Running on RISCV machine llvm-exegesis I faced with trouble: can't measure C_ADDI16SP, beacuse immediate has type simm10_lsb0000nonzero.
Patch adds support for processing this immediate operand type.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132650
This issue is found by build llvm-testsuite with `-Oz`, linker will complain
`dangerous relocation: %pcrel_lo missing matching %pcrel_hi` and that
turn out cause by we outlined pcrel-lo, but leave pcrel-hi there, that's
not problem in general, but the problem is they put into different section, they
pcrel-hi and pcrel-lo pair (e.g. AUIPC+ADDI) *MUST* put be present in same
section due to the implementation.
Outlined function will put into .text name, but the source functions
will put in .text.<function-name> if function-section is enabled or the
function has `comdat` attribute.
There are few solutions for this issue:
1. Always disallow instructions with pcrel-lo flags.
2. Only disallow instructions with pcrel-lo flags that when function-section is
enabled or this function has `comdat` attribute.
3. Check the corresponding instruction with pcrel-high also included in the
outlining candidate sequence or not, and allow that only when pcrel-high is
included in the outlining candidate.
First one is most conservative, that might lose some optimization
opportunities, and second one could save those opportunities, and last
one is hard to implement, and don't have any benefits since pcrel-high
are using different label even accessing same symbol.
Use custom section name might also cause this problem, but that already
filtered by RISCVInstrInfo::isFunctionSafeToOutlineFrom.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132528
llvm-exegesis uses operand type information provided in tablegen files to initialize
immediate arguments of the instruction. Some of them simply don't have such information.
Thus we should set into relevant immediate operands their specific type.
Also create verification methods for them.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131771
In branch relaxation pass, `j`'s with offset over 1MiB will be relaxed
to `jump` pseudo-instructions.
This patch allocates a stack slot for functions with a size greater than
1MiB. If the register scavenger cannot find a scratch register for
`jump`, spill a register to the slot before the jump and restore it
after the jump.
.mbb:
foo
j .dest_bb
bar
bar
bar
.dest_bb:
baz
The above code will be relaxed to the following code.
.mbb:
foo
sd s11, 0(sp)
jump .restore_bb, s11
bar
bar
bar
j .dest_bb
.restore_bb:
ld s11, 0(sp)
.dest_bb:
baz
Depends on D129999.
Reviewed By: StephenFan
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130560
We can always fold zext.b since it is just andi. The others require
Zba/Zbb.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130302
This patch implements recently ratified extension Zmmul, a subextension
of M (Integer Multiplication and Division) consisting only
multiplication part of it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103313
Reviewed By: craig.topper, jrtc27, asb
We can use lw to load 4 bytes from the stack and sign extend them
instead of loading all 8 bytes.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129948
This patch extends D124824. It uses SHXADD+SLLI to emit 3, 5, or 9 multiplied by a power 2.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D129179
Computing scalable offset needs up to two scrach registers. We add
scavenge spill slots according to the result of `RISCV::isRVVSpill`
and `RVVStackSize`. Since ADDI is not included in `RISCV::isRVVSpill`,
PEI doesn't add scavenge spill slots for scrach registers when using
ADDI to get scalable stack offsets.
The ADDI instruction has a destination register which can be used as
a scrach register. So one scavenge spil slot is sufficient for
computing scalable stack offsets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128188
These methods don't access any state from RISCVInstrInfo. Make them
free functions in the RISCV namespace.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127583
The patch is a replacement of D125199. PseudoReadVL with vtype has worry for
computing same vtypes of VLEFF/VLSEGFF in two different places, DAGToDAG and
InsertVSETVLI. VLEFF/VLSEGFF MI with VL output still could provide the vtype of
VLEFF/VLSEGFF to the users of its VL.
The patch names the new pseudo as original VLEFF/VLSEGFF name suffixed "_VL" and
expand them in RISCVInsertVSETVLI pass.
This patch also reverts commit 4537aae0d5,
"[RISCV] Make PseudoReadVL have the vtypes of the corresponding VLEFF/VLSEGFF.".
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126794
Instead of matching opcodes to know the format to emit, use an
enum value that we can get from the RISCVMatInt::Inst class.
Change the consumers to use fully covered switches so that we get
a compiler warning if a new kind is added. With the opcode checks
it was easier to forget to update one of the 3 consumers.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126317
This patch adds minimal support for lowering an read.register intrinsic with vlenb as the argument. Note that vlenb is an implementation constant, so it is never allocatable.
