An instruction may define the same reg unit multiple times,
avoid inserting the same reaching def multiple times in that case.
Also print the reg unit, rather than the super-register, in the
debug code.
Move the logic whether lowering of deopt value requires a spill slot in
a separate lambda.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: dantrushin
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77629
Now that we have scalable vectors, there's a distinction that isn't
getting captured in the original SequentialType: some vectors don't have
a known element count, so counting the number of elements doesn't make
sense.
In some cases, there's a better way to express the commonality using
other methods. If we're dealing with GEPs, there's GEP methods; if we're
dealing with a ConstantDataSequential, we can query its element type
directly.
In the relatively few remaining cases, I just decided to write out
the type checks. We're talking about relatively few places, and I think
the abstraction doesn't really carry its weight. (See thread "[RFC]
Refactor class hierarchy of VectorType in the IR" on llvmdev.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75661
Summary:
In lieu of a proper pass that strips debug info, add a way
to omit debug-locations from the MIR output so that
instructions with MMO's continue to match CHECK's when
mir-debugify is used
Reviewers: aprantl, bogner, vsk
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77575
Summary:
To debugify MIR, we need to be able to create metadata and to do that, we
need a non-const Module. However, MachineFunction only had a const reference
to the Function preventing this.
Reviewers: aprantl, bogner
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77439
A global symbol that is defined in a comdat should not generate an alias since
call sites that would've referred to that symbol will refer to their own
independent local aliases rather than the surviving global comdat one. This
could result in something that looks like:
```
ld.lld: error: relocation refers to a discarded section: .text._ZN3fbl8internal18NullFunctionTargetIvJjjPjEED1Ev.stub
>>> defined in user-x64-clang/obj/system/ulib/minfs/libminfs.a(minfs._sources.file.cc.o)
>>> section group signature: _ZN3fbl8internal18NullFunctionTargetIvJjjPjEED1Ev.stub
>>> prevailing definition is in user-x64-clang/obj/system/ulib/minfs/libminfs.a(minfs._sources.vnode.cc.o)
>>> referenced by function.h:169 (../../zircon/system/ulib/fbl/include/fbl/function.h:169)
>>> minfs._sources.file.cc.o:(minfs::File::AllocateAndCommitData(std::__2::unique_ptr<minfs::Transaction, std::__2::default_delete<minfs::Transaction> >)) in archive user-x64-clang/obj/system/ulib/minfs/libminfs.a
```
We ran into this when experimenting with a new C++ ABI for fuchsia
(refer to D72959) which takes relative offsets between comdat'd functions
which is why the normal C++ user wouldn't run into this.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77429
Summary:
A bug report mentioned that LLVM was producing jumps off the end of a
function when using "asm goto with outputs". Further digging pointed to
MachineBasicBlocks that had their address taken and were indirect
targets of INLINEASM_BR being removed by BranchFolder, because their
predecessor list was empty, so they appeared to have no entry.
This was a cascading failure caused earlier, during Pre-RA instruction
scheduling. We have a few special cases in Pre-RA instruction scheduling
where we split a MachineBasicBlock in two. This requires careful
handing of predecessor and successor lists for a MachineBasicBlock that
was split, and careful handing of PHI MachineInstrs that referred to the
MachineBasicBlock before it was split.
The clue that led to this fix was the observation that many callers of
MachineBasicBlock::splice() frequently call
MachineBasicBlock::transferSuccessorsAndUpdatePHIs() to update their PHI
nodes after a splice. We don't want to reuse that method, as we have
custom successor transferring logic for this block split.
This patch fixes 2 pre-existing bugs, and adds tests.
The first bug was that MachineBasicBlock::splice() correctly handles
updating most successors and predecessors; we don't need to do anything
more than removing the previous fallthrough block from the first half of
the split block post splice. Previously, we were updating the successor
list incorrectly (updating successors updates predecessors).
