Commit Graph

11831 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
A-Wadhwani de3445e0ef [SROA] Create additional vector type candidates based on store and load slices
This patch adds additional vector types to be considered when doing
promotion in SROA, based on the types of the store and load slices. This
provides more promotion opportunities, by potentially using an optimal
"intermediate" vector type.

For example, the following code would currently not be promoted to a
vector, since `__m128i` is a `<2 x i64>` vector.

```

__m128i packfoo0(int a, int b, int c, int d) {
  int r[4] = {a, b, c, d};
  __m128i rm;
  std::memcpy(&rm, r, sizeof(rm));
  return rm;
}
```

```
packfoo0(int, int, int, int):
        mov     dword ptr [rsp - 24], edi
        mov     dword ptr [rsp - 20], esi
        mov     dword ptr [rsp - 16], edx
        mov     dword ptr [rsp - 12], ecx
        movaps  xmm0, xmmword ptr [rsp - 24]
        ret
```

By also considering the types of the elements, we could find that the
`<4 x i32>` type would be valid for promotion, hence removing the memory
accesses for this function. In other words, we can explore other new
vector types, with the same size but different element types based on
the load and store instructions from the Slices, which can provide us
more promotion opportunities.

Additionally, the step for removing duplicate elements from the
`CandidateTys` vector was not using an equality comparator, which has
been fixed.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132096
2022-09-12 09:55:37 -07:00
Sanjay Patel 4ca25c66d4 [Reassociate] prevent partial undef negation replacement
As shown in the examples in issue #57683, we allow matching
vectors with poison (undef) in this transform (and possibly more),
but we can't then use the partially defined value as a replacement
value in other expressions blindly.

This seems to be avoided in simpler examples of reassociation,
and other passes should be able to clean up the redundant op
seen in these tests.
2022-09-12 12:28:34 -04:00
Max Kazantsev 0e465c0c2f [IRCE] Bail in case of pointer types. PR40539
We should not unconditionally expect that SCEVable types are all integers
because SCEV can also be computed for pointers. Bail in this case.
2022-09-12 16:01:25 +07:00
Junduo Dong 6975ab7126 [Clang] Reimplement time tracing of NewPassManager by PassInstrumentation framework
The previous implementation of time tracing in NewPassManager is direct but messive.

The key codes are like the demo below:
```
  /// Runs the function pass across every function in the module.
  PreservedAnalyses run(LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM,
                        LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) {
      /// ...
      PreservedAnalyses PassPA;
      {
        TimeTraceScope TimeScope(Pass.name());
        PassPA = Pass.run(F, FAM);
      }
      /// ...
 }
```

It can be bothered to judge where should we add the tracing codes by hands.

With the PassInstrumentation framework, we can easily add `Before/After` callback
functions to add time tracing codes.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131960
2022-09-11 05:42:55 -07:00
Nikita Popov a9f312c7f4 [AST] Use BatchAA in aliasesUnknownInst() (NFCI) 2022-09-09 15:54:48 +02:00
Nikita Popov 4ab77d1677 [LICM] Allow promotion with non-load/store users
If there are non-load/store users of the promoted pointer, we
currently abort promotion. However, having such users isn't really
relevant to the transform. We already separately check that a)
there are no instructions that modref the promoted pointer and
b) that a pointer capture disables store promotion.

In the affected @test_captured_in_loop test case we have a readnone
capture of the promoted pointer, which means that load promotion
can be performed (while store promotion cannot).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133485
2022-09-09 13:09:59 +02:00
Sanjay Patel 85b289377b [SCCP] convert signed div/rem to unsigned for non-negative operands, 2nd try
The original commit ( fe1f3cfc26 ) was reverted because it could
crash / assert when trying to fold a value that was replaced
by a constant. In that case, there might not be an entry for the
constant in the solver yet.

This version adds a check for that possibility along with tests to
exercise that pattern (they used to crash).

Original commit message:
This extends the transform added with D81756 to handle div/rem opcodes.
For example:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/cX6za6

This replicates part of what CVP already does, but the motivating example
from issue #57472 demonstrates a phase ordering problem - we convert
branches to select before CVP runs and miss the transform.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133198
2022-09-07 11:56:29 -04:00
Aaron Kogon ae05b9dc30 Sink/hoist memory instructions between loop fusion candidates
Currently, instructions in the preheader of the second of two fusion
candidates are sunk and hoisted whenever possible, to try to allow the
loops to fuse. Memory instructions are skipped, and are never sunk or
hoisted. This change adds memory instructions for sinking/hoisting
consideration.

