some methods in the ABI need a Process to do their work.
Instead of passing it in as a one-off argument to those
methods, this patch puts it in the base class and the methods
can retrieve if it needed.
Note that ABI's are sometimes built without a Process
(e.g. SBTarget::GetStackRedZoneSize) so it's entirely
possible that the process weak pointer will not be
able to reconsistitue into a strong pointer.
<rdar://problem/32526754>
llvm-svn: 306633
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
All references to Host and Core have been removed, so this
class can now safely be lowered into Utility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30559
llvm-svn: 296909
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This reverts commit rL280668 because the register tests fail on i386
Linux.
I investigated a little bit what causes the failure - there are missing
registers when running 'register read -a'.
This is the output I got at the bottom:
"""
...
Memory Protection Extensions:
bnd0 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000}
bnd1 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000}
bnd2 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000}
bnd3 = {0x0000000000000000 0x0000000000000000}
unknown:
2 registers were unavailable.
"""
Also looking at the packets exchanged between the client and server:
"""
...
history[308] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4a#d7
history[309] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet:
$name:bnd0;bitsize:128;offset:1032;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory
Protection Extensions;ehframe:101;dwarf:101;#48
history[310] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4b#d8
history[311] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet:
$name:bnd1;bitsize:128;offset:1048;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory
Protection Extensions;ehframe:102;dwarf:102;#52
history[312] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4c#d9
history[313] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet:
$name:bnd2;bitsize:128;offset:1064;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory
Protection Extensions;ehframe:103;dwarf:103;#53
history[314] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4d#da
history[315] tid=0x7338 < 130> read packet:
$name:bnd3;bitsize:128;offset:1080;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint64;set:Memory
Protection Extensions;ehframe:104;dwarf:104;#54
history[316] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4e#db
history[317] tid=0x7338 < 76> read packet:
$name:bndcfgu;bitsize:64;offset:1096;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;#99
history[318] tid=0x7338 < 19> send packet: $qRegisterInfo4f#dc
history[319] tid=0x7338 < 78> read packet:
$name:bndstatus;bitsize:64;offset:1104;encoding:vector;format:vector-uint8;#8e
...
"""
The bndcfgu and bndstatus registers don't have the 'Memory Protections
Extension' set. I looked at the code and it seems that that is set
correctly.
So I'm not sure what's the problem or where does it come from.
Also there is a second failure related to something like this in the
tests:
"""
registerSet.GetName().lower()
"""
For some reason the registerSet.GetName() returns None.
llvm-svn: 280703
Summary:
The Intel(R) Memory Protection Extensions (Intel(R) MPX) associates pointers
to bounds, against which the software can check memory references to
prevent out of bound memory access.
This patch allows accessing the MPX registers:
* bnd0-3: 128-bit registers to hold the bound values,
* bndcfgu, bndstatus: 64-bit configuration registers,
This patch also adds read/write tests for the MPX registers in the register
command tests and adds a new subdirectory for MPX specific tests.
Signed-off-by: Valentina Giusti <valentina.giusti@intel.com>
Reviewers: labath, granata.enrico, lldb-commits, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24187
llvm-svn: 280668
We were checking for integer types only before this. So I added the ability for CompilerType objects to check for integer and enum types.
Then I searched for places that were using the CompilerType::IsIntegerType(...) function. Many of these places also wanted to be checking for enumeration types as well, so I have fixed those places. These are in the ABI plug-ins where we are figuring out which arguments would go in where in regisers/stack when making a function call, or determining where the return value would live. The real fix for this is to use clang to compiler a CGFunctionInfo and then modify the code to be able to take the IR and a calling convention and have the backend answer the questions correctly for us so we don't need to create a really bad copy of the ABI in each plug-in, but that is beyond the scope of this bug fix.
Also added a test case to ensure this doesn't regress in the future.
llvm-svn: 273750
"gcc" register numbers are now correctly referred to as "ehframe"
register numbers. In almost all cases, ehframe and dwarf register
numbers are identical (the one exception is i386 darwin where ehframe
regnums were incorrect).
The old "gdb" register numbers, which I incorrectly thought were
stabs register numbers, are now referred to as "Process Plugin"
register numbers. This is the register numbering scheme that the
remote process controller stub (lldb-server, gdbserver, core file
support, kdp server, remote jtag devices, etc) uses to refer to the
registers. The process plugin register numbers may not be contiguous
- there are remote jtag devices that have gaps in their register
numbering schemes.
I removed all of the enums for "gdb" register numbers that we had
in lldb - these were meaningless - and I put LLDB_INVALID_REGNUM
in all of the register tables for the Process Plugin regnum slot.
