Between issues such as
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56323, the fact that this
lowering (unlike the code in amdgpu-to-rocdl) does not correctly set
up bounds checks (and thus will cause page faults on reads that might
need to be padded instead), and that fixing these problems would,
essentially, involve replicating amdgpu-to-rocdl, remove
--vector-to-rocdl for being broken. In addition, the lowering does not
support many aspects of transfer_{read,write}, like supervectors, and
may not work correctly in their presence.
We (the MLIR-based convolution generator at AMD) do not use this
conversion pass, nor are we aware of any other clients.
Migration strategies:
- Use VectorToLLVM
- If buffer ops are particularly needed in your application, use
amdgpu.raw_buffer_{load,store}
A VectorToAMDGPU pass may be introduced in the future.
Reviewed By: ThomasRaoux
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129308
A 1% increase in the number of clang-formatted files.
An additional 530 files have been added to LLVM, and an additional
450 files are now clang-format clean. Raising the overall % to 53%
There are now 8857 files clean out of 16432 (ignoring lit tests)
A 1% increase in the number of clang-formatted files.
An additional 235 files have been added to LLVM, and an additional
268 files are now clang-format clean. Raising the overall % to 52%
There are now 8407 files clean out of 15902 (ignoring lit tests)
Whilst the % clang-formatted remains the same, the number
of files added to the LLVM project has risen by almost by 259.
- 190 of them have been added clang-format clean.
- 69 files have been added unformatted. (lit tests should be excluded from this number)
- 291 files have been added to the list of files that are clang-format clean
- 101 files have either become unclean or have been removed
As this updates the clang-formatted-files there are now
8139 files that are clean which we can be used as a regression test when making changes to clang-format.
```
clang-format -verbose -n -files ./clang/docs/tools/clang-formatted-files.txt
```
Original commit message: "
Original commit message: "
Original commit message: "
Original commit message:"
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
"
This patch also ignores ppc due to missing weak symbol for __gxx_personality_v0
which may be a feature request for the jit infrastructure. Also, adds a missing
build system dependency to the orc jit.
"
Additionally, this patch defines a custom exception type and thus avoids the
requirement to include header <exception>, making it easier to deploy across
systems without standard location of the c++ headers.
"
This patch also works around PR49692 and finds a way to use llvm::consumeError
in rtti mode.
"
This patch also checks if stl is built with rtti.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
NOTE: some files are being removed from those files that are clang-formatted
which means some lack of formatting is slipping through the net on reviews
Original commit message: "
Original commit message: "
Original commit message:"
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
"
This patch also ignores ppc due to missing weak symbol for __gxx_personality_v0
which may be a feature request for the jit infrastructure. Also, adds a missing
build system dependency to the orc jit.
"
Additionally, this patch defines a custom exception type and thus avoids the
requirement to include header <exception>, making it easier to deploy across
systems without standard location of the c++ headers.
"
This patch also works around PR49692 and finds a way to use llvm::consumeError
in rtti mode.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
Two typos, one unsused include and some leftovers from the TargetProcessControl -> ExecutorProcessControl renaming
Reviewed By: xgupta
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110260
Original commit message: "
Original commit message:"
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
"
This patch also ignores ppc due to missing weak symbol for __gxx_personality_v0
which may be a feature request for the jit infrastructure. Also, adds a missing
build system dependency to the orc jit.
"
Additionally, this patch defines a custom exception type and thus avoids the
requirement to include header <exception>, making it easier to deploy across
systems without standard location of the c++ headers.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
Original commit message:"
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
"
This patch also ignores ppc due to missing weak symbol for __gxx_personality_v0
which may be a feature request for the jit infrastructure. Also, adds a missing
build system dependency to the orc jit.
The current infrastructure in lib/Interpreter has a tool, clang-repl, very
similar to clang-interpreter which also allows incremental compilation.
This patch moves clang-interpreter as a test case and drops it as conditionally
built example as we already have clang-repl in place.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107049
TextAPI/ELF has moved out into InterfaceStubs, so theres no longer a
need to seperate out TextAPI between formats.
Reviewed By: ributzka, int3, #lld-macho
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99811
Summary:
Any change to clang-format is tested with the unit tests, However sometimes the better approach is to run it over a very large fully formatted source tree and then inspect the differences. This seems to be a source of many of the regressions found by @krasimir and by @sylvestre.ledru and @Abpostelnicu who run it over the Mozilla sources, but often these regressions are only found after changes have been committed.
LLVM itself would be a good dog-fooding candidate for similar tests except such a large proportion of the tree is not 100% clang formatted, as such you are never aware if the change comes from a change to clang-format or just because the tree has not been formatted first.
The following review is for a small python tool which scans the whole of the LLVM source tree and counts the number of files which have one or more clang-format violations.
This revision contains the tool and the output from the initial run of the tool and the generated documentation which looks like the following
Reviewers: krasimir, JakeMerdichAMD, sammccall, curdeius, bollu, alexshap, jdoerfert, DavidTruby, sscalpone
Reviewed By: curdeius
Subscribers: dschuff, aheejin, fedor.sergeev, ilya-biryukov, simoncook, cryptoad, arphaman, jfb, kadircet, mstorsjo, s.egerton, usaxena95, aartbik, phosek, sstefan1, cfe-commits, sylvestre.ledru, Abpostelnicu, krasimir
Tags: #clang, #clang-format
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80627
Krzysztof Drewniak