Re-apply r184511, reverted in r184561, with the trivial default constructor
fast path removed -- it turned out not to be necessary here.
Certain expressions can cause a constructor invocation to zero-initialize
its object even if the constructor itself does no initialization. The
analyzer now handles that before evaluating the call to the constructor,
using the same "default binding" mechanism that calloc() uses, rather
than simply ignoring the zero-initialization flag.
<rdar://problem/14212563>
llvm-svn: 184815
In order to make sure virtual base classes are always initialized once,
the AST contains initializers for the base class in /all/ of its
descendents, not just the immediate descendents. However, at runtime,
the most-derived object is responsible for initializing all the virtual
base classes; all the other initializers will be ignored.
The analyzer now checks to see if it's being called from another base
constructor, and if so does not perform virtual base initialization.
<rdar://problem/14236851>
llvm-svn: 184814
Add a debug checker that is useful to understand how the ExplodedGraph is
built; it can be triggered using the following command:
clang -cc1 -analyze -analyzer-checker=debug.ViewExplodedGraph my_program.c
A patch by Béatrice Creusillet!
llvm-svn: 184768
This fixes false positives by allowing us to know that a loop is always entered if
the collection count method returns a positive value and vice versa.
Addresses radar://14169391.
llvm-svn: 184618
Per review from Anna, this really should have been two commits, and besides
it's causing problems on our internal buildbot. Reverting until these have
been worked out.
This reverts r184511 / 98123284826bb4ce422775563ff1a01580ec5766.
llvm-svn: 184561
Certain expressions can cause a constructor invocation to zero-initialize
its object even if the constructor itself does no initialization. The
analyzer now handles that before evaluating the call to the constructor,
using the same "default binding" mechanism that calloc() uses, rather
than simply ignoring the zero-initialization flag.
As a bonus, trivial default constructors are now no longer inlined; they
are instead processed explicitly by ExprEngine. This has a (positive)
effect on the generated path edges: they no longer stop at a default
constructor call unless there's a user-provided implementation.
<rdar://problem/14212563>
llvm-svn: 184511
Summary:
When doing a reinterpret+dynamic cast from an incomplete type, the analyzer
would crash (bug #16308). This fix makes the dynamic cast evaluator ignore
incomplete types, as they can never be used in a dynamic_cast. Also adding a
regression test.
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1006
llvm-svn: 184403
Summary:
When processing a call to a function, which got passed less arguments than it
expects, the analyzer would crash.
I've also added a test for that and a analyzer warning which detects these
cases.
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D994
llvm-svn: 184288
This silences warnings that could occur when one is swapping partially initialized structs. We suppress
not only the assignments of uninitialized members, but any values inside swap because swap could
potentially be used as a subroutine to swap class members.
This silences a warning from std::try::function::swap() on partially initialized objects.
llvm-svn: 184256
The untemplated implementation of getParents() doesn't need to be in a
header file.
RecursiveASTVisitor.h is full of repeated macro expansion. Moving this
include to ASTContext.cpp speeds up compilation of
LambdaMangleContext.cpp, a small C++ file with few includes, from 3.7s
to 2.8s for me locally. I haven't measured a full build, but it can't
hurt.
I had to fix a few static analyzer files that were depending on
transitive includes of C++ AST headers.
Reviewers: rsmith, klimek
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D982
llvm-svn: 184075
Introduce CXXStdInitializerListExpr node, representing the implicit
construction of a std::initializer_list<T> object from its underlying array.
The AST representation of such an expression goes from an InitListExpr with a
flag set, to a CXXStdInitializerListExpr containing a MaterializeTemporaryExpr
containing an InitListExpr (possibly wrapped in a CXXBindTemporaryExpr).
This more detailed representation has several advantages, the most important of
which is that the new MaterializeTemporaryExpr allows us to directly model
lifetime extension of the underlying temporary array. Using that, this patch
*drastically* simplifies the IR generation of this construct, provides IR
generation support for nested global initializer_list objects, fixes several
bugs where the destructors for the underlying array would accidentally not get
invoked, and provides constant expression evaluation support for
std::initializer_list objects.
llvm-svn: 183872
Summary:
"register" functions for the checker were caching the checker objects in a
static variable. This caused problems when the function is called with a
different CheckerManager.
