llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
David Majnemer	b3e96f700e	Parse: Concatenated string literals should be verified in inline asm While we would correctly handle asm("foo") and reject asm(L"bar"), we weren't careful to handle cases where an ascii literal could be concatenated with a wide literal. This fixes PR21822. llvm-svn: 223992	2014-12-11 01:00:48 +00:00
Richard Smith	d67aea28f6	User-defined literals: reject string and character UDLs in all places where the grammar requires a string-literal and not a user-defined-string-literal. The two constructs are still represented by the same TokenKind, in order to prevent a combinatorial explosion of different kinds of token. A flag on Token tracks whether a ud-suffix is present, in order to prevent clients from needing to look at the token's spelling. llvm-svn: 152098	2012-03-06 03:21:47 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

David Majnemer

b3e96f700e

Parse: Concatenated string literals should be verified in inline asm

While we would correctly handle asm("foo") and reject asm(L"bar"), we
weren't careful to handle cases where an ascii literal could be
concatenated with a wide literal.

This fixes PR21822.

llvm-svn: 223992

2014-12-11 01:00:48 +00:00

Richard Smith

d67aea28f6

User-defined literals: reject string and character UDLs in all places where the

grammar requires a string-literal and not a user-defined-string-literal. The
two constructs are still represented by the same TokenKind, in order to prevent
a combinatorial explosion of different kinds of token. A flag on Token tracks
whether a ud-suffix is present, in order to prevent clients from needing to look
at the token's spelling.

llvm-svn: 152098

2012-03-06 03:21:47 +00:00

2 Commits