This is the `ext_vector_type` alternative to D81083.
This patch extends Clang to allow 'bool' as a valid vector element type
(attribute ext_vector_type) in C/C++.
This is intended as the canonical type for SIMD masks and facilitates
clean vector intrinsic declarations. Vectors of i1 are supported on IR
level and below down to many SIMD ISAs, such as AVX512, ARM SVE (fixed
vector length) and the VE target (NEC SX-Aurora TSUBASA).
The RFC on cfe-dev: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-May/065434.html
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88905
In post-commit feedback on D104830 Jessica Clarke pointed out that
unconditionally adding __va_list to the std namespace caused namespace
debug info to be emitted in C, which is not only inappropriate but
turned out to confuse the dtrace tool. Therefore, move __va_list back
to std only in C++ so that the correct debug info is generated. We
also considered moving __va_list to the top level unconditionally
but this would contradict the specification and be visible to AST
matchers and such, so make it conditional on the language mode.
To avoid breaking name mangling for __va_list, teach the Itanium
name mangler to always mangle it as if it were in the std namespace
when targeting ARM architectures. This logic is not needed for the
Microsoft name mangler because Microsoft platforms define va_list as
a typedef of char *.
Depends on D116773
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116774
Among many FoldingSet users most notable seem to be ASTContext and CodeGenTypes.
The reasons that we spend not-so-tiny amount of time in FoldingSet calls from there, are following:
1. Default FoldingSet capacity for 2^6 items very often is not enough.
For PointerTypes/ElaboratedTypes/ParenTypes it's not unlikely to observe growing it to 256 or 512 items.
FunctionProtoTypes can easily exceed 1k items capacity growing up to 4k or even 8k size.
2. FoldingSetBase::GrowBucketCount cost itself is not very bad (pure reallocations are rather cheap thanks to BumpPtrAllocator).
What matters is high collision rate when lot of items end up in same bucket slowing down FoldingSetBase::FindNodeOrInsertPos and trashing CPU cache
(as items with same hash are organized in intrusive linked list which need to be traversed).
This change address both issues by increasing initial size of FoldingSets used in ASTContext and CodeGenTypes.
Extracted from: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118385
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118608
This patch fixes a bug introduced in commit 4eaf5846d0. Commit
4eaf5846d0 sets address space of function type as program
address space unconditionally. This breaks types which have
address space qualifiers. E.g. __ptr32.
This patch fixes the bug by using address space qualifiers if
present.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119045
Bug #52905 was originally papered over in a different way, but
I believe this is the actually proper fix, or at least closer to
it. We need to detect placeholder types as close to the front-end
as possible, and cause them to fail constraints, rather than letting
them persist into later stages.
Fixes#52905.
Fixes#52909.
Fixes#53075.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118552
Using a _BitInt (or _ExtInt) type as a block parameter or block return
type hits an "unreachable" when trying to determine the encoding for
the block. Instead of crashing, this patch handles it like some of the
other types for which we don't yet have an encoding. The test case
verifies we no longer crash, but does not verify that we provide any
particular encoding (it can be updated once someone more familiar with
ObjC steps in to define the encoding).
Fixes PR50503.
Currently we are trying to implement the semantics of C++ Modules. A big
challenge would be the ODR checking. Previously we did this in
ASTReader, it would handle the cases like:
```
module;
export module a_module;
import another_module; // check the ODR consistency here
```
or
```
export module m;
import a_module;
import another_module; // check the ODR consistency here
```
However, it wouldn't handle the case:
```
import another_module; // When we check ODR here, everything looks fine.
```
In the case, the read process is ended. But we need to check the ODR
still. To reuse the facility we do in ASTReader, this patch moves the
corresponding codes into ASTContext. This should be good since there
were facilities like `hasSameTemplateName` and `hasSameType`.
Although the patch is a little bit big, all of the change should be
trivial.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118223
This reverts commit ef82063207.
- It conflicts with the existing llvm::size in STLExtras, which will now
never be called.
- Calling it without llvm:: breaks C++17 compat
Functions pointers should be created with program address space. This
patch introduces program address space in TargetInfo. Targets with
non-default (default is 0) address space for functions should explicitly
set this value. This patch fixes a crash on lvalue reference to function
pointer (in device code) when using oneAPI DPC++ compiler.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111566
This reverts commit cc56c66f27.
Fixed a bad assertion, the target of a UsingShadowDecl must not have
*local* qualifiers, but it can be a typedef whose underlying type is qualified.
