Currently we either define SANITIZER_GO for Go or don't define it at all for C++.
This works fine with preprocessor (ifdef/ifndef/defined), but does not work
for C++ if statements (e.g. if (SANITIZER_GO) {...}). Also this is different
from majority of SANITIZER_FOO macros which are always defined to either 0 or 1.
Always define SANITIZER_GO to either 0 or 1.
This allows to use SANITIZER_GO in expressions and in flag default values.
Also remove kGoMode and kCppMode, which were meant to be used in expressions,
but they are not defined in sanitizer_common code, so SANITIZER_GO become prevalent.
Also convert some preprocessor checks to C++ if's or ternary expressions.
Majority of this change is done mechanically with:
sed "s#ifdef SANITIZER_GO#if SANITIZER_GO#g"
sed "s#ifndef SANITIZER_GO#if \!SANITIZER_GO#g"
sed "s#defined(SANITIZER_GO)#SANITIZER_GO#g"
llvm-svn: 285443
This is intended to address the following problem.
Episodically we see CHECK-failures when recursive interceptors call back into user code. Effectively we are not "in_rtl" at this point, but it's very complicated and fragile to properly maintain in_rtl property. Instead get rid of it. It was used mostly for sanity CHECKs, which basically never uncover real problems.
Instead introduce ignore_interceptors flag, which is used in very few narrow places to disable recursive interceptors (e.g. during runtime initialization).
llvm-svn: 197979
Dmitry Vyukov