The second bug was that PHI nodes that needed registers from the first
half of the split block were not having entries populated. The register
live out information was correct, and the FuncInfo->PHINodesToUpdate was
correct. Specifically, the check in SelectionDAGISel::FinishBasicBlock:
for (unsigned i = 0, e = FuncInfo->PHINodesToUpdate.size(); i != e; ++i) {
MachineInstrBuilder PHI(*MF, FuncInfo->PHINodesToUpdate[i].first);
if (!FuncInfo->MBB->isSuccessor(PHI->getParent()))
continue;
PHI.addReg(FuncInfo->PHINodesToUpdate[i].second).addMBB(FuncInfo->MBB);
was `continue`ing because FuncInfo->MBB tracks the second half of
the post-split block; no one was updating PHI entries for the first half
of the post-split block.
SelectionDAGBuilder::UpdateSplitBlock() already expects to perform
special handling for MachineBasicBlocks that were split post calls to
ScheduleDAGSDNodes::EmitSchedule(), so I'm confident that it's both
correct for ScheduleDAGSDNodes::EmitSchedule() to return the second half
of the split block `CopyBB` which updates `FuncInfo->MBB` (ie. the
current MachineBasicBlock being processed), and perform special handling
for this in SelectionDAGBuilder::UpdateSplitBlock().
Reviewers: void, craig.topper, efriedma
Reviewed By: void, efriedma
Subscribers: hfinkel, fhahn, MatzeB, efriedma, hiraditya, llvm-commits, srhines
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76961
The previous code used the type of the first field for the VT
passed to getNode for every field.
I've based the implementation here off what is done in visitSelect
as it removes the need to special case aggregates.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77093
When entering a basic block, RDA inserts reaching definitions coming
from predecessor blocks (which will be negative numbers) in a rather
peculiar way. If you have incoming reaching definitions -4, -3, -2, -1,
it will insert those. If you have incoming reaching definitions
-1, -2, -3, -4, it will insert -1, -1, -1, -1, as the max is taken
at each step. That's probably not what was intended...
However, RDA only actually cares about the most recent reaching
definition from a predecessor (to calculate clearance), so this
ends up working fine as far as behavior is concerned. It does
waste memory on unnecessary reaching definitions though.
This patch changes the implementation to first compute the most
recent reaching definition in one loop, and then insert only that
one in a separate loop.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77508
At the end of a basic block, RDA adjusts all the reaching defs it
found to be relative to the end of the basic block, rather than the
start of it. However, it also does this to registers which don't
have a reaching def, indicated by ReachingDefDefaultVal. This means
that code checking against ReachingDefDefaultVal will not skip them,
and may insert them into the reaching definition list. This is
ultimately harmless, but causes unnecessary work and is logically
not right.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77506
Summary:
This patch adds support for emission of following DWARFv5 macro forms
in .debug_macro section.
1. DW_MACRO_start_file
2. DW_MACRO_end_file
3. DW_MACRO_define_strp
4. DW_MACRO_undef_strp.
Reviewed By: dblaikie, ikudrin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72828
Summary:
This is a roll forward of D77394 minus AlignmentFromAssumptions (which needs to be addressed separately)
Differences from D77394:
- DebugStr() now prints the alignment value or `None` and no more `Align(x)` or `MaybeAlign(x)`
- This is to keep Warning message consistent (CodeGen/SystemZ/alloca-04.ll)
- Removed a few unneeded headers from Alignment (since it's included everywhere it's better to keep the dependencies to a minimum)
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: sdardis, hiraditya, jrtc27, atanasyan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77537
We're ANDing with 1 right after which will cause the SIGN_EXTEND to
be combined to ANY_EXTEND later. Might as well just start with an
ANY_EXTEND.
While there replace create the AND using the getZeroExtendInReg
helper to remove the need to explicitly create the VecOnes constant.
This code is replacing a shift with a new shift on an extended type.
If the shift amount type can't represent the maximum shift amount
for the new type, the amount needs to be extended to a type that
can.