Currently there's no way to find the UsingDecl that a typeloc found its
underlying type through. Compare to DeclRefExpr::getFoundDecl().
Design decisions:
- a sugar type, as there are many contexts this type of use may appear in
- UsingType is a leaf like TypedefType, the underlying type has no TypeLoc
- not unified with UnresolvedUsingType: a single name is appealing,
but being sometimes-sugar is often fiddly.
- not unified with TypedefType: the UsingShadowDecl is not a TypedefNameDecl or
even a TypeDecl, and users think of these differently.
- does not cover other rarer aliases like objc @compatibility_alias,
in order to be have a concrete API that's easy to understand.
- implicitly desugared by the hasDeclaration ASTMatcher, to avoid
breaking existing patterns and following the precedent of ElaboratedType.
Scope:
- This does not cover types associated with template names introduced by
using declarations. A future patch should introduce a sugar TemplateName
variant for this. (CTAD deduced types fall under this)
- There are enough AST matchers to fix the in-tree clang-tidy tests and
probably any other matchers, though more may be useful later.
Caveats:
- This changes a fairly common pattern in the AST people may depend on matching.
Previously, typeLoc(loc(recordType())) matched whether a struct was
referred to by its original scope or introduced via using-decl.
Now, the using-decl case is not matched, and needs a separate matcher.
This is similar to the case of typedefs but nevertheless both adds
complexity and breaks existing code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114251
Implement `getUnresolvedUsingType()` and don't create a new
`UnresolvedUsingType` when there is already canonical declaration.
This solved an incorrect ODR detection in modules for uresolved using
type.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115792
WG14 adopted the _ExtInt feature from Clang for C23, but renamed the
type to be _BitInt. This patch does the vast majority of the work to
rename _ExtInt to _BitInt, which accounts for most of its size. The new
type is exposed in older C modes and all C++ modes as a conforming
extension. However, there are functional changes worth calling out:
* Deprecates _ExtInt with a fix-it to help users migrate to _BitInt.
* Updates the mangling for the type.
* Updates the documentation and adds a release note to warn users what
is going on.
* Adds new diagnostics for use of _BitInt to call out when it's used as
a Clang extension or as a pre-C23 compatibility concern.
* Adds new tests for the new diagnostic behaviors.
I want to call out the ABI break specifically. We do not believe that
this break will cause a significant imposition for early adopters of
the feature, and so this is being done as a full break. If it turns out
there are critical uses where recompilation is not an option for some
reason, we can consider using ABI tags to ease the transition.
See discussion in D51650, this change was a little aggressive in an
error while doing a 'while we were here', so this removes that error
condition, as it is apparently useful.
This reverts commit bb4934601d.
`DeducedTemplateSpecializationTypes` is a `llvm::FoldingSet<DeducedTemplateSpecializationType>` [1],
where `FoldingSetNodeID` is based on the values: {`TemplateName`, `QualType`, `IsDeducedAsDependent`},
those values are also used as `DeducedTemplateSpecializationType` constructor arguments.
A `FoldingSetNodeID` created by the static `DeducedTemplateSpecializationType::Profile` may not be equal
to`FoldingSetNodeID` created by a member `DeducedTemplateSpecializationType::Profile` of an instance
created with the same {`TemplateName`, `QualType`, `IsDeducedAsDependent`}, which makes
`DeducedTemplateSpecializationTypes` lookups nondeterministic.
Specifically, while `IsDeducedAsDependent` value is passes to the constructor, `IsDependent()` method on
the created instance may return a different value, because `IsDependent` is not saved as is:
```name=clang/include/clang/AST/Type.h
DeducedTemplateSpecializationType(TemplateName Template, QualType DeducedAsType, bool IsDeducedAsDependent)
: DeducedType(DeducedTemplateSpecialization, DeducedAsType,
toTypeDependence(Template.getDependence()) | // <~ also considers `TemplateName` parameter
(IsDeducedAsDependent ? TypeDependence::DependentInstantiation : TypeDependence::None)),
```
For example, if an instance A with key `FoldingSetNodeID {A, B, false}` is inserted. Then a key
`FoldingSetNodeID {A, B, true}` is probed:
If it happens to correspond to the same bucket in `FoldingSet` as the first key, and `A.Profile()` returns
`FoldingSetNodeID {A, B, true}`, then it's a hit.
If the bucket for the second key is different from the first key, instance A is not considered at all, and it's
a no hit, even if `A.Profile()` returns `FoldingSetNodeID {A, B, true}`.
