This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
The ClangExpressionVariable::CreateVariableInList functions looked cute, but
caused more confusion than they solved. I removed them, and instead made sure
that there are adequate facilities for easily adding newly-constructed
ExpressionVariables to lists.
I also made some of the constructors that are common be generic, so that it's
possible to construct expression variables from generic places (like the ABI and
ValueObject) without having to know the specifics about the class.
llvm-svn: 249095
As part of our overall switch from hand-rolling RTTI to using LLVM-compatible
methods, I've done the same for ExpressionVariable. The main documentation for
how to do this is in TypeSystem.h, so I've simply referred to that.
llvm-svn: 247085
stores information about a variable that different parts of LLDB use, from the
compiler-specific portion that only the expression parser cares about.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D12602
llvm-svn: 246871
Clang-specific part, create the ExpressionVariable source/header file and
move ClangExpressionVariable into the Clang expression parser plugin.
It is expected that there are some ugly #include paths... these will be resolved
by either (1) making that code use generic expression variables (once they're
separated appropriately) or (2) moving that code into a plug-in, often
the expression parser plug-in.
llvm-svn: 246737
Zachary Turner