2946cd7010
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo
...
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 08:50:56 +00:00
8a505c64b0
[CVP] Handle instructions with no user. No need to create CVPLattice state. This handles terminator instructions and more.
...
Summary:
I tested this patch by compiling sqlite3.ll (clang -O3 -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns sqlite3.c.)
opt -called-value-propagation sqlite3.ll -time-passes -f -o out.ll
I get 10+% speedup for the pass. I expect some of the gain come from skipping terminator instructions.
=== BEFORE THE PATCH ===
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Pass execution timing report ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
Total Execution Time: 0.5562 seconds (0.5582 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- --- Name ---
0.2485 ( 46.4%) 0.0120 ( 57.7%) 0.2605 ( 46.8%) 0.2615 ( 46.8%) Bitcode Writer
0.1607 ( 30.0%) 0.0079 ( 37.7%) 0.1685 ( 30.3%) 0.1693 ( 30.3%) Called Value Propagation
0.1262 ( 23.6%) 0.0009 ( 4.5%) 0.1271 ( 22.9%) 0.1275 ( 22.8%) Module Verifier
0.5353 (100.0%) 0.0209 (100.0%) 0.5562 (100.0%) 0.5582 (100.0%) Total
=== AFTER THE PATCH ===
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Pass execution timing report ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
Total Execution Time: 0.5338 seconds (0.5355 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- --- Name ---
0.2498 ( 48.6%) 0.0118 ( 59.3%) 0.2615 ( 49.0%) 0.2629 ( 49.1%) Bitcode Writer
0.1377 ( 26.8%) 0.0075 ( 37.8%) 0.1452 ( 27.2%) 0.1455 ( 27.2%) Called Value Propagation
0.1264 ( 24.6%) 0.0006 ( 3.0%) 0.1270 ( 23.8%) 0.1271 ( 23.7%) Module Verifier
0.5139 (100.0%) 0.0199 (100.0%) 0.5338 (100.0%) 0.5355 (100.0%) Total
Reviewers: davide, mssimpso
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49108
llvm-svn: 342398
2018-09-17 15:28:01 +00:00
b467233d8b
[CVP] Handle calls with void return value. No need to create CVPLattice state for it.
...
Summary:
Tests: 10
Metric: compile_time
Program unpatch-result patch-result diff
Bullet/bullet 32.39 30.54 -5.7%
SPASS/SPASS 18.14 17.25 -4.9%
mafft/pairlocalalign 12.10 11.64 -3.8%
ClamAV/clamscan 19.21 19.63 2.2%
7zip/7zip-benchmark 49.55 48.85 -1.4%
kimwitu++/kc 15.68 15.87 1.2%
lencod/lencod 21.13 21.34 1.0%
consumer-typeset/consumer-typeset 13.65 13.62 -0.2%
tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4 29.88 29.92 0.1%
sqlite3/sqlite3 18.48 18.46 -0.1%
unpatch-result patch-result diff
count 10.000000 10.000000 10.000000
mean 23.022000 22.712400 -0.011671
std 11.362831 11.094183 0.027338
min 12.104000 11.640000 -0.057298
25% 16.299000 16.214000 -0.032282
50% 18.844000 19.048000 -0.001350
75% 27.689000 27.774000 0.007752
max 49.552000 48.852000 0.021861
I also tested only this pass by concatenating all the code from the
llvm/lib/Analysis/ folder and do clang -g followed by opt. I get close to 20% speedup
for the pass. I expect a majority of the gain come from skipping the dbg intrinsics.
Before patch (opt -time-passes -called-value-propagation):
============
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Pass execution timing report ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
Total Execution Time: 3.8303 seconds (3.8279 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- ---
Name ---
2.0768 ( 57.3%) 0.0990 ( 48.0%) 2.1757 ( 56.8%) 2.1757 ( 56.8%) Bitcode
Writer
0.8444 ( 23.3%) 0.0600 ( 29.1%) 0.9044 ( 23.6%) 0.9044 ( 23.6%) Called
Value Propagation
0.7031 ( 19.4%) 0.0472 ( 22.9%) 0.7502 ( 19.6%) 0.7478 ( 19.5%) Module
Verifier
3.6242 (100.0%) 0.2062 (100.0%) 3.8303 (100.0%) 3.8279 (100.0%) Total
After patch (opt -time-passes -called-value-propagation):
============
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
... Pass execution timing report ...
===-------------------------------------------------------------------------===
Total Execution Time: 3.6605 seconds (3.6579 wall clock)
---User Time--- --System Time-- --User+System-- ---Wall Time--- ---
Name ---
2.0716 ( 59.7%) 0.0990 ( 52.5%) 2.1705 ( 59.3%) 2.1706 ( 59.3%) Bitcode
Writer
0.7144 ( 20.6%) 0.0300 ( 15.9%) 0.7444 ( 20.3%) 0.7444 ( 20.4%) Called
Value Propagation
0.6859 ( 19.8%) 0.0596 ( 31.6%) 0.7455 ( 20.4%) 0.7429 ( 20.3%) Module
Verifier
3.4719 (100.0%) 0.1886 (100.0%) 3.6605 (100.0%) 3.6579 (100.0%) Total
Reviewers: davide, mssimpso
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49078
llvm-svn: 336551
2018-07-09 14:53:37 +00:00
c8bd5449e0
[CalledValuePropagation] Just use a sorted vector instead of a set.
...
The set properties are never used, so a vector is enough. No
functionality change intended.
While there add some std::moves to SparseSolver.
llvm-svn: 333582
2018-05-30 19:31:11 +00:00
99f57933ba
Attempt to unbreak the expensive-checks-win bot
...
llvm-svn: 316625
2017-10-25 22:46:34 +00:00
cb58558c2f
Add CalledValuePropagation pass
...
This patch adds a new pass for attaching !callees metadata to indirect call
sites. The pass propagates values to call sites by performing an IPSCCP-like
analysis using the generic sparse propagation solver. For indirect call sites
having a small set of possible callees, the attached metadata indicates what
those callees are. The metadata can be used to facilitate optimizations like
intersecting the function attributes of the possible callees, refining the call
graph, performing indirect call promotion, etc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37355
llvm-svn: 316576
2017-10-25 13:40:08 +00:00
Chandler Carruth