createInductionResumeValues creates a phi node placeholder
without filling incoming values. Then it generates the incoming values.
It includes triggering of SCEV expander which may invoke SSAUpdater.
SSAUpdater has an optimization to detect number of predecessors
basing on incoming values if there is phi node.
In case phi node is not filled with incoming values - the number of predecessors
is detected as 0 and this leads to segmentation fault.
In other words SSAUpdater expects that phi is in good shape while
LoopVectorizer breaks this requirement.
The fix is just prepare all incoming values first and then build a phi node.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128033
During the reordering transformation we should try to avoid reordering bundles
like fadd,fsub because this may block them being matched into a single vector
instruction in x86.
We do this by checking if a TreeEntry is such a pattern and adding it to the
list of TreeEntries with orders that need to be considered.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125712
In some cases, a recurrence splice instructions needs to be inserted
between to regions, for example if the regions get re-arranged during
sinking.
Fixes#56146.
If the OffsetBeg + InsertVecSz is greater than VecSz, need to estimate
the cost as shuffle of 2 vector, not as insert of subvector. Otherwise,
the inserted subvector is out of range and compiler may crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D128071
If the root scalar is mapped to to the smallest bit width, the vector is
truncated and the types between original buildvector and extracted value
mismatched. For extract, we emit sext/zext instructions, for shuffles we
can reuse oringal vector instead of the truncated one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127974
Instead of using the underlying instruction and VF to get the type, use
the type of the incoming value. This removes an unnecessary dependence
on the underlying instruction and enables using the recipe without an
underlying instruction.
Currently scatter vectorize nodes can be emitted only for GEPs with
constant indices. But we can also emit such nodes for GEPs with the same
ptr and non-constant vectorizable/gathered indices, if profitable. Patch
adds support for such nodes and tries to improve handling of GEPs with
non-const indeces for such nodes.
Metric: SLP.NumVectorInstructions
Program SLP.NumVectorInstructions
results results0 diff
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017speed/638.imagick_s/638.imagick_s.test 5243.00 5240.00 -0.1%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/538.imagick_r/538.imagick_r.test 5243.00 5240.00 -0.1%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/526.blender_r/526.blender_r.test 27550.00 27507.00 -0.2%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2006/453.povray/453.povray.test 5395.00 5380.00 -0.3%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/511.povray_r/511.povray_r.test 5389.00 5374.00 -0.3%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017rate/520.omnetpp_r/520.omnetpp_r.test 961.00 958.00 -0.3%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017speed/620.omnetpp_s/620.omnetpp_s.test 961.00 958.00 -0.3%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII.test 5664.00 5643.00 -0.4%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/510.parest_r/510.parest_r.test 13202.00 13127.00 -0.6%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk.test 212.00 207.00 -2.4%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 890.00 850.00 -4.5%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2006/464.h264ref/464.h264ref.test 1695.00 1581.00 -6.7%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 2338.00 2140.00 -8.5%
test-suite :: SingleSource/UnitTests/matrix-types-spec.test 63.00 55.00 -12.7%
test-suite :: SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll.test 468.00 356.00 -23.9%
Geomean difference -0.3%
All numbers show increased number of generated vector instructions.
Diff:
SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll - better without LTO, but
need an extra analysis with LTO (with LTO compiler generates
masked_gather, while before regular loads were emitted because of extra
data, availbale at LTO time).
SingleSource/UnitTests/matrix-types-spec - more vector code.
MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod - same.
External/SPEC/CINT2006/464.h264ref/464.h264ref - same.
MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark - same.
External/SPEC/CINT2006/445.gobmk/445.gobmk - no changes.
External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/510.parest_r/510.parest_r - more vector code.
External/SPEC/CFP2006/447.dealII/447.dealII - same
External/SPEC/CINT2017speed/620.omnetpp_s/620.omnetpp_s - same
External/SPEC/CINT2017rate/520.omnetpp_r/520.omnetpp - same
External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/511.povray_r/511.povray - same
External/SPEC/CFP2006/453.povray/453.povray - same
External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/526.blender_r/526.blender_r - same
External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/538.imagick_r/538.imagick_r - same
External/SPEC/CFP2017speed/638.imagick_s/638.imagick_s - same
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127219
We can skip the analysis of the constant nodes, their order should not
affect the ordering of the trees/subtrees.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D127775
OrigPHIsToFix is only used in the native path. Collecting phis can be
replaced by iterating over the plan. This also removes another
unnecessary use of a late getVPValue.
This also reduces the coupling between ILV and the VPlan utilities.
Removes the workaround from https://reviews.llvm.org/D98509#2732628 for
an AIX build compiler issue.
The AIX build compiler product that caused the issue has since been
fixed. Also, the AIX build compiler has been changed to one based on
LLVM.
All information is already available in VPlan. Note that there are some
test changes, because we now can correctly look through instructions
like truncates to analyze the actual users.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123541
This reverts commit 266ea446ab.
The reasons for the revert have been addressed by cleaning up condition
handling in VPlan and properly marking VPBranchOnMaskRecipe as using
scalars.
The test case for the revert from D123720 has been added in 3d663308a5.
Based on reviewer comments on https://reviews.llvm.org/D126692 I've
added FastMathFlags to the select instruction used when tail-folding
with reductions. These flags can then be used by InstCombine to
decide upon the most optimal floating point identity value for
fadd/fsub. Doing so unlocks further optimisations, such as folding
selects into masked loads.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126778
Try to simplify BranchOnCount to `BranchOnCond true` if TC <= UF * VF.
This is an alternative to D121899 which simplifies the VPlan directly
instead of doing so late in code-gen.
The potential benefit of doing this in VPlan is that this may help
cost-modeling in the future. The reason this is done in prepareToExecute
at the moment is that a single plan may be used for multiple VFs/UFs.
There are further simplifications that can be applied as follow ups:
1. Replace inductions with constants
2. Replace vector region with regular block.
Fixes#55354.