Since `TemplateName`, `QualType` parameter values involve memory pointers, the lookup result depend on allocator,
and may differ from run to run. When this is used as part of modules compilation, it may result in "module out of date"
errors, if imported modules are built on different machines.
This makes `ASTContext::getDeducedTemplateSpecializationType` consider `Template.isDependent()` similar
`DeducedTemplateSpecializationType` constructor.
Tested on a very big codebase, by running modules compilations from directories with varied path length
(seem to affect allocator seed).
1. https://llvm.org/docs/ProgrammersManual.html#llvm-adt-foldingset-h
Patch by Wei Wang and Igor Sugak!
Reviewed By: bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112481
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith, #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
This implements the following changes:
* AutoType retains sugared deduced-as-type.
* Template argument deduction machinery analyses the sugared type all the way
down. It would previously lose the sugar on first recursion.
* Undeduced AutoType will be properly canonicalized, including the constraint
template arguments.
* Remove the decltype node created from the decltype(auto) deduction.
As a result, we start seeing sugared types in a lot more test cases,
including some which showed very unfriendly `type-parameter-*-*` types.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110216
As discussed here: https://lwn.net/Articles/691932/
GCC6.0 adds target_clones multiversioning. This functionality is
an odd cross between the cpu_dispatch and 'target' MV, but is compatible
with neither.
This attribute allows you to list all options, then emits a separately
optimized version of each function per-option (similar to the
cpu_specific attribute). It automatically generates a resolver, just
like the other two.
The mangling however, is... ODD to say the least. The mangling format
is:
<normal_mangling>.<option string>.<option ordinal>.
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D51650
If the feature is on the command line we should honor it for all
functions. I don't think we could reliably target a single function
for a less capable processor than what the rest of the program is
compiled for.
Fixes PR52407.
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113647
This patch splits the existing SveVectorBits LangOpt into VScaleMin and
VScaleMax LangOpts such that we can represent such an option. The cc1
option has also been split into -mvscale-{min,max}=<n> options so that the
cc1 arguments better reflect the vscale_range IR attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111790
Previously without -disable-free, -clear-ast-before-backend would crash in ~ASTContext() due to various reasons.
This works around that by doing a lot of the cleanup ahead of the destructor so that the destructor doesn't actually do any manual cleanup if we've already cleaned up beforehand.
This actually does save a measurable amount of memory with -clear-ast-before-backend, although at an almost unnoticeable runtime cost:
https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=5d755b32f2775b9219f6d6e2feda5e1417dc993b&to=58ef1c7ad7e2ad45f9c97597905a8cf05a26258c&stat=max-rss
Previously we weren't doing any cleanup with -disable-free, so I tried measuring the impact of always doing the cleanup and didn't measure anything noticeable on llvm-compile-time-tracker.
Reviewed By: dblaikie
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111767
This is the second part of p0388, dealing with overloads of list
initialization to incomplete array types. It extends the handling
added in D103088 to permit incomplete arrays. We have to record that
the conversion involved an incomplete array, and so (re-add) a bit flag
into the standard conversion sequence object. Comparing such
conversion sequences requires knowing (a) the number of array elements
initialized and (b) whether the initialization is of an incomplete array.
This also updates the web page to indicate p0388 is implemented (there
is no feature macro).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103908
This implements the new implicit conversion sequence to an incomplete
(unbounded) array type. It is mostly Richard Smith's work, updated to
trunk, testcases added and a few bugs fixed found in such testing.
It is not a complete implementation of p0388.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102645
fae0dfa implemented the new __ibm128 type, this patch enables its
complex form.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109948
Currently, there're multiple float types that can be represented by
__attribute__((mode(xx))). It's parsed, and then a corresponding type is
created if available.
This refactor moves the enum for mode into a global enum class visible
to ASTContext.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, erichkeane
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111391
As discussed in D109948, pre-computing all complex float types is not
necessary and brings extra overhead. This patch removes these defined
types, and construct them in-place when needed.
Reviewed By: teemperor
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111387
This patch allows the use of __vector_quad and __vector_pair, PPC MMA builtin
types, on all PowerPC 64-bit compilation units. When these types are
made available the builtins that use them automatically become available
so semantic checking for mma and pair vector memop __builtins is also
expanded to ensure these builtin function call are only allowed on
Power10 and new architectures. All related test cases are updated to
ensure test coverage.
Reviewed By: #powerpc, nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109599
After significant problems in our downstream with the previous
implementation, the SYCL standard has opted to make using macros/etc to
change kernel-naming-lambdas in any way UB (even passively). As a
result, we are able to just emit the itanium mangling.