Previously, the code just hardcoded a check for 256 bits which
seems to have been an assumption that the original shift amount
was MVT::i8. But that seems more catered to a specific target
like X86 that uses i8 as its legal shift amount type. Other
targets may use different types.
This commit changes the code to look at the real type of the shift
amount and makes sure it has enough bits for the Log2 of the
new type. There are similar checks to this in SelectionDAGBuilder
and LegalizeIntegerTypes.
Previously line table symbol was represented as `DIE::value_iterator`
inside `DwarfCompileUnit` and subsequent function `intStmtList`
was used to create a local `MCSymbol` to initialize it.
This patch removes `DIE::value_iterator` from `DwarfCompileUnit`
and intoduce `MCSymbol` for representing this units symbol for
`debug_line` section. As a result `applyStmtList` is also modified
to utilize this. Further more a helper function `getLineTableStartSym`
is also introduced to get this symbol, this would be used by clients
which need to access this line table, i.e `debug_macro`.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77489
The newly-created constant zero will need an extra register to hold it
in the current statepoint lowering implementation. Remove it if there
exists one.
Summary:
D77423 started using a dominator tree in WasmEHPrepare, but we deleted
BBs in `prepareThrows` before we used the domtree in `prepareEHPads`,
and those CFG changes were not reflected in the domtree. This uses
`DomTreeUpdater` to make sure we update the domtree every time we delete
BBs from the CFG. This fixes ubsan/msan/expensive_check errors caught in
LLVM buildbots.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77465
Summary:
When we insert a call to the personality function wrapper
(`_Unwind_CallPersonality`) for a catch pad, we store some necessary
info in `__wasm_lpad_context` struct and pass it. One of the info is the
LSDA address for the function. For this, we insert a call to
`wasm.lsda()`, which will be lowered down to the address of LSDA, and
store it in a field in `__wasm_lpad_context`.
There are exceptions to this personality call insertion: catchpads for
`catch (...)` and cleanuppads (for destructors) don't need personality
function calls, because we don't need to figure out whether the current
exception should be caught or not. (They always should.)
There was a little optimization to `wasm.lsda()` call insertion. Because
the LSDA address is the same throughout a function, we don't need to
insert a store of `wasm.lsda()` return value in every catchpad. For
example:
```
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// wasm.lsda() call and a store are inserted here, like, in
// pseudocode,
// %lsda = wasm.lsda();
// store %lsda to a field in __wasm_lpad_context
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// We don't need to insert the wasm.lsda() and store again, because
// to arrive here, we have already stored the LSDA address to
// __wasm_lpad_context in the outer catch.
}
}
```
So the previous algorithm checked if the current catch has a parent EH
pad, we didn't insert a call to `wasm.lsda()` and its store.
But this was incorrect, because what if the outer catch is `catch (...)`
or a cleanuppad?
```
try {
foo();
} catch (...) {
// wasm.lsda() call and a store are NOT inserted here
try {
foo();
} catch (int) {
// We need wasm.lsda() here!
}
}
```
In this case we need to insert `wasm.lsda()` in the inner catchpad,
because the outer catchpad does not have one.
To minimize the number of inserted `wasm.lsda()` calls and stores, we
need a way to figure out whether we have encountered `wasm.lsda()` call
in any of EH pads that dominates the current EH pad. To figure that
out, we now visit EH pads in BFS order in the dominator tree so that we
visit parent BBs first before visiting its child BBs in the domtree.
We keep a set named `ExecutedLSDA`, which basically means "Do we have
`wasm.lsda()` either in the current EH pad or any of its parent EH
pads in the dominator tree?". This is to prevent scanning the domtree up
to the root in the worst case every time we examine an EH pad: each EH
pad only needs to examine its immediate parent EH pad.
- If any of its parent EH pads in the domtree has `wasm.lsda()`, this
means we don't need `wasm.lsda()` in the current EH pad. We also insert
the current EH pad in `ExecutedLSDA` set.
- If none of its parent EH pad has `wasm.lsda()`
- If the current EH pad is a `catch (...)` or a cleanuppad, done.
