According to @aaron.ballman this was marked Tentatively Ready as of 2022-07-07.
D129362 implemented the C counterpart.
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc, Mordante
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129380
Since those features are general properties of the environment, it makes
sense to use them from libc++abi too, and so the name libcpp-has-no-xxx
doesn't make sense.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126482
I believe the origin issue in PR31864 has been addressed by https://reviews.llvm.org/D59566.
As discussed in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53840, `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE == 2` sometimes is not consistent with `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free`, since the macro takes `long long`'s ABI alignment into account. https://reviews.llvm.org/D28213 proposed we should not rely on ABI alignment of types, thus we have consistent `ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE` and `std::atomic<long long>::is_always_lock_free` on x86's old cpu. Currently, I plan to move on to remove the workaround which should have been addressed and don't want to break current tests.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne, Quuxplusone
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119931
We shouldn't be calling these functions via ADL -- and neither should anybody
in the wild be calling it via ADL, so it's not like we need to test
the ADL ability of these functions in particular.
Reviewed as part of D119860.
The test would trigger -Wtautological-compare. I think that the little
we gain from comparing addresses isn't worth the added complexity to
work around the warning.
This reverts commit 640beb38e7.
That commit caused performance degradtion in Quicksilver test QS:sGPU and a functional test failure in (rocPRIM rocprim.device_segmented_radix_sort).
Reverting until we have a better solution to s_cselect_b64 codegen cleanup
Change-Id: Ibf8e397df94001f248fba609f072088a46abae08
Reviewed By: kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115960
Change-Id: Id169459ce4dfffa857d5645a0af50b0063ce1105
When P0883R2 was initially implemented in D103769 #pragma clang deprecated didn't exist yet.
We also forgot to cleanup usages in libc++ itself.
This takes care of both.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115995
std::atomic is, for the most part, just a thin veneer on top of compiler
builtins. Hence, it should be available even when threads are not available
on the system, and in fact there has been requests for such support.
This patch:
- Moves __libcpp_thread_poll_with_backoff to its own header so it can
be used in <atomic> when threads are disabled.
- Adds a dummy backoff policy for atomic polling that doesn't know about
threads.
- Adjusts the <atomic> feature-test macros so they are provided even when
threads are disabled.
- Runs the <atomic> tests when threads are disabled.
rdar://77873569
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114109
- Replace irrelevant synopsis by a comment
- Use a .verify.cpp test instead of .compile.fail.cpp
- Remove unnecessary includes in one of the tests (was a copy-paste error)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114094
This changes adds the pipeline config for both 32-bit and 64-bit AIX targets. As well, we add a lit feature `LIBCXX-AIX-FIXME` which is used to mark the failing tests which remain to be investigated on AIX, so that the CI produces a clean build.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111359
While looking at LWG-2988 and P0558 it seems the issues were already
implemented, but the synopsis wasn't updated. Some of the tests didn't
validate the `noexcept` status. A few tests were missing completely:
- `atomic_wait_explicit`
- `atomic_notify_one`
- `atomic_notify_all`
Mark P0558 as complete, didn't investigate which version of libc++ first
includes this. It seems the paper has been retroactively applied. I
couldn't find whether this is correct, but looking at cppreference it
seems intended.
Completes
- LWG-2988 Clause 32 cleanup missed one typename
- P0558 Resolving atomic<T> named base class inconsistencies
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103765
Some embedded platforms do not wish to support the C library functionality
for handling wchar_t because they have no use for it. It makes sense for
libc++ to work properly on those platforms, so this commit adds a carve-out
of functionality for wchar_t.
Unfortunately, unlike some other carve-outs (e.g. random device), this
patch touches several parts of the library. However, despite the wide
impact of this patch, I still think it is important to support this
configuration since it makes it much simpler to port libc++ to some
embedded platforms.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111265
While looking at the review comments in D103765 there was an oddity in
the tests for the following functions:
- atomic_fetch_add
- atomic_fetch_add_explicit
- atomic_fetch_sub
- atomic_fetch_sub_explicit
Libc++ allows usage of
`atomic_fetch_add<int>(atomic<int*>*, atomic<int*>::difference_type);`
MSVC and GCC reject this code: https://godbolt.org/z/9d8WzohbE
This makes the atomic `fetch(add|sub).*` Standard conforming and removes the non-conforming extensions.
Fixes PR47908
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103983
Even if these comments have a benefit in .h files (for editors that
care about language but can't be configured to treat .h as C++ code),
they certainly have no benefit for files with the .cpp extension.
Discussed in D110794.
