Uses the algorithm:
tan(x) = sin(x) / sqrt(1-sin^2(x))
An alternative is:
tan(x) = sin(x) / cos(x)
Which produces more verbose bitcode and longer assembly.
Either way, the generated bitcode seems pretty nasty and a more optimized
but still precise-enough solution is welcome.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
llvm-svn: 217511
Passes the tests that were submitted to the piglit list
Tested on R600 (Pitcairn)
Signed-off-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Vesely <jan.vesely@rutgers.edu>
llvm-svn: 217509
This was previously implemented with a macro and we were using
__builtin_copysign(), which takes double inputs for the float
version of copysign().
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 217045
v2: - use quotes instead of <>
- add include to r600/lib/math/nextafter.c changed
Reviewed-by: Tom Stellard <tom@stellard.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 211576
There are two implementations of nextafter():
1. Using clang's __builtin_nextafter. Clang replaces this builtin with
a call to nextafter which is part of libm. Therefore, this
implementation will only work for targets with an implementation of
libm (e.g. most CPU targets).
2. The other implementation is written in OpenCL C. This function is
known internally as __clc_nextafter and can be used by targets that
don't have access to libm.
llvm-svn: 192383
libclc was defining and undefing GENTYPE and several other macros with
common names in its header files. This was preventing applications from
defining macros with identical names as command line arguments to the
compiler, because the definitions in the header files were masking the
macros defined as compiler arguements.
Reviewed-by: Aaron Watry <awatry@gmail.com>
llvm-svn: 185838
Tom Stellard