This change uses DependenceAnalysis to check if a mem inst in the
preheader of FC1 depends on an instruction in FC0's header, across
which it will be hoisted, or FC1's header, across which it will be
sunk. We reject cases where the dependency is a data hazard.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131606
2022-09-07 07:42:00 -04:00
Nikita Popov f42d92611d [Reassociate] Avoid ConstantExpr::getFNeg() (NFCI)
Use ConstantFoldUnaryOpOperand() instead. Also make the code below
robust against non-instruction users, just in case it doesn't fold.
2022-09-07 10:48:08 +02:00
Ruobing Han fb45f3c948 [SimpleLoopUnswitch] Skip non-trivial unswitching of cold functions
In the current main branch, all cold loops will not be applied non-trivial unswitch. As reported in D129599, skipping these cold loops will incur regression in SPEC benchmark.
Thus, instead of skipping cold loops, now only skipping loops in cold functions.

Reviewed By: alexgatea, aeubanks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133275
2022-09-06 19:13:31 -04:00
Florian Hahn 27e7db54eb
Revert "[SCCP] convert signed div/rem to unsigned for non-negative operands"
This reverts commit fe1f3cfc26.

It looks like this commit breaks building llvm-test-suite.

To reproduce, run `opt -passes=ipsccp` on the IR below.

    @g = internal global i32 256, align 4

    define void @test() {
    entry:
      %0 = load i32, ptr @g, align 4
      %div = sdiv i32 %0, undef
      ret void
    }
2022-09-06 18:21:51 +01:00
Florian Hahn 2fb68c0628
[ConstraintElimination] Replace pair with named struct (NFC).
This slightly improves the readability and allows further extensions in
follow-ups.
2022-09-06 18:04:04 +01:00
Sanjay Patel fe1f3cfc26 [SCCP] convert signed div/rem to unsigned for non-negative operands
This extends the transform added with D81756 to handle div/rem opcodes.
For example:
https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/cX6za6

This replicates part of what CVP already does, but the motivating example
from issue #57472 demonstrates a phase ordering problem - we convert
branches to select before CVP runs and miss the transform.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133198
2022-09-06 08:58:15 -04:00
Arthur Eubanks 7e3aa8f01a Revert "[LoopPassManager] Implement and use LoopNestAnalysis::run() instead of manually creating LoopNests"
This reverts commit 57fd866551.

Causes crashes, see comments in D132581.
2022-09-05 15:42:48 -07:00
Nikita Popov 388b684354 [LICM] Separate check for writability and thread-safety (NFCI)
This used a single check to make sure that the object is both
writable and thread-local. Separate them out to make the
deficiencies in the current code more obvious.
2022-09-05 09:43:17 +02:00
Kazu Hirata fedc59734a [llvm] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2022-09-03 11:17:40 -07:00
Sanjay Patel 22e1f66f26 [SCCP] add helper function for replacing signed operations; NFC
Preliminary refactoring for planned enhancement in D133198.
2022-09-03 10:30:10 -04:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih c5b10f348e [Matrix] Use print instead of dump for matrix-print-after-transpose-opt
We should be able to use this option even if LLVM_ENABLE_DUMP is not on.

(should fix the bots too)
2022-09-02 16:12:21 -07:00
Francis Visoiu Mistrih 81bdb4068d [Matrix] Simplify matmuls with scalars
If one of the operands is a transposed splat, the transpose can be
removed.

This is useful to simplify when transposes are distributed to operands
of a matmul:

* k^T -> k
* (A * k)^t -> A^t * k

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130177
2022-09-02 15:50:25 -07:00
Arthur Eubanks 57fd866551 [LoopPassManager] Implement and use LoopNestAnalysis::run() instead of manually creating LoopNests
The current code is basically just emulating what the analysis manager does.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132581
2022-09-02 10:55:53 -07:00
Jolanta Jensen 958abe864a [LoopLoadElim] Add stores with matching sizes as load-store candidates
We are not building up a proper list of load-store candidates because
we are throwing away stores where the type don't match the load.
This patch adds stores with matching store sizes as candidates.
Author of the original patch: David Sherwood.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130233
2022-09-02 13:11:25 +01:00
Sergey Kachkov be37caca00 [JumpThreading] Process range comparisions with non-local cmp instructions
Use getPredicateOnEdge method if value is a non-local
compare-with-a-constant instruction, that can give more precise
results than getConstantOnEdge.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D131956
2022-09-02 12:22:45 +02:00
Nikita Popov c453e5b901 Revert "[DSE] Eliminate noop store even through has clobbering between LoadI and StoreI"
This reverts commit cd8f3e7581.