- If the current EH pad is neither a `catch (...)` nor a cleanuppad,
add `wasm.lsda()` and the store in the current EH pad, and add the
current EH pad to `ExecutedLSDA` set.
Reviewers: dschuff
Subscribers: sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, sunfish, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77423
Summary:
For current architect, we always require setContainingCsect to be
called on every MCSymbol got used in XCOFF context.
This is very hard to achieve because symbols gets created everywhere
and other MCSymbol types(ELF, COFF) do not have similar rules.
It's very easy to miss setting the containing csect, and we would
need to add a lot of XCOFF specialized code around some common code area.
This patch intendeds to do
1. Rely on getFragment().getParent() to get csect from labels.
2. Only use get/setRepresentedCsect (was get/setContainingCsect)
if symbol itself represents a csect.
Reviewers: DiggerLin, hubert.reinterpretcast, daltenty
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77080
Summary: I think it would be better to require the alignment to be >= 1. It is currently confusing to allow both values.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77372
isGCValue should detect whether the deopt value is a GC pointer.
Currently it checks by finding the value in SI.Bases and SI.Ptrs.
However these data structures contain only those values which
have corresponding gc.relocate call. So we can miss GC value if it
does not have gc.relocate call (dead after the call).
Check GC strategy whether pointer is GC one or consider any pointer
to be GC one conservatively.
Reviewers: reames, dantrushin
Reviewed By: reames
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77130
When compiling AMDGPUDisassembler.cpp in a stage 1 trunk build with
CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=RelWithDebInfo LLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address LiveDebugVariables
accounts for 21.5% wall clock time. This fix reduces that to 1.2% by switching
out a linked list lookup with a map lookup.
Note that the linked list is still used to group UserValues by vreg. The vreg
lookups don't cause any problems in this pathological case.
This is the same idea as D68816, which was reverted, except that it is a less
intrusive fix.
Reviewed By: vsk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77226
The legalizer has a tendency to lose DebugLoc's when expanding or
combining instructions. The verifier that detected these isn't ready
for upstreaming yet but this patch fixes the cases that came up when
applying it to our out-of-tree backend's CodeGen tests.
This pattern comes up a few more times in this file and probably in
the backends too but I'd prefer to fix the others separately (and
preferably when the lost-location verifier detects them).
Summary:
Currently, the comparison argument used for ATOMIC_CMP_XCHG is legalised
with GetPromotedInteger, which leaves the upper bits of the value
undefind. Since this is used for comparing in an LR/SC loop with a
full-width comparison, we must sign extend it. We introduce a new
getExtendForAtomicCmpSwapArg to complement getExtendForAtomicOps, since
many targets have compare-and-swap instructions (or pseudos) that
correctly handle an any-extend input, and the existing function
determines the extension of the result, whereas we are concerned with
the input.
This is related to https://reviews.llvm.org/D58829, which solved the
issue for ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP_WITH_SUCCESS, but not the simpler
ATOMIC_CMP_SWAP.
Reviewers: asb, lenary, efriedma
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: arichardson, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, Jim, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, evandro, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74453
Currently, DAG combiner uses (fmul (rsqrt x) x) to estimate square
root of x. However, this method would return NaN if x is +Inf, which
is incorrect.
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76853
Summary: These were templated due to SelectionDAG using int masks for shuffles and IR using unsigned masks for shuffles. But now that D72467 has landed we have an int mask version of IRBuilder::CreateShuffleVector. So just use int instead of a template
Reviewers: spatel, efriedma, RKSimon
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77183
Instead, represent the mask as out-of-line data in the instruction. This
should be more efficient in the places that currently use
getShuffleVector(), and paves the way for further changes to add new
shuffles for scalable vectors.
This doesn't change the syntax in textual IR. And I don't currently plan
to change the bitcode encoding in this patch, although we'll probably
need to do something once we extend shufflevector for scalable types.