Depends on D126679.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126680
Instead of setting the successor to the exit using CFG.ExitBB, set it to
nullptr initially. The successor to the exit block is later set either
through createEmptyBasicBlock or after VPlan execution (because at the
moment, no block is created by VPlan for the exit block, the existing
one is reused).
This also enables BranchOnCond to be used as terminator for the exiting
block of the topmost vector region.
Depends on D126618.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126679
Improved/fixed cost modeling for shuffles by providing masks, improved
cost model for non-identity insertelements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115462
This patch removes CondBit and Predicate from VPBasicBlock. To do so,
the patch introduces a new branch-on-cond VPInstruction opcode to model
a branch on a condition explicitly.
This addresses a long-standing TODO/FIXME that blocks shouldn't be users
of VPValues. Those extra users can cause issues for VPValue-based
analyses that don't expect blocks. Addressing this fixme should allow us
to re-introduce 266ea446ab.
The generic branch opcode can also be used in follow-up patches.
Depends on D123005.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126618
Improved/fixed cost modeling for shuffles by providing masks, improved
cost model for non-identity insertelements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115462
Recently the terminology used has been changed from Exit->Exiting in
line with common LLVM loop terminology. Update a remaining use of the
old terminology.
Improved/fixed cost modeling for shuffles by providing masks, improved
cost model for non-identity insertelements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115462
Extractelement instructions may come from different basic blocks, need
to take it into account when looking for a last instruction in the
bundle to prevent compiler crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126777
This patch updates the VPlan native path to use VPRegionBlocks for all
loops in a loop nest. Up to now, only the outermost loop used a region.
This is a step towards unifying both paths and keep things consistent
between them. It also prepares various code-gen parts for modeling the
pre-header in the inner loop vectorizer (D121624).
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123005
The implementations of VPlanDominatorTree, VPlanLoopInfo and VPlanPredicator
are all incompatible with modeling loops in VPlans as region without
explicit back-edges.
Those pieces are not actively used and only exercised by a few gtest
unit tests. They are at the moment blocking progress towards unifying
the native and inner-loop vectorizer paths in D121624 and D123005.
I think we should not block forward progress on unused pieces of code,
so this patch removes the utilities for now. The plan is to re-introduce
them as needed in a way that is compatible with the unified VPlan scheme
used in both the inner loop vectorizer and the native path.
Reviewed By: sguggill
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123017
In LLVM's common loop terminology, an exit block is a block outside a
loop with a predecessor inside the loop. An exiting block is a block
inside the loop which branches to an exit block outside the loop.
This patch updates a few places where VPlan was using ExitBlock for a
block exiting a region. Those instances have been updated to use
ExitingBlock.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126173
Patch improves compile time. For function calls, which cannot be
vectorized, create a unique group for each such a call instead of
subgroup. It prevents them from being grouped by a subgroups and
attempts for their vectorization.
Also, looks through casts operand to try to check their
groups/subgroups.
Reduces number of vectorization attempts. No changes in the statistics
for SPEC2017/2006/llvm-test-suite.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126476
Need to handle a corner case correctly, if all elements are Undefs/Poisons,
need to emit actual values, not just poisons.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126298
ScatterVectorize nodes should be handled same way as gathers in
reorderBottomToTop function, since we can simple reorder the loads in
this node. Because of that need to include such nodes to the list of
gathered nodes to fix compiler crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126378
SLP should build ScatterVectorize nodes only if they actually end up
with masked gather rather than with scalarization. In the second
scenario better to build a gather node.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126379
Need to use all ReductionOps when propagating flags for the reduction
ops, otherwise transformation is not correct. Plus, need to drop nuw/nsw
flags.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126371
When compiling the attached new test in scalable-reductions-tf.ll we
were hitting this assertion in fixReduction:
Assertion `isa<PHINode>(U) && "Reduction exit must feed Phi's or select"
The loop contains a reduction and an intermediate store of the reduction
value. When vectorising with tail-folding the contains of 'U' in the
assertion above happened to be a scatter_store. It turns out that we
were still creating a widen recipe for the invariant store, despite
knowing that we can actually sink it. The simplest fix is to change
buildVPlanWithVPRecipes so that we look for invariant stores before
attempting to widen it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126295
The crash is caused by incorrect order set by reorderBottomToTop(), which
happens when it is reordering a TreeEntry which has a user that has already been
reordered earlier. Please see the detailed description in the lit test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D126099
To be used correctly in a sort-like function, isFirstInsertElement
function must follow weak strict ordering rule, i.e.
isFirstInsertElement(IE1, IE1) should return false.
Builds UserIgnore list only once as a SmallDenseSet without rebuilding
it between the runs, iterate over gathers instead list of reduction ops,
do some checks in the buildTree_rec only if the corresponding containers
are not empty.
SLP vectorizer emits extracts for externally used vectorized scalars and
estimates the cost for each such extract. But in many cases these
scalars are input for insertelement instructions, forming buildvector,
and instead of extractelement/insertelement pair we can emit/cost
estimate shuffle(s) cost and generate series of shuffles, which can be
further optimized.
Tested using test-suite (+SPEC2017), the tests passed, SLP was able to
generate/vectorize more instructions in many cases and it allowed to reduce
number of re-vectorization attempts (where we could try to vectorize
buildector insertelements again and again).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107966
Previously, `getRegUsageForType` was implemented using
`getTypeLegalizationCost`. `getRegUsageForType` is used by the loop
vectorizer to estimate the register pressure caused by using a vector
type. However, `getTypeLegalizationCost` currently only appears to
understand splitting and not scalarization, so significantly
underestimates the register requirements.
Instead, use `getNumRegisters`, which understands when scalarization
can occur (via computeRegisterProperties).
This was discovered while investigating D118979 (Set maximum VF with
shouldMaximizeVectorBandwidth), where under fixed-length 512-bit SVE the
loop vectorizer previously ends up costing an v128i1 as 2 v64i*
registers where it actually occupies 128 i32 registers.
