TransferDbgValues (capital 'T') is wired into ReplaceAllUsesWith, and
transferDbgValues (lowercase 't') is used elsewhere (e.g in Legalize).
Both functions should be doing the exact same thing. This patch
consolidates the logic into one place.
This was reverted in r318455 because some newly introduced asserts,
which I thought were NFC, were firing. I filed PR35338. For now I've
weakened the asserts.
Testing: check-llvm, check-clang, and a stage2 Rel+Deb build of clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40104
llvm-svn: 318498
All these headers already depend on CodeGen headers so moving them into
CodeGen fixes the layering (since CodeGen depends on Target, not the
other way around).
llvm-svn: 318490
The sign extend might be from an i16 or i8 type and was inserted by InstCombine to match the pointer width. X86 gather legalization isn't currently detecting this to reinsert a sign extend to make things legal.
It's a bit weird for the SelectionDAGBuilder to do this kind of optimization in the first place. With this removed we can at least lean on InstCombine somewhat to ensure the index is i32 or i64.
I'll work on trying to recover some of the test cases by removing sign extends in the backend when its safe to do so with an understanding of the current legalizer capabilities.
This should fix PR30690.
llvm-svn: 318466
TransferDbgValues (capital 'T') is wired into ReplaceAllUsesWith, and
transferDbgValues (lowercase 't') is used elsewhere (e.g in Legalize).
Both functions should be doing the exact same thing. This patch
consolidates the logic into one place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40104
llvm-svn: 318448
SelectionDAGBuilder::visitAlloca assumes alloca address space is 0, which is
incorrect for triple amdgcn---amdgiz and causes isel failure.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40095
llvm-svn: 318392
Change the calculation for the desired ValueType for non-sign
extending loads, as in those cases we don't care about the
higher bits. This creates a smaller ExtVT and allows for such
combinations as:
(srl (zextload i16, [addr]), 8) -> (zextload i8, [addr + 1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40034
llvm-svn: 318390
For example, this is currently reachable by X86 if you use a masked store intrinsic with a v1iX type.
Using a fatal error seems like a better user experience if someone were to encounter this on a release build. There are several other similar places that have been converted from unreachable to fatal error previously.
llvm-svn: 318379
processDbgDeclares assumes pointer size is the same for different addr spaces.
It uses pointer size for addr space 0 for all pointers, which causes assertion
in stripAndAccumulateInBoundsConstantOffsets for amdgcn---amdgiz since
pointer in addr space 5 has different size than in addr space 0.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40085
llvm-svn: 318370
Due to integer precision, we might have numerator greater than denominator in
the branch probability scaling. Add a check to prevent this from happening.
llvm-svn: 318353
This patch peels off the top case in switch statement into a branch if the
probability exceeds a threshold. This will help the branch prediction and
avoids the extra compares when lowering into chain of branches.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D39262
llvm-svn: 318202
TargetLowering::LowerCallTo assumes that sret value type corresponds to a
pointer in default address space, which is incorrect, since sret value type
should correspond to a pointer in alloca address space, which may not
be the default address space. This causes assertion for amdgcn target
in amdgiz environment.
This patch fixes that.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39996
llvm-svn: 318167
This is a fix for a bug in r317947. We were supposed to check that all the indices are are constant 0, but instead we're only make sure that indices that are constant are 0. Non-constant indices are being ignored.
llvm-svn: 317950
Currently we can only get a uniform base from a simple GEP with 2 operands. This causes us to miss address folding opportunities for simple global array accesses as the test case shows.
This patch adds support for larger GEPs if the other indices are 0 since those don't require any additional computations to be inserted.
We may also want to handle constant splats of zero here, but I'm leaving that for future work when I have a real world example.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39911
llvm-svn: 317947
This patch implements Chandler's idea [0] for supporting languages that
require support for infinite loops with side effects, such as Rust, providing
part of a solution to bug 965 [1].
Specifically, it adds an `llvm.sideeffect()` intrinsic, which has no actual
effect, but which appears to optimization passes to have obscure side effects,
such that they don't optimize away loops containing it. It also teaches
several optimization passes to ignore this intrinsic, so that it doesn't
significantly impact optimization in most cases.
As discussed on llvm-dev [2], this patch is the first of two major parts.
