Conservatively returns zero when the GV does not specify an alignment nor is it
initialized. Previously it returns ABI alignment for type of the GV. However, if
the type is a "packed" type, then the under-specified alignments is attached to
the load / store instructions. In that case, the alignment of the type cannot be
trusted.
rdar://10464621
llvm-svn: 145300
than ABI alignment. These are loads / stores from / to "packed" data structures.
Their alignments are intentionally under-specified.
rdar://10301431
llvm-svn: 145273
Add support for trimming constants to GetDemandedBits. This fixes some funky
constant generation that occurs when stores are expanded for targets that don't
support unaligned stores natively.
llvm-svn: 144102
When this field is true it means that the load is from constant (runt-time or compile-time) and so can be hoisted from loops or moved around other memory accesses
llvm-svn: 144100
svn r139159 caused SelectionDAG::getConstant() to promote BUILD_VECTOR operands
with illegal types, even before type legalization. For this testcase, that led
to one BUILD_VECTOR with i16 operands and another with promoted i32 operands,
which triggered the assertion.
llvm-svn: 142370
with a vector condition); such selects become VSELECT codegen nodes.
This patch also removes VSETCC codegen nodes, unifying them with SETCC
nodes (codegen was actually often using SETCC for vector SETCC already).
This ensures that various DAG combiner optimizations kick in for vector
comparisons. Passes dragonegg bootstrap with no testsuite regressions
(nightly testsuite as well as "make check-all"). Patch mostly by
Nadav Rotem.
llvm-svn: 139159
hasPredecessorHelper function allows predecessors to be cached to speed up
repeated invocations. This fixes PR10186.
X.isPredecessorOf(Y) now just calls Y.hasPredecessor(X)
Y.hasPredecessor(X) calls Y.hasPredecessorHelper(X, Visited, Worklist) with
empty Visited and Worklist sets (i.e. no caching over invocations).
Y.hasPredecessorHelper(X, Visited, Worklist) caches search state in Visited
and Worklist to speed up repeated calls. The Visited set is searched for X
before going to the worklist to further search the DAG if necessary.
llvm-svn: 134592
1. (((x) & 0xFF00) >> 8) | (((x) & 0x00FF) << 8)
=> (bswap x) >> 16
2. ((x&0xff)<<8)|((x&0xff00)>>8)|((x&0xff000000)>>8)|((x&0x00ff0000)<<8))
=> (rotl (bswap x) 16)
This allows us to eliminate most of the def : Pat patterns for ARM rev16
revsh instructions. It catches many more cases for ARM and x86.
rdar://9609108
llvm-svn: 133503
GetDemandBits (which must operate on the vector element type).
Fix the a usage of getZeroExtendInReg which must also be done on scalar types.
llvm-svn: 133052
converted to add x,x if x is a undef. add undef, undef does not guarantee
that the resulting low order bit is zero.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9453156> and <rdar://problem/9487392>.
llvm-svn: 133022
The potential DAGCombine which enforces this more generally messes up some other very fragile patterns, so I'm leaving that alone, at least for now.
llvm-svn: 132809
If there is a store after the load node, then there is a chain, which means
that there is another user. Thus, asking hasOneUser would fail. Instead we
ask hasNUsesOfValue on the 'data' value.
llvm-svn: 131183
transformations in target-specific DAG combines without causing DAGCombiner to
delete the same node twice. If you know of a better way to avoid this (see my
next patch for an example), please let me know.
llvm-svn: 128758
1. Inform users of ADDEs with two 0 operands that it never sets carry
2. Fold other ADDs or ADDCs into the ADDE if possible
It would be neat if we could do the same thing for SETCC+ADD eventually, but we can't do that in target independent code.
llvm-svn: 126557
Limit the folding of any_ext and sext into the load operation to scalars.
Limit the active-bits trunc optimization to scalars.
Document vector trunc and vector sext in LangRef.
Similar to commit 126080 (for enabling zext).
llvm-svn: 126424
The DAGCombiner folds the zext into complex load instructions. This patch
prevents this optimization on vectors since none of the supported targets
knows how to perform load+vector_zext in one instruction.
llvm-svn: 126080
transformation if we can't legally create a build vector of the correct
type. Check that we can make the transformation first, and add a TODO to
refactor this code with similar cases.