However, this DOES require a little work in the CXXABI, as the microsoft
and itanium mangler use different numbering schemes for lambdas. This
patch adds a pair of mangling contexts that use the normal 'itanium'
mangling strategy to fill in the "DeviceManglingNumber" used previously
by CUDA.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110281
The current check for typedef is naive and doesn't deal with any convoluted cases. This patch makes use of the new 'AlignRequirement' enum field from 'TypeInfo' to determine whether or not this is an 'aligned' attribute on a typedef.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D109387
Currently, we have no front-end type for ppc_fp128 type in IR. PowerPC
target generates ppc_fp128 type from long double now, but there's option
(-mabi=(ieee|ibm)longdouble) to control it and we're going to do
transition from IBM extended double-double ppc_fp128 to IEEE fp128 in
the future.
This patch adds type __ibm128 which always represents ppc_fp128 in IR,
as what GCC did for that type. Without this type in Clang, compilation
will fail if compiling against future version of libstdcxx (which uses
__ibm128 in headers).
Although all operations in backend for __ibm128 is done by software,
only PowerPC enables support for it.
There's something not implemented in this commit, which can be done in
future ones:
- Literal suffix for __ibm128 type. w/W is suitable as GCC documented.
- __attribute__((mode(IF))) should be for __ibm128.
- Complex __ibm128 type.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377
Extend the information preserved in `TypeInfo` by replacing the `AlignIsRequired` bool flag with a three-valued enum, the enum also indicates where the alignment attribute come from, which could be helpful in determining whether the attribute should overrule.
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D108858
`__alignof__(x)` always returns `ABIAlign` if the "x" is marked `__attribute__((aligned()))`. However, the "aligned" attribute should only increase the alignment of a struct, or struct member, unless it's used together with the "packed" attribute, or used as a part of a typedef, in which case, the "aligned" attribute can both increase and decrease alignment.
Reviewed By: sfertile
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107598
See PR47174.
When canonicalizing nested name specifiers of the type kind,
the prefix for 'DependentTemplateSpecialization' types was being
dropped, leading to malformed types which would cause failures
when rebuilding template names.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107311
This cleanup patch refactors a bunch of functional duplicates of
getDecltypeForParenthesizedExpr into a common implementation.
Signed-off-by: Matheus Izvekov <mizvekov@gmail.com>
Reviewed By: aaronpuchert
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100713
According to https://godbolt.org/z/q5rME1naY and acle, we found that
there are different SVE conversion behaviours between clang and gcc. It turns
out that llvm does not handle SVE predicates width properly.
This patch 1) checks SVE predicates width rightly with svbool_t type.
2) removes warning on svbool_t VLST <-> VLAT/GNUT conversion.
3) disables VLST <-> VLAT/GNUT conversion between SVE vectors and predicates
due to different width.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106333
Use _Float16 as the half-precision floating point type. Define a new
type specifier 'x' for the _Float16 type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105001
Original commit message:
[clang-repl] Implement partial translation units and error recovery.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
This reverts commit 6775fc6ffa.
It also reverts "[lldb] Fix compilation by adjusting to the new ASTContext signature."
This reverts commit 03a3f86071.
We see some failures on the lldb infrastructure, these changes might play a role
in it. Let's revert it now and see if the bots will become green.
Ref: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
https://reviews.llvm.org/D96033 contained a discussion regarding efficient
modeling of error recovery. @rjmccall has outlined the key ideas:
Conceptually, we can split the translation unit into a sequence of partial
translation units (PTUs). Every declaration will be associated with a unique PTU
that owns it.
The first key insight here is that the owning PTU isn't always the "active"
(most recent) PTU, and it isn't always the PTU that the declaration
"comes from". A new declaration (that isn't a redeclaration or specialization of
anything) does belong to the active PTU. A template specialization, however,
belongs to the most recent PTU of all the declarations in its signature - mostly
that means that it can be pulled into a more recent PTU by its template
arguments.
The second key insight is that processing a PTU might extend an earlier PTU.
Rolling back the later PTU shouldn't throw that extension away. For example, if
the second PTU defines a template, and the third PTU requires that template to
be instantiated at float, that template specialization is still part of the
second PTU. Similarly, if the fifth PTU uses an inline function belonging to the
fourth, that definition still belongs to the fourth. When we go to emit code in
a new PTU, we map each declaration we have to emit back to its owning PTU and
emit it in a new module for just the extensions to that PTU. We keep track of
all the modules we've emitted for a PTU so that we can unload them all if we
decide to roll it back.
