Summary:
Check the bool value of the attribute in getOptionalBoolLoopAttribute
not just its existance.
Eliminates the warning noise generated when vectorization is explicitly disabled.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, hfinkel, dmgreen
Subscribers: jlebar, sanjoy, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57260
llvm-svn: 352555
Bitcast and certain Ptr2Int/Int2Ptr instructions will not alter the
value of their operand and can therefore be looked through when we
determine non-nullness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54956
llvm-svn: 352293
Prior to SSE41 (and sometimes on AVX1), vector select has to be performed as a ((X & C)|(Y & ~C)) bit select.
Exposes a couple of issues with the min/max reduction costs (which only go down to SSE42 for some reason).
The increase pre-SSE41 selection costs also prevent a couple of tests from firing any longer, so I've either tweaked the target or added AVX tests as well to the existing SSE2 tests.
llvm-svn: 351685
If we found unsafe dependences other than 'unknown', we already know at
compile time that they are unsafe and the runtime checks should always
fail. So we can avoid generating them in those cases.
This should have no negative impact on performance as the runtime checks
that would be created previously should always fail. As a sanity check,
I measured the test-suite, spec2k and spec2k6 and there were no regressions.
Reviewers: Ayal, anemet, hsaito
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55798
llvm-svn: 349794
The current llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata has a problem in that
it uses LoopIDs. LoopID unfortunately is not loop identifier. It is
neither unique (there's even a regression test assigning the some LoopID
to multiple loops; can otherwise happen if passes such as LoopVersioning
make copies of entire loops) nor persistent (every time a property is
removed/added from a LoopID's MDNode, it will also receive a new LoopID;
this happens e.g. when calling Loop::setLoopAlreadyUnrolled()).
Since most loop transformation passes change the loop attributes (even
if it just to mark that a loop should not be processed again as
llvm.loop.isvectorized does, for the versioned and unversioned loop),
the parallel access information is lost for any subsequent pass.
This patch unlinks LoopIDs and parallel accesses.
llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access metadata on instruction is replaced by
llvm.access.group metadata. llvm.access.group points to a distinct
MDNode with no operands (avoiding the problem to ever need to add/remove
operands), called "access group". Alternatively, it can point to a list
of access groups. The LoopID then has an attribute
llvm.loop.parallel_accesses with all the access groups that are parallel
(no dependencies carries by this loop).
This intentionally avoid any kind of "ID". Loops that are clones/have
their attributes modifies retain the llvm.loop.parallel_accesses
attribute. Access instructions that a cloned point to the same access
group. It is not necessary for each access to have it's own "ID" MDNode,
but those memory access instructions with the same behavior can be
grouped together.
The behavior of llvm.mem.parallel_loop_access is not changed by this
patch, but should be considered deprecated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52116
llvm-svn: 349725
This patch adds a VectorizationSafetyStatus enum, which will be extended
in a follow up patch to distinguish between 'safe with runtime checks'
and 'known unsafe' dependences.
Reviewers: anemet, anna, Ayal, hsaito
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54892
llvm-svn: 349556
The first test claims to show that the vectorizer will
generate a vector load/loop, but then this file runs
other passes which might scalarize that op. I'm removing
instcombine from the RUN line here to break that dependency.
Also, I'm generating full checks to make it clear exactly
what the vectorizer has done.
llvm-svn: 349554
When multiple loop transformation are defined in a loop's metadata, their order of execution is defined by the order of their respective passes in the pass pipeline. For instance, e.g.
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
is the same as
#pragma clang loop distribute(enable)
#pragma clang loop unroll_and_jam(enable)
and will try to loop-distribute before Unroll-And-Jam because the LoopDistribute pass is scheduled after UnrollAndJam pass. UnrollAndJamPass only supports one inner loop, i.e. it will necessarily fail after loop distribution. It is not possible to specify another execution order. Also,t the order of passes in the pipeline is subject to change between versions of LLVM, optimization options and which pass manager is used.
This patch adds 'followup' attributes to various loop transformation passes. These attributes define which attributes the resulting loop of a transformation should have. For instance,
!0 = !{!0, !1, !2}
!1 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.enable"}
!2 = !{!"llvm.loop.unroll_and_jam.followup_inner", !3}
!3 = !{!"llvm.loop.distribute.enable"}
defines a loop ID (!0) to be unrolled-and-jammed (!1) and then the attribute !3 to be added to the jammed inner loop, which contains the instruction to distribute the inner loop.
Currently, in both pass managers, pass execution is in a fixed order and UnrollAndJamPass will not execute again after LoopDistribute. We hope to fix this in the future by allowing pass managers to run passes until a fixpoint is reached, use Polly to perform these transformations, or add a loop transformation pass which takes the order issue into account.