As pointed out by Eli on the review, this is missing an alignment
check. The value might be written at an offset.
2022-09-02 09:28:48 +02:00
Nikita Popov 639d912282 [LICM] Allow load-only scalar promotion in the presence of unwinding
Currently, we bail out of scalar promotion if the loop may unwind
and the memory may be visible on unwind. This is because we can't
insert stores of the promoted value on unwind edges.

However, nowadays scalar promotion also has support for only
promoting loads, while leaving stores in place. This kind of
promotion is safe even in the presence of unwinding.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D133111
2022-09-02 09:27:13 +02:00
luxufan cd8f3e7581 [DSE] Eliminate noop store even through has clobbering between LoadI and StoreI
For noop store of the form of LoadI and StoreI,
An invariant should be kept is that the memory state of the related
MemoryLoc before LoadI is the same as before StoreI.
For this example:
```
define void @pr49927(i32* %q, i32* %p) {
  %v = load i32, i32* %p, align 4
  store i32 %v, i32* %q, align 4
  store i32 %v, i32* %p, align 4
  ret void
}
```
Here the definition of the store's destination is different with the
definition of the load's destination, which it seems that the
invariant mentioned above is broken. But the definition of the
store's destination would write a value that is LoadI, actually, the
invariant is still kept. So we can safely ignore it.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132657
2022-09-02 06:37:41 +00:00
Nikita Popov f5c178b6a4 [LICM] Remove unnecessary condition (NFC) 2022-09-01 15:42:35 +02:00
Nikita Popov 315aef667e [LICM] Fix thread safety checks for promotion of byval args
This code was relying on a very subtle contract: The expectation
was that for non-allocas, the unwind safety check would already
perform a capture check, so we don't need to perform it later.
This held true when this unwind safety was only handled for allocas
and noalias calls, but became incorrect when byval support was
added.

To avoid this kind of issue, just remove the dependency between the
unwind and thread-safety checks entirely. At worst, this means we
perform a redundant capture check. If this should turn out to be
problematic for compile-time, we can cache that query in a more
explicit way.
2022-09-01 15:33:46 +02:00
Nikita Popov 3f8b1d0f15 [LICM] Add some debug output to scalar promotion (NFC) 2022-09-01 14:46:30 +02:00
Yuanbo Li ebd0249fcf [DebugInfo] Missing debug location after replacement in processSRem function
This patch fixes an issue in which CorrelatedValuePropagation::processSRem
would create new instructions to represent the SRem instruction, but would not
correctly copy any existing debug location metadata to the new instruction.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132218
2022-09-01 13:18:17 +01:00
Arthur Eubanks 04f3c20989 [NFC][LICM] Stop passing around unused BFI
Uses of this were removed in 1a25d0bfbb.
2022-08-31 19:15:34 -07:00
Nikita Popov 8f3fd26b74 [Reassociate] Use getInsertionPointerAfterDef()
This simplifies the code and fixes handling for the callbr case,
where the instruction needs to be inserted in the normal
destination, rather than after the terminator.

Originally part of D129660.
2022-08-31 11:10:24 +02:00
Florian Hahn b5e208fcba
[DSE] Support looking through memory phis at end of function.
Update isWriteAtEndOfFunction to look through MemoryPhis. The reason
MemoryPhis were skipped so far was the known AliasAnalysis issue with it
missing loop-carried dependences.

This problem is already addressed in other parts of the code by skipping
MemoryDefs that may be in difference loops. I think the same logic can
be applied here.