This was split off a patch to eventually replace PseudoReadVLENB with a COPY MI because doing so revealed a couple of optimization opportunities which really seemed to warrant individual patches and tests. To write those patches, I need a way to write the tests involving vlenb, and read.register seemed like the right testing hook.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125552
The patch make PseudoReadVL have the vtypes of the corresponding VLEFF/VLSEGFF.
It's useful to get the vtypes of locations of PseudoReadVL without finding the
corresponding VLEFF/VLSEGFF.
It could simplify optimizations in RISCVInsertVSETVLI like D123581.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125199
Enable default outlining when the function has the minsize attribute.
`addr-label.ll` crashed after enabling this, so a barrier is added before
instruction selection as a workaround.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122213
No reason to special case simm12, movImm handles all immediates.
This also fixe a bug that we weren't passing the frame-setup/destroy
flag to movImm when we were calling it.
We can use SH1ADD, SH2ADD, SH3ADD to multipy by 3, 5, and 9 respectively.
We could extend this to 3, 5, or 9 multiplied by a power 2 by also
emitting a SLLI.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124824
This patch adds custom MIR operand comments to VTYPE immediate operands
in VSETVLI instructions and SEW/LMUL operands in vector codegen pseudo
instructions. The result is intended to be more human-readable and
hopefully maintainable when working with MIR, particularly when
writing or reading test cases.
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124187
We saw a failure caused by unwinding with incomplete CFIs, so we
can't outline CFI instructions when they are needed in EH.
This is a recommit of 0d40688, which was reverted in ce83883 as
related precommit test 360d44e caused some errors.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122634
We saw a failure caused by unwinding with incomplete CFIs, so we
can't outline CFI instructions when they are needed in EH.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122634
This reverts commit 23a5073600.
Although this patch achieved better codegen in most cases, it is really
important to accurately describe the cost of instructions. So I revert it.
It's not particularly user-friendly to have to call `initLRU` everywhere. Also,
it wasn't particularly great that the LRU for registers used in a sequence was
also initialized by `initLRU`.
This patch hides this stuff behind some helper functions:
* `isAvailableAcrossAndOutOfSeq`
* `isAnyUnavailableAcrossOrOutOfSeq`
* `isAvailableInsideSeq`
This allows the user to avoid calling `initLRU` explicitly. Also, it allows
us to separate initializing the used-in-sequence LRU from the main LRU.
Since both ARM and AArch64 check LR liveness in `insertOutlinedCall`, this
refactor requires that we de-const the Candidate there.
Some other quality-of-code improvements:
* LRUs in outliner::Candidate now have more descriptive names
* Use `Register` instead of `unsigned` in some places
* Improve readability in some places by using ranges rather than `std::for_each`
This is a preparatory commit for a larger compile time related change for the
AArch64 outliner.
A LUI instruction with flag RISCVII::MO_HI is usually used in conjunction
with ADDI, and jointly complete address computation. To bind the cost
evaluation of address computation, the LUI should not be regarded as a cheap
move separately, which is consistent with ADDI.
In this test case, it improves the unroll-loop code that the rematerialization
of array's base address miss MachineCSE with Heuristics #1 at isProfitableToCSE.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118216
Based on the discussion in D61884, this was done to enable compressed
instructions by giving freedom to pick a compressible register.
Integer materializing can generate LUI, ADDI, ADDIW, SLLI and some
Zb* instructions. C.LI, C.LUI, C.ADDI, C.ADDIW, and C.SLLI all have a 5-bit
register encoding. The Zb* instructions aren't compressible. Based on
that I don't think compressibility of the register is a concern.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118741
Fix the pseudos to have the correct size in the MCInstrDesc description.
Inspired by D118009 and D117970.
Reviewed By: asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118175
Where the instruction mnemonic contains a dot, we name the corresponding
instruction in the .td file using a _ in the place of the dot. e.g. LR_W
rather than LRW. This commit updates RISCVInstrInfoZb.td to follow that
convention.
This commit is currently implementing supports for scalar cryptography extension for LLVM according to version v1.0.0 of [K Ext specification](https://github.com/riscv/riscv-crypto/releases)(scala crypto has been ratified already). Currently, we are implementing the MC (Machine Code) layer of his extension and the majority of work is done under `llvm/lib/Target/RISCV` directory. There are also some test files in `llvm/test/MC/RISCV` directory.