I expect that once this is finished, we can then replace the raw "mask"
with something more appropriate for scalable vectors. Not sure exactly
what this looks like at the moment, but there are a few different ways
we could handle it. Maybe we could try to describe specific shuffles.
Or maybe we could define it in terms of a function to convert a fixed-length
array into an appropriate scalable vector, using a "step", or something
like that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72467
The attached test case is simplified from tcmalloc. Both function calls should be optimized as tailcall. But llvm can only optimize the first call. The second call can't be optimized because function dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts failed to duplicate ret into block case2.
There 2 problems blocked the duplication:
1 Intrinsic call llvm.assume is not handled by dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts.
2 The control flow is more complex than expected, dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts can only duplicate ret into its predecessor, but here we have an intermediate block between call and ret.
The solutions:
1 Since CodeGenPrepare is already at the end of LLVM IR phase, we can simply delete the intrinsic call to llvm.assume.
2 A general solution to the complex control flow is hard, but for this case, after exit2 is duplicated into case1, exit2 is the only successor of exit1 and exit1 is the only predecessor of exit2, so they can be combined through eliminateFallThrough. But this function is called too late, there is no more dupRetToEnableTailCallOpts after it. We can add an earlier call to eliminateFallThrough to solve it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76539
Summary:
In method SelectionDAGBuilder::LowerStatepoint, array SI.GCTransitionArgs
is initialized from wrong part of ImmutableStatepoint class.
We copy gc args instead of transitions args.
Reviewers: reames, skatkov
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77075
When we have
```
a = G_OR x, x
```
or
```
b = G_AND y, y
```
We can drop the G_OR/G_AND and just use x/y respectively.
Also update arm64-fallback.ll because there was an or in there which hits this
transformation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77105
Implement identity combines for operations like the following:
```
%a = G_SUB %b, 0
```
This can just be replaced with %b.
Over CTMark, this gives some minor size improvements at -O3.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76640
This reverts commit b3297ef051.
This change is incorrect. The current semantic of null in the IR is a
pointer with the bitvalue 0. It is not a cast from an integer 0, so
this should preserve the pointer type.
Summary:
This code was throwing away the opcode for a boolean, which was then
reconstructing the opcode from that boolean. Just pass the opcode, and
forget the boolean.
Reviewers: srhines
Reviewed By: srhines
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77100
Summary:
This change adds amdgcn.reloc.constant intrinsic to the amdgpu backend, which will compile into a relocation entry in the resulting elf.
The intrinsics takes a MetadataNode (String) as its only argument, which specifies the symbol name of the relocation entry.
`SelectionDAGBuilder::getValueImpl` is changed to allow metadata operands passed through to ISel.
Author: csyonghe <yonghe@google.com>
Reviewers: tpr, nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76440
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: jyknight, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, jfb, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77059
Summary:
Also deprecate getOriginalAlignment, getAlignment will take much more time as it is pervasive through the codebase (including TableGened files).
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76933
There was already a test case for landingpads to handle this case, but I
had forgotten to consider PHI instructions preceding the EH_LABEL in the
landingpad.
PR45261
MC already knows how to emulate the .weak directive (with its ELF
semantics; i.e., an undefined weak symbol resolves to 0, and a defined
weak symbol has lower link precedence than a strong symbol of the same
name) using COFF weak externals. Plumb this through the ASM printer too,
so that definitions marked with __attribute__((weak)) at the language
level (which gets translated to weak linkage at the IR level) have the
corresponding .weak directive emitted. Note that declarations marked
with __attribute__((weak)) at the language level (which translates to
extern_weak at the IR level) already have .weak directives emitted.
Weak*/linkonce* symbols without an associated comdat (in particular, ones
generated with __attribute__((weak)) in C/C++) were earlier emitted as
normal unique globals, as the comdat is required to provide the linkonce
semantics. This change makes sure they are emitted as .weak instead,
allowing other symbols to override them.
Rename the existing coff-weak.ll test to coff-linkonce.ll. I'm not
quite sure what that test covers, since the behavior being tested in it
(the emission of a one_only section) is just a result of passing
-function-sections to llc; the linkonce_odr makes no difference.