I'm sending this patch early for comment, I'm still doing some sanity checking
with LNT. I note that getRegisterClassForType appears to return VectorRC even
though the type in question (large vNi1 types) end up occupying scalar
registers. That might be worth fixing too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125918
The latch may not be the exiting block. Use the exiting block instead
when looking up the incoming value of the LCSSA phi node. This fixes a
crash with early-exit loops.
Current codegen only supports scalarization of pointer inductions for
scalable VFs if they are uniform. After 3bebec659 we now may enter the
scalarization code path in VPWidenPointerInductionRecipe::execute for
scalable vectors.
Fall back to widening for scalable vectors if necessary.
This should fix a build failure when bootstrapping LLVM with SVE, e.g.
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/176/builds/1723
This reverts commit fc9c59c355.
The patch triggers an assertion when building SPEC on X86. Reduced
reproducer shared at D107966.
Also reverts follow-up commit 11a09af76d.
This patch introduces a new VPLiveOut subclass of VPUser to model
exit values explicitly. The initial version handles exit values that
are neither part of induction or reduction chains nor first order
recurrence phis.
Fixes#51366, #54867, #55167, #55459
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123537
SLP vectorizer emits extracts for externally used vectorized scalars and
estimates the cost for each such extract. But in many cases these
scalars are input for insertelement instructions, forming buildvector,
and instead of extractelement/insertelement pair we can emit/cost
estimate shuffle(s) cost and generate series of shuffles, which can be
further optimized.
Tested using test-suite (+SPEC2017), the tests passed, SLP was able to
generate/vectorize more instructions in many cases and it allowed to reduce
number of re-vectorization attempts (where we could try to vectorize
buildector insertelements again and again).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D107966
At the moment LV runs LoopSimplify and reconstructs LCSSA form after
generating the main vector loop and before generating the epilogue
vector loop.
In practice, this adds a new exit block for the scalar loop because the
middle block now also branches to the original exit block of the scalar
loop. It also requires adding a new LCSSA phi in the newly created exit
block.
This complicates things when modeling exit values in VPlan, because we
would need to update the VPlan for the epilogue loop to update the newly
created LCSSA phi node.
But none of that should be necessary, as all analysis requiring
loop-simplify form is already done at this point and LCSSA form of the
original loop is not broken.
Reviewed By: bmahjour
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125810
Update clearReductionWrapFlags to use the VPlan def-use chain from the
reduction phi recipe to drop reduction wrap flags.
This addresses an existing FIXME and fixes a crash when instructions in
the reduction chain are not used and have been removed before VPlan
codegeneration.
Fixes#55540.
The runtime check threshold should also restrict interleave count.
Otherwise, too many runtime checks will be generated for some cases.
Reviewed By: fhahn, dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122126
VPWidenMemoryInstruction also models stores which may not produce a value.
This can trip over analyses. Improve the modeling by only adding
VPValues for VPWidenMemoryInstructionRecipes modeling loads.
Most clients only used these methods because they wanted to be able to
extend or truncate to the same bit width (which is a no-op). Now that
the standard zext, sext and trunc allow this, there is no reason to use
the OrSelf versions.
The OrSelf versions additionally have the strange behaviour of allowing
extending to a *smaller* width, or truncating to a *larger* width, which
are also treated as no-ops. A small amount of client code relied on this
(ConstantRange::castOp and MicrosoftCXXNameMangler::mangleNumber) and
needed rewriting.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125557
This patch changes the strategy for vectorizing freeze instrucion, from
replicating multiple times to widening according to selected VF.
Fixes#54992
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125016
The pattern matching and vectgorization for reductions was not very
effective. Some of of the possible reduction values were marked as
external arguments, SLP could not find some reduction patterns because
of too early attempt to vectorize pair of binops arguments, the cost of
consts reductions was not correct. Patch addresses these issues and
improves the analysis/cost estimation and vectorization of the
reductions.
The most significant changes in SLP.NumVectorInstructions:
Metric: SLP.NumVectorInstructions [140/14396]
Program results results0 diff
test-suite :: SingleSource/Benchmarks/Adobe-C++/loop_unroll.test 920.00 3548.00 285.7%
test-suite :: SingleSource/Benchmarks/BenchmarkGame/n-body.test 66.00 122.00 84.8%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C/miniGMG/miniGMG.test 100.00 128.00 28.0%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test 664.00 810.00 22.0%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/mafft/pairlocalalign.test 592.00 687.00 16.0%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame.test 402.00 426.00 6.0%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 1665.00 1745.00 4.8%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017rate/500.perlbench_r/500.perlbench_r.test 135.00 139.00 3.0%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017speed/600.perlbench_s/600.perlbench_s.test 135.00 139.00 3.0%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/7zip/7zip-benchmark.test 388.00 397.00 2.3%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/ldecod.test 895.00 914.00 2.1%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/telecomm-gsm/telecomm-gsm.test 240.00 244.00 1.7%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/mediabench/gsm/toast/toast.test 240.00 244.00 1.7%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017speed/602.gcc_s/602.gcc_s.test 820.00 832.00 1.5%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017rate/502.gcc_r/502.gcc_r.test 820.00 832.00 1.5%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/526.blender_r/526.blender_r.test 14804.00 14914.00 0.7%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Bullet/bullet.test 8125.00 8183.00 0.7%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017speed/625.x264_s/625.x264_s.test 1330.00 1338.00 0.6%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017rate/525.x264_r/525.x264_r.test 1330.00 1338.00 0.6%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/510.parest_r/510.parest_r.test 9832.00 9880.00 0.5%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/511.povray_r/511.povray_r.test 5267.00 5291.00 0.5%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/538.imagick_r/538.imagick_r.test 4018.00 4024.00 0.1%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017speed/638.imagick_s/638.imagick_s.test 4018.00 4024.00 0.1%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017speed/644.nab_s/644.nab_s.test 426.00 424.00 -0.5%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/544.nab_r/544.nab_r.test 426.00 424.00 -0.5%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017rate/541.leela_r/541.leela_r.test 201.00 192.00 -4.5%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017speed/641.leela_s/641.leela_s.test 201.00 192.00 -4.5%
644.nab_s and 544.nab_r - reduced number of shuffles but increased number
of useful vectorized instructions.