Remove the subfeature of Zbk* which conflict with b extensions to reduce the size of the patch.
(Zbk* will be resubmit after this patch has been merged)
**Co-author：**@ksyx & @VincentWu & @lihongliang & @achieveartificialintelligence
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98136
For floating point specific vector instructions, we don't need
pseudos for mf8.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116460
For .vf instructions, we don't need MF8 pseudos for f16. We don't
need MF8 or MF4 pseudos for f32. Or MF8, MF4, MF2 for f64.
Reviewed By: khchen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D116437
The implicit defines may come from a partial define in an instruction.
It does not mean the defining instruction and the COPY instruction have
the same vl and vtype. When the source comes from the implicit defines,
do not convert the whole register copies to vmv.v.v.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115866
In order to support constrained FP intrinsics we need to model FRM
dependency. Whether or not a instruction uses FRM is based on a 3
bit field in the instruction. Because of this we can't add
'Uses = [FRM]' to the tablegen descriptions.
This patch examines the immediate after isel and adds an implicit
use of FRM. This idea came from Roger Ferrer Ibanez.
Other ideas:
We could be overly conservative and just pretend all instructions with
frm field read the FRM register. Or we could have pseudoinstructions
for CodeGen with rounding mode.
Reviewed By: asb, frasercrmck, arcbbb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115555
MachineOutliner may outline a "patchable-function-entry" function whose body has
a TargetOpcode::PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTER MachineInstr. This is incorrect because
the special code sequence must stay unchanged to be used at run-time.
Avoid outlining PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTER. While here, avoid outlining FENTRY_CALL too
(which doesn't reproduce currently) to allow phase ordering flexibility.
Fixes#52635
Reviewed By: paquette
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115614
Delegate updating of LiveIntervals to each target's
convertToThreeAddress implementation, instead of repairing LiveIntervals
after the fact in TwoAddressInstruction::convertInstTo3Addr.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D113493
If we know the source operand of COPY is defined by a vector instruction
with tail agnostic and the same LMUL and there is no vsetvli between
COPY and the define instruction to change the vl and vtype, we could use
vmv.v.v or vmv.v.i to copy vector registers to get better performance than
the whole vector register move instructions.
If the source of COPY is from vmv.v.i, we could use vmv.v.i for the
COPY.
This patch only considers all these instructions within one basic block.
Case 1:
```
bb.0:
...
VSETVLI # The first VSETVLI before COPY and VOP.
... # Use this VSETVLI to check LMUL and tail agnostic.
...
vy = VOP va, vb # Define vy.
... # There is no vsetvli between VOP and COPY.
vx = COPY vy
```
Case 2:
```
bb.0:
...
VSETVLI # The first VSETVLI before VOP.
... # Use this VSETVLI to check LMUL and tail agnostic.
...
vy = VOP va, vb # Define vy.
... # There is no vsetvli to change vl between VOP and COPY.
...
VSETVLI # The first VSETVLI before COPY.
... # This VSETVLI does not change vl and vtype.
...
vx = COPY vy
```
Co-Authored-by: Zakk Chen <zakk.chen@sifive.com>
Co-Authored-by: Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@sifive.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103510
- When an unconditional branch is expanded into an indirect branch, if
there is no scavenged register, an SGPR pair needs spilling to enable
the destination PC calculation. In addition, before jumping into the
destination, that clobbered SGPR pair need restoring.
- As SGPR cannot be spilled to or restored from memory directly, the
spilling/restoring of that SGPR pair reuses the regular SGPR spilling
support but without spilling it into memory. As that spilling and
restoring points are fully controlled, we only need to spill that SGPR
into the temporary VGPR, which needs spilling into its emergency slot.
- The target-specific hook is revised to take additional restore block,
where the restoring code is filled. After that, the relaxation will
place that restore block directly before the destination block and
insert an unconditional branch in any fall-through block into the
destination block.
Reviewed By: arsenm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D106449
This function was copied from ARM where register pairs/triples/quads can wrap around the 32 encoding space. So register 31 can pair with register 0. This is not true for RISCV vectors. The spec specifically mentions the possibility of a future encoding that has more than 32 registers.
This patch removes the modulo from the code and directly checks that destination register is in the source register range and not the beginning of the range. Though I don't expect an identity copy will occur.
Reviewed By: frasercrmck
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111467
LiaoChunyu