Although we only currently have one error produced in this function I am
working on changes right now that add some more. This change makes the
error location more accurate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133016
According to the ABI for the Arm Architecture, the value for the
Tag_also_compatible_with eabi attribute is represented by an NTBS entry.
This string value, in turn, is composed of a pair of tag+value encoded
in one of two formats:
- ULEB128: tag, ULEB128: value, 0.
- ULEB128: tag, NBTS: data.
(See [[ 60a8eb8c55/addenda32/addenda32.rst (3373secondary-compatibility-tag) | section 3.3.7.3 on the Addenda to, and Errata in, the ABI for the Arm Architecture ]].)
Currently the Arm assembly parser and streamer ignore the encoding of
the attribute's NTBS value, which can result in incorrect attributes
being emitted in both assembly and object file outputs.
This patch fixes these issues by properly handing the value's encoding.
An update to llvm-readobj to properly handle the attribute's value will be
covered by a separate patch.
Patch by Victor Campos and Lucas Prates.
Reviewed By: vhscampos
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129500
The directive name is not useful because the next line replicates the error line
which includes the directive. The prevailing style uses "expected newline".
This includes .seh_* directives for generating it from assembly.
It is designed fairly similarly to the ARM64 handling.
For .seh_handler directives, such as
".seh_handler __C_specific_handler, @except" (which is supported
on x86_64 and aarch64 so far), the "@except" bit doesn't work in
ARM assembly, as '@' is used as a comment character (on all current
platforms).
Allow using '%' instead of '@' for this purpose. This convention
is used by GAS in similar contexts already,
e.g. [1]:
Note on targets where the @ character is the start of a comment
(eg ARM) then another character is used instead. For example the
ARM port uses the % character.
In practice, this unfortunately means that all such .seh_handler
directives will need ifdefs for ARM.
Contrary to ARM64, on ARM, it's quite common that we can't evaluate
e.g. the function length at this point, due to instructions whose
length is finalized later. (Also, inline jump tables end with
a ".p2align 1".)
If unable to to evaluate the function length immediately, emit
it as an MCExpr instead. If we'd implement splitting the unwind
info for a function (which isn't implemented for ARM64 yet either),
we wouldn't know whether we need to split it though.
Avoid calling getFrameIndexOffset() on an unset
FuncInfo.UnwindHelpFrameIdx, to avoid triggering asserts in the
preexisting testcase CodeGen/ARM/Windows/wineh-basic.ll. (Once
MSVC exception handling is fully implemented, those changes
can be reverted.)
[1] https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/as/Section.html#Section
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125645
The patch adds SPIRV-specific MC layer implementation, SPIRV object
file support and SPIRVInstPrinter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116462
Authors: Aleksandr Bezzubikov, Lewis Crawford, Ilia Diachkov,
Michal Paszkowski, Andrey Tretyakov, Konrad Trifunovic
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezzubikov <zuban32s@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ilia Diachkov <iliya.diyachkov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Michal Paszkowski <michal.paszkowski@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Tretyakov <andrey1.tretyakov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Konrad Trifunovic <konrad.trifunovic@intel.com>
DXIL is wrapped in a container format defined by the DirectX 11
specification. Codebases differ in calling this format either DXBC or
DXILContainer.
Since eventually we want to add support for DXBC as a target
architecture and the format is used by DXBC and DXIL, I've termed it
DXContainer here.
Most of the changes in this patch are just adding cases to switch
statements to address warnings.
Reviewed By: pete
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122062
AArch32/Armv8A introduced the performance deprecation of certain patterns
of IT instructions. After some debate internal to ARM, this is now being
reverted; i.e. no IT instruction patterns are performance deprecated
anymore, as the perfomance degredation is not significant enough.
This reverts the following:
"ARMv8-A deprecates some uses of the T32 IT instruction. All uses of
IT that apply to instructions other than a single subsequent 16-bit
instruction from a restricted set are deprecated, as are explicit
references to the PC within that single 16-bit instruction. This permits
the non-deprecated forms of IT and subsequent instructions to be treated
as a single 32-bit conditional instruction."
The deprecation no longer applies, but the behaviour may be controlled
by the -arm-restrict-it and -arm-no-restrict-it command-line options,
with the latter being the default. No warnings about complex IT blocks
will be generated.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118044
This reverts commit fd4808887e.
