Summary:
We were not following the `man` documented behaviors for invalid arguments to
`memalign` and associated functions. Using `CHECK` for those was a bit extreme,
so we relax the behavior to return null pointers as expected when this happens.
Adapt the associated test.
I am using this change also to change a few more minor performance improvements:
- mark as `UNLIKELY` a bunch of unlikely conditions;
- the current `CHECK` in `__sanitizer::RoundUpTo` is redundant for us in *all*
calls. So I am introducing our own version without said `CHECK`.
- change our combined allocator `GetActuallyAllocatedSize`. We already know if
the pointer is from the Primary or Secondary, so the `PointerIsMine` check is
redundant as well, and costly for the 32-bit Primary. So we get the size by
directly using the available Primary functions.
Finally, change a `int` to `uptr` to avoid a warning/error when compiling on
Android.
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34782
llvm-svn: 306698
Summary:
This change adds Android support to the allocator (but doesn't yet enable it in
the cmake config), and should be the last fragment of the rewritten change
D31947.
Android has more memory constraints than other platforms, so the idea of a
unique context per thread would not have worked. The alternative chosen is to
allocate a set of contexts based on the number of cores on the machine, and
share those contexts within the threads. Contexts can be dynamically reassigned
to threads to prevent contention, based on a scheme suggested by @dvyuokv in
the initial review.
Additionally, given that Android doesn't support ELF TLS (only emutls for now),
we use the TSan TLS slot to make things faster: Scudo is mutually exclusive
with other sanitizers so this shouldn't cause any problem.
An additional change made here, is replacing `thread_local` by `THREADLOCAL`
and using the initial-exec thread model in the non-Android version to prevent
extraneous weak definition and checks on the relevant variables.
Reviewers: kcc, dvyukov, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32649
llvm-svn: 302300