For mandatory/forced transformations (e.g. by having been declared by #pragma omp simd), the user must be notified when a transformation could not be performed. It is not possible that the responsible pass emits such a warning because the transformation might be 'hidden' in a followup attribute when it is executed, or it is not present in the pipeline at all. For this reason, this patche introduces a WarnMissedTransformations pass, to warn about orphaned transformations.
Since this changes the user-visible diagnostic message when a transformation is applied, two test cases in the clang repository need to be updated.
To ensure that no other transformation is executed before the intended one, the attribute `llvm.loop.disable_nonforced` can be added which should disable transformation heuristics before the intended transformation is applied. E.g. it would be surprising if a loop is distributed before a #pragma unroll_and_jam is applied.
With more supported code transformations (loop fusion, interchange, stripmining, offloading, etc.), transformations can be used as building blocks for more complex transformations (e.g. stripmining+stripmining+interchange -> tiling).
Reviewed By: hfinkel, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49281
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55288
llvm-svn: 348944
DemandedBits and BDCE currently only support scalar integers. This
patch extends them to also handle vector integer operations. In this
case bits are not tracked for individual vector elements, instead a
bit is demanded if it is demanded for any of the elements. This matches
the behavior of computeKnownBits in ValueTracking and
SimplifyDemandedBits in InstCombine.
Unlike the previous iteration of this patch, getDemandedBits() can now
again be called on arbirary (sized) instructions, even if they don't
have integer or vector of integer type. (For vector types the size of the
returned mask will now be the scalar size in bits though.)
The added LoopVectorize test case shows a case which triggered an
assertion failure with the previous attempt, because getDemandedBits()
was called on a pointer-typed instruction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55297
llvm-svn: 348602
This change caused SEGVs in instcombine. (The r347934 change seems to me to be a
precipitating cause, not a root cause. Details are on the llvm-commits thread
for r347934.)
llvm-svn: 348426
Adding a new reduction pattern match for vectorizing code similar
to TSVC s3111:
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
if (a[i] > b)
sum += a[i];
This patch adds support for fadd, fsub and fmull, as well as multiple
branches and different (but compatible) instructions (ex. add+sub) in
different branches.
The difference from the previous patch(https://reviews.llvm.org/D49168)
is as follows:
- Added check of fast-math property of fp-instruction to the
previous patch
- Fix/add some pattern for if-reduction.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54464
Patch by Takahiro Miyoshi <takahiro.miyoshi@linaro.org>
and Masakazu Ueno <masakazu.ueno@linaro.org>
llvm-svn: 347989
r320789 suppressed moving the insertion point of SCEV expressions with
dev/rem operations to the loop header in non-loop-invariant situations.
This, and similar, hoisting is also unsafe in the loop-invariant case,
since there may be a guard against a zero denominator. This is an
adjustment to the fix of r320789 to suppress the movement even in the
loop-invariant case.
This fixes PR30806.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54713
llvm-svn: 347934
This reverts commits r347776 and r347778.
The first one, r347776, caused significant compile time regressions
for certain input files, see PR39836 for details.
llvm-svn: 347867
This changeset is modeled after Intel's submission for SVML. It enables
trigonometry functions vectorization via SLEEF: http://sleef.org/.
* A new vectorization library enum is added to TargetLibraryInfo.h: SLEEF.
* A new option is added to TargetLibraryInfoImpl - ClVectorLibrary: SLEEF.
* A comprehensive test case is included in this changeset.
* In a separate changeset (for clang), a new vectorization library argument is
added to -fveclib: -fveclib=SLEEF.
Trigonometry functions that are vectorized by sleef:
acos
asin
atan
atanh
cos
cosh
exp
exp2
exp10
lgamma
log10
log2
log
sin
sinh
sqrt
tan
tanh
tgamma
Patch by Stefan Teleman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53927
llvm-svn: 347510
Summary:
Currently, when vectorizing stores to uniform addresses, the only
instance we prevent vectorization is if there are multiple stores to the
same uniform address causing an unsafe dependency.
This patch teaches LAA to avoid vectorizing loops that have an unsafe
cross-iteration dependency between a load and a store to the same uniform address.
Fixes PR39653.
Reviewers: Ayal, efriedma
Subscribers: rkruppe, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54538
llvm-svn: 347220
The general approach taken is to make note of loop invariant branches, then when
we see something conditional on that branch, such as a phi, we create a copy of
the branch and (empty versions of) its successors and hoist using that.
This has no impact by itself that I've been able to see, as LICM typically
doesn't see such phis as they will have been converted into selects by the time
LICM is run, but once we start doing phi-to-select conversion later it will be
important.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52827
llvm-svn: 347190
This just identifies the intrinsics as candidates for vectorization.
It does not mean we will attempt to vectorize under normal conditions
(the test file is forcing vectorization).
The cost model must be fixed to show that the transform is profitable
in general.