Most declarations/definitions will only refer to entities from the same or
earlier PTUs. However, it is possible (primarily by defining a
previously-declared entity, but also through templates or ADL) for an entity
that belongs to one PTU to refer to something from a later PTU. We will have to
keep track of this and prevent unwinding to later PTU when we recognize it.
Fortunately, this should be very rare; and crucially, we don't have to do the
bookkeeping for this if we've only got one PTU, e.g. in normal compilation.
Otherwise, PTUs after the first just need to record enough metadata to be able
to revert any changes they've made to declarations belonging to earlier PTUs,
e.g. to redeclaration chains or template specialization lists.
It should even eventually be possible for PTUs to provide their own slab
allocators which can be thrown away as part of rolling back the PTU. We can
maintain a notion of the active allocator and allocate things like Stmt/Expr
nodes in it, temporarily changing it to the appropriate PTU whenever we go to do
something like instantiate a function template. More care will be required when
allocating declarations and types, though.
We would want the PTU to be efficiently recoverable from a Decl; I'm not sure
how best to do that. An easy option that would cover most declarations would be
to make multiple TranslationUnitDecls and parent the declarations appropriately,
but I don't think that's good enough for things like member function templates,
since an instantiation of that would still be parented by its original class.
Maybe we can work this into the DC chain somehow, like how lexical DCs are.
We add a different kind of translation unit `TU_Incremental` which is a
complete translation unit that we might nonetheless incrementally extend later.
Because it is complete (and we might want to generate code for it), we do
perform template instantiation, but because it might be extended later, we don't
warn if it declares or uses undefined internal-linkage symbols.
This patch teaches clang-repl how to recover from errors by disconnecting the
most recent PTU and update the primary PTU lookup tables. For instance:
```./clang-repl
clang-repl> int i = 12; error;
In file included from <<< inputs >>>:1:
input_line_0:1:13: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
int i = 12; error;
^
error: Parsing failed.
clang-repl> int i = 13; extern "C" int printf(const char*,...);
clang-repl> auto r1 = printf("i=%d\n", i);
i=13
clang-repl> quit
```
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104918
This ensures that the mangled type names match between C and C++,
which is significant when using -fsanitize=cfi-icall. Ideally we
wouldn't have created this namespace at all, but it's now part of
the ABI (e.g. in mangled names), so we can't change it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104830
This implements the 'using enum maybe-qualified-enum-tag ;' part of
1099. It introduces a new 'UsingEnumDecl', subclassed from
'BaseUsingDecl'. Much of the diff is the boilerplate needed to get the
new class set up.
There is one case where we accept ill-formed, but I believe this is
merely an extended case of an existing bug, so consider it
orthogonal. AFAICT in class-scope the c++20 rule is that no 2 using
decls can bring in the same target decl ([namespace.udecl]/8). But we
already accept:
struct A { enum { a }; };
struct B : A { using A::a; };
struct C : B { using A::a;
using B::a; }; // same enumerator
this patch permits mixtures of 'using enum Bob;' and 'using Bob::member;' in the same way.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102241
In the case where the device is an itanium target, and the host is a
windows target, we were getting the names wrong, since in the itanium
case we filter by lambda-signature.
The fix is to always filter by the signature rather than just on
non-windows builds. I considered doing the reverse (that is, checking
the aux-triple), but doing so would result in duplicate lambda mangling
numbers (from linux reusing the same number for different signatures).
I discovered when merging the __builtin_sycl_unique_stable_name into my
downstream that it is actually possible for the cc1 invocation to have
more than 1 Sema instance, if you pass it multiple input files, each
gets its own Sema instance and thus ASTContext instance. The result was
that the call to Filter the SYCL kernels was using an
ItaniumMangleContext stored via a 'magic static', so it had an invalid
reference to ASTContext when processing the 2nd failure.
The failure is unfortunately flakey/transient, but the test that fails
was added anyway.
The magic-static was switched to a unique_ptr member variable in
ASTContext that is initialized when needed.
The original version of this was reverted, and @rjmcall provided some
advice to architect a new solution. This is that solution.
This implements a builtin to provide a unique name that is stable across
compilations of this TU for the purposes of implementing the library
component of the unnamed kernel feature of SYCL. It does this by
running the Itanium mangler with a few modifications.