The second part, to change LLVM's semantics to have defined behavior
on infinite loops by default, with a function attribute for opting into
potential-undefined-behavior, will be implemented and posted for review in
a separate patch.
[0] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2015-July/088103.html
[1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=965
[2] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118632.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38336
llvm-svn: 317729
In 2010 a commit with no testcase and no further explanation
explicitly disabled the handling of inlined variables in
EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue(). I don't think there is a good reason for
this any more and re-enabling this adds debug locations for variables
associated with an LLVM function argument in functions that are
inlined into the first basic block. The only downside of doing this is
that we may insert a DBG_VALUE before the inlined scope, but (1) this
could be filtered out later, and (2) LiveDebugValues will not
propagate it into subsequent basic blocks if they don't dominate the
variable's lexical scope, so this seems like a small price to pay.
rdar://problem/26228128
llvm-svn: 317702
Some of the AMDGPU stack addressing modes require knowing the sign
bit is zero. We used to accomplish this by custom lowering
frame indexes, and then putting an AssertZext around a
TargetFrameIndex. This required specifically looking for
the AssextZext + frame index pattern which was moderately
disgusting. The same could probably be accomplished
with a target specific node, but would still
require special handling of frame indexes.
llvm-svn: 317671
This header includes CodeGen headers, and is not, itself, included by
any Target headers, so move it into CodeGen to match the layering of its
implementation.
llvm-svn: 317647
As discussed on llvm-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-November/107104.html
and again more recently:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-October/118118.html
...this is a step in cleaning up our fast-math-flags implementation in IR to better match
the capabilities of both clang's user-visible flags and the backend's flags for SDNode.
As proposed in the above threads, we're replacing the 'UnsafeAlgebra' bit (which had the
'umbrella' meaning that all flags are set) with a new bit that only applies to algebraic
reassociation - 'AllowReassoc'.
We're also adding a bit to allow approximations for library functions called 'ApproxFunc'
(this was initially proposed as 'libm' or similar).
...and we're out of bits. 7 bits ought to be enough for anyone, right? :) FWIW, I did
look at getting this out of SubclassOptionalData via SubclassData (spacious 16-bits),
but that's apparently already used for other purposes. Also, I don't think we can just
add a field to FPMathOperator because Operator is not intended to be instantiated.
We'll defer movement of FMF to another day.
We keep the 'fast' keyword. I thought about removing that, but seeing IR like this:
%f.fast = fadd reassoc nnan ninf nsz arcp contract afn float %op1, %op2
...made me think we want to keep the shortcut synonym.
Finally, this change is binary incompatible with existing IR as seen in the
compatibility tests. This statement:
"Newer releases can ignore features from older releases, but they cannot miscompile
them. For example, if nsw is ever replaced with something else, dropping it would be
a valid way to upgrade the IR."
( http://llvm.org/docs/DeveloperPolicy.html#ir-backwards-compatibility )
...provides the flexibility we want to make this change without requiring a new IR
version. Ie, we're not loosening the FP strictness of existing IR. At worst, we will
fail to optimize some previously 'fast' code because it's no longer recognized as
'fast'. This should get fixed as we audit/squash all of the uses of 'isFast()'.
Note: an inter-dependent clang commit to use the new API name should closely follow
commit.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39304
llvm-svn: 317488
This header already includes a CodeGen header and is implemented in
lib/CodeGen, so move the header there to match.
This fixes a link error with modular codegeneration builds - where a
header and its implementation are circularly dependent and so need to be
in the same library, not split between two like this.
llvm-svn: 317379
When splitting a large load to smaller legally-typed loads, the last load should be padded to reach the size of the previous one so a CONCAT_VECTORS node could reunite them again.