The test precision_type.pass.cpp was a duplicate of precision.pass.cpp,
so it is removed. atomic_flag_test.pass.cpp was a duplicate of
atomic_flag_test_and_set.pass.cpp, so instead I wrote a proper
test for it. Those duplicate tests were detected with
find libcxx ! -empty -type f -exec md5sum {} + | sort | uniq -w32 -dD
This configuration is interesting because GCC has a different level of
strictness for some C++ rules. In particular, it implements the older
standards more stringently than Clang, which can help find places where
we are non-conforming (especially in the test suite).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105936
Now that Lit supports regular expressions inside XFAIL & friends, it is
much easier to write Lit annotations based on the triple.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104747
Also, fix the last issue that prevented GCC 11 from passing the test
suite. Thanks to everyone else who fixed issues.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104315
https://eel.is/c++draft/atomics.types.operations#23 says: ... the value of failure is order except that a value of `memory_order::acq_rel` shall be replaced by the value `memory_order::acquire` and a value of `memory_order::release` shall be replaced by the value `memory_order::relaxed`.
This failure mapping is only handled for `_LIBCPP_HAS_GCC_ATOMIC_IMP`. We are seeing bad code generation for `compare_exchange_strong(cmp, 1, std::memory_order_acq_rel)` when using libc++ in place of libstdc++: https://godbolt.org/z/v3onrrq4G.
This was caught by tsan tests after D99434, `[TSAN] Honor failure memory orders in AtomicCAS`, but appears to be an issue in non-tsan code.
Reviewed By: ldionne, dvyukov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103846
The synchronization library was marked as disabled on Apple platforms
up to now because we were not 100% sure that it was going to be ABI
stable. However, it's been some time since we shipped it in upstream
libc++ now and there's been no changes so far. This patch enables the
synchronization library on Apple platforms, and hence commits the ABI
stability as far as that vendor is concerned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96790
This fixes a long standing issue where the triple is not always set
consistently in all configurations. This change also moves the
back-deployment Lit features to using the proper target triple
instead of using something ad-hoc.
This will be necessary for using from scratch Lit configuration files
in both normal testing and back-deployment testing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102012
This will avoid typos like `_LIBCPP_STD_VERS` (<future>) or using `#if TEST_STD_VER > 17` without including "test_macros.h".
Reviewed By: ldionne, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99515
Add deleted volatile copy-assignment operator in the most derived atomic
to fix the Bug 41784. The root cause: there is an `operator=(T) volatile`
that has better match than the deleted copy-assignment operator of the base
class when `this` is `volatile`. The compiler sees that right operand of
the assignment operator can be converted to `T` and chooses that path
without taking into account the deleted copy-assignment operator of the
base class.
The current behavior on libstdc++ is different from what we have in libc++.
On the same test compilation fails with libstdc++. Proof: https://godbolt.org/z/nebPYd
(everything is the same except the -stdlib option).
I choose the way with explicit definition of copy-assignment for atomic
in the most derived class. But probably we can fix that by moving
`operator=(T)` overloads to the base class from both specializations.
At first glance, it shouldn't break anything.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90968
FreeBSD did not provide the __atomic_* functions as part of the base
system until recently. They were added to libgcc_s in SVN revision r364753
(August 2020), so check for availability of 'non-lockfree-atomics' so that
these tests do not fail unexpectedly on older versions of FreeBSD.
This also removes the #ifndef __APPLE__ from atomic_helpers.h that was used
to work around lack of atomic runtime functions on older Apple platforms
and replaces it with XFAIL: !non-lockfree-atomics.
Reviewed By: #libc, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88818
We create threads using std::thread in various places in the test suite.
However, the usual std::thread constructor may not work on all platforms,
e.g. on platforms where passing a stack size is required to create a thread.
This commit introduces a simple indirection that makes it easier to tweak
how threads are created inside the test suite on various platforms. Note
that tests that are purposefully calling std::thread's constructor directly
(e.g. because that is what they're testing) were not modified.
The Standard doesn't include the
```c++
template<class T>
T* atomic_fetch_meow(atomic<T*>, ...);
```
templates these tests are testing.
(See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47908)
C++98 and C++03 are effectively aliases as far as Clang is concerned.
As such, allowing both std=c++98 and std=c++03 as Lit parameters is
just slightly confusing, but provides no value. It's similar to allowing
both std=c++17 and std=c++1z, which we don't do.
This was discovered because we had an internal bot that ran the test
suite under both c++98 AND c++03 -- one of which is redundant.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80926
Raul Tambre