Intrinsic already existed for llvm.SI.tbuffer.store
Needed tbuffer.load and also re-implementing the intrinsic as llvm.amdgcn.tbuffer.*
Added CodeGen tests for the 2 new variants added.
Left the original llvm.SI.tbuffer.store implementation to avoid issues with existing code
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, tony-tye, tpr
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30687
llvm-svn: 306031
Check the MachinePointerInfo for whether the access is
supposed to be relative to the stack pointer.
No tests because this is used in later commits implementing
calls.
llvm-svn: 303301
In call sequence setups, there may not be a frame index base
and the pointer is a constant offset from the frame
pointer / scratch wave offset register.
llvm-svn: 301230
As we introduced target triple environment amdgiz and amdgizcl, the address
space values are no longer enums. We have to decide the value by target triple.
The basic idea is to use struct AMDGPUAS to represent address space values.
For address space values which are not depend on target triple, use static
const members, so that they don't occupy extra memory space and is equivalent
to a compile time constant.
Since the struct is lightweight and cheap, it can be created on the fly at
the point of usage. Or it can be added as member to a pass and created at
the beginning of the run* function.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31284
llvm-svn: 298846
While trying to add the glc bit to SMEM instructions on VI
with the new refactoring I ran into some kind of shadowing
problem for the glc operand when using the pseudoinstruction
as a multiclass parameter.
Everywhere that currently uses it defines the operand to have the same
name as its type, i.e. glc:$glc which works. For some reason now it
conflicts, and its up evaluating to the wrong thing. For the
real encoding classes,
let Inst{16} = !if(ps.has_glc, glc, ?); was not being evaluated
and still visible in the Inst initializer in the expanded td file.
In other cases I got a a different error about an illegal operand
where this was using { 0 } initializer from the bits<1> glc initializer
instead of evaluating it as false in the if.
For consistency all of the operand types should probably
be captialized to avoid conflicting with the variable names
unless somebody has a better idea of how to fix this.
llvm-svn: 285462
These ones need to have the size on the pseudo instruction set for
getInstSizeInBytes to work correctly. These also have a statically
known size.
llvm-svn: 283437
David Stuttard