The code currently pads the last load to reach the size of the first load (instead of the previous).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38495
Change-Id: Ib60b55ed26ce901fabf68108daf52683fbd5013f
llvm-svn: 317206
Summary:
For reference, see: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-August/116589.html
This patch fleshes out the instruction class hierarchy with respect to atomic and
non-atomic memory intrinsics. With this change, the relevant part of the class
hierarchy becomes:
IntrinsicInst
-> MemIntrinsicBase (methods-only class)
-> MemIntrinsic (non-atomic intrinsics)
-> MemSetInst
-> MemTransferInst
-> MemCpyInst
-> MemMoveInst
-> AtomicMemIntrinsic (atomic intrinsics)
-> AtomicMemSetInst
-> AtomicMemTransferInst
-> AtomicMemCpyInst
-> AtomicMemMoveInst
-> AnyMemIntrinsic (both atomicities)
-> AnyMemSetInst
-> AnyMemTransferInst
-> AnyMemCpyInst
-> AnyMemMoveInst
This involves some class renaming:
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemCpyInst -> AtomicMemCpyInst
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemMoveInst -> AtomicMemMoveInst
ElementUnorderedAtomicMemSetInst -> AtomicMemSetInst
A script for doing this renaming in downstream trees is included below.
An example of where the Any* classes should be used in LLVM is when reasoning
about the effects of an instruction (ex: aliasing).
---
Script for renaming AtomicMem* classes:
PREFIXES="[<,([:space:]]"
CLASSES="MemIntrinsic|MemTransferInst|MemSetInst|MemMoveInst|MemCpyInst"
SUFFIXES="[;)>,[:space:]]"
REGEX="(${PREFIXES})ElementUnorderedAtomic(${CLASSES})(${SUFFIXES})"
REGEX2="visitElementUnorderedAtomic(${CLASSES})"
FILES=$( grep -E "(${REGEX}|${REGEX2})" -r . | tr ':' ' ' | awk '{print $1}' | sort | uniq )
SED_SCRIPT="s~${REGEX}~\1Atomic\2\3~g"
SED_SCRIPT2="s~${REGEX2}~visitAtomic\1~g"
for f in $FILES; do
echo "Processing: $f"
sed -i ".bak" -E "${SED_SCRIPT};${SED_SCRIPT2};${EA_SED_SCRIPT};${EA_SED_SCRIPT2}" $f
done
Reviewers: sanjoy, deadalnix, apilipenko, anna, skatkov, mkazantsev
Reviewed By: sanjoy
Subscribers: hfinkel, jholewinski, arsenm, sdardis, nhaehnle, JDevlieghere, javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38419
llvm-svn: 316950
Introduce a isConstOrDemandedConstSplat helper function that can recognise a constant splat build vector for at least the demanded elts we care about.
llvm-svn: 316866
For cases where we know the floating point representations match the bitcasted integer equivalent, allow bitcasting to these types.
This is especially useful for the X86 floating point compare results which return all/zero bits but as a floating point type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39289
llvm-svn: 316831
In function DAGCombiner::visitSIGN_EXTEND_INREG, sext can be combined with extload even if sextload is not supported by target, then
if sext is the only user of extload, there is no big difference, no harm no benefit.
if extload has more than one user, the combined sextload may block extload from combining with other zext, causes extra zext instructions generated. As demonstrated by the attached test case.
This patch add the constraint that when sextload is not supported by target, sext can only be combined with extload if it is the only user of extload.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39108
llvm-svn: 316802
Not having the subclass data on an MemIntrinsicSDNodes means it was possible
to try to fold 2 nodes with the same operands but differing MMO flags. This
would trip an assertion when trying to refine the alignment between the 2
MachineMemOperands.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38898
llvm-svn: 316737
This code added in r297930 assumed that it could create
a select with a condition type that is just an integer
bitcast of the selected type. For AMDGPU any vselect is
going to be scalarized (although the vector types are legal),
and all select conditions must be i1 (the same as getSetCCResultType).
This logic doesn't really make sense to me, but there's
never really been a consistent policy in what the select
condition mask type is supposed to be. Try to extend
the logic for skipping the transform for condition types
that aren't setccs. It doesn't seem quite right to me though,
but checking conditions that seem more sensible (like whether the
vselect is going to be expanded) doesn't work since this
seems to depend on that also.
llvm-svn: 316554
Similar to how llvm::salvagDebugInfo hooks into InstCombine, this adds
a hook that can be invoked before an SDNode that is associated with an
SDDbgValue is erased to capture the effect of the deleted node in a
DIExpression.
The motivating example is an SDDebugValue attached to an ADD operation
that gets folded into a LOAD+OFFSET operation.
rdar://problem/32121503
llvm-svn: 316525
Vedant Kumar