Because it is somewhat common to wrap non-kernel-related lambdas in
macros that aren't present on the device (such as for logging), this
uniquely generates an ID for all lambdas involved in the naming of a
kernel. It uses the lambda-mangling number to do this, except replaces
this with its own number (starting at 10000 for readabililty reasons)
for lambdas used to name a kernel.
Additionally, this implements itself as constexpr with a slight catch:
if a name would be invalidated by the use of this lambda in a later
kernel invocation, it is diagnosed as an error (see the Sema tests).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103112
In working on p0388 (ary[N] -> ary[] conversion), I discovered neither
use of UnwrapSimilarArrayTypes used the return value. So let's nuke
it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102480
Currently clang does not emit device template variables
instantiated only in host functions, however, nvcc is
able to do that:
https://godbolt.org/z/fneEfferY
This patch fixes this issue by refactoring and extending
the existing mechanism for emitting static device
var ODR-used by host only. Basically clang records
device variables ODR-used by host code and force
them to be emitted in device compilation. The existing
mechanism makes sure these device variables ODR-used
by host code are added to llvm.compiler-used, therefore
they are guaranteed not to be deleted.
It also fixes non-ODR-use of static device variable by host code
causing static device variable to be emitted and registered,
which should not.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102237
This implements the flag proposed in RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2020-August/066437.html.
The goal is to add a way to override the default target C++ ABI through a
compiler flag. This makes it easier to test and transition between different
C++ ABIs through compile flags rather than build flags.
In this patch:
- Store -fc++-abi= in a LangOpt. This isn't stored in a CodeGenOpt because
there are instances outside of codegen where Clang needs to know what the
ABI is (particularly through ASTContext::createCXXABI), and we should be
able to override the target default if the flag is provided at that point.
- Expose the existing ABIs in TargetCXXABI as values that can be passed
through this flag.
- Create a .def file for these ABIs to make it easier to check flag values.
- Add an error for diagnosing bad ABI flag values.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85802
Default address space (applies when no explicit address space was
specified) maps to generic (4) address space.
Added SYCL named address spaces `sycl_global`, `sycl_local` and
`sycl_private` defined as sub-sets of the default address space.
Static variables without address space now reside in global address
space when compile for SPIR target, unless they have an explicit address
space qualifier in source code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89909
Overflows are never fun.
In most cases (in most of the code), they are rare,
because usually you e.g. don't have as many elements.
However, it's exceptionally easy to fall into this pitfail
in code that deals with images, because, assuming 4-channel 32-bit FP data,
you need *just* ~269 megapixel image to case an overflow
when computing at least the total byte count.
In [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable | darktable ]], there is a *long*, painful history of dealing with such bugs:
* https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/7740
* https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/7419
* eea1989f2c
* 70626dd95b
* https://github.com/darktable-org/darktable/pull/670
* 38c69fb1b2
and yet they clearly keep resurfacing still.
It would be immensely helpful to have a diagnostic for those patterns,
which is what this change proposes.
Currently, i only diagnose the most obvious case, where multiplication
is directly widened with no other expressions inbetween,
(i.e. `long r = (int)a * (int)b` but not even e.g. `long r = ((int)a * (int)b)`)
however that might be worth relaxing later.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93822
On z/OS there is a hard limitation on on the maximum requestable alignment in aligned attribute for static variables. We need to truncate values greater than that.
Reviewed By: abhina.sreeskantharajan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98864
The idiom:
```
DeclContext::lookup_result R = DeclContext::lookup(Name);
for (auto *D : R) {...}
```
is not safe when in the loop body we trigger deserialization from an AST file.
The deserialization can insert new declarations in the StoredDeclsList whose
underlying type is a vector. When the vector decides to reallocate its storage
the pointer we hold becomes invalid.
This patch replaces a SmallVector with an singly-linked list. The current
approach stores a SmallVector<NamedDecl*, 4> which is around 8 pointers.
The linked list is 3, 5, or 7. We do better in terms of memory usage for small
cases (and worse in terms of locality -- the linked list entries won't be near
each other, but will be near their corresponding declarations, and we were going
to fetch those memory pages anyway). For larger cases: the vector uses a
doubling strategy for reallocation, so will generally be between half-full and
full. Let's say it's 75% full on average, so there's N * 4/3 + 4 pointers' worth
of space allocated currently and will be 2N pointers with the linked list. So we
break even when there are N=6 entries and slightly lose in terms of memory usage
after that. We suspect that's still a win on average.
Thanks to @rsmith!
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91524
For -fgpu-rdc mode, static device vars in different TU's may have the same name.