641.leela_s and 541.leela_r - the function
`@_ZN9FastBoard25get_pattern3_augment_specEiib` is not inlined anymore
but its body gets vectorized successfully. Before, the function was
inlined twice and vectorized just after inlining, currently it is not
required. The vector code looks pretty similar, just like as it was before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111574
Need to check if the reduction is still (not)cmp-select pattern min/max
reduction to avoid compiler crash during building list of reduction
operations. cmp-sel pattern provides 2 reduction operations, while
intrinsics - just one.
Those helpers model properties of a user and they should also be
available to non-recipe users. This will be used in D123537 for a new
exit value user.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124936
This patch adds initial support for a pointer diff based runtime check
scheme for vectorization. This scheme requires fewer computations and
checks than the existing full overlap checking, if it is applicable.
The main idea is to only check if source and sink of a dependency are
far enough apart so the accesses won't overlap in the vector loop. To do
so, it is sufficient to compute the difference and compare it to the
`VF * UF * AccessSize`. It is sufficient to check
`(Sink - Src) <u VF * UF * AccessSize` to rule out a backwards
dependence in the vector loop with the given VF and UF. If Src >=u Sink,
there is not dependence preventing vectorization, hence the overflow
should not matter and using the ULT should be sufficient.
Note that the initial version is restricted in multiple ways:
1. Pointers must only either be read or written, by a single
instruction (this allows re-constructing source/sink for
dependences with the available information)
2. Source and sink pointers must be add-recs, with matching steps
3. The step must be a constant.
3. abs(step) == AccessSize.
Most of those restrictions can be relaxed in the future.
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53590.
Reviewed By: dmgreen
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119078
When the loop vectoriser encounters a known low trip count it tries
to create a single predicated loop in order to get the benefit of
vectorisation and eliminate the scalar tail. However, until now the
vectoriser prevented the use of scalable vectors in this case due
to concerns in the past about stability. I believe that tail-folded
loops using scalable vectors are now sufficiently well tested that
we can enable this. For the same reason I've also enabled it when
optimising for code size too.
Tests added here:
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-low-trip-count.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/AArch64/sve-tail-folding-optsize.ll
Transforms/LoopVectorize/RISCV/low-trip-count.ll
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121595
Under some circumstances, SCEVExpander will insert new instructions when
expanding a predicate, but the final result of the expansion can be a
false constant.
In those cases, the expanded instructions may later be used by other
expansions, e.g. the trip count. This may trigger an assertion during
SCEVExpander cleanup. To avoid this, always mark the result as used.
Fixes#55100.
If alternate node has only 2 instructions and the tree is already big
enough, better to skip the vectorization of such nodes, they are not
very profitable (the resulting code cotains 3 instructions instead of
original 2 scalars). SLP can try to vectorize the buildvector sequence
in the next attempt, if it is profitable.
Metric: SLP.NumVectorInstructions
Program SLP.NumVectorInstructions
results results0 diff
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C/miniAMR/miniAMR.test 72.00 73.00 1.4%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc.test 1186.00 1198.00 1.0%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/miniFE/miniFE.test 241.00 242.00 0.4%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.test 2131.00 2139.00 0.4%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017rate/523.xalancbmk_r/523.xalancbmk_r.test 6377.00 6384.00 0.1%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CINT2017speed/623.xalancbmk_s/623.xalancbmk_s.test 6377.00 6384.00 0.1%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/510.parest_r/510.parest_r.test 12650.00 12658.00 0.1%
test-suite :: External/SPEC/CFP2017rate/526.blender_r/526.blender_r.test 26169.00 26147.00 -0.1%
test-suite :: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Trimaran/enc-3des/enc-3des.test 99.00 86.00 -13.1%
Gains:
526.blender_r - more vectorized trees.
enc-3des - same.
Others:
510.parest_r - no changes.
miniFE - same
623.xalancbmk_s - some (non-profitable) parts of the trees are not
vectorized.
523.xalancbmk_r - same
lencod - same
timberwolfmc - same
miniAMR - same
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125571
If the insert indes was used already or is not constant, we should stop
looking for unique buildvector sequence, it mustbe splitted to
2 different buildvectors.
In InnerLoopVectorizer::getOrCreateVectorTripCount there is an
assert that the known minimum value for the VF is a power of 2
when tail-folding is enabled. However, for scalable vectors the
value of vscale may not be a power of 2, which means we have
to worry about the possibility of overflow. I have solved this
problem by adding preheader checks that prevent us from entering
the vector body if the canonical IV would overflow, i.e.
if ((IntMax - TripCount) < (VF * UF)) ... skip vector loop ...
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125235
We commonly want to create either an inbounds or non-inbounds GEP
based on a boolean value, e.g. when preserving inbounds from
existing GEPs. Directly accept such a boolean in the API, rather
than requiring a ternary between CreateGEP and CreateInBoundsGEP.
This change is not entirely NFC, because we now preserve an
inbounds flag in a constant expression edge-case in InstCombine.
Further improvement of the cost model for the scalars used in
buildvectors sequences. The main functionality is outlined into
a separate function.
The cost is calculated in the following way:
1. If the Base vector is not undef vector, resizing the very first mask to
have common VF and perform action for 2 input vectors (including non-undef
Base). Other shuffle masks are combined with the resulting after the 1 stage and processed as a shuffle of 2 elements.
2. If the Base is undef vector and have only 1 shuffle mask, perform the
action only for 1 vector with the given mask, if it is not the identity
mask.
3. If > 2 masks are used, perform serie of shuffle actions for 2 vectors,
combing the masks properly between the steps.
The original implementation misses the very first analysis for the Base
vector, so the cost might too optimistic in some cases. But it improves
the cost for the insertelements which are part of the current SLP graph.