Allowing vectorization with these intrinsics is required to avoid
potential regressions from canonicalizing to the intrinsics from
generic IR:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37417
llvm-svn: 346661
Model this function more closely after the BasicTTIImpl version, with
separate handling of loads and stores. For loads, the set of actually loaded
vectors is checked.
This makes it more readable and just slightly more accurate generally.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D53071
llvm-svn: 345998
Fix PR39417, PR39497
The loop vectorizer may generate runtime SCEV checks for overflow and stride==1
cases, leading to execution of original scalar loop. The latter is forbidden
when optimizing for size. An assert introduced in r344743 triggered the above
PR's showing it does happen. This patch fixes this behavior by preventing
vectorization in such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53612
llvm-svn: 345959
optsize using masked wide loads
Under Opt for Size, the vectorizer does not vectorize interleave-groups that
have gaps at the end of the group (such as a loop that reads only the even
elements: a[2*i]) because that implies that we'll require a scalar epilogue
(which is not allowed under Opt for Size). This patch extends the support for
masked-interleave-groups (introduced by D53011 for conditional accesses) to
also cover the case of gaps in a group of loads; Targets that enable the
masked-interleave-group feature don't have to invalidate interleave-groups of
loads with gaps; they could now use masked wide-loads and shuffles (if that's
what the cost model selects).
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, dcaballe, fhahn
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53668
llvm-svn: 345705
This commit is a combination of two patches:
* "Fix in getScalarizationOverhead()"
If target returns false in TTI.prefersVectorizedAddressing(), it means the
address registers will not need to be extracted. Therefore, there should
be no operands scalarization overhead for a load instruction.
* "Don't pass the instruction pointer from getMemInstScalarizationCost."
Since VF is always > 1, this is a cost query for an instruction in the
vectorized loop and it should not be evaluated within the scalar
context of the instruction.
Review: Ulrich Weigand, Hal Finkel
https://reviews.llvm.org/D52351https://reviews.llvm.org/D52417
llvm-svn: 345603
masked-interleaving is enabled
Enable interleave-groups under fold-tail scenario for Opt for size compilation;
D50480 added support for vectorizing loops of arbitrary trip-count without a
remiander, which in turn makes everything in the loop conditional, including
interleave-groups if any. It therefore invalidated all interleave-groups
because we didn't have support for vectorizing predicated interleaved-groups
at the time. In the meantime, D53011 introduced this support, so we don't
have to invalidate interleave-groups when masked-interleaved support is enabled.
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, dcaballe, fhahn
Reviewed By: hsaito
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53559
llvm-svn: 345115
optimizing for size
LV is careful to respect -Os and not to create a scalar epilog in all cases
(runtime tests, trip-counts that require a remainder loop) except for peeling
due to gaps in interleave-groups. This patch fixes that; -Os will now have us
invalidate such interleave-groups and vectorize without an epilog.
The patch also removes a related FIXME comment that is now obsolete, and was
also inaccurate:
"FIXME: return None if loop requiresScalarEpilog(<MaxVF>), or look for a smaller
MaxVF that does not require a scalar epilog."
(requiresScalarEpilog() has nothing to do with VF).
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, dcaballe, fhahn
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53420
llvm-svn: 344883
When optimizing for size, a loop is vectorized only if the resulting vector loop
completely replaces the original scalar loop. This holds if no runtime guards
are needed, if the original trip-count TC does not overflow, and if TC is a
known constant that is a multiple of the VF. The last two TC-related conditions
can be overcome by
1. rounding the trip-count of the vector loop up from TC to a multiple of VF;
2. masking the vector body under a newly introduced "if (i <= TC-1)" condition.
The patch allows loops with arbitrary trip counts to be vectorized under -Os,
subject to the existing cost model considerations. It also applies to loops with
small trip counts (under -O2) which are currently handled as if under -Os.
The patch does not handle loops with reductions, live-outs, or w/o a primary
induction variable, and disallows interleave groups.
(Third, final and main part of -)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50480
llvm-svn: 344743
Summary:
Teach vectorizer about vectorizing variant value stores to uniform
address. Similar to rL343028, we do not allow vectorization if we have
multiple stores to the same uniform address.
Cost model already has the change for considering the extract
instruction cost for a variant value store. See added test cases for how
vectorization is done.
The patch also contains changes to the ORE messages.