To support accessing file-scope static device variables in host code, we need to give them
a distinct name and external linkage. This can be done by postfixing each static device variable with
a distinct CUID (Compilation Unit ID) hash.
Since the static device variables have different name across compilation units, now we let
them have external linkage so that they can be looked up by the runtime.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich, and Jon Chesterfield
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85223
This patch responds to a comment from @vitalybuka in D96203: suggestion to
do the change incrementally, and start by modifying this file name. I modified
the file name and made the other changes that follow from that rename.
Reviewers: vitalybuka, echristo, MaskRay, jansvoboda11, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96974
would otherwise include template specialization types
This helps reduce the size of the encoded C++ type strings in the binary.
This is enabled by default only on Darwin, but can be enabled/disabled
via command line options.
rdar://63288571
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96816
Add the types for the RISC-V V extension builtins.
These types will be used by the RISC-V V intrinsics which require
types of the form <vscale x 1 x i64>(LMUL=1 element size=64) or
<vscale x 4 x i32>(LMUL=2 element size=32), etc. The vector_size
attribute does not work for us as it doesn't create a scalable
vector type. We want these types to be opaque and have no operators
defined for them. We want them to be sizeless. This makes them
similar to the ARM SVE builtin types. But we will have quite a bit
more types. This patch adds around 60. Later patches will add
another 230 or so types representing tuples of these types similar
to the x2/x3/x4 types in ARM SVE. But with extra complexity that
these types are combined with the LMUL concept that is unique to
RISCV.
For more background see this RFC
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2020-October/145850.html
Authored-by: Roger Ferrer Ibanez <roger.ferrer@bsc.es>
Co-Authored-by: Hsiangkai Wang <kai.wang@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92715
This change affects 'SemaOpenCLCXX/newdelete.cl' test,
thus the patch contains adjustments in types validation of
operators new and delete
Reviewed By: Anastasia
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96178
For -fgpu-rdc, shadow variables should not be internalized, otherwise
they cannot be accessed by other TUs. This is necessary because
the shadow variable of external device variables are always
emitted as undefined symbols, which need to resolve to a global
symbols.
Managed variables need to be emitted as undefined symbols
in device compilations.
Reviewed by: Artem Belevich
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95901
This change makes `DeclarationNameLoc` a proper class and refactors its
users to use getter methods instead of accessing the members directly.
The change also makes `DeclarationNameLoc` immutable (i.e., it cannot
be modified once constructed).
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94596
This change implements support for applying profile instrumentation
only to selected files or functions. The implementation uses the
sanitizer special case list format to select which files and functions
to instrument, and relies on the new noprofile IR attribute to exclude
functions from instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94820
This change implements support for applying profile instrumentation
only to selected files or functions. The implementation uses the
sanitizer special case list format to select which files and functions
to instrument, and relies on the new noprofile IR attribute to exclude
functions from instrumentation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94820
Combined with 'da98651 - Revert "DR2064:
decltype(E) is only a dependent', this change (5a391d3) caused verifier
errors when building Chromium. See https://crbug.com/1168494#c1 for a
reproducer.
Additionally it reverts changes that were dependent on this one, see
below.
> Following up on PR48517, fix handling of template arguments that refer
> to dependent declarations.
>
> Treat an id-expression that names a local variable in a templated
> function as being instantiation-dependent.
>
> This addresses a language defect whereby a reference to a dependent
> declaration can be formed without any construct being value-dependent.
> Fixing that through value-dependence turns out to be problematic, so
> instead this patch takes the approach (proposed on the core reflector)
> of allowing the use of pointers or references to (but not values of)
> dependent declarations inside value-dependent expressions, and instead
> treating template arguments as dependent if they evaluate to a constant
> involving such dependent declarations.
>
> This ends up affecting a bunch of OpenMP tests, due to OpenMP
> imprecisely handling instantiation-dependent constructs, bailing out
> early instead of processing dependent constructs to the extent possible
> when handling the template.
>
> Previously committed as 8c1f2d15b8, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted.
This reverts commit 5a391d38ac.
It also restores clang/test/SemaCXX/coroutines.cpp to its state before
da986511fb.
Revert "[c++20] P1907R1: Support for generalized non-type template arguments of scalar type."
> Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
> reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
> following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
>
> 7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
> ed13d8c667 by me
> 95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
> 430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
This reverts commit 4b574008ae.
Revert "[msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay"
> [msabi] Mangle a template argument referring to array-to-pointer decay
> applied to an array the same as the array itself.