Part of D107966.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115750
With opaque pointers, both the stored value and the address can be the
same. Only consider the recipe using the first lane only *if* the
address is not stored.
Fixes#55375.
The current reordering scheme only checks the ordering of in-tree operands.
There are some cases, however, where we need to adjust the ordering based on
the ordering of a future SLP-tree who's instructions are not part of the
current tree, but are external users.
This patch is a simple implementation of this. We keep track of scalar stores
that are users of TreeEntries and if they look profitable to vectorize, then
we keep track of their ordering. During the reordering step we take this new
index order into account. This can remove some shuffles in cases like in the
lit test.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125111
If the same scalar is inserted several times into the same buildvector,
the mask index can be used already. In this case need to check, that
this scalar is already part of the vectorized buildvector.
We can try to vectorize number of stores less than MinVecRegSize
/ scalar_value_size, if it is allowed by target. Gives an extra
opportunity for the vectorization.
Fixes PR54985.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124284
Need to use actual index instead of the tree entry position, since the
insert index may be different than 0. It mean, that we vectorized part
of the buildvector starting from not initial insertelement instruction
beause of some reason.
Given a commutative reduction leading from a shuffle, the order of the
lanes on the shuffle are not important for the result. This means we can
reorder the shuffle to something simpler, which we try shuffling the
first vector lanes first. This was D123494.
The new shuffle may not be profitable though, and if it is not we can
try the folding of select shuffles from D123911. This, with some
adjustment as the output lane ordering is now unimportant, can allow the
final shuffle to simplify given the inputs to the patterns from D123911.
Where as each transformation on their own are not profitable, the
combination is.
We can only support a single shuffle when called from reductions, but we
are able to sort the ReconstructMask, potentially allowing it to
simplify to an identity or concat mask.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D125086
Given a load without a better order, this patch partially sorts the
elements to form clusters of adjacent elements in memory. These clusters
can potentially be loaded in fewer loads, meaning less overall shuffling
(for example loading v4i8 clusters of a v16i8 as a single f32 loads, as
opposed to multiple independent bytes loads and inserts).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122145
This patch adds a combine to attempt to reduce the costs of certain
select-shuffle patterns. The form of code it attempts to detect is:
%x = shuffle ...
%y = shuffle ...
%a = binop %x, %y
%b = binop %x, %y
shuffle %a, %b, selectmask
A classic select-mask will pick items from each lane of a or b. These
do not always have a great lowering on many architectures. This patch
attempts to pack a and b into the lower elements, creating a differently
ordered shuffle for reconstructing the orignal which may be better than
the select mask. This can be better for performance, especially if less
elements of a and b need to be computed and the input shuffles are
cheaper.
Because select-masks are just one form of shuffle, we generalize to any
mask. So long as the backend has decent costmodel for the shuffles, this
can generally improve things when they come up. For more basic cost
models the folds do not appear to be profitable, not getting past the
cost checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123911
Further improvement of the cost model for the scalars used in
buildvectors sequences. The main functionality is outlined into
a separate function.
The cost is calculated in the following way:
1. If the Base vector is not undef vector, resizing the very first mask to
have common VF and perform action for 2 input vectors (including non-undef
Base). Other shuffle masks are combined with the resulting after the 1 stage and processed as a shuffle of 2 elements.
2. If the Base is undef vector and have only 1 shuffle mask, perform the
action only for 1 vector with the given mask, if it is not the identity
mask.
3. If > 2 masks are used, perform serie of shuffle actions for 2 vectors,
combing the masks properly between the steps.
The original implementation misses the very first analysis for the Base
vector, so the cost might too optimistic in some cases. But it improves
the cost for the insertelements which are part of the current SLP graph.
Part of D107966.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115750
Adds ability to vectorize loops containing a store to a loop-invariant
address as part of a reduction that isn't converted to SSA form due to
lack of aliasing info. Runtime checks are generated to ensure the store
does not alias any other accesses in the loop.
Ordered fadd reductions are not yet supported.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D110235
This adds fptosi_sat and fptoui_sat to the list of trivially
vectorizable functions, mainly so that the loop vectorizer can vectorize
the instruction. Marking them as trivially vectorizable also allows them
to be SLP vectorized, and Scalarized.
The signature of a fptosi_sat requires two type overrides
(@llvm.fptosi.sat.v2i32.v2f32), unlike other intrinsics that often only
take a single. This patch alters hasVectorInstrinsicOverloadedScalarOpd
to isVectorIntrinsicWithOverloadTypeAtArg, so that it can mark the first
operand of the intrinsic as a overloaded (but not scalar) operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124358
Currently SLP vectorizer walks through the instructions and selects
3 main classes of values: 1) reduction operations - instructions with same
reduction opcode (add, mul, min/max, etc.), which build the reduction,
2) reduced values - instructions with the same opcodes, but different
from the reduction opcode, 3) extra arguments - all other values,
instructions from the different basic block rather than the root node,
instructions with to many/less uses.
This scheme is not very efficient. It excludes some instructions and all
non-instruction values from the reductions (constants, proficient
gathers), to many possibly reduced values are marked as extra arguments.
Patch improves this process by introducing a bit extended analysis
stage. During this stage, we still try to select 3 classes of the
values: 1) reduction operations - same as before, 2) possibly reduced
values - all instructions from the current block/non-instructions, which
may build a vectorization tree, 3) extra arguments - instructions from
the different basic blocks. Additionally, an extra sorting of the
possibly reduced values occurs to build the scalar sequences which
highly likely will bed vectorized, e.g. loads are grouped by the
distance between them, constants are grouped together, cmp instructions
are sorted by their compare types and predicates, extractelement
instructions are sorted by the vector operand, etc. Also, these groups
are reordered by their length so the longest group is the first in the
list of the possibly reduced values.
The vectorization process tries to emit the reductions for all these
groups. These reductions, remaining non-vectorized possible reduced
values and extra arguments are then combined into the final expression
just like it was before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114171
'Widen' recipe are only used when actual vector values are generated.
Fix tryToWidenCall to do not create VPWidenCallRecipes for scalar vector
factors.
