The driver uses class SanitizerArgs to store parsed sanitizer arguments. It keeps a cached
SanitizerArgs object in ToolChain and uses it for different jobs. This does not work if
the sanitizer options are different for different jobs, which could happen when an
offloading toolchain translates the options for different jobs.
To fix this, SanitizerArgs should be created by using the actual arguments passed
to jobs instead of the original arguments passed to the driver, since the toolchain
may change the original arguments. And the sanitizer arguments should be diagnose
once.
This patch also fixes HIP toolchain for handling -fgpu-sanitize: a warning is emitted
for GPU's not supporting sanitizer and skipped. This is for backward compatibility
with existing -fsanitize options. -fgpu-sanitize is also turned on by default.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich, Evgenii Stepanov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111443
Make the virtual method Toolchain::GetDefaultStackProtectorLevel()
return an explict enum value rather than an integral constant. This
makes the code subjectively easier to read, and should help prevent bugs
that may (or may never) arise from changing the enum values. Previously,
these were just kept in sync via a comment, which is brittle. The trade
off is including a additional header in a few new places. It is not
necessary, but in my opinion helps the readability.
Split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D90194 to help cut down on lines
changed in code review.
Reviewed By: phosek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90271
If not overridden, AddClangSystemIncludeArgs's implementation is empty, so by
default, no system include args are added to the Clang driver. This means that
invoking Clang without the frontend must include a manual -I/usr/include flag,
which is inconsistent behavior. Therefore, override and implement this method
to match. Some boilerplate is also borrowed for handling of the other driver
flags.
While we are here, also override and enable HasNativeLLVMSupport.
Patch by: 3405691582 (dana koch)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86412
specified at Command creation, rather than as part of the Tool.
This resolves the hack I just added to allow Darwin toolchain to vary
its level of support based on `-mlinker-version=`.
The change preserves the _current_ settings for response-file support.
Some tools look likely to be declaring that they don't support
response files in error, however I kept them as-is in order for this
change to be a simple refactoring.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82782
Very few ELF platforms still use .ctors/.dtors now. Linux (glibc: 1999-07),
DragonFlyBSD, FreeBSD (2012-03) and Solaris have supported .init_array
for many years. Some architectures like AArch64/RISC-V default to
.init_array . GNU ld and gold can even convert .ctors to .init_array .
It makes more sense to flip the CC1 default, and only uses
-fno-use-init-array on platforms that don't support .init_array .
For example, OpenBSD did not support DT_INIT_ARRAY before Aug 2016
(86fa57a279)
I may miss some ELF platforms that still use .ctors, but their
maintainers can easily diagnose such problems.
Reviewed By: rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71393
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary: - Since 6.2 release, on supporters platforms clang is shipped with both libcxx and libcxxabi.
Reviewers: dberris, alekseyshl, EricWF
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45662
llvm-svn: 330310
Summary:
Basic support of Sanitiser to follow-up ubsan support in compiler-rt.
Needs to use lld instead of base ld to be fully workable.
Patch by: David CARLIER
Reviewers: krytarowski, vitalybuka, kettenis
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43961
llvm-svn: 326648
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Tim Northover