I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.
I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.
This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.
Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).
llvm-svn: 304787
Allocframe and the following stores on the stack have a latency of 2 cycles
when not in the same packet. This happens because R29 is needed early by the
store instruction. Since one of such stores can be packetized along with
allocframe and use old value of R29, we can assign it 0 cycle latency
while leaving latency of other stores to the default value of 2 cycles.
Patch by Jyotsna Verma.
llvm-svn: 302034
The packetizer needs to convert .cur instruction to its regular form if
the use is not in the same packet as the .cur. The code in the packetizer
handles one type of .cur, which is the vector load case. This patch
updates the packetizer so that it can undo all the .cur instructions.
In the test case, the .cur is the 128B version, but there are also the
post-increment versions.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 302032
The compiler was generating code that ends up ignoring a multiple
latency dependence between two instructions by scheduling the
intructions in back-to-back packets.
The packetizer needs to end a packet if the latency of the current
current insruction and the source in the previous packet is
greater than 1 cycle. This case occurs when there is still room in
the current packet, but scheduling the instruction causes a stall.
Instead, the packetizer should start a new packet. Also, if the
current packet already contains a stall, then it is okay to add
another instruction to the packet that also causes a stall. This
occurs when there are no instructions that can be scheduled in
between the producer and consumer instructions.
This patch changes the latency for loads to 2 cycles from 3 cycles.
This change refects that a load only needs to be separated by
one extra packet to eliminate the stall.
Patch by Ikhlas Ajbar.
llvm-svn: 301954
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556
llvm-svn: 291891
The Stack slot coloring pass removes a store that is followed by a load
that deal with the same stack slot. The function isLoadFromStackSlot
is supposed to consider the loads that have no side-effects. This
patch fixed the issue by removing the unsafe loads from this function
Eg:
%vreg0<def> = L2_loadruh_io <fi#15>, 0
S2_storeri_io <fi#15>, 0, %vreg0
In this case, we load an unsigned extended half word and store this in to
the same stack slot. The Stack slot coloring pass considers safe to remove
the store. This patch marked all the non-vector byte and half word loads as
unsafe.
llvm-svn: 286843
For pairs of 32-bit registers: isub_lo, isub_hi.
For pairs of vector registers: vsub_lo, vsub_hi.
Add generic subreg indices: ps_sub_lo, ps_sub_hi, and a function
HexagonRegisterInfo::getHexagonSubRegIndex(RegClass, GenericSubreg)
that returns the appropriate subreg index for RegClass.
llvm-svn: 286377
This is a function to go backwards in a block to find the first
instruction in a bundle, so iterator is a more natural choice for
parameter/return rather than a reference to a MachineInstruction.
llvm-svn: 285051
Now that MachineBasicBlock::reverse_instr_iterator knows when it's at
the end (since r281168 and r281170), implement
MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator directly on top of an
ilist::reverse_iterator by adding an IsReverse template parameter to
MachineInstrBundleIterator. This replaces another hard-to-reason-about
use of std::reverse_iterator on list iterators, matching the changes for
ilist::reverse_iterator from r280032 (see the "out of scope" section at
the end of that commit message). MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator
now has a handle to the current node and has obvious invalidation
semantics.
r280032 has a more detailed explanation of how list-style reverse
iterators (invalidated when the pointed-at node is deleted) are
different from vector-style reverse iterators like std::reverse_iterator
(invalidated on every operation). A great motivating example is this
commit's changes to lib/CodeGen/DeadMachineInstructionElim.cpp.
Note: If your out-of-tree backend deletes instructions while iterating
on a MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator or converts between
MachineBasicBlock::iterator and MachineBasicBlock::reverse_iterator,
you'll need to update your code in similar ways to r280032. The
following table might help:
[Old] ==> [New]
delete &*RI, RE = end() delete &*RI++
RI->erase(), RE = end() RI++->erase()
reverse_iterator(I) std::prev(I).getReverse()
reverse_iterator(I) ++I.getReverse()
--reverse_iterator(I) I.getReverse()
reverse_iterator(std::next(I)) I.getReverse()
RI.base() std::prev(RI).getReverse()
RI.base() ++RI.getReverse()
--RI.base() RI.getReverse()
std::next(RI).base() RI.getReverse()
(For more details, have a look at r280032.)
llvm-svn: 281172
Krzysztof Parzyszek