Fixes: PR9223 and rdar://9000350
llvm-svn: 125631
generating i8 shift amounts for things like i1024 types. Add
an assert in getNode to prevent this from occuring in the future,
fix the buggy transformation, revert my previous patch, and
document this gotcha in ISDOpcodes.h
llvm-svn: 125465
The DAGCombiner created illegal BUILD_VECTOR operations.
The patch added a check that either illegal operations are
allowed or that the created operation is legal.
llvm-svn: 125435
The bug happens when the DAGCombiner attempts to optimize one of the patterns
of the SUB opcode. It tries to create a zero of type v2i64. This type is legal
on 32bit machines, but the initializer of this vector (i64) is target dependent.
Currently, the initializer attempts to create an i64 zero constant, which fails.
Added a flag to tell the DAGCombiner to create a legal zero, if we require that
the pass would generate legal types.
llvm-svn: 125391
the load, then it may be legal to transform the load and store to integer
load and store of the same width.
This is done if the target specified the transformation as profitable. e.g.
On arm, this can transform:
vldr.32 s0, []
vstr.32 s0, []
to
ldr r12, []
str r12, []
rdar://8944252
llvm-svn: 124708
This happens all the time when a smul is promoted to a larger type.
On x86-64 we now compile "int test(int x) { return x/10; }" into
movslq %edi, %rax
imulq $1717986919, %rax, %rax
movq %rax, %rcx
shrq $63, %rcx
sarq $34, %rax <- used to be "shrq $32, %rax; sarl $2, %eax"
addl %ecx, %eax
This fires 96 times in gcc.c on x86-64.
llvm-svn: 124559
This happens e.g. for code like "X - X%10" where we lower the modulo operation
to a series of multiplies and shifts that are then subtracted from X, leading to
this missed optimization.
llvm-svn: 124532
loads properly. We miscompiled the testcase into:
_test: ## @test
movl $128, (%rdi)
movzbl 1(%rdi), %eax
ret
Now we get a proper:
_test: ## @test
movl $128, (%rdi)
movsbl (%rdi), %eax
movzbl %ah, %eax
ret
This fixes PR8757.
llvm-svn: 122392
count operand. These should be the same but apparently are
not always, and this is cleaner anyway. This improves the
code in an existing test.
llvm-svn: 122354
BUILD_VECTOR operands where the element type is not legal. I had previously
changed this code to insert TRUNCATE operations, but that was just wrong.
llvm-svn: 122102
when the wider type is legal. This allows us to compile:
define zeroext i16 @test1(i16 zeroext %x) nounwind {
entry:
%div = udiv i16 %x, 33
ret i16 %div
}
into:
test1: # @test1
movzwl 4(%esp), %eax
imull $63551, %eax, %eax # imm = 0xF83F
shrl $21, %eax
ret
instead of:
test1: # @test1
movw $-1985, %ax # imm = 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFF83F
mulw 4(%esp)
andl $65504, %edx # imm = 0xFFE0
movl %edx, %eax
shrl $5, %eax
ret
Implementing rdar://8760399 and example #4 from:
http://blog.regehr.org/archives/320
We should implement the same thing for [su]mul_hilo, but I don't
have immediate plans to do this.
llvm-svn: 121696
zextOrTrunc(), and APSInt methods extend(), extOrTrunc() and new method
trunc(), to be const and to return a new value instead of modifying the
object in place.
llvm-svn: 121120
if the extension types were not the same. The result was that if you
fed a select with sext and zext loads, as in the testcase, then it
would get turned into a zext (or sext) of the select, which is wrong
in the cases when it should have been an sext (resp. zext). Reported
and diagnosed by Sebastien Deldon.
llvm-svn: 119728
// %a = ...
// %b = and i32 %a, 2
// %c = srl i32 %b, 1
// brcond i32 %c ...
//
// into
//
// %a = ...
// %b = and i32 %a, 2
// %c = setcc eq %b, 0
// brcond %c ...
Make sure it restores local variable N1, which corresponds to the condition operand if it fails to match.
This apparently breaks TCE but since that backend isn't in the tree I don't have a test for it.
llvm-svn: 115571
Evan Cheng