This can have a substantial impact on the number of stores removed in
some cases. For MultiSource/SPEC2006/SPEC2017 with -O3:

```
Metric: dse.NumFastStores

Program                                       dse.NumFastStores
                                              base              patch   diff
External/S...CINT2017rate/557.xz_r/557.xz_r     14.00             45.00 221.4%
External/S...te/538.imagick_r/538.imagick_r    439.00           1267.00 188.6%
MultiSourc...e/Applications/SIBsim4/SIBsim4      6.00             15.00 150.0%
MultiSourc...Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator      3.00              7.00 133.3%
MultiSource/Applications/siod/siod               3.00              7.00 133.3%
MultiSourc...arks/FreeBench/distray/distray      6.00              9.00  50.0%
MultiSourc...e/Applications/obsequi/Obsequi     22.00             30.00  36.4%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc            23.00             28.00  21.7%
External/S...NT2017rate/502.gcc_r/502.gcc_r   1258.00           1512.00  20.2%
External/S...te/520.omnetpp_r/520.omnetpp_r    954.00           1143.00  19.8%
External/S...rate/510.parest_r/510.parest_r   5961.00           7122.00  19.5%
External/S...C/CINT2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk     47.00             56.00  19.1%
External/S...00.perlbench_r/500.perlbench_r    241.00            286.00  18.7%
External/S...NT2006/471.omnetpp/471.omnetpp     36.00             42.00  16.7%
External/S...06/400.perlbench/400.perlbench    183.00            210.00  14.8%
MultiSource/Applications/SPASS/SPASS            72.00             81.00  12.5%
External/S...17rate/541.leela_r/541.leela_r     72.00             80.00  11.1%
External/SPEC/CINT2006/403.gcc/403.gcc         585.00            642.00   9.7%
MultiSourc...e/Applications/sqlite3/sqlite3    120.00            131.00   9.2%
MultiSourc...Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon     11.00             12.00   9.1%
External/S.../CFP2006/453.povray/453.povray    566.00            615.00   8.7%
External/S...rate/511.povray_r/511.povray_r    578.00            627.00   8.5%
External/S...FP2006/482.sphinx3/482.sphinx3     12.00             13.00   8.3%
MultiSource/Applications/oggenc/oggenc         130.00            140.00   7.7%
MultiSourc...e/Applications/ClamAV/clamscan    250.00            268.00   7.2%
MultiSourc.../mediabench/jpeg/jpeg-6a/cjpeg     19.00             20.00   5.3%
MultiSourc...ch/consumer-jpeg/consumer-jpeg     19.00             20.00   5.3%
External/S...te/526.blender_r/526.blender_r   3747.00           3928.00   4.8%
MultiSourc...OE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE    104.00            108.00   3.8%
MultiSourc...ch/consumer-lame/consumer-lame     54.00             56.00   3.7%
MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet          1222.00           1264.00   3.4%
MultiSourc...nchmarks/tramp3d-v4/tramp3d-v4    973.00           1005.00   3.3%
External/S.../CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII   2699.00           2780.00   3.0%
External/S...06/483.xalancbmk/483.xalancbmk    788.00            810.00   2.8%
External/S.../CFP2006/450.soplex/450.soplex    180.00            185.00   2.8%
MultiSourc.../DOE-ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/CLAMR    338.00            345.00   2.1%
MultiSourc...Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark    685.00            699.00   2.0%
External/S...FP2017rate/544.nab_r/544.nab_r    158.00            160.00   1.3%
MultiSourc...sumer-typeset/consumer-typeset    772.00            781.00   1.2%
External/S...2017rate/525.x264_r/525.x264_r    410.00            414.00   1.0%
External/S...23.xalancbmk_r/523.xalancbmk_r    998.00           1002.00   0.4%
```

Compile-time is almost neutral:

https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=b3125ad3d60531a97eea20009cc9629a87755862&to=84007eee59004f43464eda7f5ba8263ed5158df8&stat=instructions

NewPM-O3: +0.03%
NewPM-ReleaseThinLTO: -0.01%
NewPM-ReleaseLTO-g: +0.03%

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132365
2022-08-30 13:27:51 +01:00
OCHyams 84a71d5259 [DebugInfo] Fix line number attribution in mldst-motion
Taking the example from the test included in this patch:

$ cat test.cpp -n
     1	void fun(int *a, int cond) {
     2	  if (cond)
     3	    a[1] = 1;
     4	  else
     5	    a[1] = 2;
     6	}

mldst-motion will merge and sink the stores in if.then and if.else into
if.end. The resultant PHI, gep and store should be attributed line zero
with the innermost common scope rather than picking a debug location from
one of the original stores.