This was exposed by D123720, because the widened recipes are considered
vector users.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124718
Similar to c515b2f39e, If there are no loops in the function as seen
through LI, we should avoid computing the remaining expensive analyses
(such as SCEV, BPI). Reordered the analyses requests and early return
if there are no loops.
The logic of avoiding expensive analyses is applied to LoopVectorizer,
LoopLoadElimination and LoopUnrollPass, i.e. all function passes which operate
on loops.
This is an NFC with compile time improvement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124529
The name CountRoundDown is potentially misleading, as the number of
iterations can be rounded up when folding the tail.
Reviewed By: fhahn
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D119681
I think this sort comparator was overly complex, and the windows
expensive check bot agreed, failing as it was not giving a strict weak
ordering. Change it to use the comparison of the mask values as unsigned
integers. This should sort the undef elements to the end whilst keeping
X<Y otherwise.
Given a shuffle feeding a commutative reduction, the lane ordering of
the shuffle will not alter the result. This is also true if there are a
number of operations between the reduction and the shuffle, providing
they only operate lane-wise. This patch searches for cases like that in
Vector Combine, allowing us to check the cost of the shuffle vs an
in-order identity shuffle and replace the order if possible. This only
handles a single shuffle at the moment to keep things simple, and is
able to ignore splats that produce results where every result is the
same.
This is a more powerful version of a combine that already happens in
instrcombine, capable of optimizing more cases by looking through more
instructions and being able to cost the shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123494
Introduced masks where they are not added and improved target dependent
cost models to avoid returning of the incorrect cost results after
adding masks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100486
Remove one of the last remaining uses of ::needsVectorIV, preparing for
its removal. Now that usesScalars is available and based on the
information explicit in VPlan, there is no need to use the pre-computed
needsVectorIV.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123720
Introduced masks where they are not added and improved target dependent
cost models to avoid returning of the incorrect cost results after
adding masks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D100486
Before this patch `Args` was used to pass a broadcat's arguments by SLP.
This patch changes this. `Args` is now used for passing the operands of
the shuffle.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124202
tryToVectorize() method implements one of searching paths for vectorizable tree roots in SLP vectorizer,
specifically for binary and comparison operations. Order of making probes for various scalar pairs
was defined by its implementation: the instruction operands, then climb over one operand if
the instruction is its sole user and then perform same actions for another operand if previous
attempts failed. Problem with this approach is that among these options we can have more than a
single vectorizable tree candidate and it is not necessarily the one that encountered first.
Trying to build vectorizable tree for each possible combination for just evaluation is expensive.
But we already have lookahead heuristics mechanism which we use for finding best pick among
operands of commutative instructions. It calculates cumulative score for candidates in two
consecutive lanes. This patch introduces use of the heuristics for choosing the best pair among
several combinations. We only try one that looks as most promising for vectorization.
Additional benefit is that we reduce total number of vectorization trees built for probes
because we skip those looking non-profitable early.
Reviewed By: Alexey Bataev (ABataev), Vasileios Porpodas (vporpo)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124309
Minor refactoring to reduce size of functional change D124309:
look-ahead scoring routines pulled out of VLOperands and formed
new LookAheadHeuristics helper class.
Reviewed By: Alexey Bataev (ABataev), Vasileios Porpodas (vporpo)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124313
This patch extends the scope of VPlan to also include the exit (aka
middle) block.
For now, the exit block remains empty, but handling of exit values will
subsequently be moved to VPlan, by adding recipes to model exit values
in the exit block.
As a first step, this will allow fixing #51366.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123457
This patch moves SCEV expansion of steps used by
VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipes to the pre-header using
VPExpandSCEVRecipe. This ensures that those steps are expanded while the
CFG is in a valid state. Previously, SCEV expansion may happen during
vector body code-generation, during which the CFG may be invalid,
causing issues with SCEV expansion.
Depends on D122095.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122096
Until now we would only accept a broadcast load pattern if it is only used
by a single vector of instructions.
This patch relaxes this, and allows for the broadcast to have more than one
user vector, as long as all of its uses are internal to the SLP graph and
vectorized.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121940
With opaque pointers, the stored value and address can be the same.
Previously the code in VPWidenMemoryInstructionRecipe::onlyFirstLaneDemanded
incorrectly considers stores with matching store and pointer operands as
only demanding the first lane, causing a crash.
This addresses an existing TODO by keeping a mapping of external IR
Value * definitions wrapped in VPValues for use in a VPlan.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123700
Currently SLP vectorizer walks through the instructions and selects
3 main classes of values: 1) reduction operations - instructions with same
reduction opcode (add, mul, min/max, etc.), which build the reduction,
2) reduced values - instructions with the same opcodes, but different
from the reduction opcode, 3) extra arguments - all other values,
instructions from the different basic block rather than the root node,
instructions with to many/less uses.
This scheme is not very efficient. It excludes some instructions and all
non-instruction values from the reductions (constants, proficient
gathers), to many possibly reduced values are marked as extra arguments.
Patch improves this process by introducing a bit extended analysis
stage. During this stage, we still try to select 3 classes of the
values: 1) reduction operations - same as before, 2) possibly reduced
values - all instructions from the current block/non-instructions, which
may build a vectorization tree, 3) extra arguments - instructions from
the different basic blocks. Additionally, an extra sorting of the
possibly reduced values occurs to build the scalar sequences which
highly likely will bed vectorized, e.g. loads are grouped by the
distance between them, constants are grouped together, cmp instructions
are sorted by their compare types and predicates, extractelement
instructions are sorted by the vector operand, etc. Also, these groups
are reordered by their length so the longest group is the first in the
list of the possibly reduced values.
The vectorization process tries to emit the reductions for all these
groups. These reductions, remaining non-vectorized possible reduced
values and extra arguments are then combined into the final expression
just like it was before.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D114171
After D121624 models the pre-header in VPlan, VPExpandSCEVRecipes can be
placed there. This ensures SCEV expansion happens before modifying the
CFG during VPlan execution, when CFG is incomplete.