This patch causes gcc to issue a lot of warnings like:
warning: base class ‘class llvm::MCParsedAsmOperand’ should be
explicitly initialized in the copy constructor [-Wextra]
This patch implements PAC return address signing for armv8-m. This patch roughly
accomplishes the following things:
- PAC and AUT instructions are generated.
- They're part of the stack frame setup, so that shrink-wrapping can move them
inwards to cover only part of a function
- The auth code generated by PAC is saved across subroutine calls so that AUT
can find it again to check
- PAC is emitted before stacking registers (so that the SP it signs is the one
on function entry).
- The new pseudo-register ra_auth_code is mentioned in the DWARF frame data
- With CMSE also in use: PAC is emitted before stacking FPCXTNS, and AUT
validates the corresponding value of SP
- Emit correct unwind information when PAC is replaced by PACBTI
- Handle tail calls correctly
Some notes:
We make the assembler accept the `.save {ra_auth_code}` directive that is
emitted by the compiler when it saves a register that contains a
return address authentication code.
For EHABI we need to have the `FrameSetup` flag on the instruction and
handle the `t2PACBTI` opcode (identically to `t2PAC`), so we can emit
`.save {ra_auth_code}`, instead of `.save {r12}`.
For PACBTI-M, the instruction which computes return address PAC should use SP
value before adjustment for the argument registers save are (used for variadic
functions and when a parameter is is split between stack and register), but at
the same it should be after the instruction that saves FPCXT when compiling a
CMSE entry function.
This patch moves the varargs SP adjustment after the FPCXT save (they are never
enabled at the same time), so in a following patch handling of the `PAC`
instruction can be placed between them.
Epilogue emission code adjusted in a similar manner.
PACBTI-M code generation should not emit any instructions for architectures
v6-m, v8-m.base, and for A- and R-class cores. Diagnostic message for such cases
is handled separately by a future ticket.
note on tail calls:
If the called function has four arguments that occupy registers `r0`-`r3`, the
only option for holding the function pointer itself is `r12`, but this register
is used to keep the PAC during function/prologue epilogue and clobbers the
function pointer.
When we do the tail call we need the five registers (`r0`-`r3` and `r12`) to
keep six values - the four function arguments, the function pointer and the PAC,
which is obviously impossible.
One option would be to authenticate the return address before all callee-saved
registers are restored, so we have a scratch register to temporarily keep the
value of `r12`. The issue with this approach is that it violates a fundamental
invariant that PAC is computed using CFA as a modifier. It would also mean using
separate instructions to pop `lr` and the rest of the callee-saved registers,
which would offset the advantages of doing a tail call.
Instead, this patch disables indirect tail calls when the called function take
four or more arguments and the return address sign and authentication is enabled
for the caller function, conservatively assuming the caller function would spill
LR.
This patch is part of a series that adds support for the PACBTI-M extension of
the Armv8.1-M architecture, as detailed here:
https://community.arm.com/arm-community-blogs/b/architectures-and-processors-blog/posts/armv8-1-m-pointer-authentication-and-branch-target-identification-extension
The PACBTI-M specification can be found in the Armv8-M Architecture Reference
Manual:
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ddi0553/latest
The following people contributed to this patch:
- Momchil Velikov
- Ties Stuij
Reviewed By: danielkiss
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112429
This moves the registry higher in the LLVM library dependency stack.
Every client of the target registry needs to link against MC anyway to
actually use the target, so we might as well move this out of Support.
This allows us to ensure that Support doesn't have includes from MC/*.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111454
In preparation for passing the MCSubtargetInfo (STI) through to writeNops
so that it can use the STI in operation at the time, we need to record the
STI in operation when a MCAlignFragment may write nops as padding. The
STI is currently unused, a further patch will pass it through to
writeNops.
There are many places that can create an MCAlignFragment, in most cases
we can find out the STI in operation at the time. In a few places this
isn't possible as we are in initialisation or finalisation, or are
emitting constant pools. When possible I've tried to find the most
appropriate existing fragment to obtain the STI from, when none is
available use the per module STI.
For constant pools we don't actually need to use EmitCodeAlign as the
constant pools are data anyway so falling through into it via an
executable NOP is no better than falling through into data padding.
This is a prerequisite for D45962 which uses the STI to emit the
appropriate NOP for the STI. Which can differ per fragment.
