libcalls." (was 0f8c626). This reverts commit 14d9390.
The patch previously failed to recognize cases where user had defined a
function alias with an identical name as that of the library
function. Module::getFunction() would then return nullptr which is what the
sanitizer discovered.
In this updated version a new function isLibFuncEmittable() has as well been
introduced which is now used instead of TLI->has() anytime a library function
is to be emitted . It additionally also makes sure there is e.g. no function
alias with the same name in the module.
Reviewed By: Eli Friedman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123198
test/Transforms/InstCombine/pr39177.ll failed in a -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Undefined build.
```
lib/Transforms/Utils/BuildLibCalls.cpp:1217:17: runtime error: reference binding to null pointer of type 'llvm::Function'
```
`Function &F = *M->getFunction(Name);`
This reverts commit 0f8c626723.
A new set of overloaded functions named getOrInsertLibFunc() are now supposed
to be used instead of getOrInsertFunction() when building a libcall from
within an LLVM optimizer(). The idea is that this new function also makes
sure that any mandatory argument attributes are added to the function
prototype (after calling getOrInsertFunction()).
inferLibFuncAttributes() is renamed to inferNonMandatoryLibFuncAttrs() as it
only adds attributes that are not necessary for correctness but merely
helping with later optimizations.
Generally, the front end is responsible for building a correct function
prototype with the needed argument attributes. If the middle end however is
the one creating the call, e.g. when replacing one libcall with another, it
then must take this responsibility.
This continues the work of properly handling argument extension if required
by the target ABI when building a lib call. getOrInsertLibFunc() now does
this for all libcalls currently built by any LLVM optimizer. It is expected
that when in the future a new optimization builds a new libcall with an
integer argument it is to be added to getOrInsertLibFunc() with the proper
handling. Note that not all targets have it in their ABI to sign/zero extend
integer arguments to the full register width, but this will be done
selectively as determined by getExtAttrForI32Param().
Review: Eli Friedman, Nikita Popov, Dávid Bolvanský
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123198
This reverts commit e810d55809.
The commit was not taken into account the fact that strduped string could be
modified. Checking if such modification happens would make the function very
costly, without a test case in mind it's not worth the effort.
C11 specifies memchr() as follows:
> The memchr function locates the first occurrence of c (converted
> to an unsigned char) in the initial n characters (each interpreted
> as unsigned char) of the object pointed to by s. The implementation
> shall behave as if it reads the characters sequentially and stops
> as soon as a matching character is found.
In particular, it is well-defined to specify a memchr size larger
than the underlying object, as long as the character is found before
the end of the object.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123665
If both the character and string are known, but the length
potentially isn't, we can optimize the memchr() call to a select
of either the known position of the character or null.
Split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D122836.
Handle the simple constant char case before the bitmask optimization.
This will allow extending the code to handle a non-constant size
argument in a followup change.
Split out from https://reviews.llvm.org/D122836.
If the memchr() size is 1, then we can convert the call into a
single-byte comparison. This works even if both the string and the
character are unknown.
Split off from https://reviews.llvm.org/D122836.
We should always be calculating a byte-wise difference here.
Previously this calculated the pointer difference while taking
the pointer element type into account, which is incorrect.
I noticed we weren't propagating tail flags on calls when
FortifiedLibCallSimplifier.optimizeCall() was replacing calls to runtime
checked calls to the non-checked routines (when safe to do so). Make
sure to check this before replacing the original calls!
Also, avoid any libcall transforms when notail/musttail is present.
PR46734
Fixes: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/46079
Reviewed By: jdoerfert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107872
In TargetLibraryInfoImpl::isValidProtoForLibFunc we no longer
need the IsSizeTTy lambda function and the SizeTTy object. Instead
we just follow the regular structure of checking for integer types
given an exepected number of bits.
We could try harder to screen out libcalls by
function signature (and that would be a much larger
change than for sprintf alone), but that might make
the transition to type-less pointers more difficult.
https://llvm.org/PR51200
This fixes a bug at LibCallSimplifier::optimizeMemChr which does the following transformation:
```
// memchr("\r\n", C, 2) != nullptr -> (1 << C & ((1 << '\r') | (1 << '\n')))
// != 0
// after bounds check.
```
As written above, a bounds check on C (whether it is less than integer bitwidth) is done before doing `1 << C` otherwise 1 << C will overflow.
If the bounds check is false, the result of (1 << C & ...) must not be used at all, otherwise the result of shift (which is poison) will contaminate the whole results.
A correct way to encode this is `select i1 (bounds check), (1 << C & ...), false` because select does not allow the unused operand to contaminate the result.
However, this optimization was introducing `and (bounds check), (1 << C & ...)` which cannot do that.
The bug was found from compilation of this C++ code: https://reviews.llvm.org/rG2fd3037ac615#1007197
Reviewed By: nikic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104901
- When emitting libcalls, do not only pass the calling convention from the
function prototype but also the attributes.
- Do not pass attributes from e.g. libc memcpy to llvm.memcpy.
Review: Reid Kleckner, Eli Friedman, Arthur Eubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103992
This can be seen as a follow up to commit 0ee439b705,
that changed the second argument of __powidf2, __powisf2 and
__powitf2 in compiler-rt from si_int to int. That was to align with
how those runtimes are defined in libgcc.
One thing that seem to have been missing in that patch was to make
sure that the rest of LLVM also handle that the argument now depends
on the size of int (not using the si_int machine mode for 32-bit).
When using __builtin_powi for a target with 16-bit int clang crashed.
And when emitting libcalls to those rtlib functions, typically when
lowering @llvm.powi), the backend would always prepare the exponent
argument as an i32 which caused miscompiles when the rtlib was
compiled with 16-bit int.
The solution used here is to use an overloaded type for the second
argument in @llvm.powi. This way clang can use the "correct" type
when lowering __builtin_powi, and then later when emitting the libcall
it is assumed that the type used in @llvm.powi matches the rtlib
function.
One thing that needed some extra attention was that when vectorizing
calls several passes did not support that several arguments could
be overloaded in the intrinsics. This patch allows overload of a
scalar operand by adding hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd, with
an entry for powi.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99439
When rewriting
powf(2.0, itofp(x)) -> ldexpf(1.0, x)
exp2(sitofp(x)) -> ldexp(1.0, sext(x))
exp2(uitofp(x)) -> ldexp(1.0, zext(x))
the wrong type was used for the second argument in the ldexp/ldexpf
libc call, for target architectures with 16 bit "int" type.
The transform incorrectly used a bitcasted function pointer with
a 32-bit argument when emitting the ldexp/ldexpf call for such
targets.
The fault is solved by using the correct function prototype
in the call, by asking TargetLibraryInfo about the size of "int".
TargetLibraryInfo by default derives the size of the int type by
assuming that it is 16 bits for 16-bit architectures, and
32 bits otherwise. If this isn't true for a target it should be
possible to override that default in the TargetLibraryInfo
initializer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99438
Before this change LLVM cannot simplify printf in following cases:
printf("%s", "") --> noop
printf("%s", str"\n") --> puts(str)
From the other hand GCC can perform such transformations for many years:
https://godbolt.org/z/7nnqbedfe
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100724
Fix for PR49984
This was discovered during Attributor testing.
Memset was always created with alignment of 1
and in case when strncpy alignment was changed
it triggered an assertion in the AttrBuilder.
Memset will now be created with appropriate alignment.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100875
D24453 enabled libcalls simplication for ARM PCS. This may cause
caller/callee calling conventions mismatch in some situations such as
LTO. This patch makes instcombine aware that the compatible calling
conventions differences are benign (not emitting undef idom).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99773
See: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47613
There was an extra sqrt call because shrinking emitted a new powf and at the same time optimizePow replaces the previous pow with sqrt and as the result we have two instructions that will be in worklist of InstCombie despite the fact that %powf is not used by anyone (it is alive because of errno).
As the result we have two instructions:
%powf = call fast float @powf(float %x, float 5.000000e-01)
%sqrt = call fast double @sqrt(double %dx)
%powf will be converted to %sqrtf on a later iteration.
As a quick fix for that I moved shrinking to the end of optimizePow so that pow is replaced with sqrt at first that allows not to emit a new shrunk powf.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98235
I think we can use here same logic as for nonnull.
strlen(X) - X must be noundef => valid pointer.
for libcalls with size arg, we add noundef only if size is known and greater than 0 - so pointers must be noundef (valid ones)
Reviewed By: jdoerfert, aqjune
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95122
Jonas Paulsson