This change is almost entirely mechnical; the one actual change in
here is to ProcessGDBRemote.cpp's ParseRegisters() which parses the
qXfer:features:read:target.xml response. As it parses register
definitions from the xml, it will assign sequential numbers as the
eRegisterKindLLDB numbers (the lldb register numberings must be
sequential, without any gaps) and if the xml file specifies register
numbers, those will be used as the eRegisterKindProcessPlugin
register numbers (and those may have gaps). A J-Link jtag device's
target.xml does contain a gap in register numbers, and it only
specifies the register numbers for the registers after that gap.
The device supports many different ARM boards and probably selects
different part of its register file as appropriate.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12791
<rdar://problem/22623262>
llvm-svn: 247741
Summary:
- Capability to force return user specified values
from inside of a function on lldb command terminal
- Support for Integral, Pointer and Floating Point values
Signed-off-by: Abhishek Aggarwal <abhishek.a.aggarwal@intel.com>
Reviewers: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: tberghammer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12595
llvm-svn: 246841
Create a new "lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext" class that will replace all direct uses of "clang::DeclContext" when used in compiler agnostic code, yet still allow for conversion to clang::DeclContext subclasses by clang specific code. This completes the abstraction of type parsing by removing all "clang::" references from the SymbolFileDWARF. The new "lldb_private::CompilerDeclContext" class abstracts decl contexts found in compiler type systems so they can be used in internal API calls. The TypeSystem is required to support CompilerDeclContexts with new pure virtual functions that start with "DeclContext" in the member function names. Converted all code that used lldb_private::ClangNamespaceDecl over to use the new CompilerDeclContext class and removed the ClangNamespaceDecl.cpp and ClangNamespaceDecl.h files.
Removed direct use of clang APIs from SBType and now use the abstract type systems to correctly explore types.
Bulk renames for things that used to return a ClangASTType which is now CompilerType:
"Type::GetClangFullType()" to "Type::GetFullCompilerType()"
"Type::GetClangLayoutType()" to "Type::GetLayoutCompilerType()"
"Type::GetClangForwardType()" to "Type::GetForwardCompilerType()"
"Value::GetClangType()" to "Value::GetCompilerType()"
"Value::SetClangType (const CompilerType &)" to "Value::SetCompilerType (const CompilerType &)"
"ValueObject::GetClangType ()" to "ValueObject::GetCompilerType()"
many more renames that are similar.
llvm-svn: 245905
for eh_frame and stabs register numberings. This is not
complete but it's a step in the right direction. It's almost
entirely mechanical.
lldb informally uses "gcc register numbering" to mean eh_frame.
Why? Probably because there's a notorious bug with gcc on i386
darwin where the register numbers in eh_frame were incorrect.
In all other cases, eh_frame register numbering is identical to
dwarf.
lldb informally uses "gdb register numbering" to mean stabs.
There are no official definitions of stabs register numbers
for different architectures, so the implementations of gdb
and gcc are the de facto reference source.
There were some incorrect uses of these register number types
in lldb already. I fixed the ones that I saw as I made
this change.
This commit changes all references to "gcc" and "gdb" register
numbers in lldb to "eh_frame" and "stabs" to make it clear
what is actually being represented.
lldb cannot parse the stabs debug format, and given that no
one is using stabs any more, it is unlikely that it ever will.
A more comprehensive cleanup would remove the stabs register
numbers altogether - it's unnecessary cruft / complication to
all of our register structures.
In ProcessGDBRemote, when we get register definitions from
the gdb-remote stub, we expect to see "gcc:" (qRegisterInfo)
or "gcc_regnum" (qXfer:features:read: packet to get xml payload).
This patch changes ProcessGDBRemote to also accept "ehframe:"
and "ehframe_regnum" from these remotes.
I did not change GDBRemoteCommunicationServerLLGS or debugserver
to send these new packets. I don't know what kind of interoperability
constraints we might be working under. At some point in the future
we should transition to using the more descriptive names.
Throughout lldb we're still using enum names like "gcc_r0" and "gdb_r0",
for eh_frame and stabs register numberings. These should be cleaned
up eventually too.
The sources link cleanly on macosx native with xcode build. I
don't think we'll see problems on other platforms but please let
me know if I broke anyone.
llvm-svn: 245141
This is more preparation for multiple different kinds of types from different compilers (clang, Pascal, Go, RenderScript, Swift, etc).
llvm-svn: 244689
It also pointed out an error in our return values where the ABI only relies on xmm registers, not ymm registers for vector return types.
llvm-svn: 242972
Jason Molenda