Note that involves an interface change to InitSections. It is now
called initSections and requires a SubtargetInfo as a parameter.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45961
The semantics of tail predication loops means that the value of LR as an
instruction is executed determines the predicate. In other words:
mov r3, #3
DLSTP lr, r3 // Start tail predication, lr==3
VADD.s32 q0, q1, q2 // Lanes 0,1 and 2 are updated in q0.
mov lr, #1
VADD.s32 q0, q1, q2 // Only first lane is updated.
This means that the value of lr cannot be spilled and re-used in tail
predication regions without potentially altering the behaviour of the
program. More lanes than required could be stored, for example, and in
the case of a gather those lanes might not have been setup, leading to
alignment exceptions.
This patch adds a new lr predicate operand to MVE instructions in order
to keep a reference to the lr that they use as a tail predicate. It will
usually hold the zeroreg meaning not predicated, being set to the LR phi
value in the MVETPAndVPTOptimisationsPass. This will prevent it from
being spilled anywhere that it needs to be used.
A lot of tests needed updating.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107638
Similar to the MQPR register class as the MVE equivalent to QPR, this
adds MQQPR and MQQQQPR register classes for the MVE equivalents of QQPR
and QQQQPR registers. The MVE MQPR seemed have worked out quite well,
and adding MQQPR and MQQQQPR allows us to a little more accurately
specify the number of registers, calculating register pressure limits a
little better.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107463
- This patch consists of the bare basic code needed in order to generate some assembly for the z/OS target.
- Only the .text and the .bss sections are added for now.
- The relevant MCSectionGOFF/Symbol interfaces have been added. This enables us to print out the GOFF machine code sections.
- This patch enables us to add simple lit tests wherever possible, and contribute to the testing coverage for the z/OS target
- Further improvements and additions will be made in future patches.
Reviewed By: tmatheson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106380
We can build it with -Werror=global-constructors now. This helps
in situation where libSupport is embedded as a shared library,
potential with dlopen/dlclose scenario, and when command-line
parsing or other facilities may not be involved. Avoiding the
implicit construction of these cl::opt can avoid double-registration
issues and other kind of behavior.
Reviewed By: lattner, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105959
We can build it with -Werror=global-constructors now. This helps
in situation where libSupport is embedded as a shared library,
potential with dlopen/dlclose scenario, and when command-line
parsing or other facilities may not be involved. Avoiding the
implicit construction of these cl::opt can avoid double-registration
issues and other kind of behavior.
Reviewed By: lattner, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105959
We can build it with -Werror=global-constructors now. This helps
in situation where libSupport is embedded as a shared library,
potential with dlopen/dlclose scenario, and when command-line
parsing or other facilities may not be involved. Avoiding the
implicit construction of these cl::opt can avoid double-registration
issues and other kind of behavior.
Reviewed By: lattner, jpienaar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D105959
This is a mechanical change. This actually also renames the
similarly named methods in the SmallString class, however these
methods don't seem to be used outside of the llvm subproject, so
this doesn't break building of the rest of the monorepo.
GNU as documentation states that a `.thumb_func` directive implies `.thumb`, teach the asm parser to switch mode whenever it's encountered. On the other hand the labeled form, exclusive to Apple's toolchain, doesn't switch mode at all.
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101975
This untangles the MCContext and the MCObjectFileInfo. There is a circular
dependency between MCContext and MCObjectFileInfo. Currently this dependency
also exists during construction: You can't contruct a MOFI without a MCContext
without constructing the MCContext with a dummy version of that MOFI first.
This removes this dependency during construction. In a perfect world,
MCObjectFileInfo wouldn't depend on MCContext at all, but only be stored in the
MCContext, like other MC information. This is future work.
This also shifts/adds more information to the MCContext making it more
available to the different targets. Namely:
- TargetTriple
- ObjectFileType
- SubtargetInfo
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101462
This patch changes the AArch32 crypto instructions (sha2 and aes) to
require the specific sha2 or aes features. These features have
already been implemented and can be controlled through the command
line, but do not have the expected result (i.e. `+noaes` will not
disable aes instructions). The crypto feature retains its existing
meaning of both sha2 and aes.
Several small changes are included due to the knock-on effect this has:
- The AArch32 driver has been modified to ensure sha2/aes is correctly
set based on arch/cpu/fpu selection and feature ordering.
- Crypto extensions are permitted for AArch32 v8-R profile, but not
enabled by default.
- ACLE feature macros have been updated with the fine grained crypto
algorithms. These are also used by AArch64.
- Various tests updated due to the change in feature lists and macros.