>
> This follows MS ABI, and corrects a regression from the implementation
> of generalized non-type template parameters, where we "forgot" how to
> mangle this case.
This reverts commit 18e093faf7.
if E is merely instantiation-dependent."
This change leaves us unable to distinguish between different function
templates that differ in only instantiation-dependent ways, for example
template<typename T> decltype(int(T())) f();
template<typename T> decltype(int(T(0))) f();
We'll need substantially better support for types that are
instantiation-dependent but not dependent before we can go ahead with
this change.
This reverts commit e3065ce238.
Previously committed as 9e08e51a20, and
reverted because a dependency commit was reverted. This incorporates the
following follow-on commits that were also reverted:
7e84aa1b81 by Simon Pilgrim
ed13d8c667 by me
95c7b6cadb by Sam McCall
430d5d8429 by Dave Zarzycki
if E is merely instantiation-dependent.
Previously reverted in 34e72a146111dd986889a0f0ec8767b2ca6b2913;
re-committed with a fix to an issue that caused name mangling to assert.
This patch enables the Clang type __vector_pair and its associated LLVM
intrinsics even when MMA is disabled. With this patch, the type is now controlled
by the PPC paired-vector-memops option. The builtins and intrinsics will be
renamed to drop the mma prefix in another patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91819
Ensure that we can deserialize a TypedefType even while in the middle of
deserializing its TypedefDecl, by removing the need to look at the
TypedefDecl while constructing the TypedefType.
This fixes all the currently-known failures for PR48434, but it's not a
complete fix, because we can still trigger deserialization cycles, which
are not supposed to happen.
shouldRTTIBeUnique() returns false for iOS64CXXABI, which causes
RTTI objects to be emitted hidden. Update two tests that didn't
expect this to happen for the default triple.
Also rename iOS64CXXABI to AppleARM64CXXABI, since it's used for
arm64-apple-macos triples too.
Part of PR46644.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91904
Previously, lax conversions were only allowed between SVE vector-length
agnostic types and vector-length specific types. This meant that code
such as the following:
#include <arm_sve.h>
#define N __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS
#define FIXED_ATTR __attribute__ ((vector_size (N/8)))
typedef float fixed_float32_t FIXED_ATTR;
void foo() {
fixed_float32_t fs32;
svfloat64_t s64;
fs32 = s64;
}
was not allowed.
This patch makes a minor change to areLaxCompatibleSveTypes to allow for
lax conversions to be performed between SVE vector-length agnostic types
and GNU vectors.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91696
wchar_t can be signed (thus hasSignedIntegerRepresentation() returns
true), but it doesn't have an unsigned type, which would lead to a crash
when trying to get it.
With this fix, we special-case WideChar types in the pointer assignment
code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91625
Lax vector conversions was behaving incorrectly for implicit casts
between scalable and fixed-length vector types. For example, this:
#include <arm_sve.h>
#define N __ARM_FEATURE_SVE_BITS
#define FIXED_ATTR __attribute__((arm_sve_vector_bits(N)))
typedef svfloat32_t fixed_float32_t FIXED_ATTR;
void allowed_depending() {
fixed_float32_t fs32;
svfloat64_t s64;
fs32 = s64;
}
... would fail because the vectors have differing lane sizes. This patch
implements the correct behaviour for
-flax-vector-conversions={none,all,integer}. Specifically:
- -flax-vector-conversions=none prevents all lax vector conversions
between scalable and fixed-sized vectors.
- -flax-vector-conversions=integer allows lax vector conversions between
scalable and fixed-size vectors whose element types are integers.
- -flax-vector-conversions=all allows all lax vector conversions between
scalable and fixed-size vectors (including those with floating point
element types).
The implicit conversions are implemented as bitcasts.
Reviewed By: fpetrogalli
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D91067
Just skip (non-bitfield) zero-sized fields, like we do with empty bases.
The class->struct conversion in the test is because -std=c++20 else deletes some default methods
due to non-accessible base dtors otherwise.
As a side-effect of writing the test, I discovered that D76801 did an ABI breaking change of sorts
for Objective-C's @encode. But it's been in for a while, so I'm not sure if we want to row back on
that or now.
Fixes PR48048.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90622
mangling support for non-type template parameters of class type and
template parameter objects.
The Itanium side of this follows the approach I proposed in
https://github.com/itanium-cxx-abi/cxx-abi/issues/47 on 2020-09-06.
The MSVC side of this was determined empirically by observing MSVC's
output.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89998