where one has provided redundant protocol qualification
that might be a typo for a specialization, e.g., NSArray<NSObject>,
which is pointless (NSArray declares that it conforms to NSObject) and
is likely to be a typo for NSArray<NSObject *>, i.e., an array of
NSObject pointers. This warning is very narrow, only applying when the
base type being qualified is parameterized, has the same number of
parameters as their are protocols listed, all of the names can also
refer to types (including Objective-C class types, of course), and at
least one of those types is an Objective-C class (making this a typo
for a missing '*'). The limitations are partly for performance reasons
(we don't want to do redundant name lookup unless we really need to),
and because we want the warning to apply in very limited cases to
limit false positives.
Part of rdar://problem/6294649.
llvm-svn: 241547
Teach C++'s tentative parsing to handle specializations of Objective-C
class types (e.g., NSArray<NSString *>) as well as Objective-C
protocol qualifiers (id<NSCopying>) by extending type-annotation
tokens to handle this case. As part of this, remove Objective-C
protocol qualifiers from the declaration specifiers, which never
really made sense: instead, provide Sema entry points to make them
part of the type annotation token. Among other things, this properly
diagnoses bogus types such as "<NSCopying> id" which should have been
written as "id <NSCopying>".
Implements template instantiation support for, e.g., NSArray<T>*
in C++. Note that parameterized classes are not templates in the C++
sense, so that cannot (for example) be used as a template argument for
a template template parameter. Part of rdar://problem/6294649.
llvm-svn: 241545
Aaron Ballman