Reviewers: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D955
llvm-svn: 183823
We drew the diagnostic edges to wrong statements in cases the note was on a macro.
The fix is simple, but seems to work just fine for a whole bunch of test cases (plist-macros.cpp).
Also, removes an unnecessary edge in edges-new.mm, when function signature starts with a macro.
llvm-svn: 183599
The function in which we were doing it used to be conditionalized. Add a new unconditional
cleanup step.
This fixes PR16227 (radar://14073870) - a crash when generating html output for one of the test files.
llvm-svn: 183451
Previously our edges were completely broken here; now, the final result
is a very simple set of edges in most cases: one up to the "for" keyword
for context, and one into the body of the loop. This matches the behavior
for ObjC for-in loops.
In the AST, however, CXXForRangeStmts are handled very differently from
ObjCForCollectionStmts. Since they are specified in terms of equivalent
statements in the C++ standard, we actually have implicit AST nodes for
all of the semantic statements. This makes evaluation very easy, but
diagnostic locations a bit trickier. Fortunately, the problem can be
generally defined away by marking all of the implicit statements as
part of the top-level for-range statement.
One of the implicit statements in a for-range statement is the declaration
of implicit iterators __begin and __end. The CFG synthesizes two
separate DeclStmts to match each of these decls, but until now these
synthetic DeclStmts weren't in the function's ParentMap. Now, the CFG
keeps track of its synthetic statements, and the AnalysisDeclContext will
make sure to add them to the ParentMap.
<rdar://problem/14038483>
llvm-svn: 183449
When processing ArrayToPointerDecay, we expect the array to be a location, not a LazyCompoundVal.
Special case the rvalue arrays by using a location to represent them. This case is handled similarly
elsewhere in the code.
Fixes PR16206.
llvm-svn: 183359
We previously asserted that there was a top-level function entry edge, but
if the function decl's location is invalid (or within a macro) this edge
might not exist. Change the assertion to an actual check, and don't drop
the first path piece if it doesn't match.
<rdar://problem/14070304>
llvm-svn: 183358
The edge optimizer needs to see edges for, say, implicit casts (which have
the same source location as their operand) to uniformly simplify the
entire path. However, we still don't want to produce edges from a statement
to /itself/, which could occur when two nodes in a row have the same
statement location.
This necessitated moving the check for redundant notes to after edge
optimization, since the check relies on notes being adjacent in the path.
<rdar://problem/14061675>
llvm-svn: 183357
...but don't yet migrate over the existing plist tests. Some of these
would be trivial to migrate; others could use a bit of inspection first.
In any case, though, the new edge algorithm seems to have proven itself,
and we'd like more coverage (and more usage) of it going forwards.
llvm-svn: 183165
A.1 -> A -> B
becomes
A.1 -> B
This only applies if there's an edge from a subexpression to its parent
expression, and that is immediately followed by another edge from the
parent expression to a subsequent expression. Normally this is useful for
bringing the edges back to the left side of the code, but when the
subexpression is on a different line the backedge ends up looking strange,
and may even obscure code. In these cases, it's better to just continue
to the next top-level statement.
llvm-svn: 183164
Specifically, if the line is over 80 characters, or if the top-level
statement spans mulitple lines, we should preserve sub-expression edges
even if they form a simple cycle as described in the last commit, because
it's harder to infer what's going on than it is for shorter lines.
llvm-svn: 183163
Generating context arrows can result in quite a few arrows surrounding a
relatively simple expression, often containing only a single path note.
|
1 +--2---+
v/ v
auto m = new m // 3 (the path note)
|\ |
5 +--4---+
v
Note also that 5 and 1 are two ends of the "same" arrow, i.e. they go from
event to event. 3 is not an arrow but the path note itself.