Depends on D121624.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122095
This patch extends the scope of VPlan to also model the pre-header.
The pre-header can be used to place recipes that should be code-gen'd
outside the loop, like SCEV expansion.
Depends on D121623.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121624
This fixes the code to actually use the location of the instruction, if
available. Previously, SetInsertPoint would overwrite the insert point
set from the instruction.
When creating induction resume values, SCEV queries may rely on
LoopInfo. Make sure vector.body gets added to the loop of the pre-header
during skeleton construction.
%vector.body will be moved to the vector preheader during VPlan
execution.
Fixes#54745.
Update VPInterleavedAccessInfo to use the generic getVectorLoopRegion
helper instead of relying on the entry block being the top-most vector
loop region.
This was exposed by 14e3650f. The recommit of 14e3650f will hit the
problematic code path requiring the workaround.
test case that crashes without the workaround.
During skeleton construction for the epilogue vector loop, generic
helpers use getOrCreateTripCount, which will re-expand the trip count
computation. Instead, re-use the TripCount created during main loop
vectorization.
This reverts the revert commit 2760cdc9c6.
This version pulls in the code to create the vector loop object in VPlan
from D121624.
This is needed because otherwise existing LoopInfo verification will
fail, as a loop block doesn't have in-loop successors now that we
do not replace the branch.
Now that we do not add new loops during skeleton construction, there's
also no need to verify LI there.
The only remaining use was to get the exit block of the loop. Instead of
relying on the loop, use the successor of VectorHeaderBB
(LoopMiddleBlock) directly to set VPTransformState::CFG::ExitB
Depends on D121621.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121623
When MaximizeVectorBandwidth is enabled, we can end up (via calls to
collectUniformsAndScalars/setCostBasedWideningDecision through
calculateRegisterUsage) making widening decisions before we have decided
whether to fold the tail by masking. These decisions will be wrong if we
later decided to fold the tail, for example when the trip count is very
low. It will use incorrect costs for loads that should get masked, using
standard memory operation costs instead.
This still at the moment uses the EmulatedMaskMemRefHack costs (a bit
unfortunately), but the old costs without this change were 1, leading to
too optimistic vectorization.
This slightly changes the way that the MaximizeVectorBandwidth option
works to make it easier to test, always honouring the option if it is
set.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120215
Instead of looking up the vector loop using the header, keep track of
the current vector loop in VPTransformState. This removes the
requirement for the vector header block being part of the loop up front.
A follow-up patch will move the code to generate the Loop object for the
vector loop to VPRegionBlock.
Depends on D121619.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121621
Now that all dependencies on creating the latch block up-front have been
removed, there is no need to create it early.
Depends on D121618.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121619
In some case, like in the added test case, we can reach
selectInterleaveCount with loops that actually have a cost of 0.
Unfortunately a loop cost of 0 is also used to communicate that the cost
has not been computed yet. To resolve the crash, bail out if the cost
remains zero after computing it.
This seems like the best option, as there are multiple code paths that
return a cost of 0 to force a computation in selectInterleaveCount.
Computing the cost at multiple places up front there would unnecessarily
complicate the logic.
Fixes#54413.
This patch moves the code to set the correct incoming block for the
backedge value to VPlan::execute.
When generating the phi node, the backedge value is temporarily added
using the pre-header as incoming block. The invalid phi node will be
fixed up during VPlan::execute after main VPlan code generation.
At the same time, the backedge value is also moved to the latch.
This change removes the requirement to create the latch block up-front
for VPWidenInductionPHIRecipe::execute, which in turn will enable
modeling the pre-header in VPlan.
Depends on D121617.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121618
If we vectorize a e.g. store, we leave around a bunch of getelementptrs for the individual scalar stores which we removed. We can go ahead and delete them as well.
This is purely for test output quality and readability. It should have no effect in any sane pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122493
This patch moves the code to set the correct incoming block for the
backedge value to VPlan::execute.
When generating the phi node, the backedge value is temporarily added
using the pre-header as incoming block. The invalid phi node will be
fixed up during VPlan::execute after main VPlan code generation.
At the same time, the backedge value is also moved to the latch.
This change removes the requirement to create the latch block up-front
for VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe::execute, which in turn will enable
modeling the pre-header in VPlan.
As an alternative, the increment could be modeled as separate recipe,
but that would require more work and a bit of redundant code, as we need
to create the step-vector during VPWidenIntOrFpInductionRecipe::execute
anyways, to create the values for different parts.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121617
This simplifies the implementation of eraseInstruction by moving the odd-replace-users-with-undef handling back to the only caller which uses it. This handling was not obviously correct, so add the asserts which make it clear why this is safe to do at all. The result is simpler code and stronger assertions.
The original commit exposed several missing dependencies (e.g. latent bugs in SLP scheduling). Most of these were fixed over the weekend and have had several days to bake. The last was fixed this morning after being noticed in manual review of test changes yesterday. See the review thread for links to each change.
Original commit message follows:
SLP currently schedules all instructions within a scheduling window which stretches from the first instruction potentially vectorized to the last. This window can include a very large number of unrelated instructions which are not being considered for vectorization. This change switches the code to only schedule the sub-graph consisting of the instructions being vectorized and their transitive users.
This has the effect of greatly reducing the amount of work performed in large basic blocks, and thus greatly improves compile time on degenerate examples. To understand the effects, I added some statistics (not planned for upstream contribution). Here's an illustration from my motivating example:
Before this patch:
704357 SLP - Number of calcDeps actions
699021 SLP - Number of schedule calls
5598 SLP - Number of ReSchedule actions
59 SLP - Number of ReScheduleOnFail actions
10084 SLP - Number of schedule resets
8523 SLP - Number of vector instructions generated
After this patch:
102895 SLP - Number of calcDeps actions
161916 SLP - Number of schedule calls
5637 SLP - Number of ReSchedule actions
55 SLP - Number of ReScheduleOnFail actions
10083 SLP - Number of schedule resets
8403 SLP - Number of vector instructions generated
I do want to highlight that there is a small difference in number of generated vector instructions. This example is hitting the bailout due to maximum window size, and the change in scheduling is slightly perturbing when and how we hit it. This can be seen in the RescheduleOnFail counter change. Given that, I think we can safely ignore.
