Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Fangrui Song ac14f7b10c [lit] Delete empty lines at the end of lit.local.cfg NFC
llvm-svn: 363538
2019-06-17 09:51:07 +00:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Alp Toker d3d017cf00 Reduce verbiage of lit.local.cfg files
We can just split targets_to_build in one place and make it immutable.

llvm-svn: 210496
2014-06-09 22:42:55 +00:00
Hal Finkel 2eed29f3c8 Implement X86TTI::getUnrollingPreferences
This provides an initial implementation of getUnrollingPreferences for x86.
getUnrollingPreferences is used by the generic (concatenation) unroller, which
is distinct from the unrolling done by the loop vectorizer. Many modern x86
cores have some kind of uop cache and loop-stream detector (LSD) used to
efficiently dispatch small loops, and taking full advantage of this requires
unrolling small loops (small here means 10s of uops).

These caches also have limits on the number of taken branches in the loop, and
so we also cap the loop unrolling factor based on the maximum "depth" of the
loop. This is currently calculated with a partial DFS traversal (partial
because it will stop early if the path length grows too much). This is still an
approximation, and one that is both conservative (because it does not account
for branches eliminated via block placement) and optimistic (because it is only
recording the maximum depth over minimum paths). Nevertheless, because the
loops that fit in these uop caches are so small, it is not clear how much the
details matter.

The original set of patches posted for review produced the following test-suite
performance results (from the TSVC benchmark) at that time:
  ControlLoops-dbl - 13% speedup
  ControlLoops-flt - 15% speedup
  Reductions-dbl - 7.5% speedup

llvm-svn: 205348
2014-04-01 18:50:34 +00:00