Reviewed By: lenary
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99079
Currently the ARM backend only accpets constant expressions as the
immediate operand in load and store instructions. This allows the
result of symbolic expressions to be used in memory instructions. For
example,
0:
.space 2048
strb r2, [r0, #(.-0b)]
would be assembled into the following instructions.
strb r2, [r0, #2048]
This only adds support to ldr, ldrb, str, and strb in arm mode to
address the build failure of Linux kernel for now, but should facilitate
adding support to similar instructions in the future if the need arises.
Link:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1329
Reviewed By: peter.smith, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98916
Currently ARM backend validates the range of branch targets before the
layout of fragments is finalized. This causes build failure if symbolic
expressions are used, with the exception of a single symbolic value.
For example, "b.w ." works but "b.w . + 2" currently fails to
assemble. This fixes the issue by delaying this check (in
ARMAsmParser::validateInstruction) of b.w instructions until the symbol
expressions are resolved (in ARMAsmBackend::adjustFixupValue).
Link:
https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1286
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97568
The Linux kernel when built with CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL makes use of these
instructions with immediate operands and wide encodings.
These are the T4 variants of the follow sections from the Arm ARM.
F5.1.72 LDR (immediate)
F5.1.229 STR (immediate)
I wasn't able to represent these simple aliases using t2InstAlias due to
the Constraints on the non-suffixed existing instructions, which results
in some manual parsing logic needing to be added.
F1.2 Standard assembler syntax fields
describes the use of the .w (wide) vs .n (narrow) encoding suffix.
Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49118
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1296
Reported-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@agner.ch>
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Reviewed By: DavidSpickett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D96632
No longer rely on an external tool to build the llvm component layout.
Instead, leverage the existing `add_llvm_componentlibrary` cmake function and
introduce `add_llvm_component_group` to accurately describe component behavior.
These function store extra properties in the created targets. These properties
are processed once all components are defined to resolve library dependencies
and produce the header expected by llvm-config.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90848
This patch implements initial backend support for a -mtune CPU controlled by a "tune-cpu" function attribute. If the attribute is not present X86 will use the resolved CPU from target-cpu attribute or command line.
This patch adds MC layer support a tune CPU. Each CPU now has two sets of features stored in their GenSubtargetInfo.inc tables . These features lists are passed separately to the Processor and ProcessorModel classes in tablegen. The tune list defaults to an empty list to avoid changes to non-X86. This annoyingly increases the size of static tables on all target as we now store 24 more bytes per CPU. I haven't quantified the overall impact, but I can if we're concerned.
One new test is added to X86 to show a few tuning features with mismatched tune-cpu and target-cpu/target-feature attributes to demonstrate independent control. Another new test is added to demonstrate that the scheduler model follows the tune CPU.
I have not added a -mtune to llc/opt or MC layer command line yet. With no attributes we'll just use the -mcpu for both. MC layer tools will always follow the normal CPU for tuning.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85165
Summary:
This fixes Bugzilla #46616 in which it was reported
that "tbb [pc, r0]" was marked as SoftFail
(aka unpredictable) incorrectly.
Expected behaviour is:
* ARMv8 is required to use sp as rn or rm
(tbb/tbh only have a Thumb encoding so using Arm mode
is not an option)
* If rm is the pc then the instruction is always
unpredictable
Some of this was implemented already and this fixes the
rest. Added tests cover the new and pre-existing handling.
Reviewers: ostannard
Reviewed By: ostannard
Subscribers: kristof.beyls, hiraditya, danielkiss, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84227
This patch upstreams support for the Armv8.6-a Matrix Multiplication
Extension. A summary of the features can be found here:
https://community.arm.com/developer/ip-products/processors/b/processors-ip-blog/posts/arm-architecture-developments-armv8-6-a
This patch includes:
- Assembly support for AArch32 and Assembly Parsing
D77872 has already added the MC representations of the instructions so that
they can be used in code gen; this patch fills in the details needed to
make assembly parsing work, and adds tests for asm and disasm
This is part of a patch series, starting with BFloat16 support and
the other components in the armv8.6a extension (in previous patches
linked in phabricator)
Based on work by:
- Luke Geeson
- Oliver Stannard
- Luke Cheeseman
Reviewers: t.p.northover, simon_tatham
Reviewed By: simon_tatham
Subscribers: simon_tatham, ostannard, kristof.beyls, hiraditya,
danielkiss, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77874
Sam Clegg