Add a new coff-weak.ll which tests the new directive emission.
Based on an previous patch by Shoaib Meenai.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44543
When we see this:
```
%a = COPY $physreg
...
SOMETHING implicit-def $physreg
...
%b = COPY $physreg
```
The two copies are not equivalent, and so we shouldn't perform any folding
on them.
When we have two instructions which use a physical register check that they
define the same virtual register(s) as well.
e.g., if we run into this case
```
%a = COPY $physreg
...
%b = COPY %a
```
we can say that the two copies are the same, and can be folded.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76890
Make these behave the same way unsafe-fp-math and co. The command line
flag should add the attribute to functions that do not already have
it, and leave existing attributes. The attribute is the actual
implementation, but the flag is useful in some testing situations.
AMDGPU has a variety of tests with denormals enabled/disabled that
would require a painful level of test duplication without a flag. This
doesn't expose setting the separate input/output modes, or add a flag
for the f32 version yet.
Tests will be included in future patch.
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: arsenm, dschuff, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, jrtc27, atanasyan, jfb, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76925
Summary: This patch is the first effort to adding basic optimizations for FREEZE in SelDag.
Reviewers: spatel, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: xbolva00, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76707
These transforms rely on a vector reduction flag on the SDNode
set by SelectionDAGBuilder. This flag exists because SelectionDAG
can't see across basic blocks so SelectionDAGBuilder is looking
across and saving the info. X86 is the only target that uses this
flag currently. By removing the X86 code we can remove the flag
and the SelectionDAGBuilder code.
This pass adds a dedicated IR pass for X86 that looks across the
blocks and transforms the IR into a form that the X86 SelectionDAG
can finish.
An advantage of this new approach is that we can enhance it to
shrink the phi nodes and final reduction tree based on the zeroes
that we need to concatenate to bring the partially reduced
reduction back up to the original width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76649
SUMMARY:
SUMMARY
for a source file "test.c"
void foo() {};
llc will generate assembly code as (assembly patch)
.globl foo
.globl .foo
.csect foo[DS]
foo:
.long .foo
.long TOC[TC0]
.long 0
and symbol table as (xcoff object file)
[4] m 0x00000004 .data 1 unamex foo
[5] a4 0x0000000c 0 0 SD DS 0 0
[6] m 0x00000004 .data 1 extern foo
[7] a4 0x00000004 0 0 LD DS 0 0
After first patch, the assembly will be as
.globl foo[DS] # -- Begin function foo
.globl .foo
.align 2
.csect foo[DS]
.long .foo
.long TOC[TC0]
.long 0
and symbol table will as
[6] m 0x00000004 .data 1 extern foo
[7] a4 0x00000004 0 0 DS DS 0 0
Change the code for the assembly path and xcoff objectfile patch for llc.
Reviewers: Jason Liu
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76162
Summary:
The existing helper function can only create a libcall to functions available in
RTLIB. Add a helper function that can create a libcall to a given function name
using the provided calling convention.
Reviewers: aditya_nandakumar, t.p.northover, rovka, arsenm, dsanders
Reviewed By: arsenm
Subscribers: wdng, hiraditya, volkan, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76845
In some scalarize/split result methods (unary, binary, ...), flags in
SDNode were not passed down, which may lead to unexpected results in
unsafe float-point optimization. This patch fixes them. (maybe not
complete)
Reviewed By: spatel
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76832
For some operations, the type is unimportant and only the number of
bits matters. For example I don't want to treat <4 x s8> as a legal
type, but I also don't want to decompose loads of this into smaller
pieces to get legal register types.
On AMDGPU in SelectionDAG, we legalize a number of operations (most
notably load and store) by coercing all types to vectors of i32. For
GlobalISel, I'm trying very hard to avoid doing this for every type,
but I don't think this strategy can be completely avoided. I'm trying
to avoid bitcasts for any legitimately legal type we can operate on,
since the intervening bitcasts have proven to be a hassle.