Reviewed By: djtodoro

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132741
2022-08-30 10:03:53 +01:00
Kazu Hirata b18ff9c461 [Transform] Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2022-08-27 23:54:32 -07:00
Kazu Hirata 21de2888a4 Use llvm::is_contained (NFC) 2022-08-27 09:53:11 -07:00
Kazu Hirata a33ef8f2b7 Use llvm::all_equal (NFC) 2022-08-27 09:53:10 -07:00
Daniil Fukalov 9c710ebbdb [TTI] NFC: Reduce InstructionCost::getValue() usage...
in order to propagate `InstructionCost` value upper.

Reviewed By: fhahn

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103406
2022-08-26 16:37:32 +03:00
Max Kazantsev ccf788a565 [IRCE] Drop SCEV of a Phi after adding a new input. PR57335
Since SCEV learned to look through single value phis with
20d798bd47, whenever we add
a new input to a Phi, we should make sure that the old cached
value is dropped. Otherwise, it may lead to various miscompiles,
such as breach of dominance as shown in the bug
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/57335
2022-08-25 18:14:29 +07:00
Sami Tolvanen cff5bef948 KCFI sanitizer
The KCFI sanitizer, enabled with `-fsanitize=kcfi`, implements a
forward-edge control flow integrity scheme for indirect calls. It
uses a !kcfi_type metadata node to attach a type identifier for each
function and injects verification code before indirect calls.

Unlike the current CFI schemes implemented in LLVM, KCFI does not
require LTO, does not alter function references to point to a jump
table, and never breaks function address equality. KCFI is intended
to be used in low-level code, such as operating system kernels,
where the existing schemes can cause undue complications because
of the aforementioned properties. However, unlike the existing
schemes, KCFI is limited to validating only function pointers and is
not compatible with executable-only memory.

KCFI does not provide runtime support, but always traps when a
type mismatch is encountered. Users of the scheme are expected
to handle the trap. With `-fsanitize=kcfi`, Clang emits a `kcfi`
operand bundle to indirect calls, and LLVM lowers this to a
known architecture-specific sequence of instructions for each
callsite to make runtime patching easier for users who require this
functionality.

A KCFI type identifier is a 32-bit constant produced by taking the
lower half of xxHash64 from a C++ mangled typename. If a program
contains indirect calls to assembly functions, they must be
manually annotated with the expected type identifiers to prevent
errors. To make this easier, Clang generates a weak SHN_ABS
`__kcfi_typeid_<function>` symbol for each address-taken function
declaration, which can be used to annotate functions in assembly
as long as at least one C translation unit linked into the program
takes the function address. For example on AArch64, we might have
the following code:

```
.c:
  int f(void);
  int (*p)(void) = f;
  p();

.s:
  .4byte __kcfi_typeid_f
  .global f
  f:
    ...
```

Note that X86 uses a different preamble format for compatibility
with Linux kernel tooling. See the comments in
`X86AsmPrinter::emitKCFITypeId` for details.

As users of KCFI may need to locate trap locations for binary
validation and error handling, LLVM can additionally emit the
locations of traps to a `.kcfi_traps` section.

Similarly to other sanitizers, KCFI checking can be disabled for a
function with a `no_sanitize("kcfi")` function attribute.

Relands 67504c9549 with a fix for
32-bit builds.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, kees, joaomoreira, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119296
2022-08-24 22:41:38 +00:00
Sami Tolvanen a79060e275 Revert "KCFI sanitizer"
This reverts commit 67504c9549 as using
PointerEmbeddedInt to store 32 bits breaks 32-bit arm builds.
2022-08-24 19:30:13 +00:00
Sami Tolvanen 67504c9549 KCFI sanitizer
The KCFI sanitizer, enabled with `-fsanitize=kcfi`, implements a
forward-edge control flow integrity scheme for indirect calls. It
uses a !kcfi_type metadata node to attach a type identifier for each
function and injects verification code before indirect calls.