The downside of this change can be seen in the large test diff. We group all vectorizable instructions together at the bottom of the scheduling region. This means that vector instructions can move quite far from their original point in code. While maybe undesirable, I don't see this as being a major problem as this pass is not intended to be a general scheduling pass.
For context, it's worth noting that the pre-scheduling that SLP does while building the vector tree is exactly the sub-graph scheduling implemented by this patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D118538
After writing the commit message for 4b1bace28, realized that the mentioned optimization was rather straight forward. We already have the code for scanning a block during region initialization, we can simply keep track if we've seen a stacksave or stackrestore. If we haven't, none of these dependencies are relevant and we can avoid the relatively expensive scans entirely.
This is an extension of commit b7806c to handle one last case noticed in test changes for D118538. Again, this is thought to be a latent bug in the existing code, though this time I have not managed to reduce tests for the original algoritthm.
The prior attempt had failed to account for this case:
%a = alloca i8
stacksave
stackrestore
store i8 0, i8* %a
If we allow '%a' to reorder into the stacksave/restore region, then the alloca will be deallocated before the use. We will have taken a well defined program, and introduced a use-after-free bug.
There's also an inverse case where the alloca originally follows the stackrestore, and we need to prevent the reordering it above the restore.
Compile time wise, we potentially do an extra scan of the block for each alloca seen in a bundle. This is significantly more expensive than the stacksave rooted version and is why I'd tried to avoid this in the initial patch. There is room to optimize this (by essentially caching a "has stacksave" bit per block), but I'm leaving that to future work if it actually shows up in practice. Since allocas in bundles should be rare in practice, I suspect we can defer the complexity for a long while.
Update all places that currently assume the entry block to the plan is
also the vector loop header to use getVectorLoopRegion instead.
getVectorLoopRegion will keep doing the right thing when the pre-header
is modeled explicitly (and becomes the new entry block in the plan).
We can not bitcast pointers across different address spaces. This was
previously fixed in D89577 but then in D93229 an enhancement was added
which peeks further through the ponter operand, opening up the
possibility that address-space violations could be introduced.
Instead of bailing as the previous fix did, simply insert an
addrspacecast cast instruction.
Reviewed By: lebedev.ri
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121787
This patch moves pointer induction handling from VPWidenPHIRecipe to its
own recipe. In the process, it adds all information required to generate
code for pointer inductions without relying on Legal to access the list
of induction phis.
Alternatively VPWidenPHIRecipe could also take an optional pointer to InductionDescriptor.
Reviewed By: Ayal
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121615
createInductionResumeValues only uses its loop argument only to get the
pre-header, but the pre-header is already known (we created/cached it
earlier). Remove the unneeded loop argument.
completeLoopSkeleton only uses its loop argument only to get the
pre-header, but the pre-header is already known (we created/cached it
earlier). Remove the unneeded loop argument.
The semantics of an inalloca alloca instruction requires that it not be reordered with a preceeding stacksave intrinsic call. Unfortunately, there's no def/use edge or memory dependence edge. (THe memory point is slightly subtle, but in general a new allocation can't alias with a call which executes strictly before it comes into existance.)
I'd tried to tackle this same case previously in 689babdf6, but the fix chosen there turned out to be incomplete. As such, this change contains a fully revert of the first fix attempt.
This was noticed when investigating problems which surfaced with D118538, but this is definitely an existing bug. This time around, I managed to reduce a couple of additional cases, including one which was being actively miscompiled even without the new scheduling change. (See test diffs)
Compile time wise, we only spend extra time when seeing a stacksave (rare), and even then we walk the block at most once per schedule window extension. Likely a non-issue.
This fixes an active miscompile visible in the test changes. The basic problem is that the scheduling dependency graph didn't have any edges for control dependence within a single basic block. The result is that we could (and in some rare cases *did*) perform reorderings within a block which could introduce new undefined behavior along paths which didn't previously contain any.
Impact wise, we have two major cases where control is not guaranteed to reach a later instruction in the block: may throw calls, and calls containing infinite loops.
* The former case was mostly covered by the memory dependencies, and to trigger require a function which can throw, but not write to memory. In theory, such a case is possible, but not likely in practice.
* The later case is likely more of an issue in practice. After this code was first written, we changed the IR semantics to allow well defined infinite loops without satisifying mustprogress. Even for C/C++ - which do imply mustprogress - recent changes to how we treat atomics (e.g. an atomic read does not always imply a write) could expose this issue. I'm a bit shocked we don't seem to have a bug report which hit this in real code actually.
Compile time wise, this results in a single extra scan of the scheduling window in the common case. Since we stop scanning at the next instruction which isn't guaranteed to execute, no matter what order we traverse instructions in, we scan the block once. The exception to this is that when we extend the scheduling window downwards, we invalidate all dependencies, and thus rescan. So the potentially expensive case is when we a call in a big schedule window which is frequently extended. We could optimize this case (by caching the last instruction not guaranteeed to transfer execution and scanning only the extended window) and starting there), but I decided to leave the complexity until it mattered. That same case is already degenerate with memory dependences which is more expensive than the control dependence scan.
We could also consider combining the memory dependence and control dependence sets to reduce memory usage, but since it complicates the code slightly and makes debugging a bit harder, I went with the simplest scheme for now.
This was noticed while trying to understand the failures reported against D118538, but is not otherwise related to that change.
Update functions that previously took a loop pointer but only to get the
pre-header. Instead, pass the block directly. This removes the
requirement for the loop object to be created up-front.
I keep thinking this assumption is probably exploitable for a bug in the existing implementation, but all of my attempts at writing a test case have failed. So for the moment, just document this very subtle assumption.
Guillaume Chatelet