Reviewers: Ayal, mkuper, anemet, hsaito
Subscribers: rkruppe, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52656
llvm-svn: 344613
Landing this as a separate part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D50480, recording
current behavior more accurately, to clarify subsequent diff ([LV] Vectorizing
loops of arbitrary trip count without remainder under opt for size).
llvm-svn: 344606
interleave-group
The vectorizer currently does not attempt to create interleave-groups that
contain predicated loads/stores; predicated strided accesses can currently be
vectorized only using masked gather/scatter or scalarization. This patch makes
predicated loads/stores candidates for forming interleave-groups during the
Loop-Vectorizer's analysis, and adds the proper support for masked-interleave-
groups to the Loop-Vectorizer's planning and transformation stages. The patch
also extends the TTI API to allow querying the cost of masked interleave groups
(which each target can control); Targets that support masked vector loads/
stores may choose to enable this feature and allow vectorizing predicated
strided loads/stores using masked wide loads/stores and shuffles.
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, dcaballe, fhahn, javed.absar
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53011
llvm-svn: 344472
Adding a new reduction pattern match for vectorizing code similar to TSVC s3111:
for (int i = 0; i < N; i++)
if (a[i] > b)
sum += a[i];
This patch adds support for fadd, fsub and fmull, as well as multiple
branches and different (but compatible) instructions (ex. add+sub) in
different branches.
I have forwarded to trunk, added fsub and fmul functionality and
additional tests, but the credit goes to Takahiro, who did most of the
actual work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49168
Patch by Takahiro Miyoshi <takahiro.miyoshi@linaro.org>.
llvm-svn: 344172
At the point when we perform `emitTransformedIndex`, we have a broken IR (in
particular, we have Phis for which not every incoming value is properly set). On
such IR, it is illegal to create SCEV expressions, because their internal
simplification process may try to prove some predicates and break when it
stumbles across some broken IR.
The only purpose of using SCEV in this particular place is attempt to simplify
the generated code slightly. It seems that the result isn't worth it, because
some trivial cases (like addition of zero and multiplication by 1) can be
handled separately if needed, but more generally InstCombine is able to achieve
the goals we want to achieve by using SCEV.
This patch fixes a functional crash described in PR39160, and as side-effect it
also generates a bit smarter code in some simple cases. It also may cause some
optimality loss (i.e. we will now generate `mul` by power of `2` instead of
shift etc), but there is nothing what InstCombine could not handle later. In
case of dire need, we can support more trivial cases just in place.
Note that this patch only fixes one particular case of the general problem that
LV misuses SCEV, attempting to create SCEVs or prove predicates on invalid IR.
The general solution, however, seems complex enough.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52881
Reviewed By: fhahn, hsaito
llvm-svn: 343954
This patch fixes PR39099.
When strided loads are predicated, each of them will form an interleaved-group
(with gaps). However, subsequent stages of vectorization (planning and
transformation) assume that if a load is part of an Interleave-Group it is not
predicated, resulting in wrong code - unmasked wide loads are created.
The Interleaving Analysis does take care not to have conditional interleave
groups of size > 1, but until we extend the planning and transformation stages
to support masked-interleave-groups we should also avoid having them for
size == 1.
Reviewers: Ayal, hsaito, dcaballe, fhahn
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52682
llvm-svn: 343931
Summary:
We are overly conservative in loop vectorizer with respect to stores to loop
invariant addresses.
More details in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38546
This is the first part of the fix where we start with vectorizing loop invariant
values to loop invariant addresses.
This also includes changes to ORE for stores to invariant address.
Reviewers: anemet, Ayal, mkuper, mssimpso
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50665
llvm-svn: 343028
Support for vectorizing loops with secondary floating-point induction
variables was added in r276554. A primary integer IV is still required
for vectorization to be done. If an FP IV was found, but no integer IV
was found at all (primary or secondary), the attempt to vectorize still
went forward, causing a compiler-crash. This change abandons that
attempt when no integer IV is found. (Vectorizing FP-only cases like
this, rather than bailing out, is discussed as possible future work
in D52327.)
See PR38800 for more information.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52327
llvm-svn: 342786
Summary:
[VPlan] Implement vector code generation support for simple outer loops.
Context: Patch Series #1 for outer loop vectorization support in LV using VPlan. (RFC: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-December/119523.html).
This patch introduces vector code generation support for simple outer loops that are currently supported in the VPlanNativePath. Changes here essentially do the following:
- force vector code generation using explicit vectorize_width
- add conservative early returns in cost model and other places for VPlanNativePath
- add code for setting up outer loop inductions
- support for widening non-induction PHIs that can result from inner loops and uniform conditional branches
- support for generating uniform inner branches
We plan to add a handful C outer loop executable tests once the initial code generation support is committed. This patch is expected to be NFC for the inner loop vectorizer path. Since we are moving in the direction of supporting outer loop vectorization in LV, it may also be time to rename classes such as InnerLoopVectorizer.
Reviewers: fhahn, rengolin, hsaito, dcaballe, mkuper, hfinkel, Ayal
Reviewed By: fhahn, hsaito
Subscribers: dmgreen, bollu, tschuett, rkruppe, rogfer01, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50820
llvm-svn: 342197
Alina Sbirlea