Unlike the current CFI schemes implemented in LLVM, KCFI does not
require LTO, does not alter function references to point to a jump
table, and never breaks function address equality. KCFI is intended
to be used in low-level code, such as operating system kernels,
where the existing schemes can cause undue complications because
of the aforementioned properties. However, unlike the existing
schemes, KCFI is limited to validating only function pointers and is
not compatible with executable-only memory.

KCFI does not provide runtime support, but always traps when a
type mismatch is encountered. Users of the scheme are expected
to handle the trap. With `-fsanitize=kcfi`, Clang emits a `kcfi`
operand bundle to indirect calls, and LLVM lowers this to a
known architecture-specific sequence of instructions for each
callsite to make runtime patching easier for users who require this
functionality.

A KCFI type identifier is a 32-bit constant produced by taking the
lower half of xxHash64 from a C++ mangled typename. If a program
contains indirect calls to assembly functions, they must be
manually annotated with the expected type identifiers to prevent
errors. To make this easier, Clang generates a weak SHN_ABS
`__kcfi_typeid_<function>` symbol for each address-taken function
declaration, which can be used to annotate functions in assembly
as long as at least one C translation unit linked into the program
takes the function address. For example on AArch64, we might have
the following code:

```
.c:
  int f(void);
  int (*p)(void) = f;
  p();

.s:
  .4byte __kcfi_typeid_f
  .global f
  f:
    ...
```

Note that X86 uses a different preamble format for compatibility
with Linux kernel tooling. See the comments in
`X86AsmPrinter::emitKCFITypeId` for details.

As users of KCFI may need to locate trap locations for binary
validation and error handling, LLVM can additionally emit the
locations of traps to a `.kcfi_traps` section.

Similarly to other sanitizers, KCFI checking can be disabled for a
function with a `no_sanitize("kcfi")` function attribute.

Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers, kees, joaomoreira, MaskRay

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119296
2022-08-24 18:52:42 +00:00
Jakub Kuderski 6fa87ec10f [ADT] Deprecate is_splat and replace all uses with all_equal
See the discussion thread for more details:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/adt-is-splat-and-empty-ranges/64692

Reviewed By: dblaikie

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D132335
2022-08-23 11:36:27 -04:00
Kazu Hirata 8b1b0d1d81 Revert "Use std::is_same_v instead of std::is_same (NFC)"
This reverts commit c5da37e42d.

This patch seems to break builds with some versions of MSVC.
2022-08-20 23:00:39 -07:00
Kazu Hirata c5da37e42d Use std::is_same_v instead of std::is_same (NFC) 2022-08-20 22:36:26 -07:00
Kazu Hirata ec5eab7e87 Use range-based for loops (NFC) 2022-08-20 21:18:32 -07:00
Kazu Hirata 258531b7ac Remove redundant initialization of Optional (NFC) 2022-08-20 21:18:28 -07:00
Kazu Hirata 6b1bc80188 [Scalar] Qualify auto in range-based for loops (NFC)
Identified with readability-qualified-auto.
2022-08-20 21:18:25 -07:00
Simon Pilgrim fdec50182d [CostModel] Replace getUserCost with getInstructionCost
* Replace getUserCost with getInstructionCost, covering all cost kinds.
* Remove getInstructionLatency, it's not implemented by any backends, and we should fold the functionality into getUserCost (now getInstructionCost) to make it easier for targets to handle the cost kinds with their existing cost callbacks.

Original Patch by @samparker (Sam Parker)

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D79483
2022-08-18 11:55:23 +01:00
Simon Pilgrim e48892ee42 [Transforms] LICM.cpp - pull out repeated getUserCost call
Pulled out of D79483
2022-08-18 10:43:29 +01:00
Konstantina 5bc8791187 [NewGVN][PHIOFOPS] Bail out if an operand is in OpSafeForPHIOfOps but it is not safe for the current basic block.
NewGVN tables are not cleared out between the initial run of NewGVN and the verification. In case of phi-of-ops optimization, OpSafeForPHIOfOps goes out of sync between the two runs. One operand might not be safe for one basic block, but it might be safe for one of its successors. In this case, the operand will be added in OpSafeForPHIOfOps map. In verification phase, we reuse OpSafeForPHIOfOps without updating it again. As a result, the operand will be considered safe for phi-of-ops optimization even for the case that it is not. This patch fixes this problem.

Fix for 53807.

Reviewed By: asbirlea

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D130910
2022-08-17 18:57:46 -07:00