For loads, I think I can get away without ever casting the result
type, and handling any arbitrary bitwidth during selection (I will
eventually want new tablegen support to help with this, rather than
having to add every possible type as legal). The unmerge required to
do anything with the value should expand to the expected shifts. This
is trickier for stores, since it would now require handling a wide
array of truncates during selection which I don't want.
Future potentially interesting case are for vector indexing, where
sub-dword type should be indexed in s32 pieces.
Record the address of a tail-calling branch instruction within its call
site entry using DW_AT_call_pc. This allows a debugger to determine the
address to use when creating aritificial frames.
This creates an extra attribute + relocation at tail call sites, which
constitute 3-5% of all call sites in xnu/clang respectively.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76336
The current implementation collects all Preds/Succs of a Dep of kind Output, creating a long chain and subsequently a schedule with an unnecessarily large II.
Was this done on purpose for a reason I'm missing?
Reviewed By: bcahoon
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75424
When we find something like this:
```
%a:_(s32) = G_SOMETHING ...
...
%select:_(s32) = G_SELECT %cond(s1), %a, %a
```
We can remove the select and just replace it entirely with `%a` because it's
always going to result in `%a`.
Same if we have
```
%select:_(s32) = G_SELECT %cond(s1), %a, %b
```
where we can deduce that `%a == %b`.
This implements the following cases:
- `%select:_(s32) = G_SELECT %cond(s1), %a, %a` -> `%a`
- `%select:_(s32) = G_SELECT %cond(s1), %a, %some_copy_from_a` -> `%a`
- `%select:_(s32) = G_SELECT %cond(s1), %a, %b` -> `%a` when `%a` and `%b`
are defined by identical instructions
This gives a few minor code size improvements on CTMark at -O3 for AArch64.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76523
I think we can save the MRI argument from these since it's in
GISelKnownBits already, but currently not accessible.
Implementation deferred to avoid dependency on other patches.
Otherwise, the Win64 unwinder considers direct branches to such empty
trailing BBs to be a branch out of the function. It treats such a branch
as a tail call, which can only be part of an epilogue. If the unwinder
misclassifies such a branch as part of the epilogue, it will fail to
unwind the stack further. This can lead to bad stack traces, or failure
to handle exceptions properly. This is described in
https://llvm.org/PR45064#c4, and by the comment at the top of the
X86AvoidTrailingCallPass.cpp file.
It should be safe to insert int3 for such blocks. An empty trailing BB
that reaches this pass is pretty much guaranteed to be unreachable. If
a program executed such a block, it would fall off the end of the
function.
Most of the complexity in this patch comes from threading through the
"EHFuncletEntry" boolean on the MIRParser and registering the pass so we
can stop and start codegen around it. I used an MIR test because we
should teach LLVM to optimize away these branches as a follow-up.
Reviewed By: hans
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76531
Summary:
Add new generic MIR opcodes G_SADDSAT etc. Add support in IRTranslator
for translating the saturating add/subtract intrinsics to the new
opcodes.
Reviewers: aemerson, dsanders, paquette, arsenm
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, hiraditya, volkan, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76600
We have some long-standing missing shuffle optimizations that could
use this transform via VectorCombine now:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35454
(and we still don't get that case in the backend either)
This function is apparently templated because there's existing code
in IR that treats mask values as unsigned and backend code that
treats masks values as signed.
The mask values are not endian-dependent (as shown by the existing
bitcast transform from DAGCombiner).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76508
Summary:
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, Jim, lenary, s.egerton, pzheng, sameer.abuasal, apazos, luismarques, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76551
When decided whether to generate a post-inc load/store, look at the
other memory nodes that use the same base address and, if any proceed
the current node, then don't do the combine.
The change only seems to be affecting the Arm backend, which I was
surprised at, but it appears to fix a lot of our issues around MVE
masked load/stores having to store a temporary address after an early
post-increment on a shared base address.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75847
Nikita Popov