Now, if we see a pair of edges like 2 and 4---where 4 is the reverse of 2
and there is optionally a single path note between them---we will
eliminate /both/ edges. Anything more complicated will be left as is
(more edges involved, an inlined call, etc).
The next commit will refine this to preserve the arrows in a larger
expression, so that we don't lose all context.
llvm-svn: 183162
The old edge builder didn't have a notion of nested statement contexts,
so there was no special treatment of a logical operator inside an if
(or inside another logical operator). The new edge builder always tries
to establish the full context up to the top-level statement, so it's
important to know how much context has been established already rather
than just checking the innermost context.
This restores some of the old behavior for the old edge generation:
the context of a logical operator's non-controlling expression is the
subexpression in the old edge algorithm, but the entire operator
expression in the new algorithm.
llvm-svn: 183160
The current edge-generation algorithm sometimes creates edges from a
top-level statement A to a sub-expression B.1 that's not at the start of B.
This creates a "swoosh" effect where the arrow is drawn on top of the
text at the start of B. In these cases, the results are clearer if we see
an edge from A to B, then another one from B to B.1.
Admittedly, this does create a /lot/ of arrows, some of which merely hop
into a subexpression and then out again for a single note. The next commit
will eliminate these if the subexpression is simple enough.
This updates and reuses some of the infrastructure from the old edge-
generation algorithm to find the "enclosing statement" context for a
given expression. One change in particular marks the context of the
LHS or RHS of a logical binary operator (&&, ||) as the entire operator
expression, rather than the subexpression itself. This matches our behavior
for ?:, and allows us to handle nested context information.
<rdar://problem/13902816>
llvm-svn: 183159
Although we don't want to show a function entry edge for a top-level path,
having it makes optimizing edges a little more uniform.
This does not affect any edges now, but will affect context edge generation
(next commit).
llvm-svn: 183158
Jordan has pointed out that it is valuable to warn in cases when the arguments to init escape.
For example, NSData initWithBytes id not going to free the memory.
llvm-svn: 183062
In many cases, the edge from the "if" to the condition, followed by an edge from the branch condition to the target code, is uninteresting.
In such cases, we should fold the two edges into one from the "if" to the target.
This also applies to loops.
Implements <rdar://problem/14034763>.
llvm-svn: 183018
...and make this work correctly in the current codebase.
After living on this for a while, it turns out to look very strange for
inlined functions that have only a single statement, and somewhat strange
for inlined functions in general (since they are still conceptually in the
middle of the path, and there is a function-entry path note).
It's worth noting that this only affects inlined functions; in the new
arrow generation algorithm, the top-level function still starts at the
first real statement in the function body, not the enclosing CompoundStmt.
This reverts r182078 / dbfa950abe0e55b173286a306ee620eff5f72ea.
llvm-svn: 182963
It is okay to declare a block without an argument list: ^ {} or ^void {}.
In these cases, the BlockDecl's signature-as-written will just contain
the return type, rather than the entire function type. It is unclear if
this is intentional, but the analyzer shouldn't crash because of it.
<rdar://problem/14018351>
llvm-svn: 182948
Most loop notes (like "entering loop body") are attached to the condition
expression guarding a loop or its equivalent. For loops may not have a
condition expression, though. Rather than crashing, just use the entire
ForStmt as the location. This is probably the best we can do.
<rdar://problem/14016063>
llvm-svn: 182904
In C, 'void' is treated like any other incomplete type, and though it is
never completed, you can cast the address of a void-typed variable to do
something useful. (In C++ it's illegal to declare a variable with void type.)
Previously we asserted on this code; now we just treat it like any other
incomplete type.
And speaking of incomplete types, we don't know their extent. Actually
check that in TypedValueRegion::getExtent, though that's not being used
by any checkers that are on by default.
llvm-svn: 182880
This gives slightly better precision, specifically, in cases where a non-typed region represents the array
or when the type is a non-array type, which can happen when an array is a result of a reinterpret_cast.
llvm